On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 02:12:46 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
I see to important HTTP related issues: 996 and 1035. Did I forget anything?
Perhaps issue876? I guess we've known about this one for a while, and
we wouldn't be making it any worse.
1) leave pipelining enabled by default,
Dear patch theory enthusiasts,
As most of you know, I've been working on a patch theory for darcs. The
new theory is similar to darcs 2's, but simpler, and should solve the
correctness issues.
There is now an implementation, minidarcs, of my proposed new theory. It
only implements a subset of
Hi Zooko,
Any chance you would be able to modify the WinXP build slave to use MSYS
for testing instead of Cygwin? We could start supporting Cygwin, but
perhaps it would be a better use of manpower to postpone such a decision
until 2.0.3 is released.
Thanks!
--
Eric Kow
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 01:42:01PM +0100, Edwin Thomson wrote:
Edwin Thomson wrote:
I've been using nested repositories for a couple of years, and have
never come across a case where darcs manipulates things in the
sub-repository, as far as I remember.
Correction - there is a case:
On Sep 8, 2008, at 6:49 AM, Eric Kow wrote:
Hi Zooko,
Any chance you would be able to modify the WinXP build slave to use
MSYS
for testing instead of Cygwin?
No, sorry. That machine is serving several other purposes and the
software installed on it can't be changed for this purpose.
By the way, the next release of buildbot is going to come out soon,
and it is fixed to no longer send false alarm squawks when
buildslaves disconnect and reconnect.
I will be busy this week with a new feature for Tahoe (the
decentralized secure filesystem), but next week I will upgrade the
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
In any case, I'm hoping that John Dias's current work on the back end will
mean that GHC becomes a cross-compiler, which will make portability a lot
easier.
GHC will only cross-compile to architectures for which it already has a
native code generator. So
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 12:57:31PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would be happy to amend/consolidate some or all of these patches as needed.
But I think this stuff is harmless enough that I can just fast-track it. Will
wait a little bit to see if anybody has complaints.
Sun Sep 7
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 10:48:27AM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
The theory description has also been slowly improving since my last
mail. The build-up, sections 1-7, should now be much more readable;
following discussions in #darcs-theory, I plan to add something about
minimal contexts, and
I'm fast-tracking this one.
I'm willing to accept a little mess in our test suites if this is what it takes
for us to have a useful Windows buildslave. This does not imply any sort of
official Cygwin support (e.g. when triaging incoming bug requests).
Mon Sep 8 15:06:40 BST 2008 Eric Kow
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 10:07:29AM -0400, David Roundy wrote:
It might be worth mentioning in your documentation that while the
internals are similar to darcs 2, the semantics that you're
implementing is the semantics of darcs 1.
Are you referring to not treating duplicate patches specially?
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 10:07:29AM -0400, David Roundy wrote:
It might be worth mentioning in your documentation that while the
internals are similar to darcs 2, the semantics that you're
implementing is the semantics of
It certainly happened twice in a row.
But I've now updated to version 2.02 + 76 patches and it didn't happen. So
let's provisionally assume that it was a 2.0.1rc2 problem.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: Ian Lynagh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: 05 September 2008 22:38
| To:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 02:33:22PM -, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
Problem is this: Darcs is hung saying Merging them 64/197. So
far it's consumed 8 minutes of CPU time on a fast machine.
I've seen some similar problems with darcs get, when I initially
started my mirroring game. Killing darcs
Another fast-trackee
Mon Sep 8 18:49:48 BST 2008 Eric Kow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Do no word splitting after expansion in pwd-based shell tests.
Lest darcs/Cygwin be confused by spaces in the pwd output.
New patches:
[Do no word splitting after expansion in pwd-based shell tests.
Eric Kow
Mon Sep 8 21:57:26 MSD 2008 Dmitry Kurochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Add -[-no]-http-pipelining options, disable pipelining by default for curl
7.19.1.
New patches:
[Add -[-no]-http-pipelining options, disable pipelining by default for curl 7.19.1.
Dmitry Kurochkin [EMAIL
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 05:54:27PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another fast-trackee
Mon Sep 8 18:49:48 BST 2008 Eric Kow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Do no word splitting after expansion in pwd-based shell tests.
Lest darcs/Cygwin be confused by spaces in the pwd output.
[Do no word
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Dmitry Kurochkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mon Sep 8 21:57:26 MSD 2008 Dmitry Kurochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Add -[-no]-http-pipelining options, disable pipelining by default for curl
7.19.1.
I can't comment on the technical aspects, but it seems like there
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:05 AM, David Roundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 05:54:27PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another fast-trackee
Mon Sep 8 18:49:48 BST 2008 Eric Kow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Do no word splitting after expansion in pwd-based shell tests.
Lest
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:13:40AM -0700, Jason Dagit wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:05 AM, David Roundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 05:54:27PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another fast-trackee
Mon Sep 8 18:49:48 BST 2008 Eric Kow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Do no
Excerpts from [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s message of Mon Sep 08 20:13:40 +0200 2008:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:05 AM, David Roundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 05:54:27PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another fast-trackee
Mon Sep 8 18:49:48 BST 2008 Eric Kow [EMAIL
On Sep 8, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
+IFS=
REPO_ABS=`portable_pwd`
If I well the conventional way is:
REPO_ABS=`portable_pwd`
I tried that first and it didn't work. The resulting value of
REPO_ABS in cygwin bash was:
C:\Documents
and
Settings\etc
when it ought to have
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 05:54:27PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another fast-trackee
Mon Sep 8 18:49:48 BST 2008 Eric Kow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Do no word splitting after expansion in pwd-based shell tests.
Lest darcs/Cygwin be confused by spaces in the pwd output.
Applied, even though
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:29:49AM -0400, David Roundy wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 10:07:29AM -0400, David Roundy wrote:
That would be more honest than to say that your theory is similar to
that of darcs 2.
I'm
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 01:04:45PM +0100, Eric Kow wrote:
Just a quick update on the recent progress towards 2.0.3. Earlier, I
reported that we have no regressions in our bugs directory since darcs
2.0.2.
This morning, I reviewed the list of known regressions on the bug
tracker. I have
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Jason Dagit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
This is an updated version of the patches I have. I still need
feedback on them. I removed a bunch of unsafeCoercePs and fixed the
compile problems on 6.6.
I'll send another email describing the problems in the
26 matches
Mail list logo
