Bug#315793: marked as done (glibc: FTBFS with new dpkg)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#313404: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#313219: marked as done (gnome-vfs2 crashes in read_entire_file with HAL and Linux 2.4)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#313219: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#320240: marked as done (g++ 4.0 doesn't compile ucontext.h on ia64)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#320240: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#313219: marked as done (gnome-vfs2 crashes in read_entire_file with HAL and Linux 2.4)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#312406: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#318429: marked as done (libc6.1-dev: failure with g++-4.0 caused by ucontext.h)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#320240: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#315793: marked as done (glibc: FTBFS with new dpkg)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#315793: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#312406: marked as done (gnome-core: Does not install in SID)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#313219: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#312406: marked as done (gnome-core: Does not install in SID)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#312406: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#317946: marked as done (binutils: [amd64?] cannot link libc.a)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#318963: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#317946: marked as done (binutils: [amd64?] cannot link libc.a)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#318956: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#317674: marked as done (libc6: can't link a program with -static)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#318963: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#320240: marked as done (g++ 4.0 doesn't compile ucontext.h on ia64)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#318429: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#318956: marked as done (glibc: causes static builds to FTBFS on amd64)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#317946: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#317946: marked as done (binutils: [amd64?] cannot link libc.a)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#317946: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#314855: marked as done (tr_TR.ISO-8859-9...LC_MONETARY: `int_curr_symbol' does not correspond to valid name)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#314855: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#297287: marked as done (snes9x: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'bool8*' to 'int' loses precision)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:17:44 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#297287: fixed in snes9x 1.42-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#294483: marked as done (conflict between libc6-sparc64 and gcc-3.0/libgcc1 over /lib/64)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 19:15:42 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Close bugs tagged as woody has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#318956: marked as done (glibc: causes static builds to FTBFS on amd64)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#317674: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#321406: evince: libdjvulibre dependency problem

Package: evince Version: 0.3.0-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Evince seems to be compiled using libjvulibre 14 but the actual state of the libjvulibre library is 15. Here are my local information : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ evince evince: error while loading shared

Bug#319958: marked as done (inkscape: fails to install (wrong dependencies))

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:47:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#319958: fixed in inkscape 0.42-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#318956: marked as done (glibc: causes static builds to FTBFS on amd64)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#318963: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#318429: marked as done (libc6.1-dev: failure with g++-4.0 caused by ucontext.h)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#318429: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#317674: marked as done (libc6: can't link a program with -static)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#317946: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#317674: marked as done (libc6: can't link a program with -static)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#318956: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#265526: marked as done (mysql++: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: `sql_use_compare' undeclared (first use this function))

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:32:14 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#265526: fixed in mysql++ 1.7.40-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#291281: marked as done (mysql++: FTBFS: unsatisfied build dependencies.)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:32:14 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#291281: fixed in mysql++ 1.7.40-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#321413: All passwords are safed in cleartext!

Package: mypasswordsafe Version: 0.0.20041004-2 Severity: critical I am using MyPasswordSafe for a long time. By accident I took a look to my default passwordsafe-file ~/.passwörter.xml and was scared because all passwords are safed in cleartext! No encryption! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Processed: Bug#318536: texi2html: Chokes on gnugo.texi

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 318536 + pending Bug#318536: texi2html: Chokes on gnugo.texi There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Processed: Re: xine-lib: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in increment

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 315986 patch Bug#315986: xine-lib: please build against libslang2 Tags were: patch Bug#315868: libxine: please build against libslang2 Tags added: patch tags 320317 patch Bug#320317: xine-lib source package depends on aalib1-dev Tags were: sid

Bug#318536: texi2html: Chokes on gnugo.texi

tags 318536 + pending thanks I'm now maintaining this package and I have found the problem that causes this bug. The authors of the code have made a simple, yet bad spelling mistake in a call to the function. Replacing the s for a z. Will be fixed on my first upload of texi2html -- N Jones

Processed: Re: Bug#321406: evince: libdjvulibre dependency problem

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 321406 djvulibre Bug#321406: evince: libdjvulibre dependency problem Bug reassigned from package `evince' to `djvulibre'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#321406: evince: libdjvulibre dependency problem

reassign 321406 djvulibre thanks Le vendredi 05 août 2005 à 12:31 +0200, Didrik Pinte a écrit : Evince seems to be compiled using libjvulibre 14 but the actual state of the libjvulibre library is 15. This is a djvulibre bug, reassigning to it with the bunch of other duplicates. Cheers,

Bug#321280: marked as done (nbd-client: Binary missing)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 04:47:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#321280: fixed in nbd 1:2.7.4-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#321261: marked as done (nautilus: Nautilus depends libexif10 which package not available)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 05:02:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#321261: fixed in nautilus 2.10.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#320138: marked as done (nautilus: ftbfs [sparc] configure: error: *** libX11 not found.)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 05:02:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#320138: fixed in nautilus 2.10.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#321420: tetex-base uninstallable due to lack of update-language

Package: tetex-base Version: 3.0-6 Severity: grave Tags: experimental Justification: renders package unusable Attempting to install tetex-base results in the following Setting up tetex-base (3.0-6) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-base.postinst: line 406: update-language: command not f dpkg: error

Processed: Tagging sid, unreproducible

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 304432 +unreproducible +sid +help Unknown tag/s: +sid, +help. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental

Processed: Tagging moreinfo

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 304432 +moreinfo Bug#304432: plucker_1.8-4(mips/unstable): FTBFS with -rsudo Tags were: unreproducible Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#304432: Tagging sid, unreproducible

tags 304432 +unreproducible +sid +help thanks Are you still being hit by this? -- .''`. Follow the white Rabbit - Ranty (and Lewis Carroll) : :' : `. `'Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid 2.6.11 Ext3) `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com

Bug#304432: Tagging moreinfo

tags 304432 +moreinfo thanks -- .''`. Follow the white Rabbit - Ranty (and Lewis Carroll) : :' : `. `'Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid 2.6.11 Ext3) `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Tagging sid, unreproducible, help

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 304432 unreproducible sid help Bug#304432: plucker_1.8-4(mips/unstable): FTBFS with -rsudo Tags were: moreinfo unreproducible Tags added: unreproducible, sid, help thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#304432: Tagging sid, unreproducible, help

tags 304432 unreproducible sid help thanks -- .''`. Follow the white Rabbit - Ranty (and Lewis Carroll) : :' : `. `'Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid 2.6.11 Ext3) `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#286496: NMU patch for gconfmm2.0 version 2.02-1.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 gconfmm2.0 (2.0.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=high * Non-maintainer upload. * GCC 4.0 transition (Closes: #286496, #317690) -- Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 5 Aug 2005 13:54:34 +0200 Patch attached. Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Processed: submitter 318164

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 submitter 318164 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#318164: CXX 4.0 transition Changed Bug submitter from Robert Jordens [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] End of message, stopping

Bug#320794: please recompile evince against libdjvulibre-dev (= 3.5.14-6)

Sebastien, Could I trouble you to recompile and dupload evince against libdjvulibre1 (= 3.5.14-6) to deal with soname change? Evince is the only package that uses the lib, so that will clear the issue. I'm not sure if the API has changed in a fashion that justifies a chance in soname. Upstream

Bug#320794: please recompile evince against libdjvulibre-dev (= 3.5.14-6)

Le vendredi 05 août 2005 à 06:49 -0600, Barak Pearlmutter a écrit : Sebastien, Could I trouble you to recompile and dupload evince against libdjvulibre1 (= 3.5.14-6) to deal with soname change? Evince is the only package that uses the lib, so that will clear the issue. Hi, What about

Bug#321301: cogito: FTBFS: Missing build dependency on ssl-dev.

Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Kurt Roeckx: Your package is missing a build dependency on ssl-dev, resulting in the following error: cc -g -O2 -Wall '-DSHA1_HEADER=mozilla-sha1/sha1.h' -c -o epoch.o epoch.c epoch.c:14:24: error: openssl/bn.h: No such file or directory

Bug#321301: cogito: FTBFS: Missing build dependency on ssl-dev.

* Sebastian Kuzminsky: epoch uses openssl for the bignums, not for the SSL. We already got rid of all the SSL stuff by using the Mozilla SSL implementation. Getting rid of this last openssl dependency will require significant changes (reimplementation or feature removal). A patch to replace

Bug#321174: marked as done (vic: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `_randseed')

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 06:02:04 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#321174: fixed in vic 1:2.8ucl1.1.5-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Bug#317863: Loops forever processing bbdb.texinfo

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 317863 + pending Bug#317863: Loops forever processing bbdb.texinfo There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#317863: Loops forever processing bbdb.texinfo

tags 317863 + pending thanks Bug fixed and bbdb should be able to be built after this next (coming) upload. -- N Jones Proud Debian FOSS User Debian Maintainer of: html2ps, ipkungfu, dvorak7min windowlab

Bug#320794: please recompile evince against libdjvulibre-dev (= 3.5.14-6)

Problem is what does fix djvulibre mean here? Fix it to generate the old soname, thus losing soname compatibility with upstream? Fix it to generate a different library name, perhaps libdjvulibre15? Fix it by asking upstream to stop changing the soname for no reason? Fix it by convincing anyone

Bug#319355: net-tools: FTBFS: field 'gen' has incomplete type

This is a follow-up to my previous mail On 8/5/05, Török Edvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:48:48 Andreas Jochens wrote: Package: net-tools Version: 1.60-15 Severity: serious When building 'net-tools' on unstable, I get the following error: cc -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -Wall

Bug#321430: flpsed is not installable

Package: flpsed Version: 0.3.3-1 Severity: serious flpsed depends on libfltk1.1c102 that is no longer available. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#321431: easytag is not installable

Package: easytag Version: 1.99.7-1 Severity: serious easytag depends on libid3-3.8.3 that is no longer available. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#321432: dosemu is not installable

Package: dosemu Version: 1.2.1-3 Severity: serious dosemu depends on slang1 that is no longer available. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#321433: Cannon install k3b and k3blibs

Package: k3blibs Version: 0.12.1-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I have this error: monk:~# apt-get install k3blibs Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible

Bug#319355: marked as done (net-tools: FTBFS: field 'gen' has incomplete type)

Your message dated Fri, 5 Aug 2005 16:52:32 +0300 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line net-tools: FTBFS: field 'gen' has incomplete type has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#321435: Unrecoverable error: typecheck in .getdeviceparams on s390

Package: gs-gpl Version: 8.15-2 Severity: serious Architecture: s390 Hi, on s390 (but not on any other debian arch) the new version of gs-gpl fails when converting a (specific) file with fig2dev: | [sid] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tor/tor-0.1.0.12/doc/design-paper$ fig2dev -L pdf cell-struct.fig

Bug#297924: marked as done (ode: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'Opcode::AABBTreeNode*' to 'udword' loses precision)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 06:47:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#297924: fixed in ode 1:0.5-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#317423: Same crash in 3.4.1

Hi, I had this very same crash in 3.4.0 and 3.4.1 (both taken from on alioth) on i386. I cannot try to change jukrc: my first reflex was to delete it to come back to the defaults (didn't help either). Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#320794: please recompile evince against libdjvulibre-dev (= 3.5.14-6)

Yes, all true. I will upload a rev which generates libdjvulibre15. When that comes down the pike, please recompile evince against it. --Barak. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#211663: Bug should be closed

Hi, the package op-showimg-fb seems to have been removed for some time from the archive, so this big can probably be closed now. Regards, Regis -- While a monkey can be a manager, it takes a human to be an engineer Erik Zapletal

Bug#317423: Juk crashes at startup

If you have libtunepimp2 0.3.0-4 installed, please downgrade it to 0.3.0-3 available from: http://packages.debian.org/testing/libs/libtunepimp2 HTH. * Nicolas DEGAND [Fri, 08 Jul 2005 13:06:46 +0200]: Package: juk Version: 4:3.3.2-1 Severity: grave I upgraded some packages

Processed: Re: leaks dpkg.log filedescriptor to child processes

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 320925 patch Bug#320925: leaks dpkg.log filedescriptor to child processes There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#320925: leaks dpkg.log filedescriptor to child processes

tags 320925 patch thanks I have made a patch that sets close-on-exec. Tell me if this is what you expected, and if my patch really fixes what you meant. Also please test if dpkg still works correctly diff -Nru ./intl/log.c ../dpkg-1.13.11/intl/log.c --- ./intl/log.c 2005-06-06 07:33:19.0

Bug#321449: gcc-snapshot should stay in unstable

Package: gcc-snapshot Severity: serious To the best of my understanding, gcc-snapshot is not intended to be ever released with a stable Debian release. This bug is intended to serve as a marker bug to make sure gcc-snapshot won't enter testing. Thanks, --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL

Bug#321096: marked as done (libextractor: wrongly build-conflicts with gcc-3.3, FTBFS on buildds)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 08:47:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#321096: fixed in libextractor 0.4.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#321461: vlc is uninstallable

Package: vlc Version: 0.8.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, The package depend on libmodplug0 which is uninstallable on sid (renamed to libmodplug0c2) It also depend on aalib-dev which change name (FTBFS), and I stop there the investigation. Mike -- System

Bug#321284: libatomic-ops override disparity

On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 12:39 +1000, Ian Wienand wrote: On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 06:57:40PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: Also, you moved the static libraries without adding a proper Replaces: field, breaking all upgrades. I've made -dev replace the non-dev I suggest dropping the

Bug#316579: New fam package ready for sarge upload

Hi all, You have reported a bug on fam that prevents removable media from unmounting and causes other related problems. I have prepared a new fam package for the sarge (current stable) release that should address these issues. Please test, and let me know if the fix works for you. Thanks, --

Bug#296609: New fam package ready for sarge upload

Hi again, Oops. I forgot to give you the URL to the new packages. http://www.cs.pdx.edu/~cklin/fam-update/ -- Chuan-kai Lin http://www.cs.pdx.edu/~cklin/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 318723 +confirmed security Bug#318723: javascript crasher Tags were: security Tags added: confirmed, security thanks control Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#318723:

tags 318723 +confirmed security thanks control The bug is fixed in the new mozilla package in sid, so it should be moved over to sarge!

Processed: Re: Bug#321461: vlc is uninstallable

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: merge #319598 #321461 Bug#319598: wxvlc / vlc depends on libwxgtk2.4 (not installable) - see also wishlist Bug#321461: vlc is uninstallable Bug#319292: vlc is not sid installable because libwxgtk2.4 isn't. Merged 319292 319598 321461. thanks Stopping

Bug#318607: marked as done (dash_0.5.2-6: FTBFS on 64bit architectures)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 10:47:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#318607: fixed in dash 0.5.2-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#317491: NMU

I uploaded an NMU for these bugs with the patches available in the BTS. Full NMU patch attached. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ diff -Naur aleph-0.9.0/cnf/bin/aleph-vcomp aleph-0.9.0.nmu/cnf/bin/aleph-vcomp --- aleph-0.9.0/cnf/bin/aleph-vcomp

Bug#321461: vlc is uninstallable

merge #319598 #321461 thanks Hello, The package depend on libmodplug0 which is uninstallable on sid (renamed to libmodplug0c2) It also depend on aalib-dev which change name (FTBFS), and I stop there the investigation. This bug will be fixed when a recompiled version of vlc is uploaded to

Bug#317490: upload?

On July, 11th you said your would prepare new packages this week. What's the status of this? Do you need any help? Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#317423: Juk crashes at startup

Hello, the workaround works, thanks Stefan Lüthje Adeodato Simó sagte: If you have libtunepimp2 0.3.0-4 installed, please downgrade it to 0.3.0-3 available from: http://packages.debian.org/testing/libs/libtunepimp2 HTH. * Nicolas DEGAND [Fri, 08 Jul 2005 13:06:46 +0200]:

Processed: Fixed in NMU of aleph 0.9.0-2.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 276735 + fixed Bug#276735: aleph: FTBFS with g++-3.4: Call to overloaded method is ambiguous Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed tag 317491 + fixed Bug#317491: FTBFS: Cannot handle GCC 4.0 Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping

Bug#316579: New fam package ready for sarge upload

On Aug 5, 2005, at 10:57 AM, Chuan-kai Lin wrote: You have reported a bug on fam that prevents removable media from unmounting and causes other related problems. I have prepared a new fam package for the sarge (current stable) release that should address these issues. Please test, and let

Bug#318361: Upload?

Hi. On July, 15th you acknowledged this bug and the patch. Is there any problem that makes it unfeasable to upload a new package with this patch? Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#317856: cannot represent change to doc/flex.info-2

Applying the patch and adding the needed versioning to the build-depends, the package fails to build: dpkg-source -b flex-2.5.31 dpkg-source: building flex using existing flex_2.5.31.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: building flex in flex_2.5.31-33.1.diff.gz dpkg-source: cannot represent change to

Bug#321355: marked as done (ftbfs [sparc] zlib.h: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 11:32:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#321355: fixed in zlib 1:1.2.3-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#321487: missing dependency on debconf

Package: libsqlite3-0 Version: 3.2.1-1 Severity: grave libsqlite3-0 sources the debconf module in it's preinst script, but doesn't depend on it: Unpacking libsqlite3-0 (from .../libsqlite3-0_3.2.2-2_powerpc.deb) ... /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: line 6: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No such

Bug#318999: complete patch (all transitions)

I believe the attached patch completes all current transitions for arkrpg. Please someone review it especially the C++ transition part. I can NMU with this patch during the current BSP if wanted. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ diff -Naur

Bug#320118: NMU diff

NMU diff attached. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature. diff -Nru ../orig/vifm-0.3/debian/changelog vifm-0.3/debian/changelog ---

Processed: Fixed in NMU of vifm 0.3-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 320118 + fixed Bug#320118: vifm: ftbfs [sparc] cannot find install-sh or install.sh There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#316579: New fam package ready for sarge upload

On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 12:28:01PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote: I'm sorry, but I do not have another compact flash that I'm willing to potentially destroy testing this. At this point I've completely removed FAM from my systems and plan to keep it that way. I can hardly fault you for your

Bug#320794: please recompile evince against libdjvulibre-dev (= 3.5.14-6)

On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 06:49:51AM -0600, Barak Pearlmutter wrote: Could I trouble you to recompile and dupload evince against libdjvulibre1 (= 3.5.14-6) to deal with soname change? Evince is the only package that uses the lib, so that will clear the issue. No, libdjvulibre1 was included in a

Bug#302231: Diff of the NMU of mlterm

Hi, Please find attached the diff of the NMU of mlterm. Bye, Aurelien -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 |

Bug#287882: Diff of the NMU of orange

Hi, Please find attached the diff of the NMU of orange. Bye, Aurelien -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 |

Bug#258509: NMU

NMU uploaded during the current BSP with the following patch: diff -Naur bdfresize-1.5.bak/charresize.c bdfresize-1.5/charresize.c --- bdfresize-1.5.bak/charresize.c 2000-12-12 12:18:14.0 +0100 +++ bdfresize-1.5/charresize.c 2005-08-05 21:24:21.0 +0200 @@ -46,7 +46,6 @@ void

Bug#280329: NMU of ecos

Hi, Please find attached the difference between version 2.0-0pre2.1 and 2.0-0pre2.2 of ecos. Bye, Aurelien -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-

Processed: tagging 321431, severity of 321431 is grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.3 tags 321431 sid Bug#321431: easytag is not installable There were no tags set. Tags added: sid severity 321431 grave Bug#321431: easytag is not installable Severity set to `grave'.

Processed: tagging 321432, severity of 321432 is grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.3 tags 321432 sid Bug#321432: dosemu is not installable There were no tags set. Tags added: sid severity 321432 grave Bug#321432: dosemu is not installable Severity set to `grave'.

Processed: Fixed in NMU of orange 0.2-3.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 287882 + fixed Bug#287882: orange: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'orange_strndup' differ in signedness Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed tag 306817 + fixed Bug#306817: orange(GNU/k*BSD): FTBFS: out of date

Processed: tagging 321433

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.3 tags 321433 sid Bug#321433: Cannon install k3b and k3blibs There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gconfmm2.0 2.0.2-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 286496 + fixed Bug#286496: gconfmm2.0: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed tag 317690 + fixed Bug#317690: libgconfmm2.0-1c102: depends on unavailable libsigc++-1.2-5c102 There were

  1   2   3   >