On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no wrote:
]] Cameron Norman
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl wrote:
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 05:29:42PM -0800, Cameron Norman wrote:
I would like to propose a different one.
[...]
So
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl wrote:
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 05:29:42PM -0800, Cameron Norman wrote:
I would like to propose a different one.
[...]
So, the change would be that: the sysvinit package would cease being a
transition / shim package, however
to come,
which makes the distribution more difficult to support.
If there was an intention to do so, how would we go about switching
systems over to systemd in the next release, if we use the solution
displayed here in Jessie?
Thanks,
--
Cameron Norman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Cameron Norman
camerontnor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl wrote:
Hi!
As Ansgar requests technical solutions, here's one:
just like systemd-shim|systemd-sysv, switch the init package from
Pre
| sysvinit-core | upstart.
If an automatic switch is something that the project wants, but after
Jessie, then then the init dependency would be changed to
systemd-sysv | sysvinit-core | upstart.
Cheers,
--
Cameron Norman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
for?
If you are going to the work of parsing it all, would it not make
sense to make a systemd generator out of it?
--
Cameron Norman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https
just picky about who its friends are
Thanks,
--
Cameron Norman
to this is when you remove bash, and you get a
loud warning at that point.
Cheers,
--
Cameron Norman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org
be simply an aesthetic issue, as systemd-shim does not impede
operation of systemd as init.
Best regards,
--
Cameron Norman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org
+ systems).
Cheers,
--
Cameron Norman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/CALZWFRJ7CJ=pdkr6xffc2gs-0zjp+czcb-ysomrp9lsep_y...@mail.gmail.com
be available in a particular format (e.g. 32x32 png) so
that WMs do not have to handle so many corner cases in that area.
Best,
--
Cameron Norman
is very stressful, and that is never
good. I do not know your taste in music, but maybe you will like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNygDLi9gb4.
Top of the day,
--
Cameron Norman
of your other message (that you would
not be surprised if upstart support was removed) seems like it is.
Would you mind clarifying a little?
Thanks y buenos noches,
--
Cameron Norman
] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=712763
Best regards,
--
Cameron Norman
El Sat, 8 de Feb 2014 a las 3:56 PM, Michael Gilbert
mgilb...@debian.org escribió:
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
I understand you think that, and I empathize, but I disagree.
The fact is, I have limited time. If I'm going to focus on making a
bigger impact with my
El Thu, 6 de Feb 2014 a las 7:41 PM, Schlacta, Christ
aarc...@aarcane.org escribió:
I'd like to request that upstart be chosen over systemd mainly
because there's already a large availability of deb packages that
support init mainly due to ubuntu. Ubuntu acts as a gateway distro
to the debian
function properly with no intervention.
--
Cameron Norman
,
--
Cameron Norman
start logind without GNOME starting.
--
Cameron Norman
as Ubuntu continues using upstart.
If you have the time, I must ask: if Upstart had no CLA, would you
prefer it over systemd?
--
Cameron Norman
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
Clint Adams cl...@debian.org writes:
As loath as I am to participate in this discussion, I have to ask if
your intent is to suddenly outlaw all the packages which depend on
runit.
I don't think runit (or daemontools)
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
I wanted to lift this out of the thread it was buried in and see if I'm
understanding it correctly, since if I am, it seems like a significant
issue.
Cameron Norman camerontnor...@gmail.com writes:
I think you raise a lot
--debian-Z) to ensure that the daemon does not
hang on sysv or systemd?
Cheers,
Cameron Norman
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote:
Le jeudi 02 janvier 2014 à 18:30 +, Ian Jackson a écrit :
I would hope that we can standardise on a single API to the system's
single cgroup writer.
I have already explained why this is not going to happen. The
to accomplish this
than to port Upstart's session init capabilities or use the current
portable session inits.
Sincerely,
Cameron Norman
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
jobs, and Debian will most likely inherit
that behavior if it uses Upstart.
Happy New Year,
Cameron Norman
$ cat jobOne.conf
start on (starting jobTwo and runlevel stop on runlevel [016])
stop on runlevel [016]
respawn
script
exec /bin/sleep 60
end script
$ cat jobTwo.conf
start
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org wrote:
Cameron Norman camerontnor...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org wrote:
Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org writes:
The criticisms of Upstart's event model in the systemd
27 matches
Mail list logo
