and...@algphoto.com.au>> wrote:
Hi,
Upon upgrading to 3.6 I have now discovered that DT has renamed
all of
the images in the folder I opened today with 20211029- 1104.CR2.
I have never set that up, I only ever run on the camera images
numbers,
how else do I get to k
at DT has renamed all of
> the images in the folder I opened today with 20211029- 1104.CR2.
>
> I have never set that up, I only ever run on the camera images numbers,
> how else do I get to keep track of the frames so that I can prepare the
> next prefix in my numbering scheme. The
for one event.
Looks like you should have used add to library rather than copy and import.
Best,
Niranjan
On 10/29/21 5:26 AM, Andrew Greig wrote:
Hi,
Upon upgrading to 3.6 I have now discovered that DT has renamed all of
the images in the folder I opened today with 20211029- 1104.CR2.
I
Andrew Greig schrieb am 29.10.21 um 14:26:
Hi,
Upon upgrading to 3.6 I have now discovered that DT has renamed all of
the images in the folder I opened today with 20211029- 1104.CR2.
I have never set that up, I only ever run on the camera images
numbers, how else do I get to keep track
Hi,
Upon upgrading to 3.6 I have now discovered that DT has renamed all of
the images in the folder I opened today with 20211029- 1104.CR2.
I have never set that up, I only ever run on the camera images numbers,
how else do I get to keep track of the frames so that I can prepare the
next
Hi Andrew,
if you still have the JPEG files (and did not disable that option or
strip the EXIF data) you should be able to recover the editing history
from the JPEG files.
Lighttable, module history stack, load from sidecar file. Then select
the matching JPEG.
Best regards,
Markus
Am 29.10.21
Le vendredi 29 octobre 2021 à 19:54 +1100, Andrew Greig a écrit :
> So I accessed my Data drive and the folder of RAW files
> completed yesterday only to find that everything had been reset.
> .xmp
> files 0 bytes so four hours of labour is down the toilet. Fortunately
> I
> files. How do I
Hi All,
I finished processing 162 RAW files yesterday, a complete shoot, took me
around 4 hours in Darktable 3.4. My time was well spent.
Today, I decided to upgrade to 3.6. It asked me if I wanted to upgrade
the data base, and having passed through earlier upgrades without
dilemma, I
Ouch, I have had to read it twice
Have a nice day,
Rafa
Enviado desde mi tabla de planchar
El vie., 29 oct. 2021 8:26, Michael Staats escribió:
> On 29/10/2021 08:21, Rafa García wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > You're lucky, the retouch module has a cloning mode that works in the
> > same way as
Le vendredi 29 octobre 2021 à 16:00 +1100, Andrew Greig a écrit :
> retouch is not superior it just does a different job
In retouch you have the same feature without content awareness.
And there is no plan for the Spot Removal to be back.
--
Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)
The best
On 29/10/2021 08:21, Rafa García wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You're lucky, the retouch module has a cloning mode that works in the
> same way as the old spot removal.
>
> Check the manual:
>
> https://docs.darktable.org/usermanual/3.6/module-reference/processing-modules/retouch/
>
Hi,
You're lucky, the retouch module has a cloning mode that works in the
same way as the old spot removal.
Check the manual:
https://docs.darktable.org/usermanual/3.6/module-reference/processing-modules/retouch/
Regards,
Rafa
El vie, 29 oct 2021 a las 8:17, Michael Staats ()
escribió:
>
On 29/10/2021 07:00, Andrew Greig wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have just moved to DT 3.6 Ubuntu 20.04 LTS and I miss the Spot removal
> tool. Please re-instate it. Some, mistakenly, I believe, consider the
> Retouch module to be superior in function to the spot removal tool.
Hi
I don't think the
The spot removal tool is still there, it's just been deprecated. You can
use the module search to find it. Enable it and create a style with it,
then you can apply the style anytime you need the spot removal module
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 1:00 AM Andrew Greig wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have just
14 matches
Mail list logo
