Bug#1017555: Let's drop win32-loader from amd64/i386 and multiarch CDs

Package: debian-cd Version: 3.1.35 Severity: normal Tags: d-i X-Debbugs-Cc: win32-loa...@packages.debian.org Following the recent discussion on d-boot [1], it seems we agreed to drop win32-loader from the Debian CDs, as it's not likely to be very useful these days. win32-loader seems also

Time to drop win32-loader ?

Hello there, (please CC me on replies, I'm not on these lists) (live from the d-i/debian-cd BoF) as some of you likely remember, win32-loader is shipped on d-i and debian-cd images, and is added in autorun.inf for automated launch on Windows machines, when USB/CDs are plugged in. What it does

Re: Keyboard Layout configuration wizard - Swiss localization

Hello Mark, Le mercredi, 24 février 2021, 21.31:43 h CET hispeedhsx a écrit : > I'm new to Debian and I switch from centos but I have seen this problem for > now several years and in several distributions even I think freebsd has it > wrong (in my opinion). > > So I'm from Switzerland and I use

Bug#982838: RoM: win32-loader must not migrate automatically

Source: win32-loader Version: 0.10.5 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org, debian-rele...@lists.debian.org win32-loader is one of the rare packages always blocked, because it has a 'byhand' counterpart per release: `/debian/tools/win32-loader/{release}`, and therefore

Bug#982606: unblock: win32-loader/0.10.4

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org Please unblock package win32-loader in its 0.10.4 version [ Reason ] win32-loader is one of the rare packages always blocked, because it has a

Bug#967048: unblock: win32-loader/0.10.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org Please unblock package win32-loader in its 0.10.1 version [ Reason ] win32-loader is one of the rare packages always blocked, because it has a

Re: win32-loader upload

Le dimanche, 12 juillet 2020, 14.09:52 h CEST Holger Wansing a écrit : > Hi Didier, > > I noticed we have some translation updates pending-upload for win32-loader. > Since there were no new changelog entries for other changings, I thought > it's a translation-update-only upload, and that would be

Bug#953809: tasksel 3.59: it needs to delete task-print-server and task-print-service

Le vendredi, 13 mars 2020, 23.39:53 h CEST Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > Hi, > > Сергей Фёдоров (2020-03-13): > > Package: tasksel > > Version: 3.59 > > Severity: normal > > > > When upgrading any of the packages from version 3.58 to 3.59: > >task-cyrillic > >task-desktop > >

Re: Bug#950553: Remove task-print-{server,service}

Le mardi, 10 mars 2020, 08.46:24 h CET Laurent Bigonville a écrit : > On Mon, 03 Feb 2020 14:48:35 +0100 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud > > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > > If that'd help for transition measures, I'd be happy to add a Provides: > > task-print-s

Bug#950553: Remove task-print-{server,service}

Package: tasksel Version: 3.58 Severity: important Tags: patch Hello, in the context of trying to reduce the number of printing-related packages installed (see discussion starting at [0], I looked at what's pulled by the task-print-server and task-print-service packages. Initially, my patch

Re: Bug#934928: Bug#933829: win32-loader: Checksums need to be updated for new stable release, download fails to validate Release file.

Le mercredi, 21 août 2019, 10.44:51 h CEST Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed > > On 2019-08-21 09:14, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > Le mardi, 20 août 2019, 16.55:47 h CEST Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > >> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > &

Re: Bug#933829: win32-loader: Checksums need to be updated for new stable release, download fails to validate Release file.

Le mardi, 20 août 2019, 16.55:47 h CEST Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > [Recipients changed to use the p-u bug rather than the win32-loader one] > > On 2019-08-16 07:55, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > So win32-loader needs a stable update.

Re: Bug#933829: win32-loader: Checksums need to be updated for new stable release, download fails to validate Release file.

Le dimanche, 4 août 2019, 08.43:49 h CEST Yetoo Happy a écrit : > Dear Maintainer, > > Checksums need to be updated for new stable release, download fails to > validate Release file. I built package using Debian 10.0 intending to embed > the new checksum and testing the built package found the

Re: Bug#914897: tech-ctte: Should debootstrap disable merged /usr by default?

Le lundi, 4 mars 2019, 22.28:38 h CET Margarita Manterola a écrit : > Hi, > > > - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > > > > The winners are: > > Option M `middle` > > Option H `hard` > > > > -

Re: Bug#914897: tech-ctte: Should debootstrap disable merged /usr by default?

Le lundi, 25 février 2019, 14.58:09 h CET Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit : > I call for vote immediately on the following resolution. > > === Resolution === > > The Technical Committee resolves to decline to override the debootstrap > maintainers. > > Furthermore, us

Re: win32-loader_0.9.4_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Le samedi, 9 février 2019, 21.43:19 h CET Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > Holger Wansing (2019-02-09): > > According to > > https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-boot%40lists.debian.org > > win32-loader is still blocked from migrating to testing because of udeb > > block. > > > > This

Re: Bug#914897: tech-ctte: Should debootstrap disable merged /usr by default?

Dear Technical Committee members, I call for vote immediately on the following resolution. === Resolution === The Technical Committee resolves to decline to override the debootstrap maintainers. Furthermore, using its §6.1.5 "Offering advice" power, the Technical Committee considers that the

Re: Bug#914897: tech-ctte: Should debootstrap disable merged /usr by default?

Le jeudi, 21 février 2019, 15.28:23 h CET Ian Jackson a écrit : > Back in the wider world, of course many people build packages on > Debian systems for installation `somewhere else'. I have done it > myself and probably many of the people reading this message have too. > > What is implicitly

Re: Bug#914897: tech-ctte: Should debootstrap disable merged /usr by default?

Le mardi, 19 février 2019, 01.59:18 h CET Steve McIntyre a écrit : > While I'm not necessarily disagreeing with the overall point(s) here, > some of the points in this list of arguments seem dubious at > best. Maybe you could expand? Sure. Sorry for publishing a new ballot before answering. > >*

Re: Bug#914897: tech-ctte: Should debootstrap disable merged /usr by default?

Le lundi, 18 février 2019, 08.58:53 h CET Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit : > Dear Technical Committee members, > (CC'ed to submitter, and debootstrap maintainers for information and > feedack) > > Here's the current state of the draft resolution; which `master` is at > https:

Bug#914897: tech-ctte: Should debootstrap disable merged /usr by default?

Dear Technical Committee members, (CC'ed to submitter, and debootstrap maintainers for information and feedack) Here's the current state of the draft resolution; which `master` is at https://salsa.debian.org/debian/tech-ctte/blob/master/914897_merged_usr/ballot.md I will submit it to vote on

Bug#918863: reboot returns to Windows 10 on Lenovo X1

Le mardi, 15 janvier 2019, 17.39:00 h CET Bernhard Übelacker a écrit : > Therefore I raise the question if win32-loader is really supposed > to work on a secure boot EFI system? No. This was never implemented. win32-loader needs a new maintainer who is willing to tackle exactly these types of

Bug#919023: Simplification of BOOTCFG_CreateGUID function

Control: tags -1 +pending Le vendredi, 11 janvier 2019, 22.42:13 h CET Thomas Gaugler a écrit : > The conversion of an UUID value into a string can be achieved by just > using the g (GUID) type of the System plug-in. As a consequence the > Win32 API calls could be eliminated. Looks good to me;

Re: #914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default

Dear Hideki, dear src:debootstrap maintainers, tl;dr: debootstrap maintainers; can you agree to disable "merged /usr" by default now, or are you OK letting the TC decide on this subject? Longer version: As you might be aware, #914897 (initially filed on src:debootstrap) has now been

Re: Bug#902226: debian-installer-netboot-images: FTBFS in stretch, even when allowing network access

Hi theres, Le lundi, 25 juin 2018, 01.33:38 h CEST Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > Cyril Brulebois (2018-06-24): > > At first glance, it seems to me this bug could be addressed in two > > different ways, which don't seem to be too convoluted. The first way > > would be to try the s-p-u download and

Re: RFC: Switching guided partitioning to LVM by default?

Le samedi, 5 août 2017, 22.20:21 h EDT Geert Stappers a écrit : > When we take LVM as default (which is fine for me) > then we should have the courage to have free PE. > So not assign all diskspace. Yes. I just tried on a stretch mini.iso, if you pick "Guided - use a whole disk with LVM" , the

Re: Bug#864973: stretch-pu: package win32-loader/0.8.3+deb9u1

Le dimanche, 25 juin 2017, 22.53:27 h CEST Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > Looks good to me, feel free to upload, thanks. > > By the way, we probably shouldn't be using “stable” in URLs, but the > target distribution (stretch here)? Uploaded. I noticed 0.8.4 hasn't migrated to testing, which might

Bug#864973: stretch-pu: package win32-loader/0.8.3+deb9u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu As discussed on debian-boot starting from https://lists.debian.org/4374235.3xk2uo9...@odyx.org , win32-loader (in stretch) still doesn't use the deb.debian.org agreed-upon mirror.

Re: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

Le mardi, 30 mai 2017, 12.56:29 h CEST Daniel Kahn Gillmor a écrit : > I've just filed unblock request #863734, which will hopefully achieve > this result. Ah great. Will keep an eye and upload as soon that's granted :-) -- OdyX

Re: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

Le samedi, 27 mai 2017, 17.17:10 h CEST Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit : > win32-loader should be arch:all-rebuilt (aka uploaded) with a versionned > Build-Depends on the latest debian-archive-keyring. It would therefore > also embed the latest versions of all the other binaries its s

Re: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

Le vendredi, 26 mai 2017, 19.04:13 h CEST Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > Hi, > > You might have noticed final preparations for d-i Stretch RC 4 are > underways. A new debian-installer upload (or a binNMU) will need to > happen before the first stretch release (aka. r0). If there's anything > you

Re: Bug#861729: unblock: win32-loader/0.8.3

(Dropping the bug, only writing to d-boot) Le mercredi, 3 mai 2017, 11.54:16 h CEST Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > A couple of things (feel free to follow up only to debian-boot and me): > - debian/files is left over after building a source package; while I >know mostly nothing about

Bug#861729: unblock: win32-loader/0.8.3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock-udeb package win32-loader 0.8.3 as it fixes an FTBFS on i386 in

Bug#860695: win32-loader: FTBFS on i386: segmentation fault

Control: clone -1 -2 Control: reassign -2 mawk 1.3.3-17 Control: reopen -2 o...@debian.org Control: retitle -2 mawk: segfaults on i386 during win32-loader build Control: severity -2 serious Le mercredi, 19 avril 2017, 17.31:26 h CEST Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit : > Le mercredi, 19 avril 2

Bug#860695: win32-loader: FTBFS on i386: segmentation fault

Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +pending Le mercredi, 19 avril 2017, 15.44:00 h CEST Sven Joachim a écrit : > >> Relevant part (hopefully): > > Actually: > >> > # Prepare the README file > >> > awk > >> > (…) > >> > Segmentation fault > > > > `awk` segfaults here. This seems to be an awk bug, or

Bug#860695: win32-loader: FTBFS on i386: segmentation fault

Control: tags -1 +moreinfo +help Le mercredi, 19 avril 2017, 09.28:30 h CEST Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > During a rebuild of all packages in stretch (in a stretch chroot, not a > sid chroot), your package failed to build on i386. win32-loader is a arch:all package, and is "usually" built on amd64

Bug#859084: unblock: win32-loader/0.8.2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock-udeb package win32-loader 0.8.2 as it fixes a FTBFS in stretch (and is always blocked because of the manual migration to be done by ftpmasters): > * Fix dpkg-query calls

Bug#850801: unblock: win32-loader/0.8.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org X-Debbugs-Cc: win32-loa...@packages.debian.org, ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock-udeb package win32-loader 0.8.1. as it has some useful stretch'ification (and is always

Bug#819092: #819092 win32-loader cannot load dailies because NSISdl doesn't support https

tags -1 +help Le mercredi, 23 mars 2016, 16.41:21 h CET Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit : > As the title says, win32-loader currently can't download dailies, as > d-i.debian.org has moved to enforced https. > > That's a limitation of the NSISdl NSIS builtin plugin. It could

Bug#830951: Support usb dongles via usb-modeswitch and network-manager during installation

Le lundi, 26 décembre 2016, 14.42:08 h CET Pirate Praveen a écrit : > I wanted to install using a Tata Photon mobile broadband, but it was not > detected. Will this be addressed for stretch? (I have retitled the bug). No. Not for stretch. This needs at least usb-modeswitch{,-data} & pppd as

Bug#847253: Updating the debian-installer-netboot-images Uploaders list

Control: tags -1 +pending Hi Tobias, hi Otavio, Le mardi, 6 décembre 2016, 21.10:26 h CET Tobias Frost a écrit : > Otavio Salvador wishes no longer to be uploader of > debian-installer-netboot-images. Otavio, you'll be missed; thanks for you past work on d-i-n-i! I wish you

Bug#845254: unblock: win32-loader/0.8.0

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package win32-loader 0.8.0. win32-loader is special in that it is always 'block'ed, because it needs manual ftpmaster intervention on migration: > # doesn't actually produce

Re: Planning for d-i Stretch Alpha 9

Just replying regarding the general "d-i Stretch Alpha 9" question: I'd like to get win32-loader 0.8.0 into stretch for the next d-i alpha. There's more win32-loader work needed, but 0.8.0 is a pile of changes that are long needed in stretch. -- Cheers, OdyX

Re: Bug#839747: debian-installer-netboot-images: FTBFS in testing (no properly formatted SHA256 checksum lines found)

Le mercredi, 5 octobre 2016, 00.32:19 h CEST Santiago Vila a écrit : > On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 12:22:31AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > It might make sense to start uploading it to unstable since we're > > slowly approaching freeze time. Say: starting with the next d-i > > release. Works for

Bug#830951: Support usb dongles via usb-modeswitch and network-manager during installation

Le mercredi, 13 juillet 2016, 12.38:03 h CEST Pirate Praveen a écrit : > I installed a desktop system using jessie 8.5 cd 1 image. Even though > desktop was selected, I was booted into a text terminal because I could not > use my usb dongle during installation. After the system is installed, I >

Bug#782845: debian-installer-netboot-images: FTBFS with a checksum mismatch

Hi Cyril, Le vendredi, 22 avril 2016, 20.18:23 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > > Le samedi, 18 avril 2015, 20.02:15 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > > > Not sure what's happening but I can't seem able to build d-i-n-i, > > > with either httpredir.debian.org, localhost (a local mirror which > > > is

Bug#819586: debian-installer-netboot-images: unhelpful handling of GPG errors

Hoy KiBi, Le vendredi, 22 avril 2016, 19.57:55 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > Adam D. Barratt (2016-03-30): > > Whilst a failure to verify the Release signature does mean that we > > don't attempt to build an image using untrusted inputs, the package > > build continues

Bug#819092: win32-loader cannot load dailies (therefore can't setup non-stable arches) because NSISdl doesn't support https

Package: win32-loader Version: 0.7.14 Severity: important Tags: d-i As the title says, win32-loader currently can't download dailies, as d-i.debian.org has moved to enforced https. That's a limitation of the NSISdl NSIS builtin plugin. It could be replaced with the Inetc plugin [0], but it isn't

Bug#818997: gpgv.exe linked dynamically against zlib1, doesn't allow proper signature verification

Package: gpgv-win32 Version: 1.4.20-4 Severity: serious Tags: d-i Dear maintainers, I've noticed that gpgv.exe fails its CI test (debian/tests/gpgv-win32) in version 1.4.20-4 (-3 and previous work fine): (This is after adding WINEDEBUG=err+all as prefix to the latest line):

Bug#818604: Relies on MD5SUM and SHA1SUM to download d-i images in a trustful way

Le vendredi, 18 mars 2016, 18.43:41 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit : > C) Get coreutils build a hashsums-win32 package containing cross- >compiled win32 executables (as we're doing for gpgv-win32 and cpio- >win32). It could also provide these files through byhand, to allow &

Bug#818604: Relies on MD5SUM and SHA1SUM to download d-i images in a trustful way

Package: win32-loader Version: 0.7.14 Severity: important Tags: d-i Control: blocks 818463 by -1 win32-loader (its standalone version, available from debian/tools/ ) currently relies exclusively on MD5 and SHA1 to trustfully download the d-i images.

Bug#818604: Relies on MD5SUM and SHA1SUM to download d-i images in a trustful way

Control: tags -1 +help Le vendredi, 18 mars 2016, 16.25:10 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit : > win32-loader (its standalone version, available from debian/tools/ ) > currently relies exclusively on MD5 and SHA1 to trustfully download > the d-i images. After some more checking, this doesn

Re: Bug#806036: Privilege escalation and code execution vulnerabilities in generated NSIS installers

Dear Security Team, Dear Debian-Boot, Andre has reported this bug on Nov 24, and I've now uploaded the new NSIS version to unstable that fixes this bug. In Debian, there's at least one NSIS installer shipped in packages: win32-loader, that is shipped on our CDs and from the mirrors. Would it

Bug#807168: debian-installer-netboot-images: required resources not declared as build-dependencies (fetches via network)

Control: tags -1 +wontfix Le dimanche, 6 décembre 2015, 18.02:48 Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > debian-installer-netboot-images source package is less than 6k in > size. Clearly the main part of the resulting binary packages come > from fetching resources over the network (apparently using wget). >

Re: win32-loader_0.7.11_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Hi Cyril, Le mardi, 1 décembre 2015, 20.57:21 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > Debian FTP Masters (2015-11-30): > > Accepted: > > (…) > > Binary: win32-loader > This change is: > -Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=d-i/win32-loader.git > +Vcs-Browser:

Bug#806853: byhand-win32-loader script TARGET directory wrong for uploads to sid

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: important Dear FTP Masters, I recently uploaded win32-loader 0.7.11 to unstable with a _source.changes, resulting in an automated arch:all build. For a reason not relevant to this bugreport, the final _all.changes as uploaded by the buildd had 'sid' as suite,

Re: URGENT BUG !!!

(Answering in french, although this is an english-speaking list) Le dimanche, 6 septembre 2015, 12.06:06 cristian cristian a écrit : > aujourd'hui j'ai voulu télécharger une image ISO pour installer Debian > "stable" mais le lien que vous donnez sur votre site pointe vers un > répertoire

Re: [RFC] Architecture detection patches in multiarch CDs

OdyXLe samedi, 15 août 2015, 16.52:41 Didier '' Raboud a écrit : After three DebConfs discussing this (but only actually using DebConf space/time to actually work on it), and taking the opportunity of the immediate post stretch-alpha2 period, I'd like to discuss two architecture detection

Re: gpgv udebs

Le mercredi, 12 août 2015, 02.39:23 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : And thanks for getting in touch with us. Indeed. Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net (2015-08-11): i believe the installer relies on gpgv for archive manifest signature verification. we have gpgv-udeb for that purpose, i

Bug#793120: Multiarch menu: 32 bits speech options (gtk non-gtk) have the same text

Package: debian-installer Version: 20150718 Severity: normal Hi, in the 'Advanced options' of the multiarch CD, the speech synthesis install options for 32 bits have the same text regardless if they are for the GTK or non-GTK flavours. Cheers, OdyX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#793118: Multiarch menu missing the 32-bits Rescue entries in 'Advanced options'

Package: debian-installer Version: 20150718 Severity: normal Tags: pending Hi, the version as shortly releases lacks the 'Rescue' entries for the 32 bits flavours of the multiarch CD, in the 'Advanced options' sub-menu. The fix for this has already been committed to git, hence the pending.

Bug#784081: debian-installer-8-netboot-amd64: expert netboot install hangs at step install_packages (tasksel): uninitialized value in vec at /usr/bin/debconf-apt-progress

Control: reassign -1 debconf 1.5.56 Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Hi Hendrik, expert netboot install hangs at step install_packages (tasksel): uninitialized value in vec at /usr/bin/debconf-apt-progress This is most certainly a bug either in debconf or in the package it was configuring, but not

Re: Bug#783358: installation-reports: Debian 8 CD - Graphical install is not the default (installation guide says it should be)

Le dimanche, 3 mai 2015, 22.22:17 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : Hello, Holger Wansing li...@wansing-online.de (2015-05-03): So, shall I revert the manual back to text install is default? Yes please. I asked Didier to keep an eye on it but he pretended being busy with other topics. ;) Ah

Bug#783647: win32-loader: please make the build reproducible

Control: tags -1 +pending Le mardi, 28 avril 2015, 19.59:55 Jérémy Bobbio a écrit : While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that win32-loader could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch—based on Git master—fixes timestamps related variations from the

Bug#783206: unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150422

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package debian-installer-netboot-images, as it mirrors the d-i in the same version. It's probably best to have it available in Jessie before it becomes stable :-)

Bug#782845: debian-installer-netboot-images: FTBFS with a checksum mismatch

Control: reopen -1 Control: retitle -1 debian-installer-netboot-images: Can FTBFS with a checksum mismatch when there should be a version mismatch FTBFS earlier on Le samedi, 18 avril 2015, 20.02:15 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : Not sure what's happening but I can't seem able to build d-i-n-i,

Re: Bug#776928: unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150107

Hi all, Le dimanche, 8 février 2015, 21.54:04 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net (2015-02-06): A debhelper compat is an explicit no-go per the freeze policy. Otherwise, looks good to me. It's a bit unfortunate that d-i-n-i is huge and not too useful to upload

Re: Please update debian-installer's copyright file

Le mardi, 30 décembre 2014, 14.25:45 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : thanks for updating the artwork in debian-installer.git as well; could you please also update its copyright file with the relevant information? Just pushed, sorry for the omission and my unresponsiveness. Cheers, OdyX

Re: rootskel-gtk_1.31_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Le lundi, 29 décembre 2014, 17.08:42 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : Where do I learn more about this? kibi@arya:~/debian-installer/packages/rootskel-gtk$ git describe warning: tag 'debian/1.31' is really '1.31' here debian/1.31 kibi@arya:~/debian-installer/packages/rootskel-gtk$ git show 1.31

Bug#772898: win32-loader testing and newer fails with TRANSLATE error

Hi Bernhard, Le dimanche, 14 décembre 2014, 15.47:47 Bernhard Übelacker a écrit : So probably the solution could be only these 2 steps? - to rebuild package nsis-common with the current g++-mingw-w64-i686 package - rebuild win32-loader with the newly built nsis-common package installed

Re: win32-loader icon update?

Le mercredi, 10 décembre 2014, 05.56:22 jnqnfe a écrit : In relation to bug #772691 (autorun.inf not displaying a custom Debian icon from setup.exe aka win32-loader.exe when a Debian install disc/iso is loaded in a Windows environment, unlike Ubuntu) which I just reported, I created a small

Re: Bug#772898: win32-loader testing and newer fails with TRANSLATE error

Control: clone -1 -2 Control: retitle -2 nmu: nsis_2.46-9 Control: user -2 release.debian@packages.debian.org Control: usertag -2 +binnmu (Release Team, please see below :) ) Hi Bernhard Cyril, Many thanks for the detailed analysis! Le dimanche, 14 décembre 2014, 15.47:47 Bernhard

Bug#772898: win32-loader testing and newer fails with TRANSLATE error

Le lundi, 15 décembre 2014, 19.20:07 Adam D. Barratt a écrit : On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 10:09 +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: @Release Team, could we please schedule binNMUs for nsis ? nmu nsis_2.46-9 . ALL . -m Rebuild with gcc-mingw-w64 14 to ensure that NSISdl.dll doesn't

Bug#772898: win32-loader testing and newer fails with TRANSLATE error

Hi all, Le vendredi, 12 décembre 2014 10.03:10, vous avez écrit : Le jeudi, 11 décembre 2014, 17.15:49 Jimmy Kaplowitz a écrit : I got this error: Error: http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily//MD5SUMS/TRANSLATE; This error is an artifact of the failure of the win32-loader

Re: win32-loader_0.7.7

Le mardi, 18 novembre 2014 07.33:45, vous avez écrit : win32-loader (0.7.7) unstable; urgency=medium . The « Lineus longissimus » release Apparently this build has a problem; I just re-tested from the mirrors and it doesn't download correctly. I suspect a too-clean chroot. I'll

Re: debian-installer-netboot-images_20141002_amd64.changes is NEW

Dear FTP Masters, Le mardi, 28 octobre 2014 12.35:23, vous avez écrit : Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.

Bug#766960: debian-installer-netboot-images: Please provide packages for Debian 8

Hi all, Le lundi, 27 octobre 2014, 11.57:33 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org (2014-10-27): Le lundi, 27 octobre 2014, 11.23:23 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : * kfreebsd-amd64's images fetching logic fails because there is no un-numbered /netboot/ directory

Re: Bug#766960: debian-installer-netboot-images: Please provide packages for Debian 8

Le mardi, 28 octobre 2014, 13.56:33 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : Since there were no 8.x uploads at all during the release cycle, it might have been an opportunity to move away from X.0 versioning… As long as it's not out of NEW, we can still change our minds. The main argument in favour of x.0

Bug#766960: debian-installer-netboot-images: Please provide packages for Debian 8

Le mardi, 28 octobre 2014, 14.43:50 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org (2014-10-28): The main argument in favour of x.0 versioning was the possibility (see #682656) to co-install versions across multiple releases. Dropping the major version number from

Bug#766960: debian-installer-netboot-images: Please provide packages for Debian 8

Le lundi, 27 octobre 2014, 09.56:38 Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit : Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Version: 20130613+deb7u2.b3 Severity: important User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: debian-edu Hi. Will there be netboot images for Debian Jessie (version 8) available? We

Bug#766960: debian-installer-netboot-images: Please provide packages for Debian 8

Le lundi, 27 octobre 2014, 11.23:23 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : * kfreebsd-amd64's images fetching logic fails because there is no un-numbered /netboot/ directory under which we could automagically take netboot.tar.gz as for other architectures. I think this should be fixed in the

Re: Time for Jessie Beta 2?

Le vendredi, 26 septembre 2014, 21.05:07 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : I'll probably skip syslinux vs. multi-arch this time, mostly due to lack of time and other large ongoing changes: let's see if we can get debian-cd to cope with latest tasksel changes soon. I have a patch suite almost there,

Bug#762478: redundant desktop selection

Le mercredi, 24 septembre 2014, 11.00:50 Joey Hess a écrit : Then next release of tasksel will know about defaulting to xfce on hurd and freebsd, so it will be unncessary for win32-loader to do so at that point. Okay, I'll just drop the desktop-related logic completely then, thanks for

Bug#762478: redundant desktop selection

Le lundi, 22 septembre 2014 14.31:19, vous avez écrit : tasksel allows selecting the desktop now, so the selection in win32-loader is unncessary (the list there is also incomplete). Thanks for the heads'up, patch in the pipes. I think that default_desktop=xfce might still be passed for

Re: (Almost) Time for Jessie Beta 2?

Hi, Le mercredi, 10 septembre 2014, 00.18:14 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : Some things got set into motion, like syslinux menu overhaul (mainly discussion around the switch to graphical by default, didn't see any patch yet) … My current work is attached, I wanted to cleanup the things (swap amd64

Re: debian installer -win32 loader ????

Hi b. Le lundi, 25 août 2014, 12.14:33 b.betz a écrit : Norton gives a trojan warning when I download the installer from goodbye-microsoft.com or wiki with your mirror my question is : is this a false negative?? win32-loader is built entirely from sources available in Debian and doesn't

Re: Bug#485586: debian-installer: Default to graphical install

Hoy, Le mardi, 19 août 2014, 01.17:02 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : The default is Install right now, which installs i386. The topic of this bug report is switching to Graphical install by default, but shouldn't we also promote amd64 by default while we're at it? This would mean having 64 bit

Re: Final steps for Jessie Beta 1

Hi Cyril, Le mardi, 12 août 2014, 01.33:37 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : two parts in this mail: information for everyone, and action for debian-cd@ at the end. I wonder (but it's certainly too late now) whether it would make sense to unblock (+byhand FTP-Master's dance) win32-loader for the next

Bug#473144: provide {loadlin,gzip,cpio}.exe for dynamic use

Hi Cyril, Le lundi, 17 mars 2014, 02.33:03 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : any opinion on the following (rather old) bug report? Yes; thanks for pinging. Robert Millan r...@aybabtu.com (2008-03-28): Currently, win32-loader is linking in loadlin.exe, gzip.exe and cpio.exe statically into the

Re: Damage to Windows C: drive from boot CD

Le dimanche, 23 février 2014, 22.06:30 Bill Corwin a écrit : Then it automatically did a bunch of things ending with Debian-Installer loader: Completed and then I discovered that it disturbed my C: crive! Apparently you used clicked through the Windows executable that puts the

Re: Building d-i using wheezy-backports bits

Hi Cyril, Le jeudi, 30 janvier 2014, 02.51:48 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : as mentioned earlier this month, I had a little proof of concept for Paris Mini-DebConf 2014[1]. I've polished a few things, so here we go. 1. https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2014/01/msg00239.html Thanks for the

Re: Bug#697331: Please add the first created user to lpadmin

Control: reopen -1 Control: reassign -1 user-setup-udeb 1.38 Control: tags -1 +patch Hi all, apparently this bug slipped through and got closed as installation- report although the request hasn't been fulfilled as far as I could see. To tell a long story short; the first created user should be

Bug#695500: d-i-n-i: #695500 is apparently a grub-mkimage (or debian-installer) bug

Control: reassign -1 src:debian-installer 20120828 , grub-common 1.99-27 Control: tags -1 -moreinfo Control: affects -1 +debian-installer-7.0-netboot-kfreebsd-i386 Control: affects -1 +debian-installer-7.0-netboot-kfreebsd-amd64 Hi all, I spent some more time debugging this RC bug by setting up

Re: Feel free to let win32-loader/0.7.4.9 into testing

Hi Cyril, (adding ftpmaster in CC). Le lundi, 7 octobre 2013 01.57:42 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : looking at the testing summary page for d-i, I noticed win32-loader is blocked from automatic migration. I'm not sure whether we want to keep it that way but at least the 0.7.4.9 release currently

Re: Debian Installer 7.0 RC2 release

Hi shirish, Le dimanche, 28 avril 2013 11.40:05, shirish शिरीष a écrit : Hi all, Thank you for making the RC2 available. Please CC me while replying as I'm not subscribed to the list. Done. I'm trying to download the RC2 DVD 1 via jigdo . I looked at the jigdo file time-stamp which is

Re: Gnome installability vs. GNU/kFreeBSD

Hi all, Le jeudi, 18 avril 2013 12.55:09, Steven Chamberlain a écrit : On 09/04/13 19:15, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: - gdm3 … doesn't finish loading. It fullscreen-says Oops, an error occured. - lightdm + Gnome: same. - lightdm + Gnome classic: same. Many thanks for testing

Bug#695500: d-i-n-i: #695500 Works locally at least

Hi all, I can reliably test that the layout of files in debian-installer-netboot- images' debian-installer-7.0-netboot-kfreebsd-amd64 is functional locally using kvm: $ kvm -m 256 -net nic -net user,bootfile=/grub2pxe,tftp=/usr/lib/debian-installer/images/7.0/kfreebsd-amd64/gtk/ (and

Re: Boot broken on latest debian iso's?

Le jeudi, 18 avril 2013 09.01:21, Godwin Monis a écrit : Hi, I have downloaded the latest debian squeeze 6.0.7 DVD iso's from http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.7/ia64/iso-dvd/. After downloading the ISO's I checked the md5 for debian-6.0.7-ia64-DVD-1.iso. This md5sum

Re: Gnome installability vs. GNU/kFreeBSD

Le mardi, 9 avril 2013 19.29:23, Steven Chamberlain a écrit : During wheezy development, GNOME 3 was so broken for us that xfce was chosen as a default for new installs. Multiple show-stopper issues got fixed during the freeze though. At this point I believe it 'should work' but so few

Bug#684128: failure to communicate

Hi Thomas, Le vendredi, 5 avril 2013 17.52:19, Thomas Goirand a écrit : On 04/05/2013 07:59 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: And all of these features will only land for the next cycle with a release in ~= 2 years time. I really hope that it wont be the case. That it doesn't go into Debian

  1   2   >