[darktable-user] Re: Lensfun-bug? Should Pentax K-1 be supported (K-1 recognized as K-S1)

2018-03-11 Thread Torsten Bronger
Hallöchen! Аl Воgnеr writes: > [...] > > Shouldn't be the _first_ query be in ~/.local/share/lensfun and > the 2nd in /usr/share/lensfun ? I must admit that I don't know for sure at the moment, but I think Lensfun overwrites data in memory while reading the XML files. Thus, for ~ having higher

Re: [darktable-user] denoise weakness

2018-03-11 Thread Jochen Spieker
Matthias Bodenbinder: > > I would really appreciate if this posting helps to start a serious discussion > about denoise in DT. I can only add that I see things very similarly as you. For a complete beginner like myself, DT's noise reduction options are way too complicated, technical and, at

Re: [darktable-user] Lensfun - Canon PowerShot G7 (1st generation) supported by darktable?

2018-03-11 Thread Torsten Bronger
Hallöchen! Аl Воgnеr writes: > [...] > > From compact-canon.xml > > > Canon > Canon PowerShot G7 > PowerShot G7 > canonG7 > 4.843 > > > I cannot find lens parameters for the G7, but for the G7 X > > > Canon > Canon G7 X

Re: [darktable-user] denoising problems

2018-03-11 Thread Peter Cripps
Bill, thanks for letting us try your noise profiles. I did some quick tests, and they seem to work very well, particularly for very noisy images. On 03/10/2018 07:35 PM, William Ferguson wrote: I usually shoot 1000-1500 images per game (football, soccer, basketball), and 600-800 for baseball

[darktable-user] Re: DT 2.2.1 Trouble with lens correction module

2018-03-11 Thread Torsten Bronger
Hallöchen! frieder writes: > [...] > > wilson.bronger.org ist also offline at the moment. This should have been for a short time only. Can you try again? > Is there away to update the db-files in lensfun 0.2.8? is it > compatible with db files 0.3.2 at all? Version 0 should be compatible,

Re: [darktable-user] denoise weakness

2018-03-11 Thread Michael Staats
On 11/03/18 09:45, David Vincent-Jones wrote: > It would be interesting to know just what 'rawtherapee' is doing that dt > does not. I am sure that somebody could enlighten us. > Hi I think that's the point. I would not drop any of the existing modules, they all seem have their use case, and

Re: [darktable-user] denoise weakness

2018-03-11 Thread David Vincent-Jones
It would be interesting to know just what 'rawtherapee' is doing that dt does not. I am sure that somebody could enlighten us. On 03/10/2018 09:32 PM, Matthias Bodenbinder wrote: > By the way, is it possible to adapt the denoise code from rawtherapee?

Re: [darktable-user] denoise weakness

2018-03-11 Thread Remco Viëtor
On samedi 10 mars 2018 21:32:49 CET Matthias Bodenbinder wrote: > Hi, > > I take the latest postings about denoise issues as an opportunity to ask a > few questions. > > I am a long term DT user. I have spend hours creating my own denoise > profiles with several instances of profiled denoise in