Bug#761032: hunspell-nl
On Wed, August 30, 2017 21:54, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > It seems that libreoffice-dictionaries started shipping an > hunspell-nl package at some point and it's actually providing an > older version of the dictionaries. > > I've talked to Rene about this, and he agreed we could take over > this package. > > Anyway, the files we ship now require hunspell 1.3.1, so it should > have been renamed ages ago. > > Thijs, do you have time to do this? Not in the short term. Probably do sometime before testing becomes stable. Cheers, Thijs
Bug#761032: hunspell-nl
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 07:34:45AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:12:15PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > Another possibility, which arguably is nicer for other non-Debian places > > as well, would be to get upstream of libreoffice-dictionaries to budle a > > newer version of that dictionary. > > That could be done, but I'd prefer to make dutch build hunspell-nl anyway. > Building hunspell-* from where they come from imho is preferred. > > Here especially since dutch already builds a hunspell-needing dict in a > myspell-nl package which should be fixed. Sure, I wasn't asking against having src:dutch do it. That said, be aware that the hunspell-nl binary built by src:libreoffice-dictionaries has an higher version than src:dutch currently has, so you'd need to take care of it. Once you take over the binary from src:dutch I'll quickly update libreoffice-dictionarie to stop building it. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#761032: hunspell-nl
Hi, On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:12:15PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Another possibility, which arguably is nicer for other non-Debian places > as well, would be to get upstream of libreoffice-dictionaries to budle a > newer version of that dictionary. > > Just file a bug in > https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=LibreOffice=Linguistic > asking for the nl dictionary to be updated. If it's an update coming > from the same source it will be handled very quickly and land in the > next update. That could be done, but I'd prefer to make dutch build hunspell-nl anyway. Building hunspell-* from where they come from imho is preferred. Here especially since dutch already builds a hunspell-needing dict in a myspell-nl package which should be fixed. Regards, Rene
Bug#761032: hunspell-nl
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:54:00PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > It seems that libreoffice-dictionaries started shipping an > hunspell-nl package at some point and it's actually providing an > older version of the dictionaries. > > I've talked to Rene about this, and he agreed we could take over > this package. Another possibility, which arguably is nicer for other non-Debian places as well, would be to get upstream of libreoffice-dictionaries to budle a newer version of that dictionary. Just file a bug in https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=LibreOffice=Linguistic asking for the nl dictionary to be updated. If it's an update coming from the same source it will be handled very quickly and land in the next update. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#761032: hunspell-nl
It seems that libreoffice-dictionaries started shipping an hunspell-nl package at some point and it's actually providing an older version of the dictionaries. I've talked to Rene about this, and he agreed we could take over this package. Anyway, the files we ship now require hunspell 1.3.1, so it should have been renamed ages ago. Thijs, do you have time to do this? Kurt
