On 2015-01-05 03:06, Laurens Blankers wrote:
On 5-1-2015 05:04, Larry Hall (Cygwin-X) wrote:
As far as I can tell, from the available information, users which meet
any of the following criteria will run into trouble:
- Custom .startxwinrc or .xinitrc
Just .startxwinrc, and the changes were
On 5-1-2015 10:48, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
Just .startxwinrc, and the changes were explained in the announcement.
The information is contained within the announcement, but it is a bit
difficult to figure out what to do from just the list of changes. A more
detailed step-by-step guide, preferably
On 2015-01-05 04:03, Laurens Blankers wrote:
On 5-1-2015 10:48, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
Just .startxwinrc, and the changes were explained in the announcement.
The information is contained within the announcement, but it is a bit
difficult to figure out what to do from just the list of changes.
On 5-1-2015 05:04, Larry Hall (Cygwin-X) wrote:
So I'm guessing with your statement above that English isn't your primary
language.
[..]
1. I am not the maintainer of the xinit package. [..]
English is indeed not my first language, but that is no excuse for not
carefully reading your replies
When using PuTTY with X11 forwarding enabled X clients are no longer
able to connect to the X server running locally. When reverting back to
1.3.2-1 the problem goes away.
This may be related to the -nolisten tcp which is now the default[1]. If
this is indeed the case it would be create of adding
Hi,
As requested [1] a separate thread for suggesting improvements to xinit,
in order to solve some of the issues people have been having since the
release of 1.3.4-1 [2].
1. Handling of empty .startxwinrc
Given the new behaviour of startxwin having an empty is never a correct
configuration. It
On 2015-01-05 05:31, Laurens Blankers wrote:
When using PuTTY with X11 forwarding enabled X clients are no longer
able to connect to the X server running locally. When reverting back to
1.3.2-1 the problem goes away.
This may be related to the -nolisten tcp which is now the default[1]. If
this
On 01/05/2015 04:06 AM, Laurens Blankers wrote:
snip
Since I believe the rest of what you wrote above has been covered in one
form or another since my last reply, I won't bore anyone with my responses.
This leaves just one very critical piece of business which absolutely must
be addressed:
A:
On 2015-01-05 05:46, Laurens Blankers wrote:
As requested [1] a separate thread for suggesting improvements to xinit,
in order to solve some of the issues people have been having since the
release of 1.3.4-1 [2].
1. Handling of empty .startxwinrc
Given the new behaviour of startxwin having an
On 2015-01-05 11:43, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2015-01-05 05:46, Laurens Blankers wrote:
As requested [1] a separate thread for suggesting improvements to xinit,
in order to solve some of the issues people have been having since the
release of 1.3.4-1 [2].
1. Handling of empty .startxwinrc
10 matches
Mail list logo
