Re: [deal.II] Why is this asserted to be impossible?

2016-09-18 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 09/18/2016 03:45 AM, Alex Zimmerman wrote: I question all of the asserts in this file: https://github.com/dealii/dealii/blob/master/source/numerics/vector_tools_rhs.cc My particular case is the one on line 36, for dim = 1 and spacedim = 1. Thanks for looking into this. This looks like we

Re: [deal.II] Why is this asserted to be impossible?

2016-09-18 Thread Alex Zimmerman
I question all of the asserts in this file: https://github.com/dealii/dealii/blob/master/source/numerics/vector_tools_rhs.cc My particular case is the one on line 36, for dim = 1 and spacedim = 1. Thanks for looking into this. On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 2:42:01 AM UTC+2, Wolfgang

Re: [deal.II] Why is this asserted to be impossible?

2016-09-17 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 09/17/2016 05:20 AM, Alex Zimmerman wrote: Not understanding why this is impossible, I began digging through the code a bit and thought I would write my own 1D implementation. I noticed that the code in the existing template should work correctly without any changes. So instead I simply

[deal.II] Why is this asserted to be impossible?

2016-09-17 Thread Alex Zimmerman
I have a code that is an extension of step-26 with non-homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions and zero forcing function, among other changes. Until recently I had only actually run the code in 2D, though I have been continuing the "dimension independent" programming. Yesterday I tried running