uri: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/
css: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/css/sisu.css
In this rough layout -- when viewed with javascript disabled -- digits 2
through 8 ought to be stacked vertically and flush left to the red rule.
What to do?
Best,
~d
--
:: desktop and mobile ::
Thanks, that did work. I didn't get the last css-discuss mailing that
had those replies.
--
Debbie
On 11/5/2010 4:22 PM, Alan Gresley wrote:
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Oops - I spoke too soon.
I fixed the Flash-overlapping-the-menu issue, but I have one last
problem in IE7 only. The image
David Laakso wrote:
uri: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/
css: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/css/sisu.css
In this rough layout -- when viewed with javascript disabled -- digits 2
through 8 ought to be stacked vertically and flush left to the red rule.
What to do?
if I understood you
Hi David,
uri: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/
css: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/css/sisu.css
In this rough layout -- when viewed with javascript disabled -- digits
2
through 8 ought to be stacked vertically and flush left to the red
rule.
What to do?
What about using a list for
On 11/6/10 11:38 AM, Susanne Jäger wrote:
David Laakso wrote:
uri: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/
css: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/css/sisu.css
In this rough layout -- when viewed with javascript disabled -- digits 2
through 8 ought to be stacked vertically and flush left to the red
David Laakso wrote:
uri: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/
css: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/css/sisu.css
In this rough layout -- when viewed with javascript disabled --
digits 2
through 8 ought to be stacked vertically and flush left to the red
rule.
What to do?
if I
At 10:00 AM -0400 11/6/10, David Laakso wrote:
uri: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/
css: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/css/sisu.css
In this rough layout -- when viewed with javascript disabled --
digits 2 through 8 ought to be stacked vertically and flush left to
the red rule.
What to
On 11/6/10 11:54 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
David Laakso wrote:
uri:http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/
css:http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/css/sisu.css
In this rough layout -- when viewed with javascript disabled --
digits 2
through 8 ought to be stacked vertically and flush left to the red
Now, if I can just figure out why Mac OS X 10.4 Safari/4.1.2 and the current
WebKit nightly are both rendering some images as teeny-tiny thumbnails with
js enabled...
Anyone?
Pretty sure it's caused by max-width declaration in #main img. Not a good idea
for inline image.
I assume
Hi all.
Since the overwhelming majority of my clients own websites hosted on
shared hosts, I was wondering if there's a straight way to compress
CSS without taking into account the oddities of the default
configuration of the web server , which varies greatly from hoster to
hoster.
Almost
Sent from my iPhone
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported
On 11/6/2010 2:51 PM, Gabriele Romanato wrote:
Hi all.
Since the overwhelming majority of my clients own websites hosted on
shared hosts, I was wondering if there's a straight way to compress CSS
without taking into account the oddities of the default configuration of
the web server , which
Here is a way to serve compressed .css files (and others) with shared
hosting that does not have mod_gzip or mod_deflate enabled:
http://blog.mycila.com/2009/08/godaddy-gzip-compression.html
In the .htaccess file, the line that excludes Safari can be removed.
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Al
Now, if I can just figure out why Mac OS X 10.4 Safari/4.1.2 and the
current WebKit nightly are both rendering some images as teeny-tiny
thumbnails with js enabled...
Anyone?
Best,
~d
uri:http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/
Resolved.
Deleted float : left; from the declaration #main img
Here is the original article that described the technique:
http://www.opensourcetutor.com/2009/06/01/how-to-compress-css-javascript-an-alternative-to-mod_deflate-or-mod_gzip/
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Gabriele Romanato
gabriele.roman...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all.
Since the overwhelming
Hi all,
the typical way to format definition lists as a 2-column table is to float
the DTs (left column) and give the DDs a left margin larger than the DT
width. This works
fine when all DDs are equal to, or longer than, their matching DT.
In my case, all my definition-list elements are one
On 11/5/10 11:16 AM, John wrote:
I have been looking online for something that will show the color
naming systems in HTML and CSS so that I can make myself a cheat
sheet...
eventually, it'll be second nature, I'm sure.
I know there's the 3-digit method, the 6 digit/character method, and
2 rgb
17 matches
Mail list logo