On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 22:46:07 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello folks,
I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
grub-installer
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6
tasksel
cdebconf
Excerpts from Adam D. Barratt's message of 2011-03-06 16:20:51 +0100:
- console-setup
Looks okay, other than the version number should be 1.68+squeeze1.
Fixed in unstable but not migrated to testing yet; could we unblock it?
I prepared a squeeze branch for this and pushed it to the
On Wed, March 9, 2011 15:12, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Excerpts from Adam D. Barratt's message of 2011-03-06 16:20:51 +0100:
- console-setup
Looks okay, other than the version number should be 1.68+squeeze1.
Fixed in unstable but not migrated to testing yet; could we unblock it?
I prepared a
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 22:46 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
grub-installer
Doesn't look like this got uploaded yet? The relevant fix is in
unstable but
On 06/03/11 11:20 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
- anything I missed?
netcfg. #614884 blocks #606268 against network-manager. We have a
working solution with the two fixes I mentioned in 614884 and my
supplied patch for NM's ifblacklist_migrate.sh filed against 606268.
The NM bug is RC but had no
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 11:39 -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
On 06/03/11 11:20 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
- anything I missed?
netcfg. #614884 blocks #606268 against network-manager. We have a
working solution with the two fixes I mentioned in 614884 and my
supplied patch for NM's
On 06/03/11 12:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Well, having it fixed in unstable would be a good start. The problem
doesn't just affect stable so having the first time the patch is in the
archive be a stable point release isn't generally appropriate.
Where would one find the patch for #614884?
On 06/03/11 12:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Well, having it fixed in unstable would be a good start. The problem
doesn't just affect stable so having the first time the patch is in the
archive be a stable point release isn't generally appropriate.
The biggest barrier to this is that Matt said
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 15:20 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 22:46 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
grub-installer
Doesn't look
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 18:09, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
It looks like this got uploaded, but targeted at unstable where there's
already a newer version, so it got rejected:
Yes. I did it wrong :-( My fault.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 22:46 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
For the record, after a discussion on #-boot earlier this evening, we
concluded that
* Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br [2011-02-12 22:46]:
I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
There are two more updates I'd like to see in 6.0.1:
- libdebian-installer: I added a
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 18:10, Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com wrote:
* Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br [2011-02-12 22:46]:
I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
There are two more
* Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br [2011-02-24 18:28]:
Please preparae and push the respective squeeze branches so we start
uploading soon.
They should be there already (unless I made a mistake with git).
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
Please take a look and comment on those. If you think anything is
missing please say so.
Is there any chance we can update the apt-setup debconf templates to
stop talking about volatile?
As people probably noticed, I haven't managed to get
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 21:52:53 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
In short, I know that volatile is now named squeeze-updates...but
how is it called more generically?
'Urgent bug fixes', or something to that effect?
Timely updates, or
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:33:39AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
'Urgent bug fixes', or something to that effect?
They're not only bug fixes but also database updates and like.
Important system updates?
One might argue that they're not
On 02/18/2011 09:02 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:33:39AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
'Urgent bug fixes', or something to that effect?
They're not only bug fixes but also database updates and like.
Important system
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:19:23PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
On 02/18/2011 09:02 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:33:39AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
'Urgent bug fixes', or something to that effect?
They're not only
Quoting Philipp Kern (pk...@debian.org):
Sure. But iso-codes most certainly won't qualify? Also database updates is
quite a stretch. tzdata, yeah, but the case there's somewhat different.
You're right: it probably won't qualify and point releases are
probably enough.
This discussion still
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 22:46:07 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello folks,
I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
grub-installer
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6
tasksel
cdebconf
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:19, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 22:46:07 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
...
Is there any chance we can update the apt-setup debconf templates to
stop talking about volatile?
I guess so. It is more a translation issue then a
Otavio Salvador a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:19, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 22:46:07 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
...
Is there any chance we can update the apt-setup debconf templates to
stop talking about volatile?
I guess so. It is more a
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 15:49:31 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 15:15, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 15:51:50 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
IMHO console-setup should be uploaded as well to fix #610843. AFAIR it
was agreed that
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
Please take a look and comment on those. If you think anything is
missing please say so.
Is there any chance we can update the apt-setup debconf templates to
stop talking about volatile?
I'm afraid I can't find any good formulation that
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 21:52:53 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
In short, I know that volatile is now named squeeze-updates...but
how is it called more generically?
'Urgent bug fixes', or something to that effect?
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 21:02, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 21:52:53 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
In short, I know that volatile is now named squeeze-updates...but
how is it called more generically?
'Urgent bug fixes', or something to that effect?
Julien Cristau wrote:
Is there any chance we can update the apt-setup debconf templates to
stop talking about volatile?
Since squeeze-updates (volatile) vs squeeze/updates (security)
are now being seen as confusingly similar names --
And, since this thread demonstrates that we don't have an
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 00:41, Joey Hess jo...@debian.org wrote:
Julien Cristau wrote:
Is there any chance we can update the apt-setup debconf templates to
stop talking about volatile?
Since squeeze-updates (volatile) vs squeeze/updates (security)
are now being seen as confusingly similar
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
'Urgent bug fixes', or something to that effect?
They're not only bug fixes but also database updates and like.
Important system updates?
One might argue that they're not important as well (think about the
updates we plan to do for
* Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br [2011-02-12 22:46]:
Please take a look and comment on those. If you think anything is
missing please say so.
I just made a change to linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6 that should be
included too.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 23:13, Jurij Smakov ju...@wooyd.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 10:46:07PM +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
...
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6
This should probably be uploaded once the update kernel for 6.0.1 is
available?
Yes. But all kernel udebs will be uploaded again
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 02:52, Joey Hess jo...@debian.org wrote:
Otavio Salvador wrote:
grub-installer
I don't see a squeeze branch, but assuming it's fixing the debconf title
bug, all for it.
humm. My bad. I am uploading the branch right now.
tasksel
I'd prefer to note remove software
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 00:03, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 23:13 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
The below
Excerpts from Otavio Salvador's message of 2011-02-12 23:46:07 +0100:
Hello folks,
I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
grub-installer
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6
tasksel
cdebconf
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 15:51:50 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
IMHO console-setup should be uploaded as well to fix #610843. AFAIR it
was agreed that this is 6.0.1 material when the bug first appeared.
If you want I can prepare a branch and upload the fix.
It needs to be fixed and tested
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 14:51, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org wrote:
IMHO console-setup should be uploaded as well to fix #610843. AFAIR it
was agreed that this is 6.0.1 material when the bug first appeared.
If you want I can prepare a branch and upload the fix.
Please prepare the branch
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 15:15, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 15:51:50 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
IMHO console-setup should be uploaded as well to fix #610843. AFAIR it
was agreed that this is 6.0.1 material when the bug first appeared.
If you want I
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 11:23 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 00:03, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk
wrote:
grub-installer
There doesn't appear to be a squeeze branch for this listed on gitweb;
for a stable update, the hurd fixes wouldn't be appropriate for
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 19:49, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
My fault. Please take a look.
Just the debconf title fix so far? That looks fine; thanks.
Up to now, yes.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br
Hi
Excerpts from Otavio Salvador's message of 2011-02-14 16:47:00 +0100:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 14:51, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org wrote:
IMHO console-setup should be uploaded as well to fix #610843. AFAIR it
was agreed that this is 6.0.1 material when the bug first appeared.
If
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 20:45, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org wrote:
I've created a squeeze branch for console-setup branched from the
version in squeeze with only the change to fix #610843 and pushed this
branch to the d-i repo.
Thanks by doing that.
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador
Otavio Salvador wrote:
grub-installer
I don't see a squeeze branch, but assuming it's fixing the debconf title
bug, all for it.
tasksel
I'd prefer to note remove software from packages in stable that users
could already expect to get installed. #611951 can wait until wheezy.
Any changes to
Hello folks,
I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
grub-installer
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6
tasksel
cdebconf
debootstrap
kernel-wedge
Please take a look and comment on those. If you think
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 10:46:07PM +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello folks,
I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
grub-installer
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6
This should probably be
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 23:13 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
The below shouldn't be assumed to be an ack or nack for the particular
uploads at this point.
46 matches
Mail list logo
