Re: [dash-dev] maven.eclipse.org

2013-01-31 Thread Matthias Sohn
2013/1/31 Andrew Ross > On 01/31/2013 11:41 AM, Matthias Sohn wrote: > > 2013/1/31 Thanh Ha > >> Hi Everyone, >> >> Per Bug 394792 I'm looking at moving maven.eclipse.org to become a >> managed service at Eclipse. I plan on tackling this issue soon and was >> wondering if taking this server dow

Re: [dash-dev] maven.eclipse.org

2013-01-31 Thread Andrew Ross
On 01/31/2013 11:41 AM, Matthias Sohn wrote: 2013/1/31 Thanh Ha mailto:thanh...@eclipse.org>> Hi Everyone, Per Bug 394792 I'm looking at moving maven.eclipse.org to become a managed service at Eclipse. I plan on tackling this issue soon and was wonderi

Re: [dash-dev] maven.eclipse.org

2013-01-31 Thread Thanh Ha
Thanks, this is good feedback to know. I'm thinking maybe the best option at the moment is to create a new server elsewhere thus leaving maven.eclipse.org alone for now. Once the new server is ready to go we can make the switch later. Thanh On 31/01/13 11:44 AM, Jesse McConnell wrote: oh tha

Re: [dash-dev] maven.eclipse.org

2013-01-31 Thread Jesse McConnell
oh that is true, we use that plugin for our p2 repositories for jetty as well so please leave that around for the time being -- jesse mcconnell jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Matthias Sohn wrote: > 2013/1/31 Thanh Ha > >> Hi Everyone, >> >> Per Bug 394792 I'm looki

Re: [dash-dev] maven.eclipse.org

2013-01-31 Thread Matthias Sohn
2013/1/31 Thanh Ha > Hi Everyone, > > Per Bug 394792 I'm looking at moving maven.eclipse.org to become a > managed service at Eclipse. I plan on tackling this issue soon and was > wondering if taking this server down would affect any projects? > the EGit project is downloading the eclipse-signin

Re: [dash-dev] maven.eclipse.org

2013-01-31 Thread Thanh Ha
Thanks Jason, This clears up some questions I had regarding staging and Maven Central. Thanh On 31/01/13 10:59 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Thanh, We will never accept artifacts from a Nexus instance that is not running the staging suite. The staging suite is the facility that validates there

Re: [dash-dev] maven.eclipse.org

2013-01-31 Thread Jason van Zyl
Thanh, We will never accept artifacts from a Nexus instance that is not running the staging suite. The staging suite is the facility that validates there is a valid POM, javadocs, sources, PGP signatures and also ensures that a release doesn't get corrupted. We have spent an enormous amount of

Re: [dash-dev] maven.eclipse.org

2013-01-31 Thread David Carver
Just remember Staging Repository support is only available in Nexus if you get the Nexus Pro version, which Sonatype has offered to you guys in the past at no charge, but was turned down. If hosting a Nexus Pro instance still goes against eclipse foundation software usage guidelines, then the

Re: [dash-dev] maven.eclipse.org

2013-01-31 Thread Thanh Ha
I had a look at oss.sonatype.org's nexus instance and from what I gather it provides each project with 4 repository services. project-snapshots (hosted) project-releases (hosted) project-with-staging (group) project repositories (group) I think if we setup maven.eclipse.org with a similar model

Re: [dash-dev] maven.eclipse.org

2013-01-31 Thread Andrew Ross
Jesse, All Agreeing with you, and building upon what you've said: In our work on CBI & LTS, it became clear that not only would a well managed service in this case be very useful, but also satisfy very important use cases for LTS. LTS' success helps subsidize efforts like CBI & this work wit

Re: [dash-dev] maven.eclipse.org

2013-01-31 Thread Martin Taal
As a replacement of sonatype, I would need 2 things: - a place to publish nightly/weekly builds - an entry in maven central (with a 2 step procedure, that's fine) I don't need the sonatype ui, so publishing/releasing through maven commandline would be fine with me. I think eclipse could offer a

Re: [dash-dev] maven.eclipse.org

2013-01-31 Thread Jesse McConnell
Martin, And you would not want to use something @ eclipse that didn't have the staging functionality that exists on oss.sonatype.org correct? cheers, jesse -- jesse mcconnell jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Martin Taal wrote: > I agree with Jesse... > > Maybe it i

Re: [dash-dev] maven.eclipse.org

2013-01-31 Thread Martin Taal
I agree with Jesse... Maybe it is best to take maven.eclipse.org down, but don't do anything else unless someone takes responsibility and there is funding to do so. I currently publish EMF Texo/Teneo and EMF jars through sonatypeto get them on maven.central. It works fine, but I find it stran

Re: [dash-dev] maven.eclipse.org

2013-01-31 Thread Jesse McConnell
I really don't understand the point of resetting it if there is not a clear understanding of what roll it will serve within the organization moving forward and a recommended path for how projects will interact with it. If it is only going to be a proxy for maven central, then that is fine and you

Re: [dash-dev] maven.eclipse.org for Eclipse Gemini?

2013-01-28 Thread Thanh Ha
On 24/01/13 03:29 PM, Denis Roy wrote: On 01/23/2013 06:10 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote: [snip] Unless you get Denis and the webmasters to bring maven.eclipse.org under the 5 9's support it is not a good thing to do to your users IMO. Builds are critical. For what i

Re: [dash-dev] maven.eclipse.org for Eclipse Gemini?

2013-01-24 Thread Denis Roy
On 01/23/2013 06:10 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote: [snip] Unless you get Denis and the webmasters to bring maven.eclipse.org under the 5 9's support it is not a good thing to do to your users IMO. Builds are critical. For what it's worth, doing just that is on Thanh's l

Re: [dash-dev] maven.eclipse.org for Eclipse Gemini?

2013-01-24 Thread Kissner, Juergen
-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:dash-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Jesse McConnell Sent: Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2013 00:10 To: Tools for Committer Community Subject: Re: [dash-dev] maven.eclipse.org for Eclipse Gemini? I'll expand since I have a bit of time now. - maven.eclipse.org

Re: [dash-dev] maven.eclipse.org for Eclipse Gemini?

2013-01-24 Thread Jesse McConnell
Saw this today and figured I would toss it onto here since it seemed quite topical: http://www.sonatype.com/people/2009/02/why-putting-repositories-in-your-poms-is-a-bad-idea/ cheers, jesse -- jesse mcconnell jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote: >

Re: [dash-dev] maven.eclipse.org for Eclipse Gemini?

2013-01-23 Thread Jesse McConnell
I'll expand since I have a bit of time now. - maven.eclipse.org is running on the free version of Nexus, not Nexus Pro and as such has no staging repository support which is a critical feature when it comes to deploying releases...we have been offered a free version of Nexus Pro but that is not al

Re: [dash-dev] maven.eclipse.org for Eclipse Gemini?

2013-01-23 Thread Jesse McConnell
IMO deploy it to central through oss.sonatype.org maven.eclipse.org has no clear mandate at this point, no path to having artifacts sent to maven central, and when you go into maven central you have to work out the orbit dependency issues yourself which is important. (which also currently have no