[dane] I'm off traveling...

Hi there all, I will be traveling for the next 2 or so weeks. While I will be checking email, I may be taking a bunch longer to respond… IETF 84 is fast approaching. We *do* have a slot scheduled, and would like to use that to discuss the How to do DANE with $foo documents (and the future of

Re: [dane] Preliminary agenda for IETF 84

On Jul 10, 2012, at 4:10 AM, Ondřej Surý wrote: Hi, I have created draft agenda from what I have heard on/off-list. Please see attached file and object if you want to change anything. No objections from me, but thanks to Ondrej for organizing this, I've been asleep at the wheel… W

Re: [dane] IANA registry not linked to?

On Aug 27, 2012, at 6:24 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 11:02:48AM -0700, Paul Hoffman paul.hoff...@vpnc.org wrote a message of 11 lines which said: Yes, it definitely is. Done and fixed by IANA. Excellent, thank you (and the IANA). W

Re: [dane] [dns-operations] DNSSEC DANE testing

On Oct 18, 2012, at 5:56 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote: In message 507fb355.4030...@afnic.fr, sandoche BALAKRICHENAN writes: Hi Paul, I have deliberately added a bogus RRSIG record to https://dane-broken.rd.nic.fr;. But the firefox add-on seems to successfully validate

[dane] Call for Adoption - draft-fanf-dane-mua-00

Dear DANE Working Group, This starts a 4-week (because of time of year) consensus call on adopting draft-fanf-dane-mua-00 as a DANE WG document. --- DRAFT INFO --- Draft: draft-fanf-dane-mua-00 Title: DNSSEC and TLSA records for IMAP, POP3, and message submission Number of

[dane] Call for Adoption - draft-fanf-dane-smtp-04

Dear DANE Working Group, This starts a 4-week (because of time of year) consensus call on adopting draft-fanf-dane-smtp-04 as a DANE WG document. - DRAFT INFO Title : Secure SMTP with TLS, DNSSEC and TLSA records. Author(s) : Tony Finch Filename:

Re: [dane] Call for Adoption - draft-fanf-dane-smtp-04

On Dec 20, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote: Dear DANE Working Group, This starts a 4-week (because of time of year) consensus call on adopting draft-fanf-dane-smtp-04 as a DANE WG document. Hi all, This is a reminder to please submit feedback on adopting

[dane] Call for Adoption - draft-fanf-dane-mua-00

On Dec 20, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote: Dear DANE Working Group, This starts a 4-week (because of time of year) consensus call on adopting draft-fanf-dane-mua-00 as a DANE WG document. --- DRAFT INFO --- Draft: draft-fanf-dane-mua-00 Title

Re: [dane] Call for Adoption - draft-fanf-dane-smtp-04

On Jan 23, 2013, at 6:36 PM, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote: On Dec 20, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote: Dear DANE Working Group, This starts a 4-week (because of time of year) consensus call on adopting draft-fanf-dane-smtp-04 as a DANE WG document

Re: [dane] To DANE or to WebFinger?

On May 3, 2013, at 8:15 AM, Leif Johansson le...@mnt.se wrote: On 05/03/2013 01:47 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: +1 to the original post and Paul's. Putting per user data in the DNS is a lousy approach, it has never been a succes because the DNS administrators are typically network

Re: [dane] Call for Agenda items

On May 25, 2013, at 1:09 PM, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote: Hi all, It seems that we probably have enough new material / discussions to warrant meeting in Berlin. So, please let us know, by the end of the month, if you'd like time on the agenda. So far it seems we only have

Re: [dane] DNS hosting

-- Frederico Neves has been promising to do a write up with screenshots and such, but keeps getting sidetracked... W Warren Kumari -- Please excuse typing, etc -- This was sent from a device with a tiny keyboard. On Aug 3, 2013, at 10:08 AM, Paul M paulit...@gmail.com wrote: Jack

[dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronym

to the list, clearly stating your view. This WGLC ends Thu 03-Oct-2013. Thanks, Warren Kumari (as DANE WG co-chair) On Sep 19, 2013, at 4:12 PM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the DNS

Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronym

Nir wrote: Me too. This one works: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-00 On Sep 19, 2013, at 11:25 PM, Andreas Schulze s...@andreasschulze.de wrote: Zitat von Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-registry

Re: [dane] draft-ietf-dane-srv

On Sep 19, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Viktor Dukhovni viktor1d...@dukhovni.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:30:59PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote: It seems that draft-ietf-dane-srv has expired. Does the document editor (and, more important, the WG) still have an interest in moving this forward?

Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-dukhovni-dane-ops

Bugger. I *obviously* should not be doing anything with a computer today… I ran the wrong script… This was supposed to be a call for adoption…. Please disregard… Ever have one of those days?! I'm having one of those weeks… W On Sep 19, 2013, at 7:11 PM, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote

[dane] Adopting draft-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane.

Dear DANE, During the Berlin meeting it was proposed that draft-ietf-dane-smtp be merged with draft-dukhovni-smtp-opportunistic-tls. There was very strong support for doing so. It appears that the author of draft-ietf-dane-smtp does not have sufficient free cycles to continue working on this,

Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronym

On Oct 16, 2013, at 4:41 PM, Olafur Gudmundsson o...@ogud.com wrote: On Oct 6, 2013, at 5:38 PM, Jim Schaad i...@augustcellars.com wrote: Sorry for being late on getting this in. 1. I do not understand the reasoning behind the 2119 language in the introduction. How would one test

[dane] On the PKIX-TA / PKIX-CA question… [ One week WGLC ]

Hi all, So, it seems that I judged consensus without enough data. I should know by now that naming things is always a fun topic :-) So, lets try and get this what to call it question nailed down once and for all. Please express a preference for: PKIX-TA PKIX-CA DANE-something I don't think

[dane] Meeting in London...

Hi there all, So, we received the message in Vancouver -- I have just requested a 2 hour slot for DANE in London. See y'all then :-) W -- Eagles soar but a weasel will never get sucked into a jet engine ___ dane mailing list dane@ietf.org

Re: [dane] On the PKIX-TA / PKIX-CA question? [ One week WGLC ]

On Dec 5, 2013, at 12:53 PM, Viktor Dukhovni viktor1d...@dukhovni.org wrote: The sample size of responses seems too small to reach a meaningful consensus. Unfortunately both to small, and not all in agreement. I’m going to extend this LC to Wednesday and suggest that, if we don’t get

[dane] Calling the naming issue...

Dear DANE WG, We (the chairs) have met and discussed this issue with our AD (CCed). We still see there being consensus for the document itself, and have seen a number of cases and discussions where more memorable names for the ordinals would have been useful (the at mic discussions in Berlin

Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-03.txt

On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:45 PM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities Working Group of the IETF. This just adds a note to the abstract

[dane] Meeting at IETF89 (London).

Hi all, We have requested a 2 hour DNAE session in London. It has been a while since we met -- please get your agenda requests in... Preference is given to already discussed drafts, things that need face to face time, etc. A very quick update on the DANE for IETF mail situation: The IETF mail

Re: [dane] Meeting at IETF89 (London).

And more than a quarter of our slot is already spoken for -- please remember to ask early if you'd like some agenda time. W On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote: Hi all, We have requested a 2 hour DNAE session in London. It has been a while since we met

Re: [dane] Feature creep for draft-ietf-dane-smime

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Viktor Dukhovni viktor1d...@dukhovni.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 06:19:15PM +, Osterweil, Eric wrote: Either way of computing the hash of the full address, rather than just the local part adds no complexity, and makes off-line attacks more

[dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane

. B: if there are any issues we can discuss them in London. Thanks, Warren Kumari (as DANE WG co-chair) ___ dane mailing list dane@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane

[dane] Reminder about IPR relating to draft-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane

under BCP 79. Please do not reply unless you want to make such a voluntary disclosure. Online tools for filing IPR disclosures can be found at http://www.ietf.org/ipr/file-disclosure. Thanks, Warren Kumari (as DANE WG co-chair) ___ dane mailing list

Re: [dane] Lukewarm discussion: DANE for opportunistic TLS protocols

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Paul Hoffman paul.hoff...@vpnc.org wrote: On Feb 14, 2014, at 2:50 PM, James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com wrote: The only real question is whether dane-srv and dane-smtp-with-dane should be published as two rfcs or combined into one? (I'm leaning towards two,

[dane] Adopting draft-wouters-dane-openpgp and draft-wouters-dane-openpgpkey-usage

Wed 12-Mar-2014. Thanks, Warren Kumari (as DANE WG co-chair) ___ dane mailing list dane@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane

[dane] DANE Agenda

Hi all. Please find the updated agenda. We have 6 or 7 drafts on the agenda this time. Please read them ahead of time so you can be primed with (intelligent!) questions :-) W DANE - Administrivia (Sit down, blue-sheets, agenda bashing) Warren / Ondrej - 5 minutes. DANE - key

Re: [dane] Slides for IETF 89

And I've posted them :-) W On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Matt Miller mamil...@cisco.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 My slides for the DANE session are available at https://outer-planes.net/~linuxwolf/ietf/ietf89-danewg-srv.pdf . Feedback is welcome. See you

[dane] Agenda for Toronto.

Hi there, The Toronto meeting is approaching. Based upon last times attendance, etc we have requested a 2 hour slot. If you'd like some time on the agenda, please let us know soon, or you might not get a slot. W ___ dane mailing list dane@ietf.org

[dane] Compressed Call for Adoption: draft-gilmore-dane-rawkeys-00

for adoption to instead be a single week. Please let us know clearly if you *object* to this document being adopted, with a clear explanation of why. Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. This call for adoption ends Monday 07-Jul-2014. Thanks, Warren Kumari (as DANE WG co

[dane] IPR check on draft-gilmore-dane-rawkeys-00

. Online tools for filing IPR disclosures can be found at http://www.ietf.org/ipr/file-disclosure. We will be doing this all again when (and if) the document goes to WGLC. Thanks, Warren Kumari (as DANE WG co-chair, with the process hat on!) ___ dane

[dane] Call for agenda items.

Hi there DANEites, We still have free agenda time for the upcoming London meeting. Please let us know if you would like some... The sooner you request time, the more likely you are to get some... Remember, we give priority to documents that have open issues than would benefit from in person

[dane] Draft minutes from IETF90

Huge thanks to Geoff for taking these. Will be posted as final minutes if there are no corrections by Friday. W -- Administrivia DANE status, (appoint scribes, blue-sheets, agenda bashing) Chairs - 5 min DANE has a new charter, and the DANE specification documents will be

[dane] Meeting in Hawaii?

Dear DANE, We have requested a 2 hour slot for Hawaii, however, we have not seen much activity since Toronto, and so are thinking of handing the time back. Please let us know if you'd really like to meet, and open issues on documents that need discussing. Also, if you have a doc, we'd like it

Re: [dane] Meeting in Hawaii?

On Wednesday, October 1, 2014, Dan York y...@isoc.org wrote: Warren, (and everyone else) On Sep 29, 2014, at 4:10 PM, Jakob Schlyter ja...@kirei.se javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ja...@kirei.se'); wrote: On 27 sep 2014, at 02:52, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml

Re: [dane] List of incidents that DANE would have blocked?

On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:38 AM, Rene Bartsch i...@bartschnet.de wrote: Am 2014-10-01 18:37, schrieb William Stouder-Studenmund: I learned about DANE recently and was excitedly talking to some operations friends of mine about it. Some of them work in shops that aren’t using DNSSEC yet, and

[dane] Requests for agenda time...

Hi all, A reminder to please send us your requests for agenda time for the upcoming meeting. We give priority to documents that have outstanding issues, then those that have gotten a lot of discussion. W -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first

Re: [dane] Requests for agenda time...

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net wrote: On 10/7/14, 3:30 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Jakob Schlyter ja...@kirei.se wrote: On 7 okt 2014, at 14:25, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote: A reminder to please send us your

Re: [dane] draft-ietf-dane-smime

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote: [top post at random place in thread ] I'd like everyone to take a breath and step back for a minute. I'd like to (off list) arrange a call with Paul and Eric so we can summarize this to be as concise as possible

Re: [dane] DANE WG Interim Virtual Meeting, December 2, 2014

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Olafur Gudmundsson o...@ogud.com wrote: Dear colleagues Just a reminder that the virtual meeting is happening next week on Tuesday. Please send in usage statements ASAP, as that will help frame the discussion Also, please read

[dane] Draft minutes posted.

Hi, First off, huge thanks to Allison Mankin for taking clear and detailed minutes. I have just posted them as *draft* minutes, please let me know within the next 7 days if you see any errors, or we'll count them as final. Posted here: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/minutes/minutes-91-dane

[dane] Draft Minutes from interim meeting.

Hi all, DANE just had it's first interim meeting, and we think it went off really well. Thanks to everyone who participated, and to Russ and Doug who volunteered to take notes. They are posted here: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/interim/2014/12/02/dane/minutes/minutes-interim-2014-dane-1

[dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey - *please* review.

of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.) Thanks, Warren Kumari (as DANE WG co-chair) -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad

Re: [dane] Comments on draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-02 (fwd)

the contents of this, and possibly other documents. We need a single, clean way to deal with finding things associated with an email address, not one per document... W On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote: Ok, so there are still a number of outstanding things we need

Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey - *please* review.

: are you OK with the general document? A clear Yes, this is good or No, worst idea ever would be useful. I'd really like more then 3 or 4 people commenting. W On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote: Dear DANE WG, The author of draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey has

[dane] Preliminary agenda posted.

http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/92/agenda/agenda-92-dane What: DANE When: TUESDAY, March 24, 2015, 1730-1830 Where: Venetian Agenda: Administrivia Olafur / Warren 10 minutes Verisign IPSEC DANE Glen Wiley, Eric Osterweil 20 minutes As you can see, we don't have a very full

Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey - *please* review.

Thanks everyone for your feedback and comments, the WGLC is now closed. I think that it looks like there is strong consensus for publishing, but I'm hoping to re-read all the comments on my flight home (currently sitting in TXL) to see if I've missed anything obvious... W On Sat, Mar 14, 2015

Re: [dane] Payment association records

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Wiley, Glen gwi...@verisign.com wrote: A few of us have put some work into an 00 draft describing a DANE like RR that would provide an association for payment information via the DNS. The abstract from the draft reads: There is no standard, interoperable

Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey - *please* review.

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Rose, Scott W. scott.r...@nist.gov wrote: On Feb 23, 2015, at 12:31 PM, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote: [ Meta top post ] I'd like to also draw attention to the companion document draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-usage ( http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc

[dane] WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-ops-07

personally aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-dane-ops? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.) Thanks, Warren Kumari (as DANE WG co-chair) -- I don't think the execution is relevant when

[dane] A reminder about RFC 6982 - The Implementation Status Section.

Hi all, A quick reminder to the WG about RFC 6982: Improving Awareness of Running Code: The Implementation Status Section. Authors, if you are aware of implementations of your proposal, please include an Implementation Status section in your draft. Showing that there are implementations

Re: [dane] WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-ops-07

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote: Dear DANE WG, The authors of draft-ietf-dane-ops have indicated that they believe that the document is ready, and have asked for Working Group Last Call (actually, they requested this a while back, we'd delayed while

Re: [dane] trying to understand dane better

On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Jigar Joshi jiga...@gmail.com wrote: I was using this https://www.dnssec-validator.cz/ I got this icon [image: Inline image 2] for a local network url which is over http (no https support for that url) however hovering over still says secured by dnssec

Re: [dane] trying to understand dane better

at 8:05 AM, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote: On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Jigar Joshi jiga...@gmail.com wrote: I was using this https://www.dnssec-validator.cz/ I got this icon [image: Inline image 2] for a local network url which is over http (no https support for that url

[dane] Virtual Queue Experiment for DANE

Hi all, The secretariat / remote participation folk would like you to complete a survey on how the Virtual Queue Experiment went (the thing that looked like PacMan and have a queue that folk could join). Survey is here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/92dane Thanks, W -- I don't think the

Re: [dane] DANE works, thanks

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Viktor Dukhovni ietf-d...@dukhovni.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 06:26:27PM +0200, A. Schulze wrote: Barry Leiba encourage me to write this it works message. Thanks for the confirmation. OK, the total number of DNSSEC enabled destinations is small.

[dane] Fwd: Third and FINAL call for volunteers, Nomcom 2015-2016

Terriberry Tina (Ting) Tsou (Zou) TIRUMALESWAR REDDY KONDA Tobias Gondrom Toerless Eckert Tomohiro Fujisaki Tony Hansen Uma Chunduri Vic Liu Vijay Gurbani Warren Kumari Wassim Haddad Wijnands IJsbrand Xufeng Liu Yi Zhao Yihong Huang Yizhou Li Yuanlong Jiang Zhaohui Zhang -- I don't think the execution

[dane] Agenda requests for Prague.

Hi all, We have requested a slot at the upcoming meeting in Prague (IETF93). Please send over agenda requests if you would like some time. We give priority to drafts that have received significant discussion and have open issues. If we do not have sufficient material to justify meeting we will

Re: [dane] Deferral of SMIME draft

Thanks to everyone who offered to help author, but that's not the issue - the current authors are interested, able, and involved. Rather the issues include a lack of clear agreement on the email address processing and difficulty in getting actual review and feedback on drafts. We have quite

[dane] Draft agenda posted.

Hi all, We have just posted the draft agenda for Prague. What: DANE - DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities When: Monday Afternoon session IV (18:50-19:50) Where: Congress Hall II Agenda: Administrivia Olafur / Warren 10 minutes TLS extension for DNSSEC chain Shumon Huque 15 minutes

Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-ops-08.txt (chair guidance request)

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Viktor Dukhovni ietf-d...@dukhovni.org wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 04:08:35PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote: With Section 9 ideally no longer under a cloud of uncertainty, we would

[dane] NomCom 2015-2016 Call for Volunteers -- please consider volunteering.

Hi all, I wanted to make sure that you had all seen the NomCom 2015-2016 Call for Volunteers emails form Harald. This should be viewed as an important responsibility - having a strong IAB and IESG is important to a well functioning IETF. *Please* consider volunteering - and remember, the more

Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-ops-08.txt (chair guidance request)

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Viktor Dukhovni ietf-d...@dukhovni.org wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 04:08:35PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote: With Section 9 ideally no longer under a cloud of uncertainty, we would also update section 12: We have heard nothing from the working group saying

[dane] Call for agenda items for Prague

Hi all, The Prague IETF meeting is approaching. We have requested some agenda time, please let us know if you would like some time to present. Please also keep in mind that we give time to documents that have had discussion onlist, and that have open issues that will benefit from discussions.

Re: [dane] clarify, are SMIMEA and OPENPGPKEY drafts experimental?

On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 1:58 AM, Scott Kitterman skl...@kitterman.com wrote: On Thursday, July 30, 2015 08:31:02 AM Olafur Gudmundsson wrote: On Jul 28, 2015, at 8:11 AM, Wiley, Glen gwi...@verisign.com wrote: Was a decision taken to make the SMIMEA and OPENPGPKEY drafts experimental

Re: [dane] Skiing Down the ALPS ⛰: Alternative Local-Part Synthesis for DANE (draft-seantek-dane-alps-00.txt)

I encourage everyone to read this, especially if you are new to the DANE local parts discussion -- I'm not sure about the solution, nor if DANE is the appropriate place for this, but it is interesting and frames the discussion well... W On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Sean Leonard

Re: [dane] DNS-Record type for SMIMEA

.lo...@posteo.de> wrote: > Hi Warren, > > It would be great if you could do that, thanks > > Best regards > Patrik > > Am 25.08.2015 um 23:40 schrieb Warren Kumari: >> >> >> On Tuesday, August 25, 2015, Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net >> <mailto:war..

Re: [dane] DNS-Record type for SMIMEA

On Tuesday, August 25, 2015, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote: On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Olafur Gudmundsson o...@ogud.com javascript:; wrote: Nobody has submitted the request form. ... also known as: If someone would like a DNS RR for SMIMEA, please write up a short draft

[dane] 3 drafts now in RFC Editor state.

Hi all, Just a quick note... draft-ietf-dane-ops, draft-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane and draft-ietf-dane-srv all just changed to RFC Editor state. I'd like to once again thank the WG, and the authors in particular for all of their hard work here, and for bearing with us W -- I don't think

Re: [dane] DANE meeting at IETF95 in BA

A reminder - y'all told us that you want DANE to meet in BA, and that there is still much work to be done (yay!), but we have not seen any requests, or recent, promised documents / updates (boo!) W On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 6:02 PM Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote: > Hi al

Re: [dane] Meeting plans for Buenos Aires?

On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 6:32 AM Alexey Melnikov wrote: > > On 5 Feb 2016, at 01:53, John R Levine wrote: > > >> Thanks for the suggestion! I'd prefer to try to recharter the current > group > >> with any new work items first, before this more drastic

[dane] DANE meeting at IETF95 in BA

Hi all, We are glad to see all of the enthusiasm and desire to get more work done[0] in response to our "Are we done here?" email. We've requested a meeting slow in Buenos Aires, and would like to have a productive meeting - as always we will be giving meeting time to documents which have open

Re: [dane] Why shut down the DANE group?

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 3:54 PM Patrik Fältström wrote: > On 1 Mar 2016, at 21:37, Geoff Huston wrote: > > > Sometimes the lies we tell ourselves just get in the way. This is one > such case. > > Yup! > > My view for DNSSEC: > > Will be deployed in the same speed as new DNS

Re: [dane] DANE meeting at IETF95 in BA

Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote: > A reminder - y'all told us that you want DANE to meet in BA, and that > there is still much work to be done (yay!), but we have not seen any > requests, or recent, promised documents / updates (boo!) > > W > > > On Fri, Feb 12,

[dane] Cancelled: DANE meeting at IETF95.

Dear Colleagues The chairs scheduled a meeting and asked for agenda items. At this point there is insufficient material for us to justify meeting in person thus we are canceling the meeting. We hope that DNSOP may be able to take our slot (DNS-OARC meets just before the IETF meeting, and having a

Re: [dane] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 7:02 AM Alexey Melnikov wrote: > Hi Paul, > A very quick reply, as I am travelling. I will do a longer version later: > > > On 19 Apr 2016, at 21:05, Paul Wouters wrote: > > > > I will need guidance from the IESG on how to

Re: [dane] Working group Last call: draft-ietf-dane-smime-11.txt

On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On 9 Jul 2016, at 11:15, John Levine wrote: > >> Section 3 is wrong > > > The wording in this draft matches the wording in draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey > that has IETF consensus. Get over it. Yup. Much of the WG

Re: [dane] AD review of draft-ietf-dane-smime-14

Thank you. W On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > > Hiya, > > Thanks for checking. As I didn't see any objections, I've > asked for IETF LC to be started. > > Cheers, > S. > > On 13/02/17 17:32, Warren Kumari

Re: [dane] AD review of draft-ietf-dane-smime-14

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Marc Groeneweg wrote: >>>the IPR declaration's statement that licensing information >>>will be provided "later." > As we had with the keyrelay draft in regext (and the draft of Peter Koch with > DNSSEC transfers). Can you remind us what

Re: [dane] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6698 (3594)

Hello all, So, this errata was filed, but it seems never officially closed out - RFC6698 was updated by RFC7671 - "The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol: Updates and Operational Guidance". What would the WG (especially the submitter) like us to do with this errata? I

Re: [dane] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6698 (3594)

On Tuesday, September 13, 2016, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-d...@dukhovni.org> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 02:36:56PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote: > > > So, this errata was filed, but it seems never officially closed out - > > RFC6698 was updated by RFC7671 - "

Re: [dane] WG Action: Conclusion of DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities (dane)

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 6:33 PM, IESG Secretary wrote: > The DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities (dane) working group in > the Security Area has concluded. The IESG contact persons are Stephen > Farrell and Kathleen Moriarty. > > The mailing list will remain open.

Re: [dane] Need some feed back

[ - a bunch of addresses on the CC list ] DANE / Pradeep, I manually approved this posting - I would like to note that this, like the previous email, is off-topic for the DANE list. Pradeep, you have been warned against this sort of behavior on other mailing lists (as an example,

Re: [dane] DANE coming to Microsoft O365 (In case you did not already see the announcement elsewhere)

On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 6:16 PM Nico Williams wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 05:38:50PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > Here's the story from "El Reg": > > https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/04/07/microsoft_dane_office/ > > Let me be the first to congratulate you here. > > For those who