Re: [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files

gt;>> > 2016-08-01 5:46 GMT-03:00 Rafa García > > > > > >>> > >: > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > Hi Edgardo, > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > I wr

Re: [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files

t; > >>>> > > > >>> > >>>> > > > >>> > >>>> > > > >>> > >>>> Rgds, > > > >>> > >>>> > > > >>> > >>>> &

Re: [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files

I tried it now, too, but I must say that (at least for my D610) I had expected a bit more. I let Nikon's software work on more than 500 files and got 60 differing profiles. Most of them looked more or less the same, three were not usable in Darktable, and one comes out completely green—not

Re: [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files

Please note that there are legal concerns regarding these profiles. The RawTherapee guys, who (AFAIK) were the first ones to cine up with a way to extract them, never shared them. Please don't share files of questionable legality on the forum, regardless of size. Kofa

Re: [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files

> > >>>> > Almost. It generates a different profile for each camera > >>>> > setting (it seems like). So of mine 98 pictures, I got 10 > >>>> > different profiles. > >>>> > > >>>> > > That would mean t

Re: [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files

Sorry about that, I didn't notice the size of the file, I'll have it in mind the next time. 2016-08-01 19:20 GMT-03:00 Terry Duell : > Hello Edgardo, > > On Tue, 02 Aug 2016 04:10:22 +1000, Edgardo Hoszowski < > edgardo.hoszow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sure, see attached >>

Re: [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files

Hello Edgardo, On Tue, 02 Aug 2016 04:10:22 +1000, Edgardo Hoszowski wrote: Sure, see attached The 'attached' that arrived here was 6.5 MB. I'm not sure what others think, but in view it is bad etiquette to attach large files to posts to mailing lists, as

Re: [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files

;> >> >> >> >> > Message du 26/07/16 20:41 >> > De : "Vidar Hoel" <vidar.h...@sysrq.info> >> > A : "Jean-Luc CECCOLI" <jean-luc.cecc...@wanadoo.fr>, >> darktable-user@lists.darktable.org >> > Copie à : >

Re: [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files

;> >> >> >> >> > Message du 26/07/16 20:41 >> > De : "Vidar Hoel" <vidar.h...@sysrq.info> >> > A : "Jean-Luc CECCOLI" <jean-luc.cecc...@wanadoo.fr>, >> darktable-user@lists.darktable.org >> > Copie à : >

Re: [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files

s a subjective observation! > > > > Regards, > > Vidar Hoel > > > > > That said, I think that that is the way profiles work... > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > J.-Luc >

Re: [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files

r@lists.darktable.org > Copie à : > Objet : [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files > > Hi, > > some time ago I noticed that the JPGs from my Nikon were better then > what I could achieve from processing the RAW-file (NEF) in Darktab

Re: [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files

, J.-Luc > Message du 26/07/16 18:45 > De : "Vidar Hoel" <vidar.h...@sysrq.info> > A : darktable-user@lists.darktable.org > Copie à : > Objet : [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files > > Hi, >

Re: [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files

Hi. Base curve and input color profile are located *after* the denoise (profiled) in pipe, so they can not interfere with denoise (profiled) in any way... https://www.darktable.org/usermanual/ch03s02.html.php Roman. On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Vidar Hoel wrote: >

Re: [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files

Hi, No, I use the "denoise (profiled)" as before, and it works the same way, regardless of what modules (base curve or input color profile) I have applied before. It sure seems like it, anyway. Regards, Vidar Hoel On 26. juli 2016 19:09, Colin Adams wrote: That looks very interesting. But

re: [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files

worse results than using the DT dedicated basecurve, isn't it ? That said, I think that that is the way profiles work...   Regards,   J.-Luc     > Message du 26/07/16 18:45 > De : "Vidar Hoel" > A : darktable-user@lists.darktable.org > Copie à : > Objet : [darktabl

Re: [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files

That looks very interesting. But I have a question. The image showed much less noise. But can you also use profiled denoise with this approach, or is there an inherent conflict? On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 at 17:45 Vidar Hoel wrote: > Hi, > > some time ago I noticed that the JPGs