Igor schrieb:
I'm still trying to get O'Caml to run properly (I keep getting the No
bytecode file specified message)... Do you want to discuss this
off-list?
You cannot strip O'Caml executables, it is somewhere in the docs which
of the compiler executables may be stripped and which not.
On Aug 27 00:31, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 04:33:38PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
[..lots of unnecessary quoting removed...]
Huh? So, for example, if one builds a program that uses, say,
cygncurses7.dll (by linking with /usr/lib/libncurses.dll.a), which, in
turn,
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 04:33:38PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 02:46:55PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) wrote:
Igor
Igor schrieb:
Executables compiled by O'Caml cannot be compiled in general, they are
mixed mode, text/binary code and stripping removes the text... have you
opened a binary with an editor already? Looks funny.
Yep. I assume you mean
Hi,
In the course of my real job duties, I built O'Caml under Cygwin. It
builds OOTB, and, even though there seem to be some minor packaging issues
to be worked out, looks like it'll be easy to package nicely, so I was
considering ITPing it. However, parts of it are released under the Q
Public
Igor schrieb:
Hi,
In the course of my real job duties, I built O'Caml under Cygwin. It
builds OOTB, and, even though there seem to be some minor packaging issues
to be worked out, looks like it'll be easy to package nicely, so I was
considering ITPing it.
+1 vote from me.
However,
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Igor schrieb:
Hi,
In the course of my real job duties, I built O'Caml under Cygwin. It
builds OOTB, and, even though there seem to be some minor packaging issues
to be worked out, looks like it'll be easy to package nicely, so I was
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
However, parts of it are released under the Q
Public license, which GNU lists explicitly as
non-GPL-compatible. Does this mean an automatic
no to an official Cygwin package [...] ?
From http://cygwin.com/licensing.html:
In accordance with section 10 of the GPL, Red
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
However, parts of it are released under the Q
Public license, which GNU lists explicitly as
non-GPL-compatible. Does this mean an automatic
no to an official Cygwin package [...] ?
From
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
In the course of my real job duties, I built O'Caml under Cygwin. It
builds OOTB, and, even though there seem to be some minor packaging issues
to be worked out, looks like it'll be easy to package nicely, so I was
considering ITPing it. However, parts of it are released
Igor schrieb:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Igor schrieb:
Hi,
In the course of my real job duties, I built O'Caml under Cygwin. It
builds OOTB, and, even though there seem to be some minor packaging issues
to be worked out, looks like it'll be easy to package nicely,
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Eugene Kotlyarov wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
In the course of my real job duties, I built O'Caml under Cygwin. It
builds OOTB, and, even though there seem to be some minor packaging issues
to be worked out, looks like it'll be easy to package nicely, so I was
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Igor schrieb:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Igor schrieb:
Hi,
In the course of my real job duties, I built O'Caml under Cygwin.
It builds OOTB, and, even though there seem to be some minor
packaging issues to be
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
I'm still trying to get O'Caml to run properly (I keep getting the No
bytecode file specified message)
This sometimes means that the executable has been damaged by stripping it.
Max.
Wow, this is amazing. In all of the years that you've been following cygwin
in the mailing list, this is the first time you've ever read the licensing
page?
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 02:46:55PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Max Bowsher wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
I'm still trying to get O'Caml to run properly (I keep getting the No
bytecode file specified message)
This sometimes means that the executable has been damaged by stripping it.
Right. I've seen this on the ocaml lists, so
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Wow, this is amazing. In all of the years that you've been following cygwin
in the mailing list, this is the first time you've ever read the licensing
page?
Oh, I've read it before, but this particular exception seemed to not wedge
itself in my
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 04:33:38PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:46:55PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
However, parts of it are
18 matches
Mail list logo
