Bug#329344: cowdancer: cow-shell does not start, gives error

2005-09-21 Thread Francesco Potorti`
Package: cowdancer Version: 0.4 Severity: grave Here is what I get: $ cp -al src test $ cd test $ cow-shell Invoking bash cow-shell: exec: No such file or directory $ type cow-shell cow-shell is hashed (/usr/bin/cow-shell) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT

Bug#329345: gnumeric does not start

2005-09-21 Thread Sylvain FORET
Package: gnumeric Version: 1.5.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable In debian testing, after a libgoffice-1 upgrade, gnumeric does not start. It crashes with the following error message: gnumeric: symbol lookup error: gnumeric: undefined symbol: cell_formats and return

Bug#327994: The package FTBFS anyway

2005-09-21 Thread arnaud . quette
salut Christian so you've not yet upgraded to kdelibs4c2? Well, this didn't seem to be mandatory but I'm pretty ignorant of this issue. Remember that I just wanted to have a look at this software ..:-) Or have I missed something on the road? I've 2 problems to solve: the kde/qt

Bug#329212: fisg: Fisg segfault

2005-09-21 Thread Alexander Wirt
Sythos schrieb am Dienstag, den 20. September 2005: Package: fisg Version: 0.3.8-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable fisg segfault while parsing file, strace output attached Are you able to give me the correspondending logfile that has segfaultet? Thanks for your

Bug#329212: fisg: Fisg segfault

2005-09-21 Thread Alexander Wirt
Sythos schrieb am Mittwoch, den 21. September 2005: On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:35:06AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: Package: fisg Version: 0.3.8-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable fisg segfault while parsing file, strace output attached Are you able to

Bug#328674: very old package, should this be removed?

2005-09-21 Thread Jim Mintha
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 07:05:13PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: Package: slsc Version: 0.2.3-8 Severity: serious I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I propose to remove it. There are not many users, upstream development seems to be stalled and the package

Bug#329343: lincity-ng: Saved game can't be pause after loaded. When save my game is on accelerate mode.

2005-09-21 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Welly Hartanto wrote: Package: lincity-ng Version: 1.0.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: 4 I'm new to lincity-ng nad found the game exciting. After playing a while I save my game. While saving, my game was on accelerate mode ( by clicking the yellow arrow ). I opened the saved game

Processed: fixed in sffview-0.3-5

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 293420 0.3-5 Bug#293420: sffview: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): 'errno' was not declared in this scope 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 0.3-5, send any further explanations to

Processed: Re: Bug#329345: gnumeric does not start

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 329345 + testing pending Unknown tag/s: testing. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental

Bug#327998: marked as done (qsynaptics: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 02:17:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327998: fixed in qsynaptics 0.22.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#329335: samba hangs(CPU usage 40%). smbd can't be killed.

2005-09-21 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 329335 important tags 329335 moreinfo thanks On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:17:18AM +0200, hr wrote: Package: samba Version: 3.0.14a-6 Severity: critical Tags: experimental Justification: breaks unrelated software Re: Bug#329335: samba hangs(CPU usage 40%). smbd can't be killed.

Bug#329345: gnumeric does not start

2005-09-21 Thread Sylvain FORET
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: tags 329345 + testing pending close 329345 1.5.90-1 thanks On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 19:07:02 +1000, Sylvain FORET wrote: In debian testing, after a libgoffice-1 upgrade, gnumeric does not start. As goffice's API has not stabilised yet, gnumeric and goffice need to

Processed: Re: Bug#329335: samba hangs(CPU usage 40%). smbd can't be killed.

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 329335 important Bug#329335: samba hangs(CPU usage 40%). smbd can't be killed. Severity set to `important'. tags 329335 moreinfo Bug#329335: samba hangs(CPU usage 40%). smbd can't be killed. Tags were: experimental Tags added: moreinfo

Bug#329286: wterm: workaround patch

2005-09-21 Thread Rene van Bevern
Package: wterm Version: 6.2.9-6.2 Followup-For: Bug #329286 Hello, wterm is currently compiled using the -O3 switch. I've tested compiling wterm with -O2 on m68k and it worked. (Thanks to Ingo Juergensmann for providing me a test account) Because -O2 is the recommended optimisation level

Processed: tagging 329286

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 tags 329286 patch Bug#329286: wterm_6.2.9-6.3: FTBFS: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Tags were: sid Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#326007: marked as done (imapfilter: Immediately aborts with *** glibc detected *** corrupted double-linked list: 0xb7d84218 ***)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 04:32:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#326007: fixed in imapfilter 1:1.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#329364: ruby1.8_1.8.3-1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k

2005-09-21 Thread Stephen R Marenka
to do whatever you want with this bug. Here are selected excerpts from the buildd log. | Automatic build of ruby1.8_1.8.3-1 on poseidon by sbuild/m68k 42 | Build started at 20050921- | ** [...] | ** Using build

Bug#329304: fail2ban: fails to ban because iptables not in path

2005-09-21 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
nope -- I do use original script, thus I have -b as well (although it is not necessary, fail2ban detaches anyway (background config parameter in fail2ban.conf) If it's not needed, don't use it! The background option suppresses most error diagnostics you could want to look at. It's a

Bug#329373: xen.postinst contains illegal sed command

2005-09-21 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Package: kernel-package Version: 9.007 Severity: Grave Justification: renders package unusable As of 9.007 xen.postinst contains the following line: realimageloc=$(echo $realimageloc | sed -e 's|^/*|/|o' -e 's|/+|/|o') Yet, there is no such option as o to sed's s command. Thus any customly

Bug#329344: cowdancer: cow-shell does not start, gives error

2005-09-21 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, Here is what I get: $ cp -al src test $ cd test $ cow-shell Invoking bash cow-shell: exec: No such file or directory $ type cow-shell cow-shell is hashed (/usr/bin/cow-shell) What's your '$SHELL' ? regards, junichi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#329345: gnumeric does not start

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 329345 + etch Bug#329345: gnumeric does not start There were no tags set. Tags added: etch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#329201: ion3-mod-ionflux: and the second part of the fix

2005-09-21 Thread Rene van Bevern
Package: ion3-mod-ionflux Version: 20050428-7 Followup-For: Bug #329201 Okay, seems as I forgot half of the thing. The attached patch fully eliminates inherited sockets. The two patches have been sent to the upstream repository and a new package will be uploaded upon their inclusion (should not

Bug#329344: cowdancer: cow-shell does not start, gives error

2005-09-21 Thread Francesco Potorti`
$ cp -al src test $ cd test $ cow-shell Invoking bash cow-shell: exec: No such file or directory $ type cow-shell cow-shell is hashed (/usr/bin/cow-shell) What's your '$SHELL' ? $ echo $SHELL bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#329344: cowdancer: cow-shell does not start, gives error

2005-09-21 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, $ cow-shell Invoking bash cow-shell: exec: No such file or directory What's wrong with your configuration is that you have 'bash' as SHELL, and not a full path. Where is the environment variable set on your system? A workaround would be the following patch: --- cow-shell.c.~1.5.~

Processed: bug 329201 is forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 forwarded 329201 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#329201: ion3-mod-ionflux: The listening UNIX socket is inherited by processes spawned by ion Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to

Bug#329175: marked as done (lowmem: Low memory mode stills goes through the language selection screen)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:58:47 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#328483: marked as done (gcl: Depends on binutils-dev (= 2.16.1-999), so uninstallable in sid)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:46:36 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closed with gcl-2.6.7-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#329274: marked as done (dhis-tools-genkeys: Uninstallable, libgmp3 not available in sid anymore.)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 06:47:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329274: fixed in dhis-tools-dns 5.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#329272: marked as done (dhis-server: Uninstallable, libgmp3 not available anymore.)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 06:47:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329272: fixed in dhis-server 5.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#329389: ipw2200-source: fails at compiling kernel module

2005-09-21 Thread Eric Van Buggenhaut
Package: ipw2200-source Version: 1.0.6-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable 6 versions have passed, but the kernel module still doesn't compile: dh_testdir dh_testroot rm -f build-arch-stamp build-indep-stamp configure-stamp rm -rf modules /usr/bin/make clean make[1]:

Bug#329344: cowdancer: cow-shell does not start, gives error

2005-09-21 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, I think it is okay, unless you decide that having a relative path for the shell is a security risk and you don't want to support this. But yours would be the only program (as far as I am aware) that chuckles on this problem. As I said, before correcting it now, I had this mistake

Bug#329344: marked as done (cowdancer: cow-shell does not start, gives error)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:02:03 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329344: fixed in cowdancer 0.5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#328141: marked as done (mount: umount -r drops nosuid flag (CAN-2005-2876))

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:47:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#328141: fixed in util-linux 2.12p-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#329063: marked as done (mount: [CAN-2005-2876] umount -r privilege escalation)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:47:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#328141: fixed in util-linux 2.12p-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#328141: marked as done (mount: umount -r drops nosuid flag (CAN-2005-2876))

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:47:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329063: fixed in util-linux 2.12p-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#329063: marked as done (mount: [CAN-2005-2876] umount -r privilege escalation)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:47:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329063: fixed in util-linux 2.12p-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#329391: no longer seems to work

2005-09-21 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 04:36:44PM +0200, Joey Hess wrote: Package: palo-installer Version: 0.0.7 Severity: grave Tags: d-i palo-installer seems to fail when installing etch. Selections from the logs: + ls -l vmlinux ls: vmlinux: No such file or directory + chroot /target /sbin/palo

Bug#327917: marked as done (Wrong permission for /usr/bin/gopherweblink)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:26:37 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#329275: marked as done (haskelldb-bin: Uninstallable, libgmp3 not available in sid anymore.)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:47:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329275: fixed in haskelldb 0.9.cvs.601-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#329276: marked as done (lhs2tex: Uninstallable, depends on libgmp3)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:47:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329276: fixed in lhs2tex 1.9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#327962: marked as done (fireflier: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 18:20:20 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Upload of 1.1.6 fixes this problem has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#323563: marked as done (maxima: uninstallable)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:47:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#323563: fixed in maxima 5.9.1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#323563: marked as done (maxima: uninstallable)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:47:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#325852: fixed in maxima 5.9.1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#325852: marked as done (maxima: uninstallable in sid: please rebuild against libgmp3c2)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:47:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#325852: fixed in maxima 5.9.1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#325852: marked as done (maxima: uninstallable in sid: please rebuild against libgmp3c2)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:47:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#323563: fixed in maxima 5.9.1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#329053: marked as done (arc: Insecure temporary file handling)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:02:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329053: fixed in arc 5.21m-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#329391: marked as done (no longer seems to work)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:02:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329391: fixed in base-installer 1.30 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#329413: mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper: postinst is broken (update-mozilla-firefox-chrome: command not found)

2005-09-21 Thread Helmut Grohne
Package: mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper Version: 0.9.3-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable During aptitude upgrade: Setting up mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper (0.9.3-4) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper.postinst: line 8: update-mozilla-firefox-chrome: command

Bug#328981: udev: dependencie loop when upgrading kernel 2.6.11 to 2.6.12

2005-09-21 Thread Ashar Voultoiz
Marco d'Itri wrote: On Sep 18, Ashar Voultoiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would it be possible to make the udev package aware that a kernel 2.6.12 is being installed ? Then one can use: No. But try harder, everybody else has been able to install udev. (dpkg -i may help. If it does not, ask on

Processed: Fixed in NMU of bogl 0.1.18-1.2

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 284741 + fixed Bug#284741: bogl: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid storage class for function 'smalloc' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#329422: No warnings when uninstalling kernel package

2005-09-21 Thread Joe Mason
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686 Version: 2.6.8-16 Severity: critical Most of the time when I try to uninstall a package that's critical to system functionality, it tells me I'm about to uninstall a core component and asks me to type, Yes I know what I'm doing or similar to continue. $ sudo

Bug#328981: udev: dependencie loop when upgrading kernel 2.6.11 to 2.6.12

2005-09-21 Thread Ben Pfaff
Ashar Voultoiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Marco d'Itri wrote: On Sep 18, Ashar Voultoiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would it be possible to make the udev package aware that a kernel 2.6.12 is being installed ? Then one can use: No. But try harder, everybody else has been able to install udev.

Bug#327492: zinc-compiler: Depends on unavailable library libgmp3

2005-09-21 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Hi, I did an NMU of your package to fix this. I've attached the diff. Kurt diff -u zinc-compiler-1.0.2/debian/changelog zinc-compiler-1.0.2/debian/changelog --- zinc-compiler-1.0.2/debian/changelog +++ zinc-compiler-1.0.2/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +zinc-compiler (1.0.2-2.1) unstable;

Bug#320510: marked as done (axiom depends on libgmp3)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:32:12 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#320510: fixed in axiom 20050901-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: your mail

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 328975 + patch Bug#328975: libcrypto++: FTBFS on arm, m68k, hppa; use g++-3.4 there Tags were: patch Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: Fixed in NMU of zinc-compiler 1.0.2-2.1

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 327492 + fixed Bug#327492: Depends on unavailable library libgmp3 There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Processed: Fixed in NMU of c2hs 0.13.6-2

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 328910 + fixed Bug#328910: c2hs: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'groff-base' Tags were: patch Bug#328954: c2hs: FTBFS: Please install groff to use LinuxDoc DTD SGML Text Conversion Tags added: fixed tag 328954 + fixed Bug#328954: c2hs: FTBFS:

Bug#329239: mutt-ng segfaults when attempting to open mailbox

2005-09-21 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 the mental interface of Arias told: Package: mutt-ng Version: 0.0+20050916-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Could you please test http://www.lxtec.de/debarchiv/binary-i386/mutt-ng/mutt-ng_0.0+20050920-1_i386.deb Let us know wether it helps. And

Bug#327722: Gopher bug

2005-09-21 Thread John Goerzen
Joey and security folks, I think that the attached patch will fix the problem. It seems a little too simple, though, so I'd appreciate it if any of you would glance an eye at it and make sure it looks good. If so, I'll upload it as 3.0.10 to sid and you can do the appropriate thing with the

Processed: FTBFS: Cannot find linux/ppp.h

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 323514 +patch Bug#323514: FTBFS: Cannot find linux/ppp.h There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#328789: wml: segmentation fault in pass 3

2005-09-21 Thread Matthias Klose
Recompiling perl and eperl did fix the segfault problem for me on powerpc (I think the perl version in unstable doesn't need the recompilation really). Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#239538: marked as done (grunch feeds bad arguments to pnmfile)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:19:23 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line grunch removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: FTBFS: Undefined reference to memcmp

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 323733 +patch Bug#323733: FTBFS: Undefined reference to memcmp There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#161523: marked as done (grunch: Error in call to 'makeppm'. File names not set)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:19:23 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line grunch removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#319488: marked as done (grunch: File conflict with star)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:19:23 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line grunch removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#319487: marked as done (star: file conflict with grunch)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:19:23 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line grunch removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#328674: very old package, should this be removed?

2005-09-21 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Jim Mintha [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 07:05:13PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I propose to remove it. There are not many users, upstream development seems to be stalled and the package is FTBFS at the

Bug#258944: marked as done (iterm: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:47:45 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#258944: fixed in iterm 0.5-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Fixed in upload of gconf2 2.12.0-2 to experimental

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 316403 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#316403: circular dependency between libgconf2-4 and gconf2 There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-in-experimental quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#327159: marked as done (kdepim-dev: Missing dependency on kitchensync)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:37:19 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327159: fixed in kdepim 4:3.4.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#327594: marked as done (kdepim FTBFS on arm, hppa, m68k. should use gcc-3.4 on these arch)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:37:19 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327594: fixed in kdepim 4:3.4.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#329454: broken symlinks /usr/bin/boo*

2005-09-21 Thread H B
Package: boo Version: 0.6.0.1858-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After installing boo with apt-get -t unstable install boo the expected executables booi and booc in /usr/bin are just broken symlinks to cli-wrapper which seems to be a file in package mono-common.

Bug#327380: marked as done (libpq-dev: missing depends on libssl-dev)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:47:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327380: fixed in postgresql-8.0 8.0.3-16 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: FTBFS: Undefined reference to memcmp

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 323733 +fixed-upstream Bug#323733: FTBFS: Undefined reference to memcmp Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed-upstream thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#323733: FTBFS: Undefined reference to memcmp

2005-09-21 Thread Erik Schanze
tags 323733 +fixed-upstream thanks Hi! The problem is fixed in new upstream version 1.4.4. Kindly regards, Erik -- www.ErikSchanze.de * Bitte keine HTML-E-Mails! No HTML mails, please! Limit: 100 kB * * Linux-Info-Tag in Dresden, am 29.

Bug#329459: emacs21: FTBFS on powerpc

2005-09-21 Thread Roger Leigh
Package: emacs21 Version: 21.4a-2 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source The build fails on powerpc: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=emacs21ver=21.4a-2arch=powerpcstamp=1127111387file=logas=raw I've also retried the build locally in a sid chroot, but the temacs

Processed: Fixed in NMU of wnn6-sdk 1.0.0-12.1

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 259894 + fixed Bug#259894: wnn6-sdk: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: conflicting types for 'malloc' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#329462: general: standard value $LANG=[EMAIL PROTECTED] - very tiny GTK1 font

2005-09-21 Thread Annett Fritz
Package: general Severity: grave Tags: l10n Justification: renders package unusable The standard value $LANG=[EMAIL PROTECTED] breaks fontsize for some gtk1 programs like gxedit or tipptrainer. With $LANG=de_DE they show a readable font. A normal user doesn't know that when he chooses the locale

Bug#329463: Not installable on Sid because of unmet dependencies

2005-09-21 Thread Ole Janssen
Package: torcs Version: 1.2.3-2 Severity: grave When I try to install torcs I get the following error message: # apt-get install torcs Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible

Bug#320868: marked as done (asterisk: Asterisk segfaults when hangup button in linphone pressed)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:26:42 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#320868: fixed in rate-engine 0.5.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: severity of 329422 is normal

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 severity 329422 normal Bug#329422: No warnings when uninstalling kernel package Severity set to `normal'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#328942: marked as done (orsa: FTBFS: doxygen: command not found)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:02:40 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#328942: fixed in orsa 0.7.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: tagging 329413

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 tags 329413 experimental Bug#329413: mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper: postinst is broken (update-mozilla-firefox-chrome: command not found) There were no tags set. Tags added:

Bug#329468: debootstrap: woody installation fails

2005-09-21 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: debootstrap Version: 0.3.1.7 Severity: serious # debootstrap woody woody I: Retrieving Release I: Retrieving Packages I: Validating Packages I: Checking component main on http://ftp.debian.org/debian... I: Extracting base-files... I: Extracting base-passwd... I: Extracting bash... I:

Bug#316403: marked as done (circular dependency between libgconf2-4 and gconf2)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:32:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#316403: fixed in gconf2 2.10.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#319676: marked as done (aspell-bg: Needs repackaging for latest aspell)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:32:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#319676: fixed in bgoffice 3.0-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#329481: swig is unavailable in testing

2005-09-21 Thread cckemp
Package: swig Version: 1.3.24-1 Severity: serious Justification: swig is unavailable in testing There does not appear to be a version of swig in debian testing. In order to install swig I needed to download it and related packages from an alternate distribution. It seems to exist in oldstable,

Bug#296907: marked as done (nvclock violates policy by being in Main)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:32:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#296907: fixed in nvclock 0.8b-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#327943: marked as done (nvclock: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:32:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327943: fixed in nvclock 0.8b-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#329486: rmpi: needs rebuild for lam transition

2005-09-21 Thread Russ Allbery
Package: rmpi Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Due to C++ libraries in the package, lam had to change shared library package names as part of the C++ transition. rmpi now needs to be rebuilt with the new version of lam so that it can migrate into testing. Please upload

Bug#329487: xmpi: needs rebuild for lam transition

2005-09-21 Thread Russ Allbery
Package: xmpi Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Due to C++ libraries in the package, lam had to change shared library package names as part of the C++ transition. rmpi now needs to be rebuilt with the new version of lam so that it can migrate into testing. Please upload

Bug#329488: clustalw-mpi: needs rebuild for lam transition

2005-09-21 Thread Russ Allbery
Package: clustalw-mpi Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: Policy 2.2.3 Due to C++ libraries in the package, lam had to change shared library package names as part of the C++ transition. clustalw-mpi now needs to be rebuilt with the new version of lam so that it can migrate into testing.

Bug#323744: netpipe: also needs rebuild for lam transition

2005-09-21 Thread Russ Allbery
Package: netpipe Followup-For: Bug #323744 When you do this upload to fix the mpich build dependency, please also add a versioned dependency on: lam4-dev (= 7.1.1-3.2) netpipe also depends on lam, which is also doing its own C++ transition, and m68k has not yet built the latest lam package.

Bug#329487: xmpi: needs rebuild for lam transition

2005-09-21 Thread Russ Allbery
In the previous bug report, please read xmpi where I said rmpi. Sorry about that; that was a bad cut and paste. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#328206: lam: patch to lower optimization level

2005-09-21 Thread Russ Allbery
Package: lam Followup-For: Bug #328206 Here is a patch to lower the optimization level of lam from -O3 to -O2. This will hopefully resolve the m68k build problem, and debian-devel mail seems to indicate this is a good idea for i386 as well. I've tested this patch and confirmed that lam still

Processed: tagging 328206

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 tags 328206 patch Bug#328206: lam: FTBFS on m68k due to ICE, try lower optimization? There were no tags set. Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#329499: unsatisfied build dependency: librrd0-dev

2005-09-21 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: ganglia-monitor-core Severity: serious Version: 2.5.7-2 needs to be changed to librrd2-dev. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#329481: marked as done (swig is unavailable in testing)

2005-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:48:43 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329481: swig is unavailable in testing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#329486: rmpi: needs rebuild for lam transition

2005-09-21 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 21 September 2005 at 21:27, Russ Allbery wrote: | Package: rmpi | Severity: serious | Tags: patch | Justification: Policy 2.2.1 | | Due to C++ libraries in the package, lam had to change shared library | package names as part of the C++ transition. rmpi now needs to be | rebuilt with the new

Bug#284741: Fixed in NMU of bogl 0.1.18-1.2

2005-09-21 Thread Joey Hess
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:32:06AM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: tag 284741 + fixed Thanks! Jeff Bailey is going to be adopting bogl, and hopefully he can give it some overdue attention. Oh yeah, here's the NMU diff, since the patch in the BTS wasn't quite enough. --

  1   2   >