Bug#1018818: bpfcc: FTBFS with libbpf 1.0.0

Control: fixed -1 0.25.0+ds-1 Hi Sudip, Thanks for the report new upstream release is fixing this issue and I've already uploaded new version and is building fine against all release architecture. So closing this bug. Thanks and Regards, Vasudev

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

Michel Le Bihan writes: > Hello, > > I opened a merge request, but merging all branches into your repo > might cause issues in the upstream branch in the future due to the > merge commits. Instead, it will be best to pull all branches from my > repo into branches of your repo, but without adding

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

Michel Le Bihan writes: > Le mardi 22 décembre 2020 à 17:35 +0530, Vasudev Kamath a écrit : >> Jonas Smedegaard writes: >> >> > Quoting Michel Le Bihan (2020-12-20 17:15:29) >> > > Le dimanche 20 décembre 2020 à 16:50 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard a >> &g

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

Jonas Smedegaard writes: > Quoting Michel Le Bihan (2020-12-20 17:15:29) >> Le dimanche 20 décembre 2020 à 16:50 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >> > Quoting Michel Le Bihan (2020-12-20 16:06:27) >> > > A quick summary of the differences between both repos: >> > >> > Thanks, that is no doubt

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

Hi Alberto, > I have checked that current upstream (9.0) builds flawlessly, and made > my release available at https://salsa.debian.org/aluaces-guest/biboumi > . That is great. > Can I be sponsored so we can upload to at least experimental? Sure, please raise a merge request against biboumi

Bug#976596: bpfcc FTBFS: symbol differences

Hi Adrian, Adrian Bunk writes: > Source: bpfcc > Version: 0.17.0-7 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > This might be due to the LLVM 9 -> 11 transition, > or for other reasons. > > The general problem of shipping symbols files for C++ code > is discussed at

Bug#937413: pycryptopp: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

Hi Moritz, Moritz Mühlenhoff writes: > > Hi Vasudev, > > https://github.com/tahoe-lafs/pycryptopp/issues/36#issuecomment-504130020 > states: > > | The Tahoe-LAFS project has decided it is not interested in porting > | pycryptopp to Python 3. Instead, Tahoe-LAFS is switching to the > |

Bug#938622: tahoe-lafs: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

Sorry for the delayed response here. I let the package to fall of from testing as upstream does not yet any support for building python3. Though currently there is some work going on for supporting python3 in upstream, I'm not sure of ETA of the procedure. Will reintroduce the package once

Bug#948404: glances crashes on startup

Hi Daniel, Daniel Echeverry writes: > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 11:25:05PM -0500, Daniel Echeverry wrote: >> tags 948404 + moreinfo unreproducible >> thanks >> >> Hi! >> >> Thanks for your report! Unfortunately I can't reproduce this bug, I install >> glances via ap-get install and works

Bug#948404: glances crashes on startup

Package: glances Version: 3.1.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: Renders glances use less Dear Maintainer, I installed glances from Debian repository and when trying to launch It crashes with following stack trace Error while initializing the ip plugin ('NoneType' object has no attribute

Bug#938887: zfec: diff for NMU version 1.5.2-2.1

Sandro Tosi writes: > > I've prepared an NMU for zfec (versioned as 1.5.2-2.1). The diff > is attached to this message. Thanks Sandro. I've merged your patch into Git. Cheers, Vasudev

Bug#932781: Bug#932428, Bug#932767, Bug#932781: gnome-shell crashes involving monitor changes

nnector for the external monitor. > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 10:36:59 +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: >> Closing laptop lid normally puts laptop sleep and I get back my session on >> reopen. But after recent update >> I see that I get logged out and closer inspection rev

Bug#897732: patches

Vasudev Kamath writes: > Hi Adrian, > > Adrian Bunk writes: >> >> Hi Vasudev, >> >> are there any remaining problems with >> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ctpp2/merge_requests/1 >> ? > > I've merged the changes. I had requested changes

Bug#899124: fa-solid-900.ttf symlinked as fontawesome-webfont.ttf

Alexis Murzeau writes: > Hi, > > Le 27/06/2018 à 00:21, Alexis Murzeau a écrit : >> Le 26/06/2018 à 04:13, vasudev-debian a écrit : >>> I'll have a look. if possible clone from team repo and raise a pr on it. >>> >> >> I've created 3 PR at [0], one for each branch (in this order: upstream, >>

Bug#899124: fa-solid-900.ttf symlinked as fontawesome-webfont.ttf

Hi Alexis, Thomas, First of all I apologise for not replying in time. I'm bit occupied by family work so not getting enough time to deal with package. Alexis Murzeau writes: >> >> I also would like to highlight that what you're describing here is the >> workflow of a transition, which is what

Bug#899124: fa-solid-900.ttf symlinked as fontawesome-webfont.ttf

Hi Thomas, I read through and prepared a version to experimental which symlinks fa-solid-900.ttf as fontawesome-webfont.ttf. I've uploaded it to experimental, can you please check if this helps?. @Others Please let me know if this new version in experimental with suggestion from Thomas

Bug#899124: fonts-font-awesome: completely breaks web applications, with no notice

Pierre-Elliott Bécue writes: > > Hi, > > I'm maintaining HyperKitty, and it relies on fontawesome-webfont.ttf and > FontAwesome.otf from the v4 version. To avoid shipping the files with the > package, I linked them from the debian's one in d/rules. (see [1]) > > Do we agree that

Bug#899124: fonts-font-awesome: completely breaks web applications, with no notice

; On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 10:32:38PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: >> > Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org> writes: >> > > 2) revert the changes in fonts-font-awesome in unstable, upload the >> > > new release to experimental, and give people a few months to ada

Bug#899124: fonts-font-awesome: completely breaks web applications, with no notice

Hi Antonio, Antonio Terceiro writes: > Package: fonts-font-awesome > Version: 5.0.10-1 > Severity: grave > > Font-Awesome version completely changed everything, and any web > applications that use it are now broken unless they go through some > manual intervention. > >

Bug#898501: Broken symlinks

Hi all, First of all sorry for mess I created. I made a silly mistake of not updating the links file properly before upload. I'm rectifying it now and will upload the fixed version ASAP. Second I noted that from the bug report by Antonio that the usage patterns have changed a lot between 4 and

Bug#886120: FTBFS: chown: cannot access '..._cgraph.dot': No such file or directory

Adam Borowski writes: >> Yeah. Since you mentioned its random can we reduce the severity of the >> bug?. > > Bad idea, as it fails a lot: on my armhf box, 17/20 times, on my amd64, 6/12 > times. > > Turn out, the problem is not that sometimes it fails. The wrongness it that

Bug#886120: FTBFS: chown: cannot access '..._cgraph.dot': No such file or directory

Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> writes: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:42:19PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: >> Control: tag -1 +moreinfo +unreproducible >> >> Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> writes: >> > Source: ctpp2 >> > Version: 2.8.3-

Bug#877533: biboumi needs /var/lib/biboumi directory to work properly.

Hi Louiz, Florent Le Coz <lo...@louiz.org> writes: > On 10/02/2017 06:01 PM, Vasudev Kamath wrote: >> Package: biboumi >> Version: 6.0-1 >> Severity: serious >> >> Dear Maintainer, >> >> From the newer version of biboumi, it needs /v

Bug#877533: biboumi needs /var/lib/biboumi directory to work properly.

Package: biboumi Version: 6.0-1 Severity: serious Dear Maintainer, >From the newer version of biboumi, it needs /var/lib/biboumi directory to be existing to start the service. This probably changed during version 5.0 or 6.0 (not sure which exactly as I found issue in 6.0). Please create

Bug#869614: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#869614: fontforge: CVE-2017-11568 CVE-2017-11569 CVE-2017-11570 CVE-2017-11571 CVE-2017-11572 CVE-2017-11573 CVE-2017-11574 CVE-2017-11575 CVE-2017-11576 CVE-2017-115

Hideki Yamane writes: > On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 12:16:22 +0200 > Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: >> Btw, any plan to do as well an unstable upload? > > I'm on Uploaders list, but cannot manipulate current fontforge source repo > since it changes packaging

Bug#872464: zimlib: FTBFS all over the place due to symbols diff

Hi James, On 17-Aug-2017 22:45, "James Clarke" wrote: Source: zimlib Version: 2.0.0-1 Severity: serious Hi, Once again zimlib FTBFS due to symbols file diffs. Please at least *try* to get a working symbols file; you can at least build amd64 locally, and we have porterboxen

Bug#860625: zimlib: FTBFS on i386: dh_makeshlibs: failing due to earlier errors

James Clarke writes: > Control: tags -1 patch > > These symbol files differences have been fixed by Ubuntu. I came to an > identical patch independently before being told about it. I have also > performed some additional cleanup where things are clearly based on > bitness or

Bug#860792: fonts-lato: Hash Sum Mismatch on the packages

and it installed without any issue. This probably is some issue local to your system. Did you run apt-get update before trying to install the package?. Since I can not reproduce the issue I've lowered the severity. Best Regards, -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info

Bug#856162: ctpp2 FTBFS on !i386/amd64: missing symbols

Hi Adrian, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes: > control: tags -1 patch > > Hi! > > Attaching a debdiff for an NMU with the updated symbols for all architectures. > > I used the helper scripts from the pkg-kde-tools package to update the symbols > file from the build

Bug#840393: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#840393: Bug#840393: Bug#840393: Bug#840393: mensis: FTBFS with newly released fontforge

Adrian Bunk <b...@stusta.de> writes: > On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 10:05:06PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: >> Adrian Bunk <b...@stusta.de> writes: >> >> > In unstable this is provided by: >> > /usr/include/fontforge/basics.h:extern void *grealloc(

Bug#844214: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#844214: Fails to start: libgif.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Control: tag -1 + unreproducible moreinfo Control: severity -1 important Hi Karthik, Kartik Mistry writes: > Package: fontforge > Version: 1:20161005~dfsg-4 > Severity: serious > > ~/ fontforge > fontforge: error while loading shared libraries: libgif.so.4: cannot open >

Bug#844188: pdf2htmlex: FTBFS with fontforge due to use of library_version_configuration structure

Source: pdf2htmlex Severity: serious User: pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: fontforge-transition Dear Maintainer, pdf2htmlex fails to build with new fontforge uploaded to unstable. The build logs can be found here ¹. This mainly happening due to use of

Bug#840393: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#840393: Bug#840393: Bug#840393: mensis: FTBFS with newly released fontforge

Adrian Bunk writes: > > In unstable this is provided by: > /usr/include/fontforge/basics.h:extern void *grealloc(void *,long size); > Yeah right, but its no longer provided in new fontforge. Upstream also mentioned same.

Bug#840393: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#840393: Bug#840393: mensis: FTBFS with newly released fontforge

Hello Yamane San, Hideki Yamane <henr...@debian.or.jp> writes: > On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 13:12:54 +0530 > Vasudev Kamath <vasu...@copyninja.info> wrote: >> mensis fails to build from source with fontforge version 20161005 from >> experimental. It fails in the confi

Bug#840417: [Pkg-fonts-devel] pdf2htmlex: FTBFS with new release of fontforge

Control: reassign -1 libfontforge-dev Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/issues/2907 Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> writes: > Hi, > > On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:55:28 +0530 Vasudev Kamath <vasu...@copyninja.info> > wrote: >> pdf

Bug#840417: pdf2htmlex: FTBFS with new release of fontforge

Source: pdf2htmlex Severity: serious User: pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: fontforge-transition Dear Maintainer, pdf2htmlex FTBFS with new version of fontforge (currently in experimental). Below is the snippet of log showing the error. /encoding.cc [ 47%] Building C object

Bug#840393: mensis: FTBFS with newly released fontforge

Source: mensis Severity: serious User: pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: fontforge-transition Dear Maintainer, mensis fails to build from source with fontforge version 20161005 from experimental. It fails in the configure step with following error checking fontforge/basics.h

Bug#665334: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#665334: non-DFSG postscript embedded in fontforge (currently August 2014)

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> writes: > Hi Vasudev-- > > On Sat 2016-07-30 03:17:01 -0400, Vasudev Kamath wrote: > >> Do you still find this problem in latest fontforge in Debian >> experimental?.. I did a quick search in fontforge/othersubrs.c file I

Bug#665334: non-DFSG postscript embedded in fontforge (currently August 2014)

Hi Dkg, Do you still find this problem in latest fontforge in Debian experimental?.. I did a quick search in fontforge/othersubrs.c file I did not find exact license text you posted. Since I became the new maintainer of fontforge, this bug popped up on my Maintainer Dashboard :-). So wondering

Bug#818456: zimlib: FTBFS: required file './compile' not found

Control: tag -1 +confirmed Hi Martin, I can reproduce this bug what surprises me is that compile file is present in the source and still the error is given out. Is it because compile file provided by upstream is older version?. I've no idea on how to resolve this bug so any hints suggestions

Bug#817041: librem0: Missing run-time dependency on libre0

Control: tag -1 +pending Hi, I've applied a patch which fixes this issue and pushed the changes to pkg-multimedia repo. I would need some one to upload this to archive. Best Regards

Bug#817041: librem0: Missing run-time dependency on libre0

Control: tag -1 +confirmed Hi Guillem, Need some help here. Guillem Jover writes: > Package: librem0 > Version: 0.4.7-1 > Severity: serious > > Hi! > > This package provides a shared library that is not self-contained, and > it is missing a run-time dependency on libre0,

Bug#817041: librem0: Missing run-time dependency on libre0

Guillem Jover writes: > Package: librem0 > Version: 0.4.7-1 > Severity: serious > > Hi! > > This package provides a shared library that is not self-contained, and > it is missing a run-time dependency on libre0, as it uses some of its > symbols. The library should link

Bug#804678: marked as pending

Matteo F. Vescovi writes: > tag 804678 pending > thanks > > Hello, > > Bug #804678 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can > see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at: > >

Bug#808109: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#808109: Bug#808109: fonts-droid-fallback and fonts-droid: error when trying to install together

Vasudev Kamath <vasu...@copyninja.info> writes: >> >> but that seems non-ideal to me: if there was an NMU 1:4.4.4r2-7.1 >> based on 1:4.4.4r2-7, then it would presumably still have shipped >> DroidSansFallback.ttf and so on, so it cannot be co-installed >> wi

Bug#808109: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#808109: fonts-droid-fallback and fonts-droid: error when trying to install together

Simon McVittie <s...@debian.org> writes: > On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 at 16:55:47 +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: >> Ralf Treinen <trei...@free.fr> writes: >> > The version constraints on your Breaks and Replaces do not match the >> > current versi

Bug#808109: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#808109: Bug#808109: fonts-droid-fallback and fonts-droid: error when trying to install together

Ralf Treinen <trei...@free.fr> writes: > Hi, > > On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 10:45:54AM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: > >> I'm just wondering why Breaks and Replaces is not having any affect. Or >> do I need conflicts relation here? >> >> Any

Bug#808109: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#808109: fonts-droid-fallback and fonts-droid: error when trying to install together

Control: tag -1 +help Ralf Treinen writes: > Hi again, > > sorry but this is not fixed in fonts-android/1:6.0.1r3-1 : > > Selecting previously unselected package fonts-droid. > (Reading database ... 10935 files and directories currently installed.) > Preparing to unpack

Bug#802799: fonts-droid: non-free file "DroidNaskhUI-Regular.ttf"

Hi Dmitry, fonts-android no longer ships the affected files, so I'm closing this bug now. fonts-droid is in testing has these files, but I guess when fonts-droid-fallback migrates to testing it will automatically gets removed from archive, since fonts-droid is no longer built by fonts-android

Bug#808109: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#808109: fonts-droid-fallback and fonts-droid: error when trying to install together

Control: tag -1 +confirmed Ralf Treinen writes: > > automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the > same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has > detected the following problem: > > > Selecting previously unselected package

Bug#802799: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#802799: fonts-droid: non-free file "DroidNaskhUI-Regular.ttf"

Hi, Dmitry Smirnov writes: > Source: fonts-android > Version: 1:4.4.4r2-7 > Severity: serious > > File "DroidNaskhUI-Regular.ttf" contains the following metadata: > > >Digitized data copyright © 2006, 2012 Google Corporation. > > NOTIFICATION OF LICENSE

Bug#694354: Forwarded the bug to upstream

Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/kohler/lcdf-typetools/issues/10 Me and Jonas had a discussion where jonas mentioned tool distributes non-DFSG code embedded as template code for others to compile when creating fonts with this tool ...and distributing non-DFSG code is forbidden, no

Bug#790296: Dropping the help tag

On Fri Aug 28 20:04:37 2015 GMT+0530, intrigeri wrote: Hi, Vasudev Kamath wrote (28 Aug 2015 14:19:30 GMT) : On Fri Aug 28 18:10:08 2015 GMT+0530, intrigeri wrote: OK. Please re-add this tag if you can't fix it in a timely manner. Actually its fixed and in git. Problem is lintian

Bug#790296: Dropping the help tag

On Fri Aug 28 18:10:08 2015 GMT+0530, intrigeri wrote: Control: severity -1 serious Thanks for this. Hi, Vasudev Kamath wrote (22 Aug 2015 11:37:55 GMT) : Control: tag -1 -help OK. Please re-add this tag if you can't fix it in a timely manner. Actually its fixed and in git. Problem

Bug#791016: ctpp2: ftbfs, and library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default

Simon McVittie s...@debian.org writes: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 at 14:32:59 +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: I've updated the package droping libjs-jquery related modification. I've pushed the changes to collab. Thanks, I've sponsored that upload for you. It should go into the NEW queue shortly

Bug#791016: ctpp2: ftbfs, and library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default

Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com writes: On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Simon McVittie s...@debian.org wrote: I had a look at it, and saw this: Drop jquery.js from ctpp2-doc and depend on libjquery-js. If the documentation is generated by Doxygen, which it appears

Bug#791016: ctpp2: ftbfs, and library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default

. The rest of the changes look reasonable, although I haven't built it. Ah!. I didn't knew about this, since I saw the lintian warning I replaced jquery with libjs-jquery. I will fix this and notify when package is ready. Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de

Bug#791250: Do you need any help for pugixml

Andreas Tille andr...@fam-tille.de writes: On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:53:35AM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: $ debian/rules debian/control sed -e 's/__LIBPKGNAME__/libpugixml1/g' -e 's/__LIBPKGNAMEv5__/libpugixml1v5/g' debian/control.in.in debian/control.in Please either enlighten me

Bug#791250: Do you need any help for pugixml

Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu writes: On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:30:23PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: DEB_MAINTAINER_MODE=1 fakeroot debian/rules debian/control Very halpful - so I added this to README.source and uploaded a fixed package. Great! Thanks a bunch!. Cheers,

Bug#791016: ctpp2: ftbfs, and library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default

Control: tag -1 +pending Err. I forgot that being a DM I can't upload package with new packaes. So I will wait for some one to upload the package for me. Changes are already on collab-maint repo. Cheers, signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#791250: Do you need any help for pugixml

(forgenerating appropriate library package names). [1] http://blog-archive.copyninja.info/2013/05/cdbs_packaging%3A_package_relationship_management.html Cheers, -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net}

Bug#791250: Do you need any help for pugixml

Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org writes: Hi, do you see any chance to fix this soonish or do you need help. I'd volunteer to inject a fix into collab-maint git or upload NMU if you want me to. If you can that would be great!. I'm already working on ctpp2 so I'm not sure if I

Bug#791016: ctpp2: ftbfs, and library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default

Hello, Thanks for the patch, I've merged the same in the repository and uploaded a new version. Cheers, signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#772457: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#772457: Bug#772457: fonts-droid: Possibly typo in debian/maintscript

Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org writes: On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Vasudev Kamath wrote: You are right, its a typo. We never built a binary called fonts-android. I've fixed this in git, I've kept it in unreleased state so some one can push it to the archive and file a unblock

Bug#772457: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#772457: fonts-droid: Possibly typo in debian/maintscript

. We never built a binary called fonts-android. I've fixed this in git, I've kept it in unreleased state so some one can push it to the archive and file a unblock request. (I hope its valid candidate for unblock request.). Cheers, -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on ~friendica: copyni

Bug#717636: Reassigning this bug to texlive-lang-indic

Control: reassign -1 texlive-lang-indic 2014.20141024-1 thanks Since latex-sanskrit is now a transitional dummy package and texlive-lang-indic is the package which is shipping the files which are mentioned in this bug report, I'm hereby reassigning it to texlive-lang-indic. Cheers, -- Vasudev

Bug#717636: [Debian-in-workers] Bug#717636: latex-sanskrit package

Hi, Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 5:04 PM, intrigeri intrig...@debian.org wrote: On current sid, with texlive-lang-indic installed: $ t1disasm /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/sanskrit/sktb10.pfb | grep start dup 3 {systemdict

Bug#717636: latex-sanskrit package

-sanskrit. Also bug is ignored for jessie!. Sorry for not including this earlier conversation. I had to re-read it to understand the concept -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net} -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#717636: latex-sanskrit package

intrigeri intrig...@debian.org writes: Hi, Vasudev Kamath wrote (02 Oct 2014 05:23:48 GMT) : Well probably bug should be closed, because the new package is just transitional package and doesn't have any source in it which was the reason for this bug report. Isn't it a transitional package

Bug#717636: latex-sanskrit package

intrigeri intrig...@debian.org writes: Hi, Vasudev Kamath wrote (14 Aug 2014 08:12:31 GMT) : Its no longer part of Debian-IN team, now its transitional package part of TexLive, thanks to Debian-Tex maintainers (Norbert specifically) [1] OK, fair enough. The RC bug (#717636) should probably

Bug#722994: dwm: Unused patch 03-transparent-makefile.patch

! Sorry lost track again! Will discuss this with release team today. Thanks for reminding :) -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net} -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#752837: kiwix: build-depends on xulrunner-dev which is gone

: Revert changes that are irrelevant now that Iceweasel is not a xulrunner application. [1] https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/i/iceweasel/changelog-31.0-3 -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net} -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc

Bug#722994: dwm: Unused patch 03-transparent-makefile.patch

and signed with GPG key :). -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on ~friendica: copyni...@samsargika.copyninja.info IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net} GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#752837: kiwix: build-depends on xulrunner-dev which is gone

Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de writes: Hi Kelson, On Fr 27 Jun 2014 10:13:53 CEST, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote: On 27.06.2014 05:38, Vasudev Kamath wrote: Kelson it looks like the package we are depending on xulrunner-dev is no longer provided, do you know which of above

Bug#752837: kiwix: build-depends on xulrunner-dev which is gone

is no longer provided, do you know which of above packages we can use?. I think this also has to be taken care during your next release. Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net} -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ

Bug#746937: xmail links against libssl but doesn't have openssl exception in License

1.0.1g-3 ii libstdc++6 4.9.0-1 ii openssl1.0.1g-3 xmail recommends no packages. xmail suggests no packages. -- Vasudev Kamath Connect on ~friendica: copyni...@samsargika.copyninja.info IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net} GPG Key

Bug#701302: Tagging fixed upstream

Control: tag -1 +fixed-upstream This bug has been fixed upstream I forgot to tag it. Cheers, -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on ~friendica: copyni...@samsargika.copyninja.info IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net} GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4

Bug#701302: kiwix: ftbfs with GCC-4.8

Hi, This bug seems to be fixed by upstream in their Git where they seem to have removed the clucene code completely. This should be part of next upstream release which is still on going. I might try and pull down their git snapshot to test this in between. Cheers, -- Vasudev Kamath http

Bug#711787: falconpl: FTBFS on mipsen

I'm in same situation like python2 and python3 also my porter box access is now expired. I've already wrote to Kartik who is main maintainer of falconpl to see how to proceed but yet to get his reply. Kartik is CCed -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net

Bug#710311: Unable to reproduce exact scenario mentioned and nmu diff

Hi Radu, Radu Spineanu radu.spine...@gmail.com writes: Sent a ping to Davide, no answer yet. Let's wait for an answer for a couple more days. any update on this yet?.. is it worth to have the package still in Debian? actually this nmu is blocking one of NM process task so :) -- Vasudev

Bug#730753: [Debian-in-workers] Bug#730753: update fonts-smc to latest upstream version

to push the fix so the package updation need to wait till I get upstream tarball in right shape. Cheers -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net} -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble

Bug#710311: Unable to reproduce exact scenario mentioned and nmu diff

On 11:21 Sat 19 Oct , intrigeri wrote: Hi, Vasudev Kamath wrote (19 Oct 2013 05:59:12 GMT) : It seems to me that the attached patch symlinks /usr/share/xmail/sample to /usr/share/doc/xmail/sample (while it should do the contrary, right?) and does not move /usr/share/doc/xmail

Bug#710311: Unable to reproduce exact scenario mentioned and nmu diff

On 11:21 Sat 19 Oct , intrigeri wrote: Hi, Vasudev Kamath wrote (19 Oct 2013 05:59:12 GMT) : It seems to me that the attached patch symlinks /usr/share/xmail/sample to /usr/share/doc/xmail/sample (while it should do the contrary, right?) and does not move /usr/share/doc/xmail

Bug#710311: Unable to reproduce exact scenario mentioned and nmu diff

On 10:33 Wed 16 Oct , intrigeri wrote: Hi, Vasudev Kamath wrote (22 Sep 2013 07:52:26 GMT) : I went through the log and prepared an NMU for fixing the policy issue, as mentioned in Debian policy document I symlinked the sample folder under /usr/share/doc/xmail to /usr/share/xmail

Bug#694354: lcdf-typetools include non free adobe code for hinting

not really copyright statement but string declared inside the code can you please reconsider about this bug report Cheers, -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net} IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net} GPG

Bug#710311: Unable to reproduce exact scenario mentioned and nmu diff

. Also ccing my AM intrigeri as I'm doing this as part of my NM process. PS: Also this is first time I'm attempting to do an NMU so if there is any issues please let me know. [1] https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/bugged/xmail_1.27-1.1+b1.log Cheers, -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect

Bug#722991: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#722991: libspiro0: FTBFS uneeded dh kde option

that is only for KDE libs. Let me check how I can fix this. Thanks for the report. Cheers! -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net} IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net} GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D

Bug#722991: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#722991: Bug#722991: libspiro0: FTBFS uneeded dh kde option

On 16:55 Mon 16 Sep , Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am Montag, den 16.09.2013, 20:16 +0530 schrieb Vasudev Kamath: Well I used pkg-kde-tools to generate symbols file I thought it should work but looks like that is only for KDE libs. Let me check how I can fix this. Doesn't this work

Bug#722991: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#722991: Pending fixes for bugs in the libspiro package

On 16:22 Mon 16 Sep , pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org wrote: tag 722991 + pending thanks Some bugs in the libspiro package are closed in revision acb0cf1ab38866868fb056fee9444e33479f81da in branch 'master' by Vasudev Kamath The full diff can be seen at http

Bug#711787: falconpl: FTBFS on mipsen

them still. -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net} IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net} GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#711787: falconpl: FTBFS on mipsen

. Or if there is any otherway please let me know. Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net} IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net} GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E

Bug#713125: [Debian-in-workers] Bug#713125: latex-sanskrit: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: texlive-common (= 0.18)

waiting for a DD (ccd kartik) to upload it. Thanks for the report. Cheers, -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net} IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net} GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770

Bug#713175: ctpp2: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat 'debian/tmp/usr/lib/libctpp2.la': No such file or directory

fix this issue hence tagging the bug as pending and waiting for Jonas (or any DD) to upload the fix. Also its not the problem of not find .la file build failed due to problems in symbol file. Thanks for reporting the problem. Cheers, -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on ~friendica

Bug#705682: Fix ready

likely be the editorconfig-el package. Thanks because I wanted to try out the emacs plugin for long time. -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net} -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble

Bug#705682: Fix ready

Hi Axel, On 15:50 Sun 09 Jun , Axel Beckert wrote: Hi Vasudev, Vasudev Kamath wrote: If you can upload I'll be happy as Jonas is busy Can you send me a link where I can download the (signed) source package to sponsor? Looks like we have a new release so I'm packaging it now and put

Bug#705682: Fix ready

Hi Axel, On 15:50 Sun 09 Jun , Axel Beckert wrote: Hi Vasudev, Vasudev Kamath wrote: If you can upload I'll be happy as Jonas is busy Can you send me a link where I can download the (signed) source package to sponsor? Here is the signed package [1] [1] http://mentors.debian.net

Bug#705682: Fix ready

. (But solving debug-package-for-multi-arch-same-pkg-not-coinstallable would include bumping debhelper compatibility to 9, though.) Yeah or probably fixing in CDBS :-) Thanks a lot for the upload. We will see what Jonas has to say about my comments above. -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info

Bug#705682: Fix ready

Hi Axel, If you can upload I'll be happy as Jonas is busy Axel Beckert a...@debian.org wrote: Hi Vasudev, Vasudev Kamath wrote on 21-Apr-2013: Control: tag -1 +pending Thanks Aron for reporting. I've prepared a fix and will be uploaded soon Any news here? Do you need a sponsor? (E.g

Bug#711705: [Debian-in-workers] Bug#711705: Bug#711705: Depends on unavailable package called fonts-lohit-taml-classical

Hi Fix is ready but it has to go through new and being dm I can't upload so waiting for DD to upload it Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote: forcemerge 711368 711705 thanks Quoting Juhapekka Tolvanen (juht...@iki.fi): Package: fonts-taml Version: 2:1.3 Severity: grave I think

Bug#705682: Fix ready

-- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net} -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

  1   2   >