(Yeah, if anyone spots a truly relevant item, commenting on it is
welcome. Or posting a URL. But simple game theory says that it's best that
people don't just bounce things they read to our list, something Choate,
mattd, and Jei seem to not understand.)
I store articles that interest me
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, proffr11 wrote:
I've also paid some dues in that I'm being prosecuted for endeavoring
to further crypto-anarchy.I've had one 3000$ notebook seized and held
over 8 months.I spit in the eye of happy fun court.I try and
propagate crypto-anarchist ideas in other forums,(like
Eric Murray wrote:
[...]
Spam on cpunks has gone WAY up in the last month or so... to the point
that on the raw feed there is usually significantly more spam than
content[1]. The only drawback to this filtering scheme is that I still
have to look at all the spam to make sure there isn't a
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Meyer Wolfsheim wrote:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Jei wrote:
I've never taken the list to be for only my purposes.
I forward and post what I find relevant and interesting.
Your definition of relevant is... interesting. You were the one who
forwarded the article about
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Jei wrote:
I've been on cpunks lists for years. The one before this got 100 spam
e-mails per day, and I don't mean news articles that people forwarded.
Frankly, I don't see why people are so soft-skinned about the topic.
The whole concept is fuzzy at best and until our
On Tuesday, February 5, 2002, at 07:36 PM, Jei wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Tim May wrote:
(Yeah, if anyone spots a truly relevant item, commenting on it is
welcome. Or posting a URL. But simple game theory says that it's best
that people don't just bounce things they read to our list,
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Petro wrote:
Bullshit.
I'd have less of your passed-along drivel in my mailbox, 5 or ten less
items to delete, a few more seconds to spend on *worthwhile* articles.
Here's a good rule of thumb, if you can't think of 2 or 4 paragraphs
to say about
[1] this isn't true of the other lists that I run some of which have
been around for many years, and get very little spam. I think that
it's pretty obvious that one or more people are luring spam to cpunks
in order to discourage the discussions that happen here.
This has been obvious for
On Tuesday, February 5, 2002, at 11:03 AM, Eric Murray wrote:
Lne.com CDR subscribers won't see them, but someone is signing
up the ssz node to a lot of web mail lists roughly 30 as of
this morning. The IP addr of the host generating the subscription
requests is 62.211.132.149, which
At 12:14 AM 2/6/2002 +0100, Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer wrote:
Could it be that there is a subspecies genetically adapted to work for the government
? There is a very strong evolutionary pressure here - they would get more chance to
procreate than their victims.
Which brings
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Tim May wrote:
(Yeah, if anyone spots a truly relevant item, commenting on it is
welcome. Or posting a URL. But simple game theory says that it's best
that people don't just bounce things they read to our list, something
Choate, mattd, and Jei seem to not understand.)
genetic information. The target's histocompatibility markers. Just walk by
their car and take a swipe of the door handle (warning: could also target
family members and parking attendants).
Looks like pretty soon the knowledge of someone's GATC code will be deadly.
Time to put on those 6'
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:36:29AM +0200, Jei wrote:
My logic tells me it is best to ensure the widest coverage to issues you
care about, get as many sources as you can, and simply ram down the facts
as many people's troats as you can,
Many people on this list don't appreciate having stuff
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Eric Murray wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:36:29AM +0200, Jei wrote:
My logic tells me it is best to ensure the widest coverage to issues you
care about, get as many sources as you can, and simply ram down the facts
as many people's troats as you can,
Many
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Morlock Elloi wrote:
genetic information. The target's histocompatibility markers. Just walk by
their car and take a swipe of the door handle (warning: could also target
family members and parking attendants).
Looks like pretty soon the knowledge of someone's GATC
15 matches
Mail list logo
