On 20-7-2010 19:13, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Problem is, fam upstream is dead.
Yeah; but since I can't predict what will happen in the future (yet :-)
I think we should do the wisest move we can think of, until some new
upstream shows up, since
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Could you just do the gamin changes?
If we want to go that route we need to build all packages against
gamin's fam, since it has the largest amount of strings.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 29-7-2010 13:13, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Could you just do the gamin changes?
If we want to go that route we need to build all packages against
gamin's fam, since it has the largest amount of strings.
Oops. I assumed gamin had less strings.
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 02:05:56PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Oops. I assumed gamin had less strings. Is the number of strings in
gamin stable?
Looks like Chuan-kai will have to work on this.
Alright. Looks like I have to get off my arse and do some work.
Expect an upload this weekend.
On 29-7-2010 17:10, Chuan-kai Lin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 02:05:56PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Oops. I assumed gamin had less strings. Is the number of strings in
gamin stable?
Looks like Chuan-kai will have to work on this.
Alright. Looks like I have to get off my arse and do
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Oops. I assumed gamin had less strings. Is the number of strings in
gamin stable?
gamin isn't moving much anymore
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 06:02:06PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Great. Will you increase the array size to 100?
I plan to apply Loïc's patch that came with the original bug report,
which does increase the array size to 100.
--
Chuan-kai Lin
http://web.cecs.pdx.edu/~cklin/
--
To
On 20-7-2010 19:13, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Problem is, fam upstream is dead.
Yeah; but since I can't predict what will happen in the future (yet :-)
I think we should do the wisest move we can think of, until some new
upstream shows up, since
On 19-7-2010 23:19, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Loïc, is a fixed number of entries in the array good enough for you,
even though it's not 100?
A fixed number of entries is fine to workaround the issue, what matters
is that we use the same number
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Given that the number of entries is unlikely to change, isn't it
easier to use the current number of entries?
The next time you need a new entry, you can reserve 19 more entries.
I think it would be wiser to keep some buffer now if you're setting
On 20-7-2010 10:58, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Given that the number of entries is unlikely to change, isn't it
easier to use the current number of entries?
The next time you need a new entry, you can reserve 19 more entries.
I think it would be wiser
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Problem is, fam upstream is dead.
Yeah; but since I can't predict what will happen in the future (yet :-)
I think we should do the wisest move we can think of, until some new
upstream shows up, since we're essentially our own upstream right now.
On 16-7-2010 19:24, Chuan-kai Lin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 04:03:33PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
What's the status of this issue?
Has it been forwarded upstream?
I have not done anything with the bug because I am not sure the warnings
are worth addressing.
Why didn't you tell
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Loïc, is a fixed number of entries in the array good enough for you,
even though it's not 100?
A fixed number of entries is fine to workaround the issue, what matters
is that we use the same number across the two ABIs.
I recommend taking some
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 04:03:33PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
What's the status of this issue?
Has it been forwarded upstream?
I have not done anything with the bug because I am not sure the warnings
are worth addressing. Upstream appears to have ceased all activities
about three years
Hi Chuan-kai Lin,
What's the status of this issue?
Has it been forwarded upstream?
Greetings,
Olaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
16 matches
Mail list logo
