Brings a smile, xorcist :)
"The great unknowable" experiencing itself, through itself, by
imposing arbitrary restrictions upon spliters of itself."
Which conception gives rise to a fundamental existential question:
"To what extent am I puppeteered/ pre-ordained, and to what extent
(if at all)
4 real saw that name on hacker m0dUle -
Original Message
On Oct 7, 2016, 3:01 PM, John Newman wrote:
R u the famous "rooty tooty fresh and fruity" ??
John
On Oct 7, 2016, at 5:46 PM, rooty < arpsp...@protonmail.com> wrote:
r u the famous mEtaSploit hacker script righter
R u the famous "rooty tooty fresh and fruity" ??
John
> On Oct 7, 2016, at 5:46 PM, rooty wrote:
>
> r u the famous mEtaSploit hacker script righter - ge0rgi
>
>
>
> Original Message
> On Oct 7, 2016, 11:15 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
>
> On Fri,
>
> I figure it's best to ignore the implications of the simulation
> hypothesis. There's nothing to be done about it.
If I'm understanding you correctly, I find I quite agree, but for perhaps
different reasons, because I don't find the implications to be all that
difficult.
Whether reality is
> On Oct 7, 2016, at 2:15 PM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 12:49:35PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
>> Many believe that we live in a computer simulation. But it takes a
>> billionaire and his money to ask scientists to help break us out of
>> the
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 12:49:35PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> Many believe that we live in a computer simulation. But it takes a
> billionaire and his money to ask scientists to help break us out of
> the simulation. ...
lol, so billionaires are asking to root the virtual machine, get root on
the
On 09/22/2016 06:23 AM, John Newman wrote:
>
>> On Sep 22, 2016, at 12:34 AM, Mirimir wrote:
>> 'Quantum Thief' opens with prisoner's dilemma selection. Make numerous
>> digital copies, select for copies that cooperate, repeat.
>>
>> "As always, before the warmind and I shoot
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 03:15:40PM -0400, Steve Kinney wrote:
> None of this can or should persuade anyone but me that something
> damned strange is going on with this "reality" thing. But I was and
> remain so persuaded. Now the question is, what does it mean and what
> can I do with/to/about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/21/2016 10:36 AM, John Newman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 02:04:25PM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 03:33:24PM -0400, John wrote:
>> For me a plausible counter example appears a late Bulgarian
>> phenomenon
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 02:04:25PM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 03:33:24PM -0400, John wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> >
> >
> > On September 18, 2016 8:36:52 AM EDT, Georgi Guninski
> > wrote:
> > >The
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 03:33:24PM -0400, John wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
>
>
> On September 18, 2016 8:36:52 AM EDT, Georgi Guninski
> wrote:
> >The main problem is this scales upwards till infinity via arguments of
> >the form "who
> On Sep 20, 2016, at 11:39 PM, Mirimir wrote:
>
>> On 09/20/2016 09:22 PM, Tom wrote:
>> btw, I'd suggest reading Phil Plaits 'Death from the Skies!'. In this
>> book he examines a couple of scenarios how the universe might end (among
>> a couple other ways how we could
On 09/20/2016 09:22 PM, Tom wrote:
> btw, I'd suggest reading Phil Plaits 'Death from the Skies!'. In this
> book he examines a couple of scenarios how the universe might end (among
> a couple other ways how we could die). Very fun read.
There's The Killing Star by Charles R. Pellegrino and
On 09/17/2016 08:09 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> So many people have proposed we're simulated...
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation_hypothesis
>
> Now why would such an extremely advanced civilization / collective
> want to simulate us? Is this an unanswered question?
Maybe they're so advanced
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:48 PM, wrote:
> I find it difficult to believe in the heat death of the universe. The Big
> Crunch makes sense to me. The universe expands for a time, and collapses.
> Like breathing.
> But continual expansion with the universe turning into some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On September 18, 2016 8:36:52 AM EDT, Georgi Guninski
wrote:
>The main problem is this scales upwards till infinity via arguments of
>the form "who simulates the simulator?" and "who made what was before
>the big bang?".
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:09:30PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> So many people have proposed we're simulated...
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation_hypothesis
>
> Now why would such an extremely advanced civilization / collective
> want to simulate us? Is this an unanswered question?
>
I
Too cerebral.
It's interesting to me that the simulation hypothesis has so much in
common with Buddhist philosophy. In fact, Buddhism already answers this
sort of thing.
Alan Watts, as a Zen Buddhist, presented the view that life is essentially
a game played out at the cosmic level. All life is
18 matches
Mail list logo