* Tobias Ellinghaus [10-18-14 08:31]:
> Am Samstag, 18. Oktober 2014, 11:10:25 schrieb Tobias Ellinghaus:
> > Am Freitag, 17. Oktober 2014, 19:29:45 schrieb Patrick Shanahan:
> > > * Tobias Ellinghaus [10-17-14 18:04]:
[...]
> > "I would propose adding a new variable $(IMAGE_VERSION) or somethi
Am Samstag, 18. Oktober 2014, 11:10:25 schrieb Tobias Ellinghaus:
> Am Freitag, 17. Oktober 2014, 19:29:45 schrieb Patrick Shanahan:
> > * Tobias Ellinghaus [10-17-14 18:04]:
> > [...]
> >
> > > That's why I proposed a $(VERSION) variable for export that contains the
> > > image version (as sho
Am Freitag, 17. Oktober 2014, 19:29:45 schrieb Patrick Shanahan:
> * Tobias Ellinghaus [10-17-14 18:04]:
> [...]
>
> > That's why I proposed a $(VERSION) variable for export that contains the
> > image version (as shown in the image info lib on the left side), that
> > would allow you to have wh
* Tobias Ellinghaus [10-17-14 18:04]:
[...]
> That's why I proposed a $(VERSION) variable for export that contains the
> image version (as shown in the image info lib on the left side), that
> would allow you to have whatever naming scheme you want.
[...]
I am using darktable-1.5.1413549125 bu
Am Freitag, 17. Oktober 2014, 18:43:09 schrieb Wolfgang Goetz:
[duplicates get the same export name when $(FILE_NAME) is used]
> thus: atm it is not advisable to use duplicate.
>
>
> proposal:
> implement *different* counter naming convention for dup and exp.
That's why I proposed a $(VERSION)
* Wolfgang Goetz [10-17-14 12:45]:
[...]
> first of all: back your existing output while playing with dup/exp
>
> you selected all in lighttable and
> exported in a clean destination without overwrite.
> this is the only way to get pseude-synchron filenames.
>
>
> try another full export (unc
Wolfgang Goetz wrote:
Hello,
> wish: darktable-cli xmp jpg ...searches for the nef
> referenced in xmp. _XYxmp->nef
fulfilled #-P ...just a one-liner / no-brainer (attached):
./dt-cli-xmp.sh 20130228-11210370-NIKON_D800E.nef.xmp g.jpg
[init] moving database into new XDG directory structure
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
Hello Patrick,
[..duplicate and export versioning..]
>
> Not completely following your logic but I frequently crop images
> differently using "duplicate" and get:
>
> 140927_101652_dsf_3691_dt.jpg
> 140927_101652_dsf_3691_dt_01.jpg
> 140927_101652_dsf_3691.nef
> 140927_1
* Wolfgang Goetz [10-16-14 16:57]:
[...]
> because the 'picture' is described by xmp.
>
> what i expect:
> jpg-cxx pointing to xmp-cxx pointing to nef
> (Derived From)
>
> jpg jpg-c01 jpg-c02 ... jpg-cnn
> xmp xmp-c01 xmp-c02 ... xmp-cnn
> nef
>
>
> what is actual:
> all jpg-kk from duplicat
Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 15. Oktober 2014, 22:09:34 schrieb Wolfgang Goetz:
> > Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> >
> > Hello Tobias,
>
> Hi.
Hello,
> > the simple rule to have exactly ONE sidecar file is broken anyway.
>
> I am not sure I understand what you mean. What rule? Duplicat
Am Mittwoch, 15. Oktober 2014, 22:09:34 schrieb Wolfgang Goetz:
> Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
>
> Hello Tobias,
Hi.
[...]
> > > clone number should be named different: a_c01.nef.xmp
> > > (export: a_c01_01.jpg, a_c01_02.jpg ...,
> > > with overwrite: always a_c01.jpg)
> > >
> > > export $(FILE_N
Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
Hello Tobias,
> Am Dienstag, 14. Oktober 2014, 00:02:42 schrieb Wolfgang Goetz:
[...numbering duplicates and outputfiles independant...]
my personal decision: do not use duplicates
for regular work at the moment.
> > clone number should be named different: a_c01.nef
Am Dienstag, 14. Oktober 2014, 00:02:42 schrieb Wolfgang Goetz:
> Hello,
Hi.
> raw(=nef) folder, one duplicate:
>
> a.nef
> a.nef.xmp
> a_01.nef.xmp
>
> ---> sequence number for xmp is clone number.
Yes, that is the definition of the clone number.
> darktable_e
13 matches
Mail list logo
