Are there any plans to add additional NR algorithms like KREMY
(http://aggregate.org/DIT/KREMY/) to DT?
___
darktable developer mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
* Andrey [11-05-18 15:02]:
> New feature (filters stack widget) to rearrange filters, pin filter to
> apply changes in place where it was initiated :)
> *It's not clear where the last change (on top of the history) is applied.
>
>
> пн, 5 нояб. 2018 г. в 22:29, William Ferguson :
>
> > I like
Hi,
I'm still looking how to simplify the process for creating noise profiles. So
I did a new experiment today.
However nobody really explained the plots to me. Could someone do that?
New test setup:
https://discuss.pixls.us/t/fujifilm-x-t3-support-tracking-discussion/9243/15?
u=asn
I just
New feature (filters stack widget) to rearrange filters, pin filter to
apply changes in place where it was initiated :)
*It's not clear where the last change (on top of the history) is applied.
пн, 5 нояб. 2018 г. в 22:29, William Ferguson :
> I like the last photo. I think that really
On 5.11.18 09:34, Rolf Meyerhoff wrote:
if you have followed the UI refactoring discussion lately then you will
have noticed that the intended target audience for DT are programmers
and graphics nerds who really know what each module does, [...]
Rolf nails the issue.
The basic problem this
I like the last photo. I think that really captures the essence of
darktable. :-)
I stopped at the denoise and didn't really set out to finish processing the
image, so the colors on the bear aren't the same. However, the detail is
still there and wasn't affected by the denoising. I did blow
After reading all the posts in this thread i want send my own view to
this. RT and DT are both great tools with different pros and cons. The
most important points for me are:
RT is much simpler to use and the denoise-modul gives great results
without hour-long parameter tweaking or years of
Hi,
I'm a programmer, graphics nerd and photographer so DT fits me very
well. :-)
I really like to have all the power of DT available when I need it.
Recently I had to edit over 1500 scans of very degenerated photos from
the 70s and DT did a fantastic job that no other raw converter could
have
Thank you for the detailed answer. It is worth placing on DT's main page.
пн, 5 нояб. 2018 г. в 17:47, Rolf Meyerhoff :
> Hi,
>
> if you have followed the UI refactoring discussion lately then you will
> have noticed that the intended target audience for DT are programmers
> and graphics nerds
Hi Rolf,
I am not a programmer nor a graphic nerd. I simply take potographs in my
spare time.
I like dt because I know I have in my hands a powerful tool.
No matter if I use it 100% or 10%
I know dt is SO powerful thereby I have a large margin for improvement.
Moreover I feel curious and I like
Hi,
if you have followed the UI refactoring discussion lately then you will
have noticed that the intended target audience for DT are programmers
and graphics nerds who really know what each module does, in which order
the modules have to be edited, how the modules interact with each other,
when
You are the man! At last I saw it with my own eyes. I will try to repeat
this but I would appreciate for preset to learn on.
Thanks, Dominik!
пн, 5 нояб. 2018 г. в 16:30, Dominik Markiewicz :
> Hi,
>
> > The issue with darktable is that nobody can make the image as clear, as
> with RT or DPP.
..that old picture again? it has a ton of noise in green. fwiw i like
what i can do in dt better than the fine grained noise that stays in
the OP's RT version. but as pascal pointed out, it seems to be a waste
of time to comment on this here. noise preferences are very
subjective, and yes, by all
I like DT. I've spent a lot of time exploring related materials, trying to
get most of nr. I prepared a demonstrative picture and asked people to
teach me (time to time - forums and irc channel - last 2 years). Yes, I
keep using DPP. What is the point of my last try here you think?! To sit on
a
Hi,
> The issue with darktable is that nobody can make the image as clear, as
with RT or DPP. With all of it's power and all of competitors' 2-slider
weakness.
I believe it's quite good:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BSQA2Q49RwLVcs9TzB8v79ROW-vR-V4n/view?usp=sharing
(also a few seconds,
Hello Andrey,
why do you discuss this on the dev mailing list? Is this supposed to be a
bug report or a feature request? Than put it in the appropriate place (but
with a proper description of the bug/desire feature).
To me it looks more like something for the play raw sub forum (
пн, 5 нояб. 2018 г. в 14:17, Sturm Flut :
> Hi,
>
> ignoring that this is one of the cases where not setting the camera to
> "Auto" would have resulted in a much better picture and avoided most of
> the issue to begin with:
>
Av-priority. Just a technical image to explore nr tools.
>
> Profiled
Hi Andrey,
Sorry guys - nobody showed me the power of dt yet.
> Thanks. Sorry for disturbance. Good luck.
>
Your messages sound like nothing will make you change your mind. You're set
on a mode where you think dt is a crap at denoising images. So no problem.
Keep using DPP is this fits your
Hi,
ignoring that this is one of the cases where not setting the camera to
"Auto" would have resulted in a much better picture and avoided most of
the issue to begin with:
Profiled Denoise in Wavelet mode with strength 0.2 already looks pretty
identical to what DPP does, at least to me. XMP is
Sorry guys - nobody showed me the power of dt yet.
Thanks. Sorry for disturbance. Good luck.
пн, 5 нояб. 2018 г. в 13:48, Maurizio Paglia :
> Ciao Andrey,
> believe me: I understand your frustration but I can assure dt can give you
> optimal results with no pain.
> Its GUI can intimidate many
Ciao Andrey,
believe me: I understand your frustration but I can assure dt can give you
optimal results with no pain.
Its GUI can intimidate many users because it is "Linux style" (RT imitate
LR so it is more friendly to many people) but you cannot have power with a
'single slider' interface...
I have read the manual. Please, read the whole discussion and try to
process the image with RT close enough to DPP or RT.
Note the time and compare results side by side.
Thank you.
пн, 5 нояб. 2018 г. в 12:57, Matej Martinovic :
> I haven't read the whole discussion, but have you read the
I haven't read the whole discussion, but have you read the manual? If not,
please read "3.4.4.3. Denoise – profiled" in
https://www.darktable.org/usermanual/en/correction_group.html
All you "need" are two instances. Both can be saved as presets to be
automatically applied.
BR
Matej
On
I did tried some authored presets found somewhere on the web. And I am
still on windows with dpp.
You see.. this is not a photographer workflow. DT is some kind of technical
toy.
I wouldn't try to explain denoise tools logic of DT to my wife who got into
photography. This is the main problem.
And
Hi,
just for the record, did you tried to use some presets?
I understand dt can appear difficult, so you can try to apply a preset and
then - if needed - only adjust some sliders.
Tanks,
Maurizio
Il giorno lun 5 nov 2018 alle ore 09:06 Andrey ha
scritto:
> I like your work. We have got a nice
I like your work. We have got a nice bench, lever is ok, but the bear..
darktable vs dpp:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1G026G5va8h-V8Mqn0HlghslN7vKnfvwG
darktable vs rawtherapee:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=15hxaZDOh0Cqrs3IptcEdH_kPjSuu-NR9
I've tried to recover the bear, but my result is
I loaded DPP and played with the image to see how Canon processed it.
Then, I went back to darktable and tried again.
Here's what I came up with.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1sM3oq7EDWXtAdqWyMMqwENcf1oP7wK_G
XMP is attached.
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 3:25 AM Andrey wrote:
> Just compare the
Just compare the pictures side by side. Your result is rather good for DT,
not for RT or Canon DPP.
Stains, colored lever, bear's fur is blured.
Look at this:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_s1WzY2D_fgxTs0sjP4ygsPUcnf_GfkA
Pay attention to history and NR tool clarity.
DT may replace all denoise
Yes. But it hasn't rainbow on the bench and has a very detailed bear's fur.
And this is just the first, fast try.
Look at this:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_s1WzY2D_fgxTs0sjP4ygsPUcnf_GfkA
Pay attention to history and NR tool clarity. This tool IS for
photographers.
вс, 4 нояб. 2018 г. в
I noticed that this image shows major loss of contrast and there are
large amounts of noice in the shadows:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz9fwFLCJOjNNnZWNjVSYXhaX28/view
Per Inge Oestmoen
> Andrey wrote:
I've spent a huge amount of time watching youtube videos, reading
different
: Re: [darktable-dev] noise
I've spent a huge amount of time watching youtube videos, reading different tutorials and testing all the tools DT has.
Here are the crops you may look at:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1rqPfr8rHalwvbjJ03Ho-pze4Uxsq3ggh
DT gives unacceptable result. I've tried
I've spent a huge amount of time watching youtube videos, reading different
tutorials and testing all the tools DT has.
Here are the crops you may look at:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1rqPfr8rHalwvbjJ03Ho-pze4Uxsq3ggh
DT gives unacceptable result. I've tried to pop this theme up year by year
Try this...
To add the styles to darktable - save the styles, then in lighttable mode
open the styles dialog and click import, select the files, then import
them. Each one is standalone, so if you start with 1 and it's not enough
then you try 2, 2 will overwrite 1. The higher the number the
did you try demosaic; PPG or Amaze and change those options?
Op za 3 nov. 2018 om 17:59 schreef Andrey L :
> Hello, guys. Canon DPP makes me crazy, but DT is unable to compete with
> neither Canon DPP, nor RawTherapee :(
> Could you please pay some attention to DarkTable's noise removal
>
Hello, guys. Canon DPP makes me crazy, but DT is unable to compete with
neither Canon DPP, nor RawTherapee :(
Could you please pay some attention to DarkTable's noise removal
opportunities?
I have to spend senconds with Canon DPP to suppress noise on high-iso
image,
I need minutes to get a good
Hello,
There doesn't seem to be a noise profile for the D850 in Darktable
yet. I followed the instructions on the "profiling sensor and
photon noise" page. The scripts warned me about the images not
being under-exposed. However, I exposed at EV compensation -1.0 and
used the highest contrast
Done!
And thank you Stefan! :)
And Pete, yes, I had found your blog at https://landscrapes.wordpress.
com/2016/05/10/darktable/ regarding sensor profiling.
Oops, now that I look at it, I take that back, I hadn't seen yours.
Thanks, I'll review it. I'd really like to work through this process
Hi
please create a ticket at
https://redmine.darktable.org/projects/darktable/issues/new
and add your link there. I have done the noise profiling and I will attach it
to your ticket. Result look good and can be used.
Stefan
> Hi -
>
> I've been muddling around attempting to create a noise
I wrote up the process I used for a Canon G3 X. Maybe that can help you get
started. https://landscrapes.wordpress.com/2016/05/10/darktable/
My process may not produce enough midtone. I got around that when I did my T7i
by draping a cable through the frame from top to bottom. With everything
Hi -
I've been muddling around attempting to create a noise profile for the new
Sony ILCE-7RM3.
Sadly, I'm just a user and I'm still trying to figure out how to add "raw
linear.dtstyle" to DT so I can apply the style to the ISO image set I
created.
Additionally, since the ILCE-7RM3 is not yet
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 12:19 AM, David Vincent-Jones
wrote:
Hi.
> My results and profile data is available at:
> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/fnajmbsqdqbh48d/AACIXZfjmlfQLvv19DqQH1CWa?dl=0
Best to open a new issue in redmine, less chance of this being lost.
> Works very well.
My results and profile data is available at:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/fnajmbsqdqbh48d/AACIXZfjmlfQLvv19DqQH1CWa?dl=0
Works very well.
David
___
darktable developer mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to
Hi,
There was a bug in darktable < 2.2.0rc1 that effected noise profiling.
Please rerun the script with an up to date version.
Regards,
Stefan
> Hi,
>
> I have created noise profiles for the Panasonic Lumix DMC G7/G70 and
> uploaded the resulting tar achive to:
>
>
Hi,
I have created noise profiles for the Panasonic Lumix DMC G7/G70 and
uploaded the resulting tar achive to:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/zafgi8viiyqimyv/dt-noiseprofile-20160704.tar.gz?dl=0
This camera is labeled with two names by Panasonic: G70 in Germany, Swiss,
Austria and G7 everywhere
Hi,
I have created noise profiles for the Panasonic Lumix DMC G7/G70 and
uploaded the resulting tar achive to:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/zafgi8viiyqimyv/dt-noiseprofile-20160704.tar.gz?dl=0
This camera is labeled by Panasonic with two names: G70 in Germany, Swiss,
Austria and G7 everywhere
Noise profile for Canon Powershot G3 X
This still hasn't been added to the distribution. I notified this list
at the beginning of May, and it apparently fell through a crack or
something. Would someone please validate and add this to the product or
let me know if there's a problem with it?
Hello !
Just arriving on this mailing list, I would like to help for the camera
support in Darktable.
First, with the noise profile of the A7II. I'm seeing this page, but I
don't know if it's up to date :
http://www.darktable.org/2012/12/profiling-sensor-and-photon-noise/
So my questions :
Hi,
I've tried to generate noise profiles for my Olympus OM-D E-M5 mk2:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/50pvcexey23v1i7/dt-noiseprofile-20151008.tar.gz?dl=0
The command that I ran and its output is available here:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/bhss1a5hlbjfgbp/output.txt?dl=0
Let me know if I can improve
48 matches
Mail list logo