It looks like all the issues are sorted out for the initrds, I plan to
begin the final build shortly after archive sync tomorrow. I'm only
waiting now for a few builds to be uploaded from the autobuilders and
similar.
Looking at the timeline, starting the initrd builds tomorrow will give
us 9 days
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> Unfortunately the last week was not as free for me as I supposed it to
> be. So I didn't have the oportunity to thest the package for LVM support
> in partman-auto.
>
> I am attaching the package to this message. I haven't commited it
> because I don't know how the commit w
Package: lvmcfg
Severity: normal
If I have an lvm lv with a swap on it, and it's swapped on, and I go
into the lvmcfg from partman, and try to delete it, I can't. Probably it
should try to swapoff lv's before deleting them.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT p
> > For this, we would need to have a udeb with the
> > /usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED file when countrychooser (or later
> > localechooser) is run.
>
> I don't see why we would need that. I'm suggesting that the default
> answers to the country shortlist questions be determined at build time,
> not at
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 07:21:31AM -0400, Bahman wrote:
> I have tried apt-get install i2c-source and nothing, the package
> doesn't exist. But there is such a package in the archive.
I don't see any package named i2c-source.
If you want to install the source code of a package, add to
/etc/apt/
Your message dated Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:00:17 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#275843: Installation report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
I have the exact same problem with the same model.
Using a pre-rc2 or nightly build with kernel 2.6 I could do a complete
installation, but
then it freezes during boot.
The symptons and error messages seems to identical to:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2004/09/msg00414.html
and if that's
Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> After some firter analysis, I've founfd that this guess is also wrong.
> "File not found" message is really there in logs, but it is not because
> package is really missing, but because
> of /usr/lib/prebaseconfig.d/10bind-mount script, that removes bind
> mount /c
Christian Perrier wrote:
> If this is a new package, I think it's OK to commit it now : this
> won't interfere with the (finished) string freeze and this gives
> translators a chance to update translations as soon as possible.
>
> Joey, do you agree?
Yes, I agree, and have committed it.
--
see
Geert Stappers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A new build got me:
>
> Build conflicts: upx-ucl-beta (>= 1.93)
>
>
> Looking further brougth me to installer/debian/changelog with
>
> - upx-ucl-beta 1.93 is broken. Avoid building with this version via
> Build-Conflicts. The safe version to use,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 07:21:31AM -0400, Bahman wrote:
> I have tried apt-get install i2c-source and nothing, the package
> doesn't exist. But there is such a package in the archive.
This isn't the correct list; please contact debian-user with such
problems in the future.
That said, i2c-source i
Package: kbd-chooser
Severity: normal
The prebaseconfig script tries to apt-install some packages after the CD
is ejected.
Luckily, all the packages seem to be installed for other reasons
already (because base-config depends on them). Still, this needs to be
fixed.
-- System Information:
Debian
Package: network-console
Severity: normal
In prebaseconfig, the CD is unmounted and apt-install is no longer
guaranteed to work after step 10. The prebaseconfig script for
network-console runs at 85 or so and uses apt-install. This will fail
for installs from CD. I assume that so far all installs
Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> After some firter analysis, I've founfd that this guess is also wrong.
> "File not found" message is really there in logs, but it is not because
> package is really missing, but because
> of /usr/lib/prebaseconfig.d/10bind-mount script, that removes bind
> mount /c
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Package: countrychooser
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Right now the postinst script sets default countries in the shortlist at
> > runtime. I've sort of fixed this to not break preseeding, but the right
> > fix is really to add D
same. Both error upon
attempting to install initrd-tools package when sid is selected with
the expert-powerpc, and both succeed when install-powerpc is selected
(no option for selecting sarge or sid is presented in this option). I
have repeated the tests with today's image (20041011) fo
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20041009/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
downloaded and burned to cd-r on a winxp system w/
nero 5.
uname -a:
Linux theta 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Mon Sep 13 23:29:55 EDT
2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 1
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/i386/pre-rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso>
downloaded the 20041006
uname -a: Linux vuelta 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Mon Sep 13 23:29:55 EDT 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 20041011
Method: Boot from a cd
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Pre-Release Candidate 2, downloaded 10 October
2004
uname -a: N/A
Date: 11 October 2004 10am
Method: Installed from bootable CD made from iso
Machine: Old custom-built system
Processor: Cyrix 6x86 200+
Memory: 64 Mb
Root Device: Maxtor SAT
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 2004-10-4 cdimage.debian.org pre-rc2 i386
uname -a: Linux amethyst 2.4.27-1-586tsc #1 Fri Sep 3 06:38:00 UTC 2004 i586
GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-10-04 20:00
Method: booted netinst, booted off cdr, installed debs from netinst and l
Package: languagechooser
Severity: normal
Tags: patch l10n
Please change the Hebrew default locale to he_IL.UTF-8. This is almost as in bug
#273718. I hope this will solve another bug related to the 2nd stage.
Thanks,
Lior Kaplan
D-I Hebrew Translator
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.
Rejected: rootskel_1.05_sparc.changes: a file with this name already exists in the
Done directory.
Rejected: rootskel-locale_1.05_sparc.udeb: old version (1.05) in unstable >= new
version (1.05) targeted at unstable.
Rejected: rootskel-locale_1.05_sparc.udeb: can not overwrite existing copy alre
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/ just before rc2 was
released (sorry, don't have the exact date for the download)
uname -a: Linux betula 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Mon Sep 13 23:29:55 EDT 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
(I upgraded
rootskel_1.05_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_1.05_sparc.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.05_sparc.udeb
rootskel-locale_1.05_sparc.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
Rejected: rootskel_1.05_sparc.changes: a file with this name already exists in the
Done directory.
Rejected: rootskel-locale_1.05_sparc.udeb: old version (1.05) in unstable >= new
version (1.05) targeted at unstable.
Rejected: rootskel-locale_1.05_sparc.udeb: can not overwrite existing copy alre
rootskel_1.05_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_1.05_sparc.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.05_sparc.udeb
rootskel-locale_1.05_sparc.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
|--==> Petter Reinholdtsen writes:
PR> [Free Ekanayaka]
>>Probably the right number would be 90, but it is currently used by
>>localization-config. Actually I think that also localization-config
>>should change its number, as the the keyboard layout should be
>>injected in
After googling I found information that the 2.6 Kernel on a
businesscard CD works well with my Toshiba 3020ct, is there a boot
floppy that has a 2.6 Kernel on it somewhere?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Mon, 11 Oct 2004 21:47:03 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Recreation of rescue image can only be done from the BIOS
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
[Free Ekanayaka]
> Probably the right number would be 90, but it is currently used by
> localization-config. Actually I think that also localization-config
> should change its number, as the the keyboard layout should be
> injected in the debconf database *before* running xdebcon
Accepted:
languagechooser_1.38.dsc
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.38.dsc
languagechooser_1.38.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.38.tar.gz
languagechooser_1.38_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.38_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PR
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 275882 pending
Bug#275882: os-prober: [patch]windows NT/2000/XP refinement
Tags were: d-i patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
languagechooser_1.38_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
languagechooser_1.38.dsc
languagechooser_1.38.tar.gz
languagechooser_1.38_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.05_sparc.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_1.05_sparc.udeb
rootskel-locale_1.05_sparc.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-locale_1.05_sparc.udeb
rootskel_1.05_sparc.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.05_sparc.udeb
Thank you for your con
rootskel_1.05_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_1.05_sparc.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.05_sparc.udeb
rootskel-locale_1.05_sparc.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
Rejected: md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of rootskel_1.05.dsc.
Rejected: md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of rootskel_1.05.tar.gz.
Rejected: rootskel_1.05.dsc: old version (1.05) in unstable >= new version (1.05)
targeted at unstable.
Rejected: can not overwrite existing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 252751
Bug#252751: dialogs with multiselect list boxes should not require user to use tab to
select OK
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> reassign 252751 cdebconf
Bug#252751: dialogs with multiselect list boxes should not require user to u
Accepted:
netcfg-dhcp_1.05_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_1.05_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_1.05_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_1.05_i386.udeb
netcfg_1.05.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.05.dsc
netcfg_1.05.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.05.tar.gz
netcfg_1.0
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.14
Severity: minor
Joey Hess email address at tasksel man page is written as debiam.org and I
suppose it should be debian.org.
A really small bug, but still a bug. :)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Ar
rootskel_1.05_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_1.05.dsc
rootskel_1.05.tar.gz
rootskel_1.05_sparc.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.05_sparc.udeb
rootskel-locale_1.05_sparc.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
netcfg_1.05_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_1.05.dsc
netcfg_1.05.tar.gz
netcfg_1.05_i386.udeb
netcfg-dhcp_1.05_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_1.05_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: jigdo-lite with template that was current Oct.6 2004
uname -a: Linux debian 2.6.7-ruby #1 Mon Oct 11 07:25:24 CDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Mon Oct. 11 2004
Method: From 6 jigdo-lited CD's (current) What did you boot off? CD1 If network
Hello,
A new build got me:
Build conflicts: upx-ucl-beta (>= 1.93)
Looking further brougth me to installer/debian/changelog with
- upx-ucl-beta 1.93 is broken. Avoid building with this version via
Build-Conflicts. The safe version to use, 1.91, is in testing.
Closes: #275378
I keep running into this bug, so I'm going to note it here so folks have
some hope of finding it and understanding what's going on.
I just did a d-i run on a pristine (took it out of the box ~30 minutes
ago) Dell GX280, 3GB memory, dual SATA disks.
everything seems to roll merrily along - the i
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 02:30:51AM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:27:35 -0300
> Andre Luis Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I know that Gustavo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was working on the gtk frontend
> > sometime ago. Last time I meet him personally (around a month ago
Quoting Anton Zinoviev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Unfortunately the last week was not as free for me as I supposed it to
> be. So I didn't have the oportunity to thest the package for LVM support
> in partman-auto.
>
> I am attaching the package to this message. I haven't commited it
> because I don't
On Saturday 09 October 2004 16:58, you wrote:
> Frederik,
>
> I am trying to install Debian on a SPARC Ultra5 like you. It's a
> serial console install without keyboard, mouse, display. I am using
> the Debian Installer also. My install fails exactly like your does.
>
> Were you able to get Debi
I just did a complete install and found the same problem using
debian-installer version pre-rc2.
This problem was already known many months ago, and reported in #244956.
Bye,
Giuseppe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
Package: preseed
Version: 1.01
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
I would like to have an additional preseed which runs before the
language choser.
see http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/10/msg00812.html
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'tes
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: PRE RC-2
uname -a: Linux zegal 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Mon Sep 13 23:29:55 EDT 2004 i586 GNU/Linux
Date: 11 oct 2004 ~ 11 H 00 (GMT+2)
Method: expert26
NetInstall
From SCSI CDRW Drive
Local Network without DHCP and without Prox
Unfortunately the last week was not as free for me as I supposed it to
be. So I didn't have the oportunity to thest the package for LVM support
in partman-auto.
I am attaching the package to this message. I haven't commited it
because I don't know how the commit would interfere with the string
fre
> > Right now the postinst script sets default countries in the shortlist at
> > runtime. I've sort of fixed this to not break preseeding, but the right
> > fix is really to add Default fields to each individual per-language
> > shortlist template, and not set it at runtime.
>
>
> For this, we w
Package: xdebconfigurator
Version: 1.10
Severity: normal
I think xdebconfigurator should be run *after* pkgsel. This way
xdebconfigurator triggers itself if the xserver-common package (which
contains dexconf) was installed, and does nothing otherwise.
Probably the right number would be
> > So, my proposal is the following:
> >
> > -commit the changes you think are needed to languagechooser un trunk
> > -of some are needed to base-cofnig, commit them to its trunk (NOT to
> > the sarge branch)
> >
> > TEST all that damn thing. Possibly before THIS EVENING 10/8 18:00 UTC
>
> I've c
Hi,
I'd like to use netcfg-dhcp but *not* netcfg-static.
I'm wondering which is the default behaviour of netcfg-dhcp in case of
failure.. Does it prompt the user for error? If so is there a way to
force it to silently go on even in case of failure? I'd like the
process to be non-interacti
[Free Ekanayaka]
> currently xdebconfigurator base-config menu item has number 76, while
> pkgselhas 80. Isthere any particular reason for running
> xdebconfigurator *before* tasksel?
Nope. The number was selected for woody, and just copied to sarge.
Should we change it to another
Hi,
currently xdebconfigurator base-config menu item has number 76, while
pkgselhas 80. Isthere any particular reason for running
xdebconfigurator *before* tasksel?
Running it running it *after* would make it trigger itself basing on
the user choice (with or without X).
Cheers,
Your message dated Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:14:32 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug
Hi People,
I have tried apt-get install i2c-source and nothing, the package doesn't exist. But
there is such a package in the archive.
Any ideas please
___
Bahman
___
No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
Make My Way your hom
On Friday 08 October 2004 18:43, Joey Hess wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > Or passwd/root-passwd with an invented 'hash' flag set.
Yes, I think that would work, although (playing devil's advocate, somewhat), a
hash is just a string with different semantics.
Normally, the semantics are held in t
1. It doesn't work (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=272360).
2. I'm not sure a novice your will be able to use aptitude on the fly..
remember he doesn't know Debian.
3. Please leave this bug open.
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #275907: tasksel: de
Michael Gilbert wrote:
> the debian-installer allowed me to configure my wireless lan settings
> during the initial network setup (before the first boot during the
> installation...this step actually worked correctly and the first set of
> packages needed for the base system were obtained over my w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> reassign 275920 netcfg
Bug#275920: debian-installer: wireless lan (wlan) settings are discarded at first boot
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `netcfg'.
>
End of mess
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> retitle 274665 Should detect IBM Thinkpad's recovery partition
Bug#274665: installation-reports: Installation report on Thinkpad X31
Changed Bug title.
> severity 274665 wishlist
Bug#
64 matches
Mail list logo
