F-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
M Database Libraries [runtime]
ii libsasl2 2.1.19-1.7 Authentication abstraction library
ii postfix [mail-transport-agen 2.2.4-1.0.1 A high-performance mail transport
mutt-ng recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Ve
#x27;re seeing.
If not, Axel is pretty responsive with bug reports so I'll ping him to
see if he has any idea what might be happening.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgp6uufqAj7ak.pgp
Description: PGP signature
it will be fully fixed in the next upload.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpMyQtVejfiB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: abcde
Version: 2.3.99-1
Severity: minor
The description for the '-B' option says 'vatiable' instead of
'variable'.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (499, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/
pts to make the life of a Debi
ii fakeroot 1.5.4 Gives a fake root environment
ii sudo 1.6.8p9-3 Provide limited super user privile
-- no debconf information
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
fish_1.16.
rt upstream archives into darc
ii devscripts2.9.8 Scripts to make the life of a Debi
ii dpkg-dev 1.13.11package building tools for Debian
darcs-buildpackage recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-0
uildresult .. -- --basetgz /var/cache/pbuilder/sid.tgz
> I'm assuming you are using pdebuild-internal, and somehow have
> stderr redirected to stdout.
This email is the first time I've heard of pdebuild-internal.
> Are you using some weird setup for uml or some sort?
No, it
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 10:26:17AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 10:28:28AM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> > Package: darcs-buildpackage
> > Version: 0.5.5
> > Severity: important
> >
> > As the subject says, dbp-importdsc just hangs when t
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 08:16:13AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 08:03:47AM -0500, James Vega wrote:
> > > This sounds like the known darcs bug where if, say, you deleted a file
> > > in your repo that was modified by the patches you are trying to pu
produce your problem here.
> Other questions:
>
> Do you happen to have dpkg-cross inside your pbuilder chroot?
Not unless it's part of a standard buildd variant.
> Are you running pdebuild inside a pbuilder session?
No.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpSKJKNJVWWv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ptitude-doc 0.3.5.1-2 English manual for aptitude, a ter
-- no debconf information
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- desc_parse.cc 2005-10-05 02:55:21.0 -0400
+++ desc_parse.cc.new 2005-11-03 19:38:10.0 -0500
@@ -127,7 +127,
is given to
> stderr and not to file):
It worked as expected here, too.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpaBlpZBGBMB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I just tried this with a cleanly created pbuilder environment and the
diffs are being properly created. So, it seems that the cause of the
problem is in the basetgz that I've been using.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpBdjMD6e9S6.pgp
LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages manpages-dev depends on:
ii manpages 2.08-1 Manual pages about using a GNU/Lin
manpages-dev recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROT
61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: load-dirs-common
Version: 1.0.22
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A TypeError is raised when calling the addTag method of a wc object (in
tla_wc.py). This is from trying to concatenate a list and a string.
Attached patch fixes the problem.
Jame
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: fish
Version : 1.9.1
Upstream Author : Axel Liljencrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://roo.no-ip.org/fish/
* License : GPL
Description : a friendly
Package: debhelper
Version: 4.2.35
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Found a type in '/usr/share/man/man1/dh_desktop.1.gz', see attached patch.
James
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (499,
licy: (500, 'unstable'), (499, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.2-debil
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the juke package.
The package description is:
Juke is a simple curses/ ncurses based juke box program for Unix
computers. It uses command line based players to play all kinds of
music format.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/uns
h has changed since then.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpGnlnagafUj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bootstrap a basic Debian system
ii python2.3.5-3An interactive high-level object-o
piuparts recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
What doesn't work about it? You haven't provided much information for
me to see why you think it is not acting as intended.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I'll be able to figure this out soon.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
resolve the issue soon. :)
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: cowdancer
Version: 0.25
Severity: normal
File: /usr/sbin/cowbuilder
"cowbuilder --update --override-config --mirror $mirror" fails as
expected (since --distribution isn't specified) but it then fails to
cleanup the build directory. Both the /proc and /dev/pts bind mounts
are left in tact
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 09:23:43AM -0500, James Vega wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 04:31:18PM -0500, James Vega wrote:
> > Ah, you're right. The /usr/bin/vim binary you have is probably a
> > version of Vim 6.3 so it'll be looking for /usr/share/vim/vim63. The
> &g
er, ":syntax off" inside of vim does not work either.
It works fine for me. Can you try reproducing this via the above
suggested command line? If that works as expected, the problem is
likely in your ~/.vimrc or ~/.vim/.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
fter the holidays. Maybe
your log will point out something that I missed before.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
on (13.11-3) which had some changes regarding
monitor detection. Could you give that a try to see if it works any
better? I'm working on getting my laptop setup with usplash to see if I
can reproduce the problem in case the new version is still buggy.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09
looks like /usr/bin/vim is some weird file that's been left lying
> around...
>
> I have dpkg 1.3.22.
Could you tell us which version you were upgrading from? We haven't
used diversions for vim in a long time.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PR
to try cleaning up the
build. I try to take a look at things again and get the build running
(if my computer can handle it now).
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
reproduce the bug in unstable or testing. Are you able to
reproduce this if you start vim as "vim -u /etc/vim/vimrc -N", ":syntax
on" and then follow the steps you listed?
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
st which is the newer maintainer
version of the file.
Also, you can check /var/log/dpkg.log to see from which version you upgraded.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
d on my terminal. Setting 'background' to 'dark' fixed
the problem.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 01:01:29PM -0800, Peter Eckersley wrote:
> On 04/12/06, James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >That's odd because the first thing /etc/vim/vimrc does is to source
> >/usr/share/vim/vim70/debian.vim and that sets the proper &#
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 12:08:07PM -0800, Peter Eckersley wrote:
> On 04/12/06, James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 04:59:45PM -0800, Peter Eckersley wrote:
> >> After a recent upgrade (to version 7+), vim on my system stopped
&
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 12:43:27PM -0800, Peter Eckersley wrote:
> On 04/12/06, James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> My runtime path is pretty weird:
> >>
> >>
> >runtimepath=~/.vim,/usr/share/vim/vimfiles,/usr/share/vim,/usr/s
tag 379839 wontfix
thanks
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 11:35:47PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 09:03:24AM -0500, James Vega wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 01:40:59PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 09:50:24PM +0200, Jens Seidel wr
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 04:31:18PM -0500, James Vega wrote:
> Ah, you're right. The /usr/bin/vim binary you have is probably a
> version of Vim 6.3 so it'll be looking for /usr/share/vim/vim63. The
> URL you posted in a previous email isn't working, but I'll give t
erman users :-/
Done.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to get some good testing of
the config file transition and I need to look into a build problem.
Hopefully I'll have it uploaded this weekend.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: vim-scripts
Version: 7-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
The install file does not list the macros and autoload directories. The
macros directory isn't that important, but the autoload directory breaks
plugins that use autoloaded functions (such as Align). The attached
patch adds the ne
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 09:41:14AM -0500, James Vega wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 12:43:39PM +, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> > Please package 1.22.0! (I know, it was only released yesterday, this
> > is just in case you haven't seen it.) It has some important bug and
>
ed and I've talked with
upstream. He's working on making fish better behaved when it is unable
to write to $HOME.
I'm going to downgrade this for now since the package is building and
leave it open as a reminder to me to re-add running upstream's test
suite in a later upload.
Jame
on "prerm remove" not
"prerm upgrade". I'll confirm this and should be able to get a new
upload which fixes it this weekend.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 02:40:46PM -0500, James Vega wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 11:11:50AM -0700, Larry Lade wrote:
> > Package: vim
> > Version: 1:7.0-164+1
> > Followup-For: Bug #399024
> >
> >
> > Confirmed.
> >
> > This
t
least when I perform an upgrade. I'll try it in a fresh chroot later to
see if something about my normal environment is making things work when
they shouldn't. Otherwise, I'm at a loss as to why it's working for me
and not for other people.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: bzr-builddeb
Version: 0.14
Severity: normal
When exporting the directory to perform a build, bzr-builddeb uses
incorrect version information for non-native packages. For example,
attempting to build fish 1-22.2-1 should create the directory
fish-1.22.2. Instead, it creates fish-1.22.2-1
ecause simply starting the application of the package leads to a full
> system crash I think a severity of "Serious" would be appropriate.
It's possible to adjust the serverity after the fact (as I've done with
this email), so it's not necessarily a problem that it wasn'
27;m not sure if there are other kernel patches SuSE uses which may cause
further problems down the line.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
(see #408753). I'm not sure of a way
around this but it is probably something that should be looked into in
case we end up making a similar transition with some other translation
of the manpages.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ess correctly, then it's not a big deal.
If the script doesn't guess correctly, the user should be able to check
the dch manpage and see that exporting DEBEMAIL fixes the issue.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ress. Users can always
create a shell alias/script if they frequently use bts usertags with a
specific email address.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 07:26:08PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 14:05 -0400, James Vega wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 05:16:25PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > Or should we modify bts to use $DEBEMAIL or $EMAIL as the default user
> >
Package: linux-patch-exec-shield
Version: 1:2.6.20-1
Severity: minor
This package currently depends on grep-dctrl which is simply a dummy
package to help people transition from Sarge to Etch. The actual
package is dctrl-tools.
James
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstab
Package: linux-patch-exec-shield
Version: 1:2.6.20-1
Followup-For: Bug #392464
This patch is failing with the current 2.6.18 kernel on mm/mprotect.c.
The last two hunks for this file fail. It looks like there's a new
version on Ingo's site that fixes this.
James
-- System Information:
Debian Rel
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the hwinfo package. I have neither the time
nor the resources to properly test and maintain this package.
The package description is:
hwinfo is the hardware detection tool used in SuSE Linux.
.
In Debian-Edu (Skolelinux) hwinfo has show
(#387156) with a patch that at
least fixed the problem when I attempted to build screen. Never saw a
response from the maintainer though.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> agent effectively bringing #397354 back alive:
Has anyone tried contacting people at Berlios to see if they would be
averse to allowing devscripts to connect?
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
that happens, it won't be fixed.
Thanks for clarifying the situation. I had the same impression when I
took a look at providing a patch. I'll go ahead and mark the bug
accordingly.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
yed.
I thought I remembered hearing about some work done with multibyte
display on the vim-dev list. I'll give this a better look over after
clearing up the current issues wrt Etch.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
n()
File "/usr/bin/reportbug", line 783, in main
return iface.user_interface()
File "/usr/bin/reportbug", line 1594, in user_interface
patch = ('patch' in taglist)
TypeError: iterable argument required
James
-- Package-specific info:
** Environment settings:
DE
Package: vim-addon-manager
Version: 0.1
Severity: normal
Using unrecognized options causes vim-addons to quit with a backtrace
instead of informing the user how vim-addons can be invoked.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0 /t/svnside % vim-addons --list
/usr/bin/vim-addons: unrecognized option `--list'
/usr/lib
XmPushButton works around the bug in
> vim:
Thanks for the patch. I'm currently building Vim to verify the fix.
If that's successful, we'll probably upload in the next couple days.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
rom Steve
> Oualline's book in the user manual, and that text uses this license.
Ideally, a re-examination of the license on Debian's side will determine
that it does meet our guidelines. Thank you for taking the time to
respond to our questions.
James
[1] -
http://lists.alioth.debia
D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
found 388164 1.0.65-3
thanks
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 06:08:46PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> java-gcj-compat attempts to register manpages for jar, java, keytool,
> and rmiregistry. Of these, only jar, java, and rmiregistry have
> symlinks in $jdkhome (as defined in the postinst) and onl
.
Invoking vim as "vim -u NONE" will always cause this behavior since Vim
is in vi-compatible mode. If you still see the problem when invoking
VIm as "vim -u NONE -N", then there is a problem. I was unable to
reproduce this using "vim -u NONE -N" with vim-ruby.
Package: quilt
Version: 0.45-4
Followup-For: Bug #381125
The quilt manpage still contains the buildd lines as noted in the
original report.
James
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (499, 'experimental')
Architecture: i38
-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.2-1
Severity: normal
As the attached screenshot shows, the colors aptitude uses in 256 color
terminals (xterm-256color and putty-256color are ones I've tried) make
it quite difficult to read. This is probably related to the fix put in
for #337689.
James
-- System I
The reason you're seeing the different behavior is because File->Close
does more than just :close. It checks to see whether there is more than
one window open or not. In your scenario (only one window), it actually
performs ":confirm enew" since :close will always fail if there i
till able to reproduce this? I tried with the current vim7
packages and did not see this behavior. I'll close this bug in a week
or so if I do not hear back from you.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hether this is still the case with the vim7 packages?
It looks fine to me, but I don't understand Polish. :)
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
s there a specific reason vim-tiny is built without
multi-byte support or should we start building vim-tiny with that?
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tag 374853 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 08:19:08PM +0200, Nicolas wrote:
> Since a few weeks, I got an error message when running vim-gtk. The
> message is displayed in a window. Here is its contents :
> Error deteced while processing /usr/share/vim/vim70/menu.vim:
> line
or detected while processing BufReadCmd Auto commands for "file://*":
> E37: No write since last change (add ! to override)
> Press ENTER or type command to continue
Can you still reproduce this? This works fine for me.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega &
oblems? If so, check whether you
have a stale /etc/vim/vimrc or /etv/vim/gvimrc. There would likely be a
vimrc.dpkg-new or vimrc.dpkg-dist (same with gvimrc) in /etc/vim.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 08:53:55AM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
> On 10/9/06, James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 03:01:28AM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> when I run 'vim file://etc/bash.bashrc', I got an
le to reproduce this build
failure on ia64/amd64 systems I have access to (merulo and pergolesi).
I've nudged upstream to see what his preferred solution would be.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 01:13:23PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 11:08:11AM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> > Fish uses features that are specific to c99 which is why upstream uses
> > the -std=c99 compiler flag. I've been unable to reproduce this build
>
Package: cmake
Version: 2.4.3-1
Severity: normal
Currently cmake Recommends having some variant of emacs installed. It
appears that this Recommends is solely because an emacs cmake mode is
installed. This use of Recommends is overkill considering that tools
like aptitude normally auto-install re
consider hwinfo to be in rather good shape, with one bug that I'm not
> able to find myself: #381387: hwinfo --pci under ISDN Adapter invasion.
The latest upstream fixes this.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
gnome-pilot-* 2.0.14 has been ported to use pilot-link 0.12.x. Any
chance of getting the new upstream uploaded so these two RC bugs can be
closed?
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
a dependency
on vim-common would prevent that. We can just change the packaging so
/u/s/d/vim-gui-common is a directory with the same same contents as
vim-common (or just the minimum required by policy).
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hwinfo 13.3-2 should be hitting the archives today. Could you test
whether that version fixes your bug? I don't have any PCIe hardware to
check.
Thanks,
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
for use with
Versions of packages java-gcj-compat recommends:
pn libgcj7-src(no description available)
-- no debconf information
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 07:31:55PM +0200, Antonio-Miguel Corbi Bellot wrote:
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
> When starting gvim (either from vim-gnome or from vim-gtk) I get
> this
> error:
> Error detected while processing /usr/share/vim/
assign a action via nautilus or whatnot so your personal
> ..desktop preferences are known. Something like that.
>
> How exactly fish is to know if your running KDE vs Gnome or what to do
> when your running something like Fluxbox or Ion3 I don't know.
This is also something tha
th z
>
> if you hit tab then it will look like:
> ~> ls z$<100/>
I'm unable to reproduce this. If you can still reproduce this after
moving ~/.fish and ~/.fish.d out of the way, please open a separate bug
report and I'll follow up.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
harge' bit violate DFSG #1?
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
g works fine. Which suites me
> fine right now.
Good. :) I'll suggest the $XDG_DATA_DIRS/packages check to Axel (with a
patch if I get time) and see what he thinks. I'll close this bug when I
get a response from him on the issue.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
long description.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
The attached patch fixed the version compare in print_version to make
use of AptPkg instead of performing a string equality.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -Naur apt-show-versions-0.09.orig/apt-show-versions
apt-show-versions-0.09/ap
-1 is then recognized as not being a valid bug number.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
s discussed on IRC, we'll model this after the entry for virata
instead. I'll add the patch and forward the request to Bram later
today.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: xmms2-core
Version: 0.2DrFeelgood-1
Severity: normal
If no startup.d or shutdown.d directories exist (e.g.,
~/.xmms2/{startup,shutdown}.d), the following messages are emitted:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0 ~ % xmms2d
INFO: src/xmms/log.c:35: Initialized logging system :)
INFO: src/xmms/mai
o #367566.
#367566 was actually specific to the debchangelog ftplugin and has ben
fixed. This problem occurs with any filetype that has syntax-based
folding. I'm working on a patch now.
Thanks for the report,
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signa
1 - 100 of 890 matches
Mail list logo
