[css-d] :: page check :: ~d

Goals: 1/ Usable in any given screen width (ie/6 fixed at 780 width) 2/ Look and feel: macho (off-topic comments appreciated off-list, please) Constructive suggestions and comments appreciated. markup css Be

Re: [css-d] Page Check

Morning Georg You wrote about www.nannery.net . > > Looks a bit strange on narrow windows, but the same in all browsers - > including IE8. > (snipped a bit) > http://www.gunlaug.no Thanks for taking a minute to look at this page, It's appreciated. As I pointed out to DL, I am / was when I poste

Re: [css-d] Page Check

Morning David You wrote > > Dunno about IE/8 but imagine it will also break the same way all browser > will at 800 and drop the right column at less than that ;-) . > This could be a nice touch: > p{ /*font-size:.8em;*/} Thanks for taking a minute to look at this page, It's appreciated. I am /

Re: [css-d] Page Check

JWN wrote: > I'd appreciate it if some of you with IE 8 would have a look at > www.nannery.net and let me know if there are any problems. Looks a bit strange on narrow windows, but the same in all browsers - including IE8. regards Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no

Re: [css-d] Page Check

JWN wrote: > Morning all > > I'd appreciate it if some of you with IE 8 would have a look at > www.nannery.net and let me know if there are any problems. > > This is a conversions from tables Works as I expect in IE 6- 7, FF > 3.0.7 and Opera 9.00 on Win XP Pro SP3. > > Thanks in advance. >

[css-d] Page Check

Morning all I'd appreciate it if some of you with IE 8 would have a look at www.nannery.net and let me know if there are any problems. This is a conversions from tables Works as I expect in IE 6- 7, FF 3.0.7 and Opera 9.00 on Win XP Pro SP3. Thanks in advance. Jim Nannery blog - www.nann

[css-d] Page Check Please

OK I have this page it works fine in Safari, FF on Mac. I did take notice that if I added a wrapper around the header to the footer the maincontent bgcolor moves to the top of the manicontent section. Now if I move the closing div for the maincontent so it is outside of the footer closing div the

Re: [css-d] Page Check please

> > There is one display issue that I did see. While you did fix the centering > with respect to the radio buttons, when printed, the heading is no longer > centered. > > ...Rob Thanks Rob; I will fix that. It is centered on the content, but not on the page. Thanks for the catch. Del __

Re: [css-d] Page Check please

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Laakso > Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 3:10 PM > To: Del Wegener > Cc: css > Subject: Re: [css-d] Page Check please > > Del Wegener wrote: > > > > > http://ww

Re: [css-d] Page Check please

Del Wegener wrote: > > http://www.drdelmath.com/special_topics/function/functions_quadratic_properties.htm > You frequently make similar comments about font-size. I started with > font-size at 100% in the body and then set the other font sizes relative to > that by using em measurements. The

Re: [css-d] Page Check please

David Laakso wrote to Del, >> In the wonderful world of personal opinion, setting the primary content >> font-size to suit your preference, rather than users preference does >> not >> "look okay" to me. >> A line-measure of 85 percent of the screen will be difficult for users >> with very wid

Re: [css-d] Page Check please

> In the wonderful world of personal opinion, setting the primary content > font-size to suit your preference, rather than users preference does not > "look okay" to me. > Nor I'm not crazy about trying to decipher or read anything in print-media > or on the Web that is red, white, and blue. >

Re: [css-d] Page Check please

David Laakso wrote: > Del Wegener wrote: > >> Good Morning; >> >> The page in question >> http://www.drdelmath.com/special_topics/function/functions_quadratic_properties.htm >> is pretty simple but it is another step for me in using "best practices." >> This uses no tables and I believe my CSS i

Re: [css-d] Page Check please

Del Wegener wrote: > Good Morning; > > The page in question > http://www.drdelmath.com/special_topics/function/functions_quadratic_properties.htm > is pretty simple but it is another step for me in using "best practices." > This uses no tables and I believe my CSS is pretty lean and clean. >

[css-d] Page Check please

Good Morning; The page in question http://www.drdelmath.com/special_topics/function/functions_quadratic_properties.htm is pretty simple but it is another step for me in using "best practices." This uses no tables and I believe my CSS is pretty lean and clean. Right now I use Javascript to display

Re: [css-d] Page Check - my first fully CSS page multi column layout

Barrett wrote: > Good to hear it works so far. > Yeah the background color has been a paradox of just what you say and > the known "branding" of the site now for so many years. > > > > > Barrett > >>> http://beta.handmade-paper.us/page/CPO/CTGY/mbt >>> >>> > The most beautiful thing we can ex

Re: [css-d] Page Check - my first fully CSS page multi column layout

Good to hear it works so far. Yeah the background color has been a paradox of just what you say and the known "branding" of the site now for so many years. I have contemplated seeing if someone could help me come up with some sort of javascript chunk where I could allow the user to change th

Re: [css-d] Page Check - my first fully CSS page multi column layout

Barrett wrote: > http://beta.handmade-paper.us/page/CPO/CTGY/mbt > > See what you think - tear it up. > > Barrett > Seems fine to me in Mac Opera, FF, Camino, and Safari; and, in XP IE/7 and IE/6. Holds decent font-scaling and folds well from a full to narrow window cross-browser. FWIW, I

[css-d] Page Check - my first fully CSS page multi column layout

Page Check - my first fully CSS page multi column layout http://beta.handmade-paper.us/page/CPO/CTGY/mbt See what you think - tear it up. This page only as I have not verified other templates on the site. Navbar is not done yet. Page should be a fully fluid multi column layout - no tables. The CSS

Re: [css-d] page check and help with placement

Erin Spangler wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Please check this image: > http://www.thedogsonline.com/temp-site/new-showcase/images/example-image.jpg > > against this page: > http://www.thedogsonline.com/temp-site/new-showcase/showcase-template.html > http://www.thedogsonline.com/temp-site/new-showcas

[css-d] page check and help with placement

Hello everyone, Please check this image: http://www.thedogsonline.com/temp-site/new-showcase/images/example-image.jpg against this page: http://www.thedogsonline.com/temp-site/new-showcase/showcase-template.html http://www.thedogsonline.com/temp-site/new-showcase/showcase.css and you'll see that

Re: [css-d] Page Check Please

Del Wegener wrote: > > http://www.edi-cp.com/edi_new/edi_page_layout.htm > > Note the white space above and below the orange box near the bottom. How > can I get rid of the white space? > > > Del > > > > div#extra p {margin:0;} div#content { padding-bottom:1px; } Food for thought:

[css-d] Page Check Please

Good Afternoon; I have slowly been moving toward all CSS and now have my first page without tables, frames, or JavaScript. It all validates. In your opinion am I proceeding correctly ? http://www.edi-cp.com/edi_new/edi_page_layout.htm Do you see anything that will get me into trouble as I proce

Re: [css-d] page check-positioning gap, font issues/questions

Ron Zisman wrote: > http://www.ricochet.org/ricochet2/company_principal.html > font question/issue > > originally, i speced .8em font size on html/body > > looked and worked fine. i know it's a no-no as i've been informed it > causes issue in msie, i have been taught (by a list member) to use

Re: [css-d] page check-positioning gap, font issues/questions

Ron Zisman wrote: > http://www.ricochet.org/ricochet2/company_principal.html > > i haven't yet viewed the page in msie; only opera and firefox on the > mac. i'll deal with msie when the page is stable > > gap issue: > > at the top of the page (on top of yellow box and menus), i'm getting > a ga

[css-d] page check-positioning gap, font issues/questions

http://www.ricochet.org/ricochet2/company_principal.html i haven't yet viewed the page in msie; only opera and firefox on the mac. i'll deal with msie when the page is stable gap issue: at the top of the page (on top of yellow box and menus), i'm getting a gap. i've tried zeroing out margins

[css-d] Page Check

At 6:13 PM -0500 10/5/07, Jim Nannery wrote: >I'd appreciate it if some of you would look at > > > >especially with Mac / Safari browsers. I have (and test in) Safari Win 3.0 >and all seems fine but I don't have enough faith in it for final production. >I

Re: [css-d] Page Check

On 5 Oct 2007, at 14:17, "Jim Nannery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd appreciate it if some of you would look at > www.sylvesterneal.com/index2.html Hi Jim, Mac OS X v10.4.10 Safari beta 3 - the main text is tight against the gold edge of the picture Firefox 2.0.0.7 - text is okay but pict

Re: [css-d] Page Check

OS X 10.4.10; Safari 3.0.3; Camino 1.5: Just basic poking around on the site … everything looks good with 1 exception: On the home page in Safari, there is no white space between the portrait and the body of text, i.e. "This web site is designed serve the Districts …" is flush left against the po

[css-d] Page Check

Morning List I'd appreciate it if some of you would look at www.sylvesterneal.com/index2.html especially with Mac / Safari browsers. I have (and test in) Safari Win 3.0 and all seems fine but I don't have enough faith in it for final production. Should be good to go in all other major browser

Re: [css-d] Page check

Scott Povlot wrote: > Thanks, David. > > I changed the #shop width to 200px. That's much > better. > > However, I am not sure what you mean about "Eighty > percent of default (on body) is kind of tiny start > point for those using a high dpi monitor." What > resolution are you using? What do you

Re: [css-d] Page check

Thanks, David. I changed the #shop width to 200px. That's much better. However, I am not sure what you mean about "Eighty percent of default (on body) is kind of tiny start point for those using a high dpi monitor." What resolution are you using? What do you suggest for a font setting? Scott

Re: [css-d] Page check

Scott Povlot wrote: > I have just finished a new page design. This is my > first using a fixed width page. It looks OK on > Windows IE6/7 and Firefox. > > Can you please validate on other OS and browsers? > > Also, any comments on the design would be appreciated. > > The URL is > http://www.pie

[css-d] Page check

I have just finished a new page design. This is my first using a fixed width page. It looks OK on Windows IE6/7 and Firefox. Can you please validate on other OS and browsers? Also, any comments on the design would be appreciated. The URL is http://www.piedmont-div.org/nmra/nmra_home_page.ht

Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL

Ray Leventhal wrote: > David Laakso wrote: > >> [1] >> >> Best, >> >> ~dL >> >> >> > Hi David, > > The layout looks good in Win: FF1.5/2.0 IE 6/7. In WinFF 2.0, the link > for GF Safe Lists shows GF underlined. Not so in my view in FF1.5 or

Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL

David Laakso wrote: > I get frequent reminders from the guy that the thing [1] is supposed to > work in all versions of win/ie. > Comments, suggestions, and links to an "anger management" seminar > appreciated. > Thanks. > > [1] > > Best, > > ~dL > >

Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL

L Lay wrote: > David Laakso wrote: > >> [1] >> >> Best, >> >> ~dL >> >> >> > It even works on my Dell laptop (IE 6) - with UseHR on or off. FWIW, > Lynx and Fangs are also happy. > > > Lori > > These are important considerations in my boo

Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL

Ingo Chao wrote: > David Laakso wrote: > >> I get frequent reminders from the guy that the thing [1] is supposed to >> work in all versions of win/ie. >> Comments, suggestions, and links to an "anger management" seminar >> appreciated. >> Thanks. >> >> [1]

Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL

David Laakso wrote: > [1] > > Best, > > ~dL > > It even works on my Dell laptop (IE 6) - with UseHR on or off. FWIW, Lynx and Fangs are also happy. Lori __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROT

Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL

Donna Jones wrote: >> >> [1] >> > > David, I just opened up IE5.01 and, as far as I can tell, it works > perfectly! Good work! could he be looking in IE4??!! ...trimmed] > > cheers and good luck finding an "anger management" seminar, I notice >

Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL

Luis Speciale wrote: > ~davidLaakso a écrit : > >> A page check with with whatever you are running is appreciated. >> http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/ct1/ >> >> > > > > > Luis > > > Luis, you have raised some very good points and I appreciate your thorough and thoughtful repl

Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL

At 1:25 AM -0400 7/8/07, David Laakso wrote: >I get frequent reminders from the guy that the thing [1] is supposed to >work in all versions of win/ie. >Comments, suggestions, and links to an "anger management" seminar >appreciated. >Thanks. > >[1] > >Bes

Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL

Rahul Gonsalves wrote: > On 08-Jul-07, at 10:55 AM, David Laakso wrote: > >> Comments, suggestions, and links to an "anger management" seminar >> appreciated. >> >> [1] > > As always, I wish I'd picked out those colours myself. I tried very > hard to br

Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL

On Jul 8, 2007, at 1:25 AM, David Laakso wrote: > I get frequent reminders from the guy that the thing [1] is > supposed to > work in all versions of win/ie. It does work just fine -- unless you count that the left add may overlap the last nav-element on extremely narrow windows and font- s

Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL

~davidLaakso a écrit : > A page check with with whatever you are running is appreciated. > http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/ct1/ > Hi Mac OS X Firefox 2.0.0.4 and the geckos (Mozilla, Netscape) #secondary img.rht {index.css (line 465) display:block; float:right; margin:6px 3% 3px 0pt; //

Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL

> I get frequent reminders from the guy that the thing [1] is supposed to > work in all versions of win/ie. > Comments, suggestions, and links to an "anger management" seminar > appreciated. > Thanks. > > [1] David, I just opened up IE5.01 and, as fa

Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL

On 08-Jul-07, at 10:55 AM, David Laakso wrote: > Comments, suggestions, and links to an "anger management" seminar > appreciated. > > [1] As always, I wish I'd picked out those colours myself. I tried very hard to break it in the browsers (all OS X)

Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL

David Laakso wrote: > I get frequent reminders from the guy that the thing [1] is supposed to > work in all versions of win/ie. > Comments, suggestions, and links to an "anger management" seminar > appreciated. > Thanks. > > [1] > > Best, > > ~dL >

[css-d] page check :: ~dL

I get frequent reminders from the guy that the thing [1] is supposed to work in all versions of win/ie. Comments, suggestions, and links to an "anger management" seminar appreciated. Thanks. [1] Best, ~dL -- http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ ___

Re: [css-d] page check in IE7 please

Good morning James, It was foretold that on 20/6/2007 @ 08:23:40 GMT-0400 (which was 09:23:40 where I live) James Gadrow would write: > Place your ie code in a conditional comment so it doesn't mess up the > page in other browsers. Yeah, it seems that's the only way out :-) Anyways, tnx fo

Re: [css-d] page check in IE7 please

Luc wrote: > Good evening Roger, > It was foretold that on 19/6/2007 @ 12:38:55 GMT-0400 (which was > 13:38:55 where I live) Roger Roelofs would write: > > > > >> One of the beauties of allowing floats to drop is >> that the content is conveniently viewable at more screen/window >> siz

Re: [css-d] page check please, 2nd request

Thanks Audra and Marc -- I'm still working through how positioning works, so this is a good lesson for me. I appreciate you both taking the time to plow through the code and help me out. Peg On 6/19/07, Audra Coldiron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peggy Coats wrote: > > any idea why IE 6 and 7 a

Re: [css-d] page check please, 2nd request

Peggy Coats wrote: > any idea why IE 6 and 7 are throwing off the content div to the right on this > site-in-progress? > > site: http://ambientglow.com/garage/priestess/web/index.html > > CSS: http://www.ambientglow.com/garage/priestess/web/css/priestess.css Hi Peg. You'll need to change quit

[css-d] page check please, 2nd request

any idea why IE 6 and 7 are throwing off the content div to the right on this site-in-progress? site: http://ambientglow.com/garage/priestess/web/index.html CSS: http://www.ambientglow.com/garage/priestess/web/css/priestess.css Thanks, Peg _

Re: [css-d] page check in IE7 please

Good evening Roger, It was foretold that on 19/6/2007 @ 12:38:55 GMT-0400 (which was 13:38:55 where I live) Roger Roelofs would write: > One of the beauties of allowing floats to drop is > that the content is conveniently viewable at more screen/window > sizes, but that means you have t

Re: [css-d] page check in IE7 please

Luc, On Jun 19, 2007, at 11:37 AM, Luc wrote: > Good afternoon Roger, > It was foretold that on 19/6/2007 @ 10:14:22 GMT-0400 (which was > 11:14:22 where I live) Roger Roelofs would write: > > > >> This design assumes users will browse at full screen and have large >> monitors, and neither i

Re: [css-d] page check in IE7 please

Good afternoon James, It was foretold that on 19/6/2007 @ 10:02:58 GMT-0400 (which was 11:02:58 where I live) James Gadrow would write: > I presume > you either need a hasLayout trigger somewhere that contains your header, > or (depending upon how you laid out the page) you may just need t

Re: [css-d] page check in IE7 please

Good afternoon Roger, It was foretold that on 19/6/2007 @ 10:14:22 GMT-0400 (which was 11:14:22 where I live) Roger Roelofs would write: > This design assumes users will browse at full screen and have large > monitors, and neither is true in my case. I only ever see the > leftmost

Re: [css-d] page check in IE7 please

Luc, On Jun 19, 2007, at 9:42 AM, Luc wrote: > Good morning James, > It was foretold that on 19/6/2007 @ 09:16:57 GMT-0400 (which was > 10:16:57 where I live) James Gadrow would write: > >> Only problem I see is that the last letter in your header is >> overlapping >> your right hand image. > >

Re: [css-d] page check in IE7 please

Luc wrote: > Good morning James, > It was foretold that on 19/6/2007 @ 09:16:57 GMT-0400 (which was > 10:16:57 where I live) James Gadrow would write: > > >> Only problem I see is that the last letter in your header is overlapping >> your right hand image. >> > > Is that some IE7 bug i

Re: [css-d] page check in IE7 please

Good morning James, It was foretold that on 19/6/2007 @ 09:16:57 GMT-0400 (which was 10:16:57 where I live) James Gadrow would write: > Only problem I see is that the last letter in your header is overlapping > your right hand image. Is that some IE7 bug i'm not aware of? Or just setting the

Re: [css-d] page check in IE7 please

Luc wrote: > Good morning list, > > At the moment i'm without IE7 on my machine. Could somebody check > this page on IE7? > > http://www.dzinelabs.com/projects/MP/Pages/roger > > Does it hold together when resizing the viewport? > > TIA > > Only problem I see is that the last letter

[css-d] page check in IE7 please

Good morning list, At the moment i'm without IE7 on my machine. Could somebody check this page on IE7? http://www.dzinelabs.com/projects/MP/Pages/roger Does it hold together when resizing the viewport? TIA -- Best regards, Luc Powered by The Bat! version

[css-d] Page check please

Good evening list, Could some good soul give me some feedback on the following page: http://www.dzinelabs.com/projects/MP/Pages/werkendvoorbeeldcsslist2.html Css is embedded. Requests: how does it look at 600x800, Moz, FF, IE? -- Best regards, Luc http:

Re: [css-d] page check please

i'm seeing bios pop up but no images besides the first in ie6 Jeff __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- htt

[css-d] page check please

Hi All, Can you please click on the faces on the left. I want to make sure that two onclick events work that the person's bio comes up and a detail photo comes up too. I am especially interested in internet explorer 6.0 and older. http://www.bartlettsfarm.com/staff1.html Many Thanks, Noah ___

Re: [css-d] page check - footer problems in IE

> > You're close enough :-) > > Add a 'hasLayout'[1] trigger... > > #footer {width: 100%;} > > ...to make IE recognize footer as a "block" that shall clear floats as > one unit. > > regards > Georg Thanks Georg, I love and hate how you make it so simple! You've bailed me out more than on

Re: [css-d] page check - footer problems in IE

Don Hinshaw wrote: > http://test.hinshawdesign.com/pfg/round2/template_css_v3.1.html > My intuition tells me that it has something to do with the floats > above the footer, but I fear I am in a little over my depth. You're close enough :-) Add a 'hasLayout'[1] trigger... #footer {width: 100%;}

[css-d] page check - footer problems in IE

Hi all, I'm coding this crazy layout with lots of rules dividing up the space, and so far it is coming together pretty well, but I am up against a problem in IE (6+7) that I can't figure out the cause of. Here is the basic page: http://test.hinshawdesign.com/pfg/round2/template_css_v3.1.html Thi

Re: [css-d] Page Check -

Hi Kevin, I've checked it in Mac Firefox 1.5. Everything seems to be order, if you didn't want the horizontal-stripe white background going down to the footer on the left and right cols. The image 'Secured Network Solutions' has shifted left about 10px beyond the left margin of your central co

Re: [css-d] Page Check -

Kevin J Pledger wrote: > Hi All, > > Can I please get a page check on www.oneyed.com/mt/vendors/ideagen > > I have checked it with FF2 / IE7, but don't have access to any of the other > browsers. > > If there are glaring mistakes in my CSS, please let me know, because if this > looks okay ac

[css-d] Page Check -

Hi All, Can I please get a page check on www.oneyed.com/mt/vendors/ideagen I have checked it with FF2 / IE7, but don't have access to any of the other browsers. If there are glaring mistakes in my CSS, please let me know, because if this looks okay across browser land it will become the temp

[css-d] Page check - Outdoor Image

Hi folks - Can I get a couple of eyeballs on this page, please? None of the links go anywhere, but I'd like critique of the page in especially MS. It validates, it looks good in Safari, FF for Mac, and Opera for Mac Any comments that might be off topic are welcome, but only in direct e-

Re: [css-d] Page Check - mostly IE for PC

Keith Burgin wrote: > Hi folks - > > Could I get a page check on http://newsite.outdoorimage.com, please? > > I work in Mac, and have looked at it on Firefox, Opera, Safari, and > Camino. I need IE for PC 6 and 7 if you have it. Everything > validates so far. None of the links work yet. > >

[css-d] Page Check - mostly IE for PC

Hi folks - Could I get a page check on http://newsite.outdoorimage.com, please? I work in Mac, and have looked at it on Firefox, Opera, Safari, and Camino. I need IE for PC 6 and 7 if you have it. Everything validates so far. None of the links work yet. Thank you kindly, Keith Burgin

Re: [css-d] page check please

: Jehangir Larry Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 4:33 AM Subject: Re: [css-d] page check please Though I believe everything is working as you intend, I would suggest rethinking the header rollover trick. When I roll over the header image, the image extends

Re: [css-d] page check please

Though I believe everything is working as you intend, I would suggest rethinking the header rollover trick. When I roll over the header image, the image extends, and thus increases the height of the page. But then if I move on to the navigation bar - in an effort to navigate to a particular section

Re: [css-d] page check please

Jehangir Larry wrote: > ~davidLaakso wrote: > > Thanks David. > Did as you said. Unable to center the various buttons in the sidebar - > despite margin 0 auto and text-align-center. > The above reference was to center the page. The page is centered now. However, the search thing is too wide

Re: [css-d] page check please

Jehangir Larry wrote: > Pls re-check for me? Also any suggestion - how to center those > 'buttons'? Change to... .center { text-align:center; width: 190px;} ...and the buttons will be centered. The '.center' will otherwise collapse to the width of two buttons, and there's no width to center with

Re: [css-d] page check please

to center those 'buttons'? Deeply appreciate your support. The 'fixed' problem implies I modify the design? Best. Larry From: "~davidLaakso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jehangir Larry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 9:51 AM

Re: [css-d] page check please

Jehangir Larry wrote: > Appreciate a page check - different user agents (specially older IE), with > suggestions for improvement. > www.teerthyatri.com > Many TIA. > Larry > > Larry, I think it is probably working as you intend in ie7.0 and the latest versions of ff and opera. IE 6 and down do

[css-d] page check please

Appreciate a page check - different user agents (specially older IE), with suggestions for improvement. www.teerthyatri.com Many TIA. Larry __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 in

Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL [continued]

~davidLaakso wrote: > ~davidLaakso wrote: > > A page check of this test page with whatever you're running is > appreciated. But when push comes to shove it's all versions of ie she > hopes to please. > Thanks to all who took time to offer comments a

Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL [continued]

In Opera 9.10 there's a ~10px white gap between questions and the gray box (left column). The same space in FF 2.0.0.1, IE7, IE6 and Netscape is gray. In IE5.5 and IE6 the Chevrolet logo is not found. Also the contents of that gray box (Chevrolet Question?) is not centered like in the other brows

Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL [continued]

> Subject: Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL [continued] > > > ~davidLaakso wrote: > > ~davidLaakso wrote: > [trimmed] > > Whoops. I discovered a horrendous error and took it down. Back to the > > drawing board. > > ~dL > > > Oh, my. Such a mess. Bet

Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL [continued]

~davidLaakso wrote: > ~davidLaakso wrote: >> ~davidLaakso wrote: > [trimmed] >> Whoops. I discovered a horrendous error and took it down. Back to the >> drawing board. >> ~dL >> > Oh, my. Such a mess. Better now I hope. > A page check of this test page with whatever you're running is > appreciat

Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL [continued]

~davidLaakso wrote: > ~davidLaakso wrote: [trimmed] > Whoops. I discovered a horrendous error and took it down. Back to the > drawing board. > ~dL > Oh, my. Such a mess. Better now I hope. A page check of this test page with whatever you're running is appreciated. But when push comes to shove it

Re: [css-d] Page check for newbite

Before CSS, I used to think of myself as a very logical person ... > > Beth > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Dawson > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 5:07 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: css-d@lists

Re: [css-d] Page check for newbite

ED] On Behalf Of Matt Dawson > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 4:36 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; css-d@lists.css-discuss.org > Subject: Re: [css-d] Page check for newbite > > > For starters, it's a very attractive first css layout. Congrats! > > I noticed one thing

Re: [css-d] Page check for newbite

ere?: http://www.callibeth.com/galleries.htm Beth -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Dawson Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 4:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Subject: Re: [css-d] Page check for newbite For starte

Re: [css-d] Page check for newbite

For starters, it's a very attractive first css layout. Congrats! I noticed one thing right away- and I don't think it has anything to do with the Safari problem you mention. Your layout scheme for the three columns (defined in index.css) is a little wonky. If I resize the size of my browser windo

[css-d] Page check for newbite

My first CSS website. And my first post (hope it's not a duplicate), although I've been trying to follow and learn from the discussions for several weeks. http://www.callibeth.com/index.htm Although this page looks as I want it to in Firefox/PC and IE7/PC, I understand that this page doesn't do we

Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL

~davidLaakso wrote: > ~davidLaakso wrote: >> A page check with with whatever you are running is appreciated. >> >> (embedded) >> Thanks. >> ~dL >> > Whoops. I discovered a horrendous error and took it down. Back to the > drawing board. What level of

Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL

~davidLaakso wrote: > A page check with with whatever you are running is appreciated. > > (embedded) > Thanks. > ~dL > > Whoops. I discovered a horrendous error and took it down. Back to the drawing board. ~dL -- http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ ___

Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL

~davidLaakso wrote: > A page check with with whatever you are running is appreciated. > Gives me a Forbidden message! :-( -- David [EMAIL PROTECTED] authenticity, honesty, community _

Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL

Hi david safari 2.0.4 running off powerbook G4 - panther res 1440 x 900. Looks good. menu bar under banner has different weights to typefaces. - maybe cos links not in place. top 3 menu items on banner are a little unclear. especially my garge - the red is lost against background. email th

[css-d] page check :: ~dL

A page check with with whatever you are running is appreciated. (embedded) Thanks. ~dL -- http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/ma

Re: [css-d] page check!!

Hi list, Cross browser check please. http://www.highburytearooms.com.au http://www.highburytearooms.com.au/highbury.css There are a couple of errors that I am aware and I would like some help in sorting them out. IE 6.0 two layers not showing up . I have fooled around with z-index etc to no

Re: [css-d] Page Check and Input Button Problem

Rahul Gonsalves wrote: > ~davidLaakso wrote: > >> Rahul Gonsalves wrote: >> >> > > In reference to: I am getting a 404 at the moment, Rahul. > I should have clarified - the "Sign Up" button in the bottom-right > corner, was the one t

Re: [css-d] Page Check and Input Button Problem

~davidLaakso wrote: > Rahul Gonsalves wrote: >> One of the problems that I'm facing is that the submit button does not >> shift its position on hover. > Well, I can't help with that (I guess one needs to know what a "submit > button" is? :-) ). I should have clarified - the "Sign Up" button in

  1   2   >