On 2010-08-20 7:50, Jeremy Ramer wrote:
After upgrading from cygwin 1.5 to cygwin 1.7 starting a bash shell is
much slower. It usually takes around 4 seconds before I get a prompt.
On cygwin 1.5 it was only around 1 second. I captured some logs from
the startup using this process:
- Open
On 2010-03-15 10:23, Bernd Prager wrote:
Has anybody gotten Eclipse C++ CDT to run with Cygwin 1.7.?
My Eclipse does not recognize Cygwin being installed and I cannot use
the Cygwin gcc tool chain.
The CDT looks for Cygwin in the registry. But Cygwin 1.7 doesn't use the
registry anymore. It
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 5 13:40, Nahor wrote:
Hi,
I have a samba share mounted in cygwin with the following fstab entry:
//server/nahor /home/nahor smbfs binary,user,exec,acl,posix=0,cygexec 0 0
Permissions are set correctly:
$ ls -al
-rwxr--r-- 1 nahor Domain Users 19 Aug 5
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 6 10:50, Nahor wrote:
One weird thing though, the directory permission are 700 and yet I can
list the content of the directory, cd in it and add/delete files. So
permissions are not consistently checked. But then, I assume it's
because all that is done
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
On 08/06/2009 05:25 PM, Nahor wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 6 10:50, Nahor wrote:
One weird thing though, the directory permission are 700 and yet I
can list the content of the directory, cd in it and add/delete files.
So permissions are not consistently
Hi,
I have a samba share mounted in cygwin with the following fstab entry:
//server/nahor /home/nahor smbfs binary,user,exec,acl,posix=0,cygexec 0 0
Permissions are set correctly:
$ ls -al
-rwxr--r-- 1 nahor Domain Users 19 Aug 5 11:46 t.sh
My test script doesn't do much:
$ cat ./t.sh
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Bugfixes and enhancements in the form of patches (diff -u) are welcome.
Not a patch but easy enough to find:
[A brief history of the Cygwin project]
the 1.7 release in 2008
= 2009
Cheers,
Nahor
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe
packages missing the version field
are missing from the setup tool in a fresh install.
Nahor
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http
Nahor wrote:
Carl Lund wrote:
Hi--
I tried updating my Cygwin installation, and got a message indicating
that cygreadline6.dll was missing. I did not request any changes; I
was just trying to update my current configuration to the latest release.
My suspicion is that something has been
Hi,
I have the following prompt in bash (Gentoo style):
PS1='\[\033[01;[EMAIL PROTECTED] \[\033[01;34m\]\w $ \[\033[00m\]'
When I press TAB to get the list of possible completion on the command
line, I have some extra characters added to the display:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ cd /c/tab
the black line.
Nahor
inline: x_test9.ico
. I assume that
quit a dew (most?) geeks using Cygwin/XFree would be in the same case.
But it's just a guess.
Nahor
for the binary.
All that just for a stoopid icon. Baah...
Nahor
.
Another way to confirm it, did the older icons (test6 and earlier) also
displayed thin borders?
Nahor
inline: x_test6.ico
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Earle F. Philhower, III wrote:
Howdy Nahor,
For someone who's entire contribution to XWin has been
an alpha-blended X icon you've got some loud opinions...
He's done much more than that. His full name is Jehan Bing and it
looks like the bulk of his work is here
instead
of a thick one. So probably that Win2k uses the first one with 24b or
more because, when win2k came out, both were identical.
Nahor
Earle F. Philhower, III wrote:
Sorry, then, Nahor, didn't recognize the handle. (Just when I was
getting a good flamefest started, too!)
Hehe, I got burnt that way too one day, telling someone to just
contribute instead of ranting when the guy already contributed. :p
Nahor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried booting my system with VGA mode, and icon is still garbled.
I also tried installing FireFox that seems to work just fine.
What about the attached file. I created it with another icon editor.
There is a slight change in the binary file so maybe it will work on
and
see if their icon works. If they work, the issue is in my icon. If not,
you'll have to wait for Earle's patch to land.
Nahor
with edges at 45 degrees, fully black icon, blue X, red X, pig with
wings, X on top of MS Windows logo... you name it.
Nahor
and see if
they are garbled too?
Nahor
inline: x_test6.ico
then size, from worst to best
(16x16x4, 24x24x4, 32x32x4, 16x16x8, 24x24x8, ..., 32x32x32)
...crossing fingers...
Nahor
inline: x_test8.ico
does this one look in 24x24? If it's good, then Harold can change it
(once again :p) in the exe.
Nahor
inline: x_test6.ico
but it will solve any the
taskbar/systray/shortcuts issue.
Nahor
desktop. Really smooth. However, I haven't checked it how it
looks on systems that don't support alpha channel in icons.
Nahor
inline: x_test3.ico
. This icon has images in 32x32 and 16x16, in 16m with alpha,
256 and 16 colors.
Nahor
inline: x_test4.ico
it. Some may like
it better. I'm 50-50 between the current one and the one attached.
Nahor
inline: X.ico
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Hmm... that is an interesting change. I am now split 33-33-33 between
the current, the one in CVS, and the one you just sent :)
I haven't seen the one in CVS. Is there a simple way to get it without
having to checkout the whole source?
Nahor
28 matches
Mail list logo
