Both reported problems with the italian language were already solved in
CVS from 2004/01/06. The problem will be fixed with the next upload of
partconf-0.20.
Bye,
Giuseppe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Giuseppe Sacco writes:
The actual italian language is colony of english language :-(
Do not despair, we are with you!
Erich (from Germany)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: installation-reports
Version: beta2
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: Sarge Beta 2 100MB image from Debian website
(sarge-i386-netinst.iso)
uname -a: n/a
Date: 1/17/2004
Method: Installed using net boot option from CD-ROM; attempting a stable install
Machine: Hand-built
K. Griffis wrote:
[snip]
I am having problems getting the stable distro to install. My network card
is detected and works fine (gets a lease from DHCP, etc.). I can select a
Debian mirror with no problem. I also proceed to select stable for
distribution type; however, I get an error
Tested both netinst and businesscard ISOs, on i2000 prototype (dual
Itanium). Both worked fine. Only issues, which are already known are:
elilo udeb works but is English only and spews some unwanted text to the
screen. Will be fixed in the next upload.
Installed kernel gives sc() messages
Quoting Andreas Tille ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I tried the German installation and I think I found only one not yet translated
screen - so thanks to all the translators as well.
Which one?
Damn - I forgot it because I've thought there would be a tool
which shows untranslated stuff, but
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Christian Perrier wrote:
Well, we have a tool for translators for checking unstranslated stuff,
but there are some cases where, even if the string is translated, the
translations is not shown by debconf. So, this is why you may be asked
about what you found.
I hereby
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: debian installer beta2
uname -a: it didn't succeed
Date: 16-01-04
Method: boot from usb-cdrom
Machine: ibm blade server
Processor: 2 intel xeon smp
Memory: 1Gb
Root Device: it would be /dev/hda but it never arrived
Root Size/partition table:
Output
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: debian installer beta2
uname -a: it didn't succeed
Date: 16-01-04
Method: boot from usb-cdrom
Machine: ibm blade server
Processor: 2 intel xeon smp
Memory: 1Gb
Root Device: it would be /dev/hda but it never arrived
Root Size/partition table:
Output
I have tried with pxe following the tutorials (
...
but it didn't work either. The dhcp, pxe and tftp is working
but it didn't load the kernel.
For me PXE was successful, see
wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?DebianInstallerNetbootPXE
I have slightly differnet paths in pxelinux.cfg/default file,
Thank you for the information I will try on monday with the way of that
wiki.
Thank you again, today, after 12 hours trying I am thinking on giving up.
Jose Blanca
From: Holger Schurig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: failed install report on a brand new blade server
Date
Richard Hirst wrote:
apt config after booting requires you to hit cancel to get out of the
add apt source screen. I think after adding the first one, it should
give you a do you want to add another screen.
This is not specific to the ia64 port. I think I have fixed the logic
error in
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Steve Langasek wrote:
severity 226742 grave
Thanks for adjusting this and sharing my opinion.
BTW, I had the same observation that in the first install process
the keyboard was adjusted fine and after the reboot changing the
keymap failed.
Kind regards
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 20040103 (according to the boot screen), downloaded
15/1/2004 from
http://people.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/beta2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux brunel 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 GNU
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 12:09:00PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Richard Hirst wrote:
apt config after booting requires you to hit cancel to get out of the
add apt source screen. I think after adding the first one, it should
give you a do you want to add another screen.
This is not specific
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: sparc netboot build from cvs of 2004/01/14 and
with hacked udpkg, kdb-chooser.
uname -a:
Linux ultra5 2.4.21 #1 Thu Aug 7 20:30:12 EDT 2003 sparc64 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004/01/14 23h
Method
Hmm, maybe I can beat the beta2 install report rush... :)
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: sarge-alpha-netinst.iso 20040111
uname -a: n/a
Date: 2004-01-11 21:00
Method: CD boot via SRM console
Machine: Microway AlphaPC 164SX
Processor: Alpha 21164 533 MHz
Memory: 384MB
Root Device: /dev
Quoth Thorsten Sauter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* Michael Rex [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-14 19:30]:
| Booting from image didn't work, like all other images I tried before.
why not? It's working fine for me.
I just checked an image yesterday and it boots. The image I tested
before, built on 09.01.04,
I tried the German installation and I think I found only one not yet translated
screen - so thanks to all the translators as well.
Which one?
Damn - I forgot it because I've thought there would be a tool
which shows untranslated stuff, but it's no problem I'll do
a further install in the
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 Christian Perrier wrote:
This is a known console-data bug...not BTS available to me currently
but it is easy to find.
Yes, I found it immediately after my posting to this list: #226742.
The problem is that I think it should be of RC priority if we would
not like to leave
Hi,
at first thanks for all your fine work at d-i. I never installed a Debian
box so easy and so fast as with
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/daily/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
(downloaded today size = 38535168 time = 2004-01-11 23:17).
I tried the German installation
2. A more serious problem is that the keymap was not set correctly.
I verified this by
dpkg-reconfigure console-data
(selected: qwertz / German / Standard / latin1 - no dead keys)
and got the following stderr output:
Looking for keymap to install:
Andreas Tille wrote:
1. I selected testing as distribution. In this case it makes no sense
to include security.debian.org into source.list. I would include a
check here whether the distribution is stable and if not security
should be left out here.
The installer does make
Quoting Andreas Tille ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
2. A more serious problem is that the keymap was not set correctly.
I verified this by
dpkg-reconfigure console-data
(selected: qwertz / German / Standard / latin1 - no dead keys)
and got the following stderr output:
Quoting Andreas Tille ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I tried the German installation and I think I found only one not yet translated
screen - so thanks to all the translators as well.
Which one?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 12:01:50PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
at first thanks for all your fine work at d-i. I never installed a Debian
box so easy and so fast as with
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/daily/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
(downloaded today size =
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: sid businesscard image from manty, built 09.01.04
uname -a: Linux hal 2.4.22-powerpc #1 jeu déc 18 10:17:34 CET 2003 ppc GNU/Linux
Date: 12.01.04
Method: businesscard image, packages fetched from ftp.de.debian.org (IIRC)
Machine: iBook G4
Processor: G4
* Michael Rex [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-14 19:30]:
| Booting from image didn't work, like all other images I tried before.
why not? It's working fine for me.
| Is http://people.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/netinst/powerpc/daily/
| the right place to get official daily builds? If so I'll
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Steve Langasek wrote:
I would prefer to always offer security.d.o (and default to yes)
regardless of what distro is being installed. For one thing, users may
install from the beta while sarge==testing, and want to use security
updates afterwards once it becomes stable,
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Joey Hess wrote:
Please file a bug report on console-data.
I checked this immediately after sending my first mail and found
#226742. I added my observation and the opinion that Severity
normal is to low in this case. I'm not an installer expert but
from a installer point
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 20040112
http://people.debian.org/~sjogren/d-i/images/daily/
uname -a: 2-4-22-1-386
Date: 20040112
Method: netinst with floppies
Machine: IBM PC 300GL
Processor: pentium
Memory: 64Mo
Root Device: /dev/hda
Root Size
Gaudenz Steinlin a crit :
Am Die, den 13.01.2004 schrieb sylvain ferriol um 00:07:
2. list of network modules is in reverse order
I don't understand this sentence. What do you mean and which order would
be the right one? Which list of network modules do you refer to?
the list is displayed when it
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://gluck.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/20040109/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a:
Date: 2004-01-12
Method: boot off CD, net boot, proxied http, sarge install
Machine: custom
Processor: celeron 350
Memory: XXX
Root Device: IDE (hda1)
Root
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 12:46:01PM +0100, ydirson wrote:
Comments/Problems:
Partition hard drives:
if I just follow the steps lineraly, no problem. At first, I had hit
cancel at some point before (have to check and reproduce), and the HD
selection menu was incomplete (did not mention the
Ah, I forgot to fill some boxes
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 12:46:01PM +0100, ydirson wrote:
Memory: 192MB
Root Size/partition table: single ~9GB root, 512M swap
And to mention yet other problems:
- the items in the initial language menu all start with choose this
or a translation of it, which
Quoting Yann Dirson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
- the items in the initial language menu all start with choose this
or a translation of it, which makes it impossible to quickly jump to a
particular language with one keystroke, as was possible in old
installer
I've proposed a new prospective
As I attempt to do more not-so-uncommon things (with the 2004-01-03
snapshot)...
- I initially have a HD with a single ext3 partition + swap (from a
previous RH install). If I repartition by deleting the ext3 and
repartitionning that space in 2, on the partition setup screen I
notice the 1st
Quoting Yann Dirson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I won't anwser to all of these. Only those I have a kind of answer or
something to add.
BTW, is it wise at all to use devfs, which is tagged as OBSOLETE in 2.6 !?
I have the same objection. This breaks out from woody AND from next
release.
The
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 03:40:07PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
[...]
- in the list of country to select mirrors from (and possibly other
lists), when using french as a language, the coutries are not sorted
according to their translation, but appear to be sorted by their
english name,
Yann Dirson wrote:
I could find nothing obviously alarming on this subject in syslog,
although there are many broken dependency reported all around. I
saved the syslog through nc (hopefully installed by a previous run on
the target HD, kudos to you for having put it here ;)
nc is not
Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 11:24:56PM +0100, Fabrice Lorrain (home) wrote:
Sarge.
dowload location :
people.d.o/~manty/testing/netinst/powerpc/20040109/sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso
download date : provided in the subject (20040109)
It may not make a difference in this case,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 12:52:24AM +0100, Fabrice Lorrain (home) wrote:
Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 11:24:56PM +0100, Fabrice Lorrain (home) wrote:
Sarge.
dowload location :
people.d.o/~manty/testing/netinst/powerpc/20040109/sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso
download date :
Steve Langasek wrote:
3-http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/
Updated daily, contains ISO images built using packages in sarge
4-http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/netinst/
Updated daily, contains ISO images built using packages in sid
More accuratly, udebs from sid,
Hi,
I did a couple of cdrom-install this afternoon (netinst image). Not much
to say (everything was ok) except for the pb with the arabic line in
language-chooser. This ligne is back to a bunch of ? (This pb
doesn't show up on the powerpc-netinst-20040109).
@+,
Fab
--
To
Hi,
Not much to say, I tryed the netinst-cdrom and it still fails on the
libopencdk4 download.
Whishlist :
Could someone add a net target on the powerpc-cdrom.
@+,
Fab
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Son, den 11.01.2004 schrieb Fabrice Lorrain (home) um 21:13:
Hi,
Not much to say, I tryed the netinst-cdrom and it still fails on the
libopencdk4 download.
Did you use the sarge or the sid images (don't know if they differ on
powerpc tough)? Please provide download location and download
Gaudenz Steinlin a écrit :
Am Son, den 11.01.2004 schrieb Fabrice Lorrain (home) um 21:13:
Hi,
Not much to say, I tryed the netinst-cdrom and it still fails on the
libopencdk4 download.
Did you use the sarge or the sid images (don't know if they differ on
powerpc tough)? Please provide download
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 11:24:56PM +0100, Fabrice Lorrain (home) wrote:
Sarge.
dowload location :
people.d.o/~manty/testing/netinst/powerpc/20040109/sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso
download date : provided in the subject (20040109)
It may not make a difference in this case, but please note that
Fabrice Lorrain (home) a écrit :
Hi,
Not much to say, I tryed the netinst-cdrom and it still fails on the
libopencdk4 download.
Now using the businesscard image from :
http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/powerpc/20040109/sarge-powerpc-businesscard.iso
This image doesn't set the
Fabrice Lorrain (home) wrote:
Now using the businesscard image from :
http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/powerpc/20040109/sarge-powerpc-businesscard.iso
This image doesn't set the /etc/resolv.conf. Old stories ...
Please try the one from here instead:
Quoting Richard Hirst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
The obvious difference to me is that in base-installer, all the
Description names are Description-*.UTF-8, while in elilo-installer they
are all .ISO-8859-2, or EUC-JP, or whatever.
Yes, this is the sign of a missing debian/po/output file
I guess
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: sarge-alpha-netinst.iso 20040109
uname -a: n/a
Date: 2004-01-09 23:45
Method: CD boot via SRM console
Machine: Microway AlphaPC 164SX
Processor: Alpha 21164 533 MHz
Memory:384MB
Root Device: /dev/hdd2
Root Size/partition table:
Disk /dev/hdd: 10.2 GB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
fredag 9. januar 2004, 17:35, skrev Erik Dykema:
Comments/Problems:
1. Everything seems to install fine excepting the kernel. The red
screen comes up and says that the kernel failed. I hit alt-f3 to see
what happened, and find the following:
I
I tried to find this tring in the beta2 tree, but I could not. Anyway,
it appears to be a French translation that is wrongly encoded; d-i should
only use utf-8. If you can grep out the relevant udeb in /var/lib/dpkg/info/,
in the chroot, it should be easy to fix.
The back-translation of
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 06:58:48AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
I tried to find this tring in the beta2 tree, but I could not. Anyway,
it appears to be a French translation that is wrongly encoded; d-i should
only use utf-8. If you can grep out the relevant udeb in /var/lib/dpkg/info/,
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:58:57PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Richard Hirst wrote:
a) The iso has kernel-installer_0.045_all.udeb, even though 0.046 is in
the archive. Presumably we are stuck with that until Joeyh forces 0.046
in to testing. As a result, it installed a 2.4.19 kernel for
Hi-
This is my third install report, apoligies for errors, welcome
correction. It is similar but more complete (due to the busybox bug
being fixed) than yesterday's with the same kernel install problem.
Is there an outstanding bug in mkinitrd / initrd-tools that is causing
this?
thanks
Things that seem curious:
Why is mkinitd caring about my hardware devices, doesn't it just
need to see the files in /target?
mkinitrd needs to build an initrd that will be able to find the real
root device after booting. If /target/dev/cciss doesn't exist, mkinitrd
has nothing to work
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:35:23AM -0500, Erik Dykema wrote:
This is my third install report, apoligies for errors, welcome
correction. It is similar but more complete (due to the busybox bug
being fixed) than yesterday's with the same kernel install problem
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:58:57PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
b) At some point during loading the installer modules, it spews a load
of text over the screen, such as:
Unknown localized field:
Description-fr.ISO-8859-15: Aucune partition de dmarrage dtecte
That doesn't seem to cause
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 02:14:34PM -0500, Erik Dykema wrote:
Things that seem curious:
Why is mkinitd caring about my hardware devices, doesn't it just
need to see the files in /target?
mkinitrd needs to build an initrd that will be able to find the real
root device after booting. If
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Debian-installer-version:
http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/\
sarge-i386-netinst.iso 07-Jan-2004 15:46 107M
uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.22-1-686 #6 Sat Oct 4 14:09:08 EST 2003 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: Thu Jan 8 21:51:39 EST
Hi-
This is my second install report, apoligies for errors, welcome correction.
thanks,
Erik Dykema
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: Jan 07 Daily, from
http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/
uname -a: Linux 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30.39 i686 unknown
Date
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/ia64/daily/sarge-ia64-businesscard.iso
dated 08-JAN-2004 15:02
uname -a:
Date: Jan 8th 2004, 23:20 GMT
Method: businesscard.iso, specified 'testing', local http mirror
Machine: HP i2000 proto
Processor
Richard Hirst wrote:
a) The iso has kernel-installer_0.045_all.udeb, even though 0.046 is in
the archive. Presumably we are stuck with that until Joeyh forces 0.046
in to testing. As a result, it installed a 2.4.19 kernel for Itanium,
rather than choosing Itanium or Mckinley 2.4.20 based on
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:58:57PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
b) At some point during loading the installer modules, it spews a load
of text over the screen, such as:
Unknown localized field:
Description-fr.ISO-8859-15: Aucune partition de dmarrage dtecte
That doesn't seem to cause a
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: nightly 2003/1/6 http://people.debian.org/
~sjogren/d-i/images/2004-01-06/
uname -a: Linux ifrit 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i586
GNU/Linux
Date: 2003/01/06 ~6-9pm PST
Method: I used the boot floppies
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
downloaded on 2003.01.05, md5sum b355a7bd83354e3b93e14ee33dc8841b.
uname -a:
Linux danube 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST
Daniel Cardenas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
According to vorlon on irc, the install code contains no Gnome code,
so this is an upstream problem.
Tried apt-get install gnome-session, after apt-get different errors
were received. Seems like very little of the gnome system was
installed.
The
Debian-installer-version: jan 3 businesscard
Machine: vmware with a former installation on the virtual disk. DHCP working
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules:
Christian Perrier wrote:
The screen is occasionnaly not cleaned up before the main menu pops up
again : for instance, when running prebaseconfig, getting an error
because of network problems while trying to fetch the Release
file.the Retrieving window remained behind the main menu when I
Hi Steve,
I have successfully installed a xfs based system. Details see
below. I was very pleased with the installer image! Thanks!
Cheers,
Erich
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/d-i/xfs/
sarge-i386-xfs
Debian-installer-version:
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/installer-i386/20040102/images/hd-media-image.img.gz
sarge-i386-netinst-iso from a mirror of the November 11th version
uname -a: n/a
Date: 4 Jan 2004
Method:
I mounted the 811 MB large thinkpad IBM Deskstar into a
--- Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sándor Bárány wrote:
After the hardware detection, the install loads the
frame buffer module (even there was a vga=normal
parameter specified on the kernel line), which fails
(the hardware is so old, there is no frame buffer
support). This causes a
I know why it worked 10 days ago when I installed. I was following someone
else's install instructions at:
http://www.pcc-services.com/debian_install.html
Thanks Sebastien and Steve for the help and fix.
- Daniel
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
The problem is than tasksel install gnome-core (the meta
James J. Ramsey wrote:
It may be old, but I think that even the recent builds
seem to have a bug that affected B?r?ny. The installer
seems to filter out some of the parameters that are
passed at the boot prompt, even though they are
standard-issue, documented kernel parameters. In
B?r?ny's
--- Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James J. Ramsey wrote:
The
installer
seems to filter out some of the parameters that
are
passed at the boot prompt, even though they are
standard-issue, documented kernel parameters. In
B?r?ny's case, the ignored parameter was
vga=normal.
In
James J. Ramsey wrote:
ide=nodma is not a module parameter per se, AFAICT.
Judging from the release notes of Red Hat 8.0
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-8.0-Manual/release-notes/x86/,
the parameter passed to the ide-cd module to disable
DMA (which is disabled by default in RH
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 2004-01-02 sarge-alpha-businesscard.iso, from
http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/alpha/
uname -a: n/a
Date: Sat Jan 3 15:46:40 CST 2004
Method: CD boot via SRM console
Machine: Microway AlphaPC 164SX
Processor: Alpha 21164 533 MHz
Memory
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 11:45:02PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
So, I figured I'd give this image another go after pulling the SCSI
controller out of the machine. The SCSI card happens to be an
integrated SCSI/ethernet device, so there was definitely no network
configuration happening on
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 12.30.2003 .ISO ftp.uio.no
uname -a: Linux debian. 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 01.01.2004
Method: How did you install? What did you boot off? If network
install, from where? Proxied?
Machine: Home build
Using:
p.d.o/~manty/testing/netinst/ia64/20040103/sarge-ia64-buisnesscard.iso
dated 02-JAN-2004 15:02
Still doesn't automatically load ide-probe-mod.o, but joeyh has that
change queued waiting for alioth to come back, I believe. That meant I
had to mess about a bit to get the cdrom visible.
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 2004-01-02 sarge-alpha-businesscard.iso, from
http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/alpha/
uname -a: n/a
Date: Sat Jan 3 15:46:40 CST 2004
Method: CD boot via SRM console
Machine: Microway AlphaPC 164SX
Processor
Richard Hirst wrote:
Still doesn't automatically load ide-probe-mod.o, but joeyh has that
change queued waiting for alioth to come back, I believe. That meant I
had to mess about a bit to get the cdrom visible.
I'm waiting until i386 is frozen in testing before uploading that, just
because it
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 03:24:20PM -0900, Joey Hess wrote:
Richard Hirst wrote:
Still doesn't automatically load ide-probe-mod.o, but joeyh has that
change queued waiting for alioth to come back, I believe. That meant I
had to mess about a bit to get the cdrom visible.
I'm waiting until
the lack of a good template.
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.22-1-386 # 9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686
Date: 01.03.2004 9am
Method: Net install from ftp us debian mirror.
Machine: home built
Processor: Celeron 850 Mhz
Memory: 512
Richard Hirst wrote:
Tricky... take the latest of
i386 frozen in testing
alioth back up
new kernel pkgs uploaded
then allow, say, three days to get ide-probe-mod and kernel-installer
changes uploaded, new d-i build, new iso, quick test.
I can't really speak for when the kernel pkgs
.
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.22-1-386 # 9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686
Date: 01.03.2004 9am
Method: Net install from ftp us debian mirror.
Machine: home built
Processor: Celeron 850 Mhz
Memory: 512 Mbytes
Root Device: IDE
Root Size
.
Gnome error:
could not find /usr/bin/gnome-session
If I try to run failsafe gnome, I get an error that says the Gnome
installation
could not be found.
I used ReiserFS.
I'm some what new to Linux this so pardon the lack of a good template.
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version
Debian-installer-version: jan 2 netinst
Machine: vmware
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create
Joey Hess wrote:
base-config priority is still screwed up (foiled again!).
Which is just weird. I did 2 installs to my test laptop, one of the same
netinst, one of the jan 2 businesscard, and both got the base-config
priority right. In vmware, it was medium, and that was a non-default
value in
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 06:46:24PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Richard Hirst wrote:
parted seems to be broken. It doesn't seem able to create filesystems
anymore. Havn't looked in to this yet, but mkpartfs pri ext2 1000
2000 just returns to the prompt without apparently doing anything.
Need
Richard Hirst wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 06:46:24PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Richard Hirst wrote:
parted seems to be broken. It doesn't seem able to create filesystems
anymore. Havn't looked in to this yet, but mkpartfs pri ext2 1000
2000 just returns to the prompt without
Richard Hirst wrote:
I think the sid script already pulled in libacl/libattr, while the sarge
script didn't. 0.2.21 fixed the sarge script to pull in those libs too.
So, using an older debootstrap worked for sid, but not sarge. 0.2.21 is
compiled for ia64, but I guess it just didn't make
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 01:10:53PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Richard Hirst wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 06:46:24PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Richard Hirst wrote:
parted seems to be broken. It doesn't seem able to create filesystems
anymore. Havn't looked in to this yet, but mkpartfs
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 05:53:15PM +, Richard Hirst wrote:
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 01:10:53PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Richard Hirst wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 06:46:24PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Richard Hirst wrote:
parted seems to be broken. It doesn't seem able to create
Am Mit, den 31.12.2003 schrieb Joey Hess um 01:30:
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Am Die, den 30.12.2003 schrieb Joey Hess um 22:00:
Some ugly things during boot:
- discover decided I should have a i810_rng module, but this module
failed to load with No such device.
According to
This is using the daily build sarge-ia64-buisnesscard.iso, dated
30-DEC-2003 11:02.
Installing sarge didn't work, because it doesn't have the newest
debootstrap, so I used it to install sid. This is the first time I've
tried d-i for a few weeks, and some things have broken in the meantime.
Richard Hirst wrote:
Installing sarge didn't work, because it doesn't have the newest
debootstrap, so I used it to install sid. This is the first time I've
tried d-i for a few weeks, and some things have broken in the meantime.
d-i is supposed to use debootstrap-udeb, which as a udeb is not
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 06:46:24PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Richard Hirst wrote:
Installing sarge didn't work, because it doesn't have the newest
debootstrap, so I used it to install sid. This is the first time I've
tried d-i for a few weeks, and some things have broken in the meantime.
801 - 900 of 1114 matches
Mail list logo
