Hi,
I noise-profiled my newly-purchased Samsung NX1 and am quite happy with the
results it makes.
The resulting file can be found here:
http://www.strobotti.com/derp/dt-noiseprofile-20150501.tar.gz
I hope it helps others as well!
Kind regards,
Juha Jantunen
http://www.strobotti.com
-
On 04/12/15 05:21, Urs Schütz wrote:
> Hi
>
> I did profiling the Olympus E-PL7 noise, following the description
> http://www.darktable.org/2012/12/profiling-sensor-and-photon-noise/
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/e7we55r8ru5p14h/dt-noiseprofile-20150412.tar.gz?dl=0
>
> Thanks for the very nice prog
Hi
I did profiling the Olympus E-PL7 noise, following the description
http://www.darktable.org/2012/12/profiling-sensor-and-photon-noise/
https://www.dropbox.com/s/e7we55r8ru5p14h/dt-noiseprofile-20150412.tar.gz?dl=0
Thanks for the very nice program to all developers.
Urs
Here is noise profile for Sony RX100 Mark3. I've tested it with my images
and the results look reasonable. The benchmark shows higher PSNR for all
ISO values but check the generated charts (I had to generate them as
PostScript not PDF).
https://www.dropbox.com/s/76cyuavtfsiw3cu/dt-noiseprofile-201
[Note: I am now resending this in order to increase the chance of getting
recognized by developers doing noise profile reviews...]
Am Dienstag, 10. Februar 2015, 22:50:10 schrieb Pedro Côrte-Real:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Roland Riegel
wrote:
> > Lately, I have upgraded to a Sony SLT-A
I generated a second profile.
I think better than the first
https://www.mediafire.com/?mukya81x5phyj3s
C Touzé
--
Slashdot TV. Videos for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=16059147
... and the third one:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/352146/GM-1/dt-noiseprofile-20140519.tar.gz
--
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-t
Let me know, if it's usable.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/352146/GX-7/dt-noiseprofile-20140519.tar.gz
thanks
--
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Stat
Another try.
Hopefully better than the old one
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/352146/GH-3/dt-noiseprofile-20140519.tar.gz
thanks
--
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI
On 26/06/14 21:43, Erwin Burema wrote:
> Recently got myself a new camera a Canon EOS 700D and to my dismay
> the profile denoise didn't have any profiles for this camera so a quick
> profiling later I got these results:
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/20940867/dt-noiseprofile-20140626.tar.
On 24/09/14 15:44, Per Östlund wrote:
> I think this has been overlooked.
Hi Per,
Thanks, Johannes has added your curves, they should now be in git master.
Regards,
Rob
> On 2014-06-27 00:46, Per Östlund wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I made an attempt at generating a noise profile for the Sony Alpha A7.
thanks for the profile! should be pushed now, files look great :)
cheers,
jo
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Per Östlund wrote:
> I think this has been overlooked.
>
> On 2014-06-27 00:46, Per Östlund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I made an attempt at generating a noise profile for the Sony Alpha A
I think this has been overlooked.
On 2014-06-27 00:46, Per Östlund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I made an attempt at generating a noise profile for the Sony Alpha A7.
> I tried it out on a couple of my high ISO shots, but couldn't really
> see much difference compared to the general poisson when I adjusted
Hi,
I created a profile by following the instructions on this page:
http://www.darktable.org/2012/12/profiling-sensor-and-photon-noise/
the results look good. the end of the script advises sending the file.
The link for the file :
http://www.mediafire.com/download/19t9divh5bxrxg2/dt-noiseprofile-2
Hi
Since some months I am playing around with darktable master
from git, just a simple user. I love it! Thanks for the
nice work!
Here is my try to give something back: I did a noise
profile for the Olympus E-PL2 from ISO200 - ISO6400.
https://www.dropbox.com/l/db5TfCYYv8xwJoEdUn3wSl??text=1
Be
Hi,
I made an attempt at generating a noise profile for the Sony Alpha A7. I
tried it out on a couple of my high ISO shots, but couldn't really see
much difference compared to the general poisson when I adjusted the
strength to be visually the same. But I'll leave the analysis to you
experts.
Hi,
Recently got myself a new camera a Canon EOS 700D and to my dismay
the profile denoise didn't have any profiles for this camera so a quick
profiling later I got these results:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/20940867/dt-noiseprofile-20140626.tar.gz
Hope that these are good enough other
profile looks very good, thanks for submitting!
-jo
2014-05-25 15:07 GMT+12:00 Aurélien PIERRE :
> Hi !
>
> I'm new here. I would like to share my noise profile for Nikon D5300.
>
> All shots have been made focusing to infinity, at f/8, with a
> white-balance manually set on a 18% (neutral) gr
Hi !
I'm new here. I would like to share my noise profile for Nikon D5300.
All shots have been made focusing to infinity, at f/8, with a
white-balance manually set on a 18% (neutral) grey card, between 100 to
25600 ISO.
All files are here :
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/85303452/dt-noisepr
yes, noise profiles are uncritical wrt new bugs, it's just new data. so no
problem to put them into the release.
-jo
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Steven Adler wrote:
> Works great! Will this make it in 1.4?
> hey,
>
> thanks for the profiles, these look spot on, i'll push to git.
>
> can y
hey,
thanks for the profiles, these look spot on, i'll push to git.
can you specify more precisely what kind of artifacts you mean? or provide
a test shot so we can take a look? is that related to noise profiling or a
separate issue?
-jo
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 4:30 PM, steve wrote:
> I gener
I generated a noise profile for the Olympus OM-D E-M1 but it shows
artifacts even at low noise levels. Is it possible that dt isn't
supporting the new RAW format of the E-M1 completely?
What do you think?
http://ubuntuone.com/1ONsmlo3Ktf7tyySfkYQ5G
Steve
---
hi, welcome to the list. your profiles look both equally good, i pushed the
normal exposure. maybe there is some secret in-camera raw processing going
on, dark values aren't stabilized quite as well as bright ones, maybe
you'll need some parametric blending with additional tweaks for dark areas
to
First, I'd like to say hello and thank for a great piece of software!
I switched from rawtherapee because it couldnt read properly my underwater pics
with WB adjusted :) Besides I was impressed by the noise profiling and decided
to profile my camera, too. I hope this could help others. I have s
nice lensflare! :)
thanks for the profile, pushed.
it somehow fails to stabilize variance in those very dark regions, i'll
have a look if that is due to this particular camera or if there is
something structural going on.
cheers,
jo
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:58 PM, TCJ wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
Hi,
I created a noise profile for my Sony SLT-A99V.
The raw import in the current version of darktable seems to be not correct.
Thatswhy I used a patched version of
"src/external/LibRaw/internal/dcraw_common.cpp" where I added
{ "SONY SLT-A99", 128, 0,
{ 6344,-1612,-462,-4863,12477
Here is a profile for the Panasonic GH-3
Hopefully it looks good.
regards
thorsten
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/352146/dt-noiseprofile-20130510.tar.gz
--
AlienVault Unified Security Management (USM) platform deli
Here is a profile for the Panasonic GH-3
Hopefully it looks good.
regards
thorsten
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/352146/dt-noiseprofile-20130510.tar.gz
--
AlienVault Unified Security Management (USM) platform del
* johannes hanika [2013-05-04 08:38] :
> sorry, but these curves don't match the data (probably something about
> exposure, too dark i would say). see the attached image. the flat green
> line should actually follow the noisy green curve very closely.
>
> -jo
My apologies for the bad samples
sorry, but these curves don't match the data (probably something about
exposure, too dark i would say). see the attached image. the flat green
line should actually follow the noisy green curve very closely.
-jo
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Stefan Wimmer wrote:
> > I tried to create denois
cool, thanks for that, committed. sorry for the delay..
j.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Wolfgang Renz wrote:
> hi,
>
> I tried to denoise some more real life pictures with the presets I sent
> before.
> Since I wasn't completely satiesfied I repeated the profiling procedure.
>
> According t
> I tried to create denoise profiles for my new Nikon D7100 and the results
> can be downloaded here:
>
> http://swimmer.home.xs4all.nl/diverse/dt-noiseprofile-20130408.tar.gz
>
> Please let me know whether the presets are reasonable otherwise I'll give it
> another try.
Hi again,
I w
graphs look spot on. pushed, thanks :)
-jo
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Stefan Wimmer wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> since my direct email is still hanging for approval I'll give it another
> try
> via Gmane ... ;-)
>
> I tried to create denoise profiles for my new Nikon D7100 and the results
>
Hello again,
since my direct email is still hanging for approval I'll give it another try
via Gmane ... ;-)
I tried to create denoise profiles for my new Nikon D7100 and the results
can be downloaded here:
http://swimmer.home.xs4all.nl/diverse/dt-noiseprofile-20130408.tar.gz
Please let me
hey,
i think something is wrong lately with hdr construction or something else
on the way in the benchmark script.. your plots look just fine and the flat
noise variances are perfect. i'll push to git master.
thanks for measuring that data :)
-jo
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:07 AM, Wolfgang Renz wr
Thank you for your work.
After a git pull, the K-5 IIs noise profile is available :-)
Cheers,
Michael
Am 23.03.2013 14:17, schrieb johannes hanika:
> cool, thanks. those plots look great, pushed.
>
> the error message is not to worry, just used to generate more helpful
> user feedback.
>
> che
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 2:17 PM, johannes hanika wrote:
> cool, thanks. those plots look great, pushed.
>
> the error message is not to worry, just used to generate more helpful
> user feedback.
That profile can probably be duplicated for the non s version btw...
Regards,
Pascal de Bruijn
-
cool, thanks. those plots look great, pushed.
the error message is not to worry, just used to generate more helpful
user feedback.
cheers,
jo
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 1:50 AM, Michael Born wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the data is here:
> http://rapidshare.com/files/3186686894/dt-noiseprofile-20130323.t
Hi all,
the data is here:
http://rapidshare.com/files/3186686894/dt-noiseprofile-20130323.tar.gz
Please tell me if something is not ok with the data.
Cheers,
Michael
PS: I used the git version of today and got the following error message
from the gen-profile script.
...
===> Prepare final tarb
Am 23.03.2013 08:54, schrieb Pascal Obry:
>
> Michael,
>
>> Sorry, I hope this time it works.
>> http://rapidshare.com/files/730495913/IMGP3276.PEF
>> http://rapidshare.com/files/3682942706/IMGP3137.DNG
>
> Ok reproduced and now fixed. Will be part of 1.2-rc2 I suppose.
>
Thank you very much.
Michael,
> Sorry, I hope this time it works.
> http://rapidshare.com/files/730495913/IMGP3276.PEF
> http://rapidshare.com/files/3682942706/IMGP3137.DNG
Ok reproduced and now fixed. Will be part of 1.2-rc2 I suppose.
--
Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)
The best way to travel is by mea
Am 22.03.2013 17:30, schrieb Pascal Obry:
>
> Michael,
>
>> The K200D can save PEF or DNG raw files. Here are test files:
>> http://rapidshare.com/files/3682942706/IMGP3137.DNG
>> http://rapidshare.com/files/730495913/IMGP3276.PEF
>
> I don't have permissions to download those files.
>
Sorry, I
Michael,
> The K200D can save PEF or DNG raw files. Here are test files:
> http://rapidshare.com/files/3682942706/IMGP3137.DNG
> http://rapidshare.com/files/730495913/IMGP3276.PEF
I don't have permissions to download those files.
--
Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)
The best way to tr
Hi Pascal.
Am 21.03.2013 22:30, schrieb Pascal Obry:
>
> Michael,
>
>> >From the metadata panel of the LT (without the ""):
>> model "PENTAX K-5 II s"
>> maker "PENTAX"
>
> This one is not on the database. There is the "PENTAX K-5" and probably
> this profile was wrongly used I suppose as the m
On 13-03-21 02:30 PM, Pascal Obry wrote:
>
> Michael,
>
>> >From the metadata panel of the LT (without the ""):
>> model "PENTAX K-5 II s"
>> maker "PENTAX"
>
> This one is not on the database. There is the "PENTAX K-5" and probably
> this profile was wrongly used I suppose as the model must be an
Michael,
>>From the metadata panel of the LT (without the ""):
> model "PENTAX K-5 II s"
> maker "PENTAX"
This one is not on the database. There is the "PENTAX K-5" and probably
this profile was wrongly used I suppose as the model must be an exact
match now.
> and
>
> model "PENTAX K200D"
> ma
Am 21.03.2013 21:52, schrieb Pascal Obry:
>
> Michael,
>
>> I'm sure there were profiles for both cameras in DT.
>
> Ok, so what is the exact model name and camera maker displayed in dt for
> those cameras?
>
>From the metadata panel of the LT (without the ""):
model "PENTAX K-5 II s"
maker "P
Michael,
> I'm sure there were profiles for both cameras in DT.
Ok, so what is the exact model name and camera maker displayed in dt for
those cameras?
--
Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)
The best way to travel is by means of imagination
http://v2p.fr.eu.org
http://www.obry.net
Hi Pascal,
I'm sure there were profiles for both cameras in DT.
Michael
Am 21.03.2013 21:38, schrieb Pascal Obry:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
>> The current git pull shows me available noise profiles for PENTAX K-5
>> and NIKON D5100 pictures.
>> No profiles are listed for PENTAX K200D and PENTAX K-5IIs
Hi Michael,
> The current git pull shows me available noise profiles for PENTAX K-5
> and NIKON D5100 pictures.
> No profiles are listed for PENTAX K200D and PENTAX K-5IIs pictures (just
> generic poissonian).
Maybe they are not in the database, I haven't looked. But anyway I have
fixed the issu
Am 21.03.2013 20:14, schrieb Pascal Obry:
>
> Is it me or the profile are not found anymore?
>
> For my D800 and D300 picture I do not see the body in the profile combo
> anymore.
>
> Pascal.
>
Hi Pascal.
The current git pull shows me available noise profiles for PENTAX K-5
and NIKON D5100 pi
Is it me or the profile are not found anymore?
For my D800 and D300 picture I do not see the body in the profile combo
anymore.
Pascal.
--
Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)
The best way to travel is by means of imagination
http://v2p.fr.eu.org
http://www.obry.net
gpg --keyserv
it's not the latest version of dt :) please let me know if an updated
git master works..
-jo
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Dimitri Gathy wrote:
> With the last version of dt(1.1+1165~g11a3979), the eos5Dc eos5D2 profiles
> appear & work fine but i have no profiles under 2500 iso for my eos5D2
With the last version of dt(1.1+1165~g11a3979), the eos5Dc eos5D2 profiles
appear & work fine but i have no profiles under 2500 iso for my eos5D2
which work fine before, when the eos 5Dc doesn't work.
the dt-noiseprofile.tar.gz, the library.db are here:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/uez42hf74x22sur/dZ
hey,
your graphs look just fine. i would guess you ran into a bug in the
script we fixed recently. this would produce the right graphs +
presets.txt but mess up the preset insertion into the database (so you
would always get black images when testing with that).
thanks for profiling!
cheers,
jo
works perfect.
Thanks a lot for the excellent work!!
J
Am 25.02.2013 07:51, schrieb johannes hanika:
hey,
thanks for profiling, the graphs look very good (will push in a minute).
turns out the script was terribly broken wrt testing those things as
presets. should be fixed now.
cheers,
jo
I try to profile my 5D2 & 5Dc. I succeed with the 5D2 but the 5Dc profile
doesn't work. I have only one profile 'generic poissonian' and when i
choose the preset corresponding to the iso, the image turns black!
I put the dt-noiseprofile.tar.gz, the library.db & the terminal verbose
here:
https://ww
hey,
thanks for profiling, the graphs look very good (will push in a minute).
turns out the script was terribly broken wrt testing those things as
presets. should be fixed now.
cheers,
jo
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:01 AM, JB wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> did the profiling for the Canon G12 and Nikon D7
Hi all,
did the profiling for the Canon G12 and Nikon D700:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/z86sf98yb9n1d1t/GSVStBr-EB/dt-np
Do these look good?
I'm not certain about the result. After a few iterations of trial and
error there are no more errors while running the gen-profile script.
But when applyin
hey,
thanks for those, the graphs look spot on :)
i'll push when i get home.
-jo
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Rico Wendrock wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> I've made a noise profile from my Olympus E-PL5. You can download the files
> here: http://www.rico-wendrock.de/files/dt-noiseprofile-20130204.tar.
Hallo,
I've made a noise profile from my Olympus E-PL5. You can download the files
here: http://www.rico-wendrock.de/files/dt-noiseprofile-20130204.tar.gz
I hope they are ok.
Rico
--
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
cool, thanks for those :)
we already had a nex-5n, and your numbers are very very similar (which
reassures me that we're on the right track profiling one device and
applying the data to another).
pushed for reference.
cheers,
jo
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Lars Kotthoff wrote:
> Hi all,
>
Hi all,
I've uploaded the noise profile for Sony NEX-5N here:
http://4c.ucc.ie/~larsko/dt-noiseprofile-20130203.tar.gz
The graphs and results from a benchmark I ran looked reasonable to me.
Cheers,
Lars
--
Everyone h
do you have a graph with the fits for me to check? or benchmarking results?
cheers,
jo
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Markus wrote:
> Attached you can find the noise profile for SONY a77. Hope it helps.
>
> Regards;
> Markus
>
>
Attached you can find the noise profile for SONY a77. Hope it helps.
Regards;
Markus
{"SLT-A77V iso 50", "SONY", "SLT-A77V", 50,
{1.06869334489541e-05, 4.14233890901092e-06, 7.39824015697458e-06},
{-9.65197592273497e-08, -1.03093231654166e-07, -7.46417677208881e-
yeah, sorry.. these images look processed and the fits are totally
off. can you try again with a fresh directory with just the raw files
and `gen-profile -d .' ?
-jo
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 5:10 PM, johannes hanika wrote:
> hey,
>
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Sergey Astanin wrote:
>>
>> H
hey,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Sergey Astanin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> finally I made profiles for Pentax K20D; I'm not sure I did them right, so
> there are some questions:
>
> 1. My camera is set to Weak noise reduction for high ISO. I don't know if
> it affects RAW (someone said on the list t
Hi,
finally I made profiles for Pentax K20D; I'm not sure I did them
right, so there are some questions:
1. My camera is set to Weak noise reduction for high ISO. I don't
know if it affects RAW (someone said on the list that it is the case
for some Pentax ca
great, thanks. the red channel is slightly too dark to give a good
fit, but looks nice apart from that.
cheers,
jo
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:37 PM, thouks wrote:
> Another one...
>
> Hopefully it looks good.
>
> regards
>
> Thorsten
> -
Hi,
You can find a noise profile for D7000 at:
http://ed.gomez.free.fr/vrac/dt-noiseprofile-20130108.tar.gz
I checked it against the current active D5100 profile (same sony
sensor), and my gaussian curve seems smoother than the D5100's one. I
attach a tuned graph2.sh output comparing both cams.
great, these look fine.
pushed to master, thanks
jo
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:05 AM, jmsarat wrote:
> Attached the noise profile for Sony SLT-A55V. The profile works well
> particularly with the new wavelet mode.
>
> Jean-Marc Sarat
>
> ---
cool, looks good!
pushed,
jo
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Nicolas S. Dade
wrote:
> Attached. I couldn't get a completely black portion at ISO 100 through
> 200 no matter what I tried. However in practice the attached profile works
> wonderfuly.
>
> -Nicolas Dade
>
>
> ---
cool, all but the blue channel looks good (currently unused anyways).
pushed to master.
cheers,
jo
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:03 AM, thouks wrote:
> Hopefully the profile looks good.
>
> regards
>
> Thorsten
> --
> Maste
cool, thanks for those. all but iso 50 look good, that one is'nt
overexposed enough.
also you seem to have used an old gen-profile script, but that's all
good, numbers look fine.
pushed to master :)
-jo
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Bert Blockx wrote:
> I have profiled my Canon Eos 1Ds Mark I
these look very good. pushed to master, thanks :)
-jo
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Bruce Guenter wrote:
>
> Here is my profile data. Does it look ok, or do I need to redo it?
>
> --
> Bruce Guenter http://untroubled.org/
>
>
Hallöchen!
johannes hanika writes:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Torsten Bronger
> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Here are the results of benchmarking:
>>
>> [...]
>
> these values look very reasonable..
>
>> I had problems making the reference HDR because of
>> http://www.darktable.org/redmine/issu
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Torsten Bronger
wrote:
> Hallöchen!
>
> I've already submitted my NEX-7 noise profile at
> https://bob.ipv.kfa-juelich.de/bronger/dt-noiseprofile-20130103.tar.gz
are in master, thanks.
> Here are the results of benchmarking:
>
> --
Hallöchen!
I've already submitted my NEX-7 noise profile at
https://bob.ipv.kfa-juelich.de/bronger/dt-noiseprofile-20130103.tar.gz
Here are the results of benchmarking:
--
ISO S/N S/N after profiled denoising
-
awesome, looks great :) pushed to master, thanks.
jo
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Guilherme Brondani Torri
wrote:
> Hello and happy 2013!
>
> Please have in attach a noise profile for the Nikon D600.
> I set it on aperture mode, and stepped manually the ISO from 100 up to 6400.
> No special f
cool, fits look good (variance stabilization doesn't work very well in
dark areas for that particular model it seems, but apart from that
it's fine).
cheers,
jo
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Marcel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> attached is a noise profile for the Olympus E-420. The red channel of the
> sh
Johannes,
> ah. see it now. i'm terrible with these mouse things and http
> interfaces. do you have an example graph or are you sure it's all good
> :) ?
Yes, the graphs are really good.
--
Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)
The best way to travel is by means of imagination
http://v
ah. see it now. i'm terrible with these mouse things and http
interfaces. do you have an example graph or are you sure it's all good
:) ?
j.
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Pascal Obry wrote:
>
> Johannes,
>
> What about my pull request for D300 denoise profile?
>
> --
> Pascal Obry / Magny
Johannes,
What about my pull request for D300 denoise profile?
--
Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)
The best way to travel is by means of imagination
http://v2p.fr.eu.org
http://www.obry.net
gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B
---
graphs look very nice, thanks for that :)
pushed to master.
jo
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 3:24 AM, João Trindade wrote:
> Sorry for the error,
>
> I've just pulled a new version of master and the script to generate
> the profile complained about the image at ISO 100.
>
> Did some new photos (with a
graphs look very good! will put it into master in a bit.
thank you sir :)
-jo
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Florian Manschwetus
wrote:
> OK, I got my hands on an 450d
>
> would be fine to have an quick answer if something went wrong, as I probably
> only have access to this today.
>
>
> Regar
Sorry for the error,
I've just pulled a new version of master and the script to generate
the profile complained about the image at ISO 100.
Did some new photos (with all ISOs) and corrected the problem.
Please ignore the previous email.
The new tar.gz is here:
http://tagus.inesc-id.pt/~jtrinda
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Matt Feifarek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:00 PM, johannes hanika wrote:
>>
>> cool, pushed that to master. let me know if your presets disappear (in
>> which case i did it wrong).
>
>
> They work; it's auto-detected. Now that I can run the Dt branch with th
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Matt Feifarek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Pascal de Bruijn
> wrote:
>>
>> I currently have no debs of git master.
>
> That has been my understanding, thanks.
>
> I have been able to build from git, but not "the debian way".
That's not really an iss
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Matt Feifarek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Pascal de Bruijn
> wrote:
>>
>> > Then I downloaded from git master. Then I moved the files from
>> > packaging/ubuntu/* into darktable root.
>>
>> This is documented nowhere. These packages files are outdate
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 2:57 AM, Matt Feifarek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Pascal de Bruijn
> wrote:
>>
>> If you add one of my PPAs and do apt-get build-dep darktable, you
>> should be fine, assuming you are on a fairly recent version of Ubuntu.
>
> Here's what I did:
>
> I did do
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Matt Feifarek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:14 PM, johannes hanika wrote:
>>
>> what's the exact exif string (for automatic matching)? OM-D E M5 or
>> OMD-E5 or .. ?
>
>
> it's coming up maker "OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP."
> and model "E-M5"
cool, pushed that to m
the graphs look perfect :)
i merged these and pushed (actually to master at this point, no more
denoise branch needed).
let us know if it works/doesn't work as expected.
what's the exact exif string (for automatic matching)? OM-D E M5 or
OMD-E5 or .. ?
thx,
jo
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:25 AM
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Matt Feifarek wrote:
> I can't compile the noise branch of Darktable on my Ubuntu system; circular
> dependency hell
There is no circular dependancy hell, really...
If you add one of my PPAs and do apt-get build-dep darktable, you
should be fine, assuming you ar
I can't compile the noise branch of Darktable on my Ubuntu system; circular
dependency hell has made it not possible for me to figure out (for whatever
it's worth, the compiling instructions up at
http://www.darktable.org/install/#ubuntu do NOT work, either for building a
package or for building di
94 matches
Mail list logo
