On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 08:43:43AM -0400, Shea Levy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In my db, a Project has many Jobs. I have a query on Projects where
> I want to:
>
> 1. Sort the jobs of each project by a particular column on the Jobs table
> 2. Only include jobs that satisfy some criterion, without exclu
Hi all,
In my db, a Project has many Jobs. I have a query on Projects where I
want to:
1. Sort the jobs of each project by a particular column on the Jobs table
2. Only include jobs that satisfy some criterion, without excluding
projects where no such jobs exist (i.e. add a condition to JOI
Hi Peter,
On 04/01/2013 08:46 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 08:43:43AM -0400, Shea Levy wrote:
Hi all,
In my db, a Project has many Jobs. I have a query on Projects where
I want to:
1. Sort the jobs of each project by a particular column on the Jobs table
2. Only include
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 08:54:55AM -0400, Shea Levy wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 04/01/2013 08:46 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 08:43:43AM -0400, Shea Levy wrote:
> >>Hi all,
> >>
> >>In my db, a Project has many Jobs. I have a query on Projects where
> >>I want to:
> >>
> >>1
On 04/01/2013 08:58 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 08:54:55AM -0400, Shea Levy wrote:
Hi Peter,
On 04/01/2013 08:46 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 08:43:43AM -0400, Shea Levy wrote:
Hi all,
In my db, a Project has many Jobs. I have a query on Projects
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 09:07:51AM -0400, Shea Levy wrote:
> On 04/01/2013 08:58 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 08:54:55AM -0400, Shea Levy wrote:
> >>Hi Peter,
> >>
> >>On 04/01/2013 08:46 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 08:43:43AM -0400, Shea Levy wr
Shea --
There may be a legacy code situation or some political barriers, but
Peter's point is that you can modify both individual Result:: classes and
ResultSet:: classes to make your scripts much more powerful and flexible.
They're designed to work this way, which is why each Result class contain
Hi Peter,
On 04/01/2013 09:37 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 09:07:51AM -0400, Shea Levy wrote:
On 04/01/2013 08:58 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 08:54:55AM -0400, Shea Levy wrote:
Hi Peter,
On 04/01/2013 08:46 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
On Mon, Apr
From: "Peter Rabbitson"
> what is so scary/undesirable about "modifying the schema" ?
>
> That is a real question - you are not the first to word things thusly. I
> need to figure out where the fear to add an extra definition is coming
> from.
>
> Cheers
I can tell you my source of fear of