[css-d] css with js disabled

2010-11-06 Thread David Laakso
uri: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/ css: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/css/sisu.css In this rough layout -- when viewed with javascript disabled -- digits 2 through 8 ought to be stacked vertically and flush left to the red rule. What to do? Best, ~d -- :: desktop and mobile ::

Re: [css-d] z-index issue in IE7

2010-11-06 Thread Debbie Campbell
Thanks, that did work. I didn't get the last css-discuss mailing that had those replies. -- Debbie On 11/5/2010 4:22 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: Thierry Koblentz wrote: Oops - I spoke too soon. I fixed the Flash-overlapping-the-menu issue, but I have one last problem in IE7 only. The image

Re: [css-d] css with js disabled

2010-11-06 Thread Susanne Jäger
David Laakso wrote: uri: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/ css: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/css/sisu.css In this rough layout -- when viewed with javascript disabled -- digits 2 through 8 ought to be stacked vertically and flush left to the red rule. What to do? if I understood you

Re: [css-d] [+] css with js disabled

2010-11-06 Thread Thierry Koblentz
Hi David, uri: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/ css: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/css/sisu.css In this rough layout -- when viewed with javascript disabled -- digits 2 through 8 ought to be stacked vertically and flush left to the red rule. What to do? What about using a list for

Re: [css-d] css with js disabled

2010-11-06 Thread David Laakso
On 11/6/10 11:38 AM, Susanne Jäger wrote: David Laakso wrote: uri: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/ css: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/css/sisu.css In this rough layout -- when viewed with javascript disabled -- digits 2 through 8 ought to be stacked vertically and flush left to the red

Re: [css-d] css with js disabled

2010-11-06 Thread Thierry Koblentz
David Laakso wrote: uri: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/ css: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/css/sisu.css In this rough layout -- when viewed with javascript disabled -- digits 2 through 8 ought to be stacked vertically and flush left to the red rule. What to do? if I

Re: [css-d] css with js disabled

2010-11-06 Thread tedd
At 10:00 AM -0400 11/6/10, David Laakso wrote: uri: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/ css: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/css/sisu.css In this rough layout -- when viewed with javascript disabled -- digits 2 through 8 ought to be stacked vertically and flush left to the red rule. What to

Re: [css-d] css with js disabled

2010-11-06 Thread David Laakso
On 11/6/10 11:54 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote: David Laakso wrote: uri:http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/ css:http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/css/sisu.css In this rough layout -- when viewed with javascript disabled -- digits 2 through 8 ought to be stacked vertically and flush left to the red

Re: [css-d] css with js disabled

2010-11-06 Thread tee
Now, if I can just figure out why Mac OS X 10.4 Safari/4.1.2 and the current WebKit nightly are both rendering some images as teeny-tiny thumbnails with js enabled... Anyone? Pretty sure it's caused by max-width declaration in #main img. Not a good idea for inline image. I assume

[css-d] A question on CSS compression and minifcation

2010-11-06 Thread Gabriele Romanato
Hi all. Since the overwhelming majority of my clients own websites hosted on shared hosts, I was wondering if there's a straight way to compress CSS without taking into account the oddities of the default configuration of the web server , which varies greatly from hoster to hoster. Almost

[css-d] 9/

2010-11-06 Thread Hendrik
Sent from my iPhone __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported

Re: [css-d] A question on CSS compression and minifcation

2010-11-06 Thread Al Sparber
On 11/6/2010 2:51 PM, Gabriele Romanato wrote: Hi all. Since the overwhelming majority of my clients own websites hosted on shared hosts, I was wondering if there's a straight way to compress CSS without taking into account the oddities of the default configuration of the web server , which

Re: [css-d] A question on CSS compression and minifcation

2010-11-06 Thread Chetan Crasta
Here is a way to serve compressed .css files (and others) with shared hosting that does not have mod_gzip or mod_deflate enabled: http://blog.mycila.com/2009/08/godaddy-gzip-compression.html In the .htaccess file, the line that excludes Safari can be removed. On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Al

Re: [css-d] css with js disabled

2010-11-06 Thread David Laakso
Now, if I can just figure out why Mac OS X 10.4 Safari/4.1.2 and the current WebKit nightly are both rendering some images as teeny-tiny thumbnails with js enabled... Anyone? Best, ~d uri:http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/ Resolved. Deleted float : left; from the declaration #main img

Re: [css-d] A question on CSS compression and minifcation

2010-11-06 Thread Chetan Crasta
Here is the original article that described the technique: http://www.opensourcetutor.com/2009/06/01/how-to-compress-css-javascript-an-alternative-to-mod_deflate-or-mod_gzip/ On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Gabriele Romanato gabriele.roman...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all. Since the overwhelming

[css-d] 2-column definition list - when floated DT is longer than DD?

2010-11-06 Thread Dev monkey
Hi all, the typical way to format definition lists as a 2-column table is to float the DTs (left column) and give the DDs a left margin larger than the DT width. This works fine when all DDs are equal to, or longer than, their matching DT. In my case, all my definition-list elements are one

Re: [css-d] methods of color specifying

2010-11-06 Thread David Hucklesby
On 11/5/10 11:16 AM, John wrote: I have been looking online for something that will show the color naming systems in HTML and CSS so that I can make myself a cheat sheet... eventually, it'll be second nature, I'm sure. I know there's the 3-digit method, the 6 digit/character method, and 2 rgb