On Mon, 21 May 2007 21:00:29 -0500 (CDT)
Matt Dobey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim,
Must not have copied the whole line.
Cheetah:~# cat /proc/swaps
FilenameTypeSizeUsed
Priority
/dev/sda5 partition
Please cc: the bug report
On Sun, 20 May 2007 16:35:27 +0200
David Härdeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 11:08:02AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
They can set their debconf priority. It's not something to avoid,
adding debconf questions
Anyway, I propose that
On Sun, 20 May 2007 18:24:21 +0200
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: pm-utils
Version: 0.99.2-1
Severity: normal
Hello,
I would really like to use your concept because I am tired with seeing
the Nth hibernation/resuming script. However, your documentation does
not invite
On Sun, 20 May 2007 18:24:21 +0200
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: pm-utils
Version: 0.99.2-1
Severity: normal
Hello,
I would really like to use your concept because I am tired with seeing
the Nth hibernation/resuming script. However, your documentation does
not invite
On Sun, 20 May 2007 04:10:47 -0500 (CDT)
Matt Dobey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My apologies for the late reply. Not sure how to properly respond, by
e-mail or if there is a mailing list that this needs to be sent to.
You need to keep the bug-report in the cc.
From the config files it seems the
On Sat, 19 May 2007 09:40:59 -0400
Luis Mondesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/16/07, Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: splashy
Version: 0.3.3
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.2
Your package fails to build with GCC 4.2 that was released a few
days ago. There is a gcc-4.2
On Fri, 18 May 2007 23:17:50 +0200
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, proposition is for example to change update_initramfs to all
and let the postinst of i-t, uswsusp, mdadm, usplash and so on
check against that setting before running -u or -u -k all.
file bug reports against any
On Fri, 18 May 2007 14:31:49 +0200
Mario Iseli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
in the attachement you will find the patch for the NMU during the BSP.
No ACK
I have an upload pending at my sponsor.
grts Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
19:22:21.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+#!/bin/sh -e
+#
+# initramfs-tools.config -- configure script for the initramfs-tools package
+#
+# Copyright 2007Tim Dijkstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+#
+# Released to the public domain
+
+. /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
+
+db_input medium initramfs-tools
On Fri, 18 May 2007 19:48:54 +0200
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tags 425050 wontfix
stop
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 07:32:45PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra (tdykstra) wrote:
I created a patch to ask a debconf question (medium priority) if
update-initramfs should update all initramfs
Package: sl-modem-daemon
Followup-For: Bug #411851
As discussed, the best I can do is make pm-utils restart
sl-modem-daemon.
I'll attach a patch, I verified that the sl-modem-daemon package has the
correct content now, I don't know about sl-modem-source.
grts Tim
-- System Information:
Debian
FJP:
On Tue, 15 May 2007 06:18:03 +
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
2. uswsusp could not find the swap partition. (This is my first laptop
install... maybe no big deal.)
Well it should have. Can you send
cat /proc/swaps
and
cat
On Tue, 08 May 2007 23:27:59 +0200
Benjamin Eikel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: splashy
Version: 0.3.3
Followup-For: Bug #410438
Hello again,
I tried the new file but the blinking magenta caret is still there when kdm
is started.
I said it was only expected to work with gdm for
On Thu, 10 May 2007 15:41:13 +0200
Benjamin Eikel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: splashy
Version: 0.3.3
Followup-For: Bug #422930
Hello again,
I tried to create an strace to investigate what is causing the cpu load. I
added strace -ff -o$DIR/splashy-strace in front of
Package: uswsusp
Version: 0.6~cvs20070420-1.etch
Severity: normal
If I setup uswsusp to use a swap file on a LVM parition, it doesn't
work. It seems to go OK, it writes the image, but at the point that
it should poweroff, I get back to where I issued `s2disk'.
Checking at the offset where the
On Mon, 07 May 2007 20:11:08 -0700
Josh Triplett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: pm-utils
Version: 0.99.2-1
Severity: wishlist
pm-utils should use suspend2-userui when hibernating with suspend2.
If the suspend2-userui package needs to enable this by dropping something
appropriate into
On Tue, 08 May 2007 08:50:57 +0200
Julien Valroff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: pm-utils
Version: 0.99.2-1
Severity: minor
Hi,
Thanks for your work on pm-utils.
I guess the architecture independent files should be moved to /usr/share.
/usr/lib should
only contain arch dependent
On Tue, 08 May 2007 10:10:43 +0200
Benjamin Eikel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: splashy
Version: 0.3.3
Followup-For: Bug #410438
Hello again,
first an answer to a question some posts above: No, I am not using initramfs.
I tried the two new files (/etc/init.d/splashy and
Hi Lorenzo, Geoffrey,
Could you please test the attached scripts (put splashy in /etc/init.d,
the other one in /etc). They should fix the problem too.
grts Tim
lsb-base-logging.sh
Description: application/shellscript
splashy
Description: Binary data
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi All,
I have the feeling that this bug has the same cause as #421441. Could
you try the two files I attached to my last comment there? This only
works with gdm btw. The others do not use the lsb_ functions yet. If
this works and intend to submit some patches for that...
On Tue, 1 May 2007 10:19:22 +0200
Matthias Steinbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: uswsusp
Version: 0.6~cvs20070202-1
Severity: wishlist
Splashy-support for s2disk only worked for me after installing
libdirectfb-extra.
However, this package is recommended or suggested by neither
reassign 415441 mdadm
thanks
Hi Martin,
We spoke a bit about this on IRC. I agreed to ask upstream. In the log
of this bug you'll find some comments from both suspend and raid people.
To summarize the problem, on the initramfs the mdadm script should (in some
cases) be run before uswsusp. This
Hi Eduard Bloch,
I have no idea about how sl-modem-daemon is supposed to behave during
resume. The original reporter of this bug says that he needs to restart
it after resume.
If this is not fixable in the daemon, then this problem can be papered
over for people using pm-utils (which will be all
Hi Luis,
According to one of the raid developers we can force raid to start readonly.
That will probably fix our problem. Can you please try the attached patch?
TIA,
Tim
--- /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-top/mdrun 2006-09-01 22:14:25.0 +0200
+++
Hi Gregor,
With the current version of initramfs-tools in unstable, your
difficulties to type a passphrase for uswsusp with a non-us keyboard
should now be fixed. Could you please verify this?
Thanks in advance,
Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:37:53 -0500
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:47:49AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Neil Brown wrote:
On Tuesday April 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[]
After the power cycle the kernel boots, devices are discovered,
retitle 417845 yaird support
severity 417845 wishlist
thanks
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 23:59:22 +0200
Jiří Paleček [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: uswsusp
Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-7
Severity: normal
Hello,
since I have installed uswsusp, resuming stopped working (no error
messages).
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 15:20:56 +1000
Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday April 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've got a bugreport [0] from a user trying to use raid and uswsusp. He's
using initramfs-tools available in debian. I'll describe the problem
and my analysis, maybe
Hi Guus,
Why didn't you apply this patch yet? You where so fast with that other patch;)
Is there something wrong with it? It works for me and makes gnuvd much more
usable.
grts Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: gnuvd
Version: 1.0.3-1.2
Followup-For: Bug #235819
I decided to fix this bug. The problem was that the url was not properly
encoded.
Patch attached.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (20, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386
Hi,
I've got a bugreport [0] from a user trying to use raid and uswsusp. He's
using initramfs-tools available in debian. I'll describe the problem
and my analysis, maybe you can comment on what you think. A warning: I only
have a casual understanding of raid, never looked at any code related to
Package: gnuvd
Version: 1.0.3-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Well, the subject says it all; gnuvd output misses a \n at the
very end of the output, which makes it a bit harder to read.
Trivial patch atached.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900,
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:53:06 -0400
Alec Berryman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: uswsusp
Followup-For: Bug #416399
The bug does not appear in 0.6~cvs20070202-1. If it's too late to get a
fix into etch, would it be possible to document this in the release
notes? I thought uswsusp was
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:55:30 +0200
Franklin PIAT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
The release 0.3~cvs20060928-7 works :
I think the problem i had was due to the way i manually added
etch-proposed-updates during the installation... leading to installing
uswsusp twice, thus the error
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:28:41 -0600
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 03:24:08PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 06:56:22 -0600
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To get around *that*, I modified my arrays to have
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:27:27 +0100
Franklin PIAT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: uswsusp
Followup-For: Bug #411727
Hello,
Thank you for the fix you have submitted. Laptop users (including me) will be
happy to
have hibernation working out of the box.
However, (sorry for that
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 06:56:22 -0600
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:58:43 -0600
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
s2disk does not mark (software) raid arrays as clean when shutting
down the machine.
I've managed to get a crude
Hi Rodrigo
I know it is not nice to do this via BTS, but at least I know you read
that. When I send you a message, I get this back:
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a
tags 414668 +moreinfo
thanks
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 08:09:11 +0100
Gijs Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Installed Splashy last week. Since then, when booting not all scripts
in rc2.d are started, at least not at every boot (eg anacron, cron,
and more).
Removed splashy from grub/menu.lst
[ I'm adding the mdadm maitainer to the CC-list, maybe he has some
useful comments. ]
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:58:43 -0600
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: uswsusp
Version: 0.6~cvs20070202-1
Severity: important
s2disk does not mark (software) raid arrays as clean
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:27:57 +0100
Franklin PIAT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently tested Etch on a few laptops and I noticed the uswsusp
resume_device was always
set to long device (devfs like) names.
I first assumed It was a well known bug for Etch installation, but it doesn't
seems
severity 411727 grave
thanks
This makes all installations of uswsusp on i386 and amd64 laptops with
debian-installer unusable.
grts Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:27:57 +0100
Franklin PIAT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- add a hook in the current package, in order to detect that we're in D-I,
then use di's mapdevfs.
Unfortunately mapdevfs is available in the d-i environment. Packages
are however installed in a chroot under /target
For reference, an updated package can be found at :
http://www.famdijkstra.org/~tdykstra/debian/uswsusp/uswsusp_0.3~cvs20060928-7_i386.changes
grts Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
If slmodemd really needs a restart on resume (instead of some bug in
the driver or so), this is a perfect case for pm-utils. By dropping
a small script in the appropriate dir it will restart slmodemd for
you. pm-utils is not in debian yet, so you'll have to wait a bit...
grts Tim
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:48:54 +0100
Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tracked the problem down some. It works nicely IF I make sure my
initrd is updated. Given that I do not run the newest kernel image on my
system (because that 2.6.20 version I tested sometimes froze the system
after
On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 23:24:37 -0500
Francois Marier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: uswsusp
Version: 0.6~cvs20070202-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
I have submitted this information upstream, but I'm including it here in case
you're interested
in adding this machine to the s2ram
severity 404316 important
thanks
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 11:33:28 +0100
Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm experiencing the same problem as mentioned in this bug for a few
weeks. Originally I thought I had a kernel problem, but I finally found
some time to test different kernels just to
Package: slapd
Version: 2.3.30-4
Severity: important
I'm trying to get my clients to authenticate with Certificates. When
I set 'TLSVerifyClient try' the connection 'hangs' during the setup
phase ot the secure connection.
The funny thing is that when running slapd from a terminal with -d-1
makes
Hi,
Can you still reproduce this bug?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=350179
grts Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Johannes,
Could you check if you've got libdirectfb-extra installed, and if not, if
installing it (and reruning update-initramfs -u) helps?
grts Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:34:04 -0200
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander Bürger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think it was required because the theme you're using probably is
using JPEG images. We're removing its support to use GIF and PNG
only. We'll probably release
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:47:38 +0100
Jan De Luyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: uswsusp
Version: 0.6~cvs20070202-1
Severity: normal
Hello,
First off, I don't know if this is a problem with the install or with
uswusp. I just installed Debian with a Debian Etch install CD (daily
of
retitle 411727 When installed in d-i, uswsusp creates broken uswsusp.conf with
devfs style dev-nodes
tags 411727 +wontfix
thanks
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:24:39 +0100
Jan De Luyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 20 February 2007, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:47:38 +0100
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:05:03 +
Traduz ML [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: uswsusp
Version: 0.6
Tags: l10n, patch
Severity: wishlist
Portuguese translation for uswsusp's debconf messages.
Translator: Pedro Ribeiro p.m42.ribeiro _at_ gmail.com
Feel free to use it.
For translation
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 07:58:31 +0100
Johannes Rohr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Montag, den 19.02.2007, 21:27 +0100 schrieb Tim Dijkstra:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:19:51 +0100
Johannes Rohr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have a custom kernel?
No, I'm tracking Debian Unstable (linux-image
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:50:07 +0100
Benjamin Eikel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: splashy
Version: 0.3.2
Severity: normal
I installed the splashy and splashy-themes package on my laptop, added the
splash option to my boot options but splashy does not
work. I am using a self-built
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:19:51 +0100
Johannes Rohr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: uswsusp
Version: 0.6~cvs20070202-1
Severity: normal
The latest version of splashy is installed and works for normal
boot/shutdown.
However, running s2disk returns looking for splash system... none
If
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 23:07:13 +0100
Benjamin Eikel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: splashy
Version: 0.3.2
Followup-For: Bug #411473
Hello again,
yes I have framebuffer support compiled into my kernel (radeonfb). That was
not the problem. The problem was that I have configured
the
Hi Steve,
You downgraded this bug. That's your call. But I do think this should be
fixed for etch.
I think it is unacceptable that an upgrade of such a critical pacakage
(for systems that use it) silently fails. It would be better to have
proper support for upgrading a database with the ldbm
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:44:07 +0100
Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: splashy
Version: 0.3.2
Severity: normal
Pressing the backspace key while running suspend to disk (uswsusp)
allows you to abort the process.
When uswsusp is configured to use splashy, this doesn't works
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:19:37 +0100
Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, my explanation was maybe not quite accurate. If I use the default
theme it becomes more obvious what happens:
On resume, init-top/splashy runs splashy boot, which brings up the
default splash screen.
Later, in
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:39:44 +0100
Frederic Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: splashy
Version: 0.3.1
Severity: important
splashy 0.3.0 and 0.3.1 have calls to splashy_config in splashy-init;
however splashy_config is linked against libglib-2.0.so.0 which is
not available if /usr/
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:43:11 +0100
Frederic Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: splashy
Version: 0.3.1
Severity: minor
[ $ENABLE = 1 ] log_warning_message To enable splashy add 'splash'
to
the kernel command line. Use of ENABLE in /etc/splashy/default is
deprecated.;
is at
Hi,
Your probably seeing the result of Bug#410897:
'Reads /proc/cmdline while /proc/ is not yet mounted.'
grts Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:10:49 +0100
Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, still with upstart. I can confirm, if I install sysvinit, the
bootup (at least wit splashy in initramfs) takes for ages and the
progressbar seems to be stuck after the first 20%.
This is very good news. Now at
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:56:21 +0100
Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: splashy
Version: 0.3.1
Severity: normal
/etc/init.d/splashy contains:
grep -q -e '[[:space:]]splash\([[:space:]]+\|$\)' /proc/cmdline
ENABLE=1
grep -q -e '[[:space:]]nosplash\([[:space:]]+\|$\)'
Hi Wolf,
Can you check if this bug is solved in the meantime?
grts Tim
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=394896
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:37:57 -0200
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Dijkstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Your probably seeing the result of Bug#410897:
'Reads /proc/cmdline while /proc/ is not yet mounted.'
While it can be part of it, I tested the regexp by hand
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:35:07 -0200
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Dijkstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:56:21 +0100
Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: splashy
Version: 0.3.1
Severity: normal
/etc/init.d/splashy contains:
grep
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 06:42:47 +0100
Georg Wittenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: splashy
Version: 0.3.0
Severity: important
Hi!
After upgrading to splashy 0.3, the splash screen is only shown on
shutdown but not when booting. Quite early in the boot process, just
after
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 22:07:23 +0100
Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: splashy
Version: 0.3.0
Severity: normal
I'm using splashy with
ENABLE_INITRAMFS=1
and uswsusp. When I suspend to disk, the subsequent resume fails (the splash
screen hangs and I have to hard reset).
If
Hi,
Not sure whether this is related, but during the upgrade to splashy 0.3 the
same error is triggered and after the upgrade /lib/splashy still contains the
some files as mentioned in this bug report.
That directory will now be removed on removal of 0.3.0, it is done in
its prerm. Hmm,
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 18:19:59 +0100
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: uswsusp
Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-6
Severity: wishlist
Hello Tim,
With etch-amd64 on my new laptop, s2ram work fine with that option:
#s2ram -f -a 1
Here the laptop ID:
#This machine can be
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:52:07 +0100
Georg Wittenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tim!
On Monday 12 February 2007 15:19, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 06:42:47 +0100
Georg Wittenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: splashy
Version: 0.3.0
Severity: important
Hi
Hi Guys,
I just got this report
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 18:19:59 +0100
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: uswsusp
Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-6
Severity: wishlist
Hello Tim,
With etch-amd64 on my new laptop, s2ram work fine with that option:
#s2ram -f -a 1
Here the laptop
Package: slapd
Version: 2.3.30-2
Severity: normal
I had a really unpleasant upgrade of my small-time (but essential to me)
server to etch yesterday night.
When upgrading I read the NEWS entries and skimmed to the changelog as
always, but didn't find any screaming messages...
When slapd was
Package: mount
Version: 2.12r-16
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
I'm very sorry, but I made an error in the patch I submitted against
#406204: swsusp-patch not applied
The way it is now will not work for userspace software suspend.
The patch attached now, applies on top of the previous
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:02:05 +0800
LI Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: uswsusp
Version: 0.5-1
Severity: important
maybe you should conflict with low version of initramfs-tools
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.18-3-amd64
/usr/sbin/mkinitramfs: line 68:
Package: libdirectfb-dev
Version: 0.9.25.1-5
Severity: important
Tags: patch
directfb-config generates wrong linking options for
imageprovider/font/videoprovider. It basically uses not enough capitals.
Attached patch fixes this. For videoprovider I'm not 100% sure because
three of the four
Package: libdirectfb-dev
Version: 0.9.25.1-5
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hi,
directfb-config generates the wrong path for the default wm module,
attached patch fixes that.
grts Tim
--- directfb-config 2006-12-04 08:10:09.0 +0100
+++ directfb-config 2007-01-20
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:29:50 +0100
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
I would want to know
your thoughts on this.
I had a look twice already, and didn't have a clue of what was wrong
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:29:50 +0100
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
I would want to know
your thoughts on this.
I had a look twice already, and didn't have a clue of what was wrong
tags 297741 +patch
thanks
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 01:19:51 +0100
Tim Dijkstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although the debs in experimental have the same issue, I just compiled
glib2.0-dev myself (on a etch system) and there strangely enough,
the .la file comes out just fine...
Sorry for replying
Hi,
I wonder why this trivial two year old bug is not fixed
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=297741
And without comment in the BTS.
This will break any package that tries to use libtool to statically
link glib-2.0.
I'm planning to upload one, but now I have to kludge around
Package: libdirectfb-dev
Version: 0.9.25.1-5
Severity: normal
The developement package seems to have a missing dependency on
libsysfs-dev
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (20, 'unstable'), (19, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386
Hi,
If this file, /etc/directfbrc, is essential we should install it
on the initramfs.
grts Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:33:42 +0100
Philip Frei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:59:07 +0100
Tim Dijkstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you just try
s2disk
It seems to work fine with s2disk. I tried it several times and the
suspend process didn't abort.
So I
Package: libdirectfb-0.9-25
Version: 0.9.25.1-5
Severity: important
File: /usr/lib/directfb-0.9.25/gfxdrivers/libdirectfb_radeon.so
On my machine splashy (which is linked against libdirectfb) hangs
the whole machine. But only when the radeon module is present.
Disabling it by adding to
severity 405388 normal
tags 405488 +confirmed
found 0.3~cvs20060928-1
thanks
On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 06:06:36 +0100
gregor herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: uswsusp
Version: 16
Severity: minor
I just set up encryption for s2disk (with an RSA file).
It took me some time to find out
Package: mount
Version: 2.12r-15
Severity: whishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
In the util-linux source package there is a file called
debian/patches/30swsusp-resume.dpatch
It is however not applied, is there any reason to not apply it?
I couldn't find a reason in the changelog, the only
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:35:04 +0100
Philip Frei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:57:53 +0100
Tim Dijkstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any error messages? If it went to quick, I think you can see some more
by going to the first free virtual terminal (eg. ctrl-alt-f8
block 405388 by 337663
thanks
Hi,
This is just to let you know that I had an e-mail conversation with the
maintainers of initramfs-tools and cryptsetup (which has the same
problem, but fixed it for that package). The initramfs maintainer
agreed to fix this post-etch.
grts Tim
signature.asc
/initramfs.conf.
this code is good tested by uswsusp, but it's a feature enhancement.
i'll queue it up for the post-etch queue.
Tested by cryptroot. But anyway, good to hear your are going to add this.
I'm CC-ing the original bug as a reminder.
TIA,
Tim Dijkstra
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 04:00:20 +0100
Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: uswsusp
Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-6
Severity: wishlist
There is a new upstream release 0.5 available at suspend.sf.net.
I've been using it successfully for some time now.
Maybe an official 0.5 release would
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 16:10:11 +0100
Philip Frei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: uswsusp
Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-6
Severity: important
About every second time I can't suspend my notebook. The suspend process
starts but just after 2 seconds it aborts.
This only happens with encryption
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 13:19:44 +0100
Marvin Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: uswsusp
Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-6
Severity: important
Hi,
I upgradet uswsusp to newest version and always get following error when
resuming the system:
- 8 - 8 - 8 - 8 -
Fatal: cannot allocate
severiy 404344 normal
retitle 404344 Need script to invalidate suspended image during normal boot-up
thanks
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 20:23:23 +0100
Zoran Dzelajlija [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: uswsusp
Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-6
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 21:29:17 -0800
Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 11:33:37PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 20:04:37 -0800
Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears that the problem here
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:33:58 +0100
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What worry me about the patch is the fact that create_lock() and
check_dpkglock() are not performed in the same order. In particular, if
create_lock() fail we exit with error 0 instead of 1 thus maybe
101 - 200 of 274 matches
Mail list logo
