Re: RFC: Packaging O'Caml

2004-08-27 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Igor schrieb: I'm still trying to get O'Caml to run properly (I keep getting the No bytecode file specified message)... Do you want to discuss this off-list? You cannot strip O'Caml executables, it is somewhere in the docs which of the compiler executables may be stripped and which not.

Re: RFC: Packaging O'Caml

2004-08-27 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Igor schrieb: Executables compiled by O'Caml cannot be compiled in general, they are mixed mode, text/binary code and stripping removes the text... have you opened a binary with an editor already? Looks funny. Yep. I assume you mean

Re: RFC: Packaging O'Caml

2004-08-26 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Igor schrieb: Hi, In the course of my real job duties, I built O'Caml under Cygwin. It builds OOTB, and, even though there seem to be some minor packaging issues to be worked out, looks like it'll be easy to package nicely, so I was considering ITPing it. +1 vote from me. However,

Re: RFC: Packaging O'Caml

2004-08-26 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Igor schrieb: Hi, In the course of my real job duties, I built O'Caml under Cygwin. It builds OOTB, and, even though there seem to be some minor packaging issues to be worked out, looks like it'll be easy to package nicely, so I was

Re: RFC: Packaging O'Caml

2004-08-26 Thread Eugene Kotlyarov
Igor Pechtchanski wrote: In the course of my real job duties, I built O'Caml under Cygwin. It builds OOTB, and, even though there seem to be some minor packaging issues to be worked out, looks like it'll be easy to package nicely, so I was considering ITPing it. However, parts of it are released

Re: RFC: Packaging O'Caml

2004-08-26 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Igor schrieb: On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Igor schrieb: Hi, In the course of my real job duties, I built O'Caml under Cygwin. It builds OOTB, and, even though there seem to be some minor packaging issues to be worked out, looks like it'll be easy to package nicely,

Re: RFC: Packaging O'Caml

2004-08-26 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Eugene Kotlyarov wrote: Igor Pechtchanski wrote: In the course of my real job duties, I built O'Caml under Cygwin. It builds OOTB, and, even though there seem to be some minor packaging issues to be worked out, looks like it'll be easy to package nicely, so I was

Re: RFC: Packaging O'Caml

2004-08-26 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Igor schrieb: On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Igor schrieb: Hi, In the course of my real job duties, I built O'Caml under Cygwin. It builds OOTB, and, even though there seem to be some minor packaging issues to be

Re: RFC: Packaging O'Caml

2004-08-26 Thread Max Bowsher
Igor Pechtchanski wrote: I'm still trying to get O'Caml to run properly (I keep getting the No bytecode file specified message) This sometimes means that the executable has been damaged by stripping it. Max.

Re: RFC: Packaging O'Caml

2004-08-26 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Max Bowsher wrote: Igor Pechtchanski wrote: I'm still trying to get O'Caml to run properly (I keep getting the No bytecode file specified message) This sometimes means that the executable has been damaged by stripping it. Right. I've seen this on the ocaml lists, so