Love it.
(Chrome/Android Nexus 4)
Ingo Chao
Am 06.06.2014 22:08 schrieb David Laakso laakso.davi...@gmail.com:
Constructive comments and suggestions on this site are always appreciated.
html
http://ccstudi.com
css
http://ccstudi.com/site/css/sisu.css
Best,
David Laakso
--
Chelsea
rendering/availability is OS dependent. You could revise your font
stack (make them more similar over all platforms). Or use web fonts
(same font everywhere, needs to be loaded by the browser).
Revised home page is at http://www.vernassoc.com/home-copy-0/
Needs login?
Best, Ingo
,
Ingo
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com wrote:
On May 30, 2012, at 2:51 AM, Paceaux wrote:
Did anyone have any thoughts on removing underline from generated content in
the hover state for IE?
I did some checking and it appears that the behavior occurs in all
meera kibe schrieb am 11.04.2012 04:42
keen to use it css3 for a website but i also want to cater to IE
people.
http://caniuse.com/
Best, Ingo
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
bruce.som...@web.de schrieb am 30.01.2012 11:40
div id=left-third
#left_third {
Firebug FTW.
Gruss, Ingo
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http
On Sunday, January 1, 2012, David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com
wrote:
Send colors your earliest convenience... particularly desperate for
Cobalt Blue and Cadmium Yellow Deep.
Vincent
PS Happy New Year!
Happy New Year!
:)
@Ghodmode: a painter's secret.
Ingo
Assuming you mean the Name/Email inputs, I see the bottom, not the
top, is chopped in Chrome/Mac with the font Little Days. With the
font-family disabled (falling back to Candara I think) and with
padding disabled, the text is somewhat centered. Is this what you mean
in your description? Canot
the list-item bullet - 3. - is to the left of the image,
in Webkit browsers the floated image is to the left of the bullet.
...
I think the exact position of the marker next to a float is undefined.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [css-d
if a word becomes very long).
But that is of course just experimental and not possible in a complex layout.
Ingo
!DOCTYPE htmlhtmlheadtitle/titlestyle div { float: left;
background: blue; position: relative; padding: 5px 0 3em 0; } img {
width: 100px; height: 25px; background: yellow; display: block
, but was
unsuccessful.
...
I think IE 8 uses display: block for those table structures.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com
not match the F of
First.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
On Wednesday, September 28, 2011, Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com
wrote:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 9:10 AM, Ingo Chao wrote:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/REC-css3-selectors-20110929/#first-letter
The ::first-letter pseudo-element represents the first letter of an
element, if it is not preceded
/content/2011/04/28/our-best-practices-are-killing-us/
Best, Ingo
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css
correctly.
http://satzansatz.de/phw/mediaie9.png
My server sends a IE=Edge HTTP header, IE 9 should be in strict mode anyway.
Yes, IE9 standards mode.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
/pointer-events
and report back if and in what browser it worked for you.
hth, Ingo
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List
of the stylesheet.
Some hate the effect [1], therefore, it is decoration.
Ingo
[1] Would someone please mop the floor? http://csscreator.com/node/21265
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo
The new holy grail, fixed width, tho.
Gruss, Ingo
PS: The lists reply settings suck. Every time.
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
Goldsmith, Marissa schrieb am 27.01.2011 19:33
I was looking at OS10.4 and 10.5, while the other end-user had
OS10.6.
Any thoughts/insights would be great.
There is not much depending on the OS. Font rendering and form elements
come to mind.
Gruss, Ingo
HTML5:Rendering:Punctuation and decorations
says
br { content: '\A'; white-space: pre; }
But this doesn't seem to work in Safari and Chrome:
http://www.satzansatz.de/w3/break.html
Who is wrong?
Ingo
__
css-discuss [css-d
.
If the content property does not apply on br in Webkit, why does it
cause a bug in Webkit then?
Removing the content property in Webkit inspector gives a line break.
Sorry, I didn't try that before.
I think its a Webkit issue, of course a rather academic one.
Thanks to all for having a look.
Best
Ingo
browser defaults. But CSS
resets seem to be more of practical use.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies
IE5.5 and up support a proprietary DropShadow filter, technically,
this is more complex, but not an image. Does that fit your
requirements?
Anyhow, I'd vote for css3 and a degradation in IE. (Or, no shadow for
the base and progressively enhance it with CSS3)
Ingo
2011/1/2, Lisa Frost birdiefr
would be to have a link to a doc that says yes, all
implementations use float for that, internally.
Thanks
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http
would be to have a link to a doc that says yes, all
implementations use float for that, internally.
Thanks
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http
Am Freitag, 17. Dezember 2010 schrieb Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com:
On Dec 17, 2010, at 7:14 AM, Ingo Chao wrote:
for images, in standards mode, for ie6 and newer, is style=float:
left identical to align=left , even in complex layouts?
...
Yes, that is the case in all browsers. I
Safari Nightly (6533.16, r63063) on Mac OS X 10.6.3
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css
-level0
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org
=3898#c9
HTH
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported
. Otherwise, it is a class.
HTH
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org
' in your selectors suggests nested
lists but that's not what you indicated above.
Sorry, the posting got a little inconsistent while it developed :)
Best, Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
select if wrapped)
.wanted1,
.wanted2 {background: url(bullet.png) left 5px no-repeat;}
Happy easter + all the best, Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki
to fit.
http://dev.l-c-n.com/IEW2-bugs/shrinkwrap.php
There is no elegant solution, so you'd have to post an URL of your
page in question.
Thanks,
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
2010/3/28 Yang Zhang yanghates...@gmail.com:
...
div class=wrapper style=vertical-align: bottom; height: 100px
div class=inner style=vertical-align: bottom; display: inline-block
Hello
/div
div class=inner style=vertical-align: bottom; display: inline-block
world
/div
/div
Why doesn't
-style.markmail.org/thread/f54zkhvd2jvrtzd6
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org
this Transcending if you like
to, but normally Progressive Enhancement and Graceful Degradation
already are confusing enough.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ
. This is only happening in IE8.
...
The IMG is already display:block, and so the containing A should
probably get display:block, too.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo
between inline
elements.
What space is that? Web developer toolbar show us no margin,
neither padding.
3.
the space between inline elements is the whitespace between them, it's
in the HMTL
It's no margin and no padding.
...
Ingo
on html changed the game, though.
Best,
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org
a way to make Mozilla act like Webkit? ...
yes, don't use -vendor-prefixes.
:)
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com
2010/1/5 Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com:
On Jan 5, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Ingo Chao wrote:
So it is an almost standards mode problem, triggered by the
transitional doctype [2]?
The inner inline-block is sitting on a baseline in strict, and in
transitional, it doesn't [3].
With both modes
Thanks a lot, David, for this clarification, and for linking to the
discussion in #24186 (10 years ago!)
Thanks again to all who helped.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
://chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/site/css/sisu.css
I'm not an expert here, I had to enable keyboard navigation first
http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200906/enabling_keyboard_navigation_in_mac_os_x_web_browsers/
but once the Fx was able to tab through your links, all worked well on
your site.
Ingo
divspanemText/em/span/div
/body
/html
In Strict mode, the red span encloses the text - in transitional mode,
it dosn't.
Why?
thanks,
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
]?
The inner inline-block is sitting on a baseline in strict, and in
transitional, it doesn't [3].
Great, thanks!
Ingo
[2] http://hsivonen.iki.fi/doctype/
[3] https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Images%2c_Tables%2c_and_Mysterious_Gaps
Getting out of practice.
Does Opera/Mac up to 10.10 has a bug with percentage min-height?
(not in 10.5 pre-alpha anymore)
http://satzansatz.de/op/minheight.html
And display:inline-block (or float) seems to fix it for a moment, just
to break again with a width?
!DOCTYPE html
html
head
Thanks!
here is the testcase with the :root:overflow fix
http://satzansatz.de/op/minheightrootoverflow.html
without:
http://satzansatz.de/op/minheight.html
best
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
Works here for me in IE8/XP.
Wrong color in IE7 (and IE8 in IE7CompatView).
regards,
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
;
...
overflow:hidden;
...
}
This cannot work with text. You cannot control the text settings of
the user, you don't know how tall the container has to be. It's a
framed-sort of design you have here.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css
is confused.
Example from the spec:
P { background: url(chess.png) gray 50% repeat fixed }
is valid
but a small change
P { background: url(chess.png) gray repeat fixed 50% }
is not valid -- according to the validator.
hmm...
Ingo
ah, its a known bug.
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8237
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List
/CSS21/visuren.html#run-in
browser support is ... to be tested. Safari and Opera?
Since you need some nesting of a DL inside of the DD, making DD and DT
display:inline and DL inline-block to simulate a run-in would maybe
end in some browser issues, too.
Ingo
the first digit of the user agent string: in such a scenario, Opera 10
is interpreted as Opera 1.
http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/opera-ua-string-changes/
:)
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
that will work in this case. I have tried via inline styles what have you,
setting the z-index for the thumbnail image on up and on hover with no
success.
Its the position:relative on li. Set it on demand, that means, on :hover only.
Ingo
?
position:absolute
Or be a little more specific in your problem description.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com
If I am not wrong, my IE8 Vista (Browser mode: IE8; Document mode: IE8
Standards) applies the rules in question. I can see a square div
aquamarine, with text on it.
test example --- http://mtroadwines.com/ie8test.htm
__
title=ie8), so the first one may win. This is
not a bug.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http
refresh the page.
I think this is related to
http://www.brunildo.org/test/IE_raf3.html
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
'print'-stylesheet
is this correct?
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org
Are there devices out there that actually use this media type?
Thanks,
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List
should do. Didn't read the other thread, and don't understand
why you are opening a new thread for the same problem.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ
loaded on the
startpage, header3col.jpg
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org
left and the thumbnail is
displayed below the div.
Debbie, I don't have Safari Win, but what if the p gets a width?
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ
: none;
outline-width: 0
}
So the BORDER-BOTTOM: #eee 1px solid; wins.
best
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com
is probably
easier.
And yes, vertical control is pretty weak in CSS. You may use html
tables then if you think this is appropriate for your situation.
Hope this helps.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
of CSS
implementations. That means, it would be probably better to design
without the need for equal height columns.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ
/InlineBlockLayout.html
see [2], Conclusions, Elements having both hasLayout and
display:inline work similarly to the standard inline-blocks ...
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
to a real page because this is an internal
system.
For your own debugging efforts, you should start building test cases anyway.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
I can reproduce the issue in a fresh IE8rc1 install on XP. After a few
refreshes, the footer disappeared.
regards,
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ
.
Firefox, Safari, Opera are correct. The float cannot pass.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-selectors/#pseudo-elements
This :: notation is introduced by the current document in order to
establish a discrimination between pseudo-classes and
pseudo-elements.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css
.
Regards,
Amrinder
asap: http://www.brunildo.org/test/IE_raf3.html
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List
'
but the correct path should be
src='/dev/images/Adress-top-3.png'
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies
or insert a solid clearing element after the floats. Or start
with unfloating the second float, subcontainer.
Check in IE6, too.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List
hacking is a bad idea. In the
end, some think !important does not work in IE. But it is ok as long as it
is not used within the same ruleset.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
reasons for presentational hacking, cosmetic things like a transparency
here, an equal height column just to show a gradient there, how great we
are. Currently, with the old paradigm, I have to fix an irrelevant 3px bug
but I am not allowed to make full use of CSS 2.1 or to try some CSS3
modules?
Ingo
clients are comparing the similarity of user experience, they DO look
at performance issues in IE too, I assume. So what does it costs to make the
page look really equal?
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
paradigm was promoted by us.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
multiple backgrounds? I don't know
how to find a pragmatic balance between CSS 2 and 3.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
Opera does not crash because of the proprietary (and of course, invalid)
zoom property; Opera ignores it.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http
in IE6 but not IE7.
Do you think it has anything to do with using outline?
outline?
It is still dropping in IE6. Let us try zoom: 1 instead of
display:inline-block for li.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
a
smaller margin for IE but it still does not help.
probably display: inline-block for li helps.
The site is at: http://farmpeacelove.com/italiano/alloggio
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/companions.html]
Maybe a faux columns technique plus Footer Stick Alt would be easier to
implement.
I know this is not what you were asking for, but frame-like pages with a
fixed footer at the bottom of the window are not that simple.
Ingo
that relative
positioning may cause boxes to overlap.
Apply a red test background to #content. See the #content is sliding under
your footer. Again, this is not footer stick alt. Don't offset #content,
offset footer instead by its own height.
Ingo
/redirect.cgi?f=83d=3810456url=http://www.sthig.com/unisource/2.jpg
There is a float drop on the right because the left margin of the left float
is duplicated.
Ingo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org
, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Ingo Chao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a style=font-size:150px; href=#img style=height:20px;
src=foo.jpg
//a
The initial value for vertical-align, baseline, applies. It affects
the inline level elements in a line
is chosen. Different fonts may give other results. The
image in the second container would get a different starting point in
y-achsis.
regards,
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
http://www.dolphinsback.com
__
css-discuss
Blake wrote:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Ingo Chao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This will slow down
new inventions a bit - which is good
Actually, I said: ... which is good since the conforming browsers are
not as free of bugs as some may believe.
What? Restricting innovation is never ever
://home.comcast.net/~adamq/chapter5/breadcrumb-navigation/breadcrumbs.html
There is no bg image visible on the first LI in a native IE6 install,
and tracing the stile shows that IE6 applies the above fix. I
think the problem is how you test in IE6.
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
http
://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/percentages.html
better don't use percentage paddings at all. At least, don't change
backgrounds (or similar) on hover.
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
http://www.dolphinsback.com
likely to get workarounds
for old browsers than installations of new ones. This will slow down
new inventions a bit - which is good, since the conforming browsers
are not as free of bugs as some may believe.
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
http://www.dolphinsback.com
problem.
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
http://www.dolphinsback.com
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies
-div ... but I
fear the table limits that, since positioning inside a table is
difficult ... we need an example page.
It depends. Scrollbars on a block inside a browser window with
scrollbars could be worse than pushing the layout a bit.
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
http
=1.0? - IE6=quirks mode - text-align:center =
centering of blocks-trick? :)
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
http://www.dolphinsback.com
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
it
there
too it must be something else. I thought I'd fixed it, by updating a file,
but
it's still there on some pages, so I'm working on it.
what page?
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
http://www.dolphinsback.com
://tinyurl.com/3dn2qz
MS Outlook 2007 uses the rendering engine of Word, and Word 2007 does
not support animated gifs. It should show the first frame of your gif,
but I would not name this the worst case. This would be if people would
not like animated gifs for some reasons.
Ingo
--
http
as Those who could understand this code would not
have to ask for it.
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
http://www.dolphinsback.com
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List
Georg
I guess the second float is put into a second anonymous table-row. We
should not use display:table for containing floats.
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
http://www.dolphinsback.com
__
css-discuss [EMAIL
-replacement/
But I think this is what David meant. You may have to upload a
simplified reduction of the problem.
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
http://www.dolphinsback.com
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css
behavior on windows), looks
like a clipped disc.
http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/list-style-type
Starting WebKit WebInspector with a rightclick (inspect element)
produces a 100% CPU load.
Did they have missed to publish a link to their public bug tracking system?
Ingo
--
http
1 - 100 of 1056 matches
Mail list logo