Ciao Francesco.
Anche a me piacerebbe moltissimo andare, ma non riesco proprio :(
Quì trovi alcune indicazioni: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf13
(Anche questo non è male: http://debconf13.debconf.org/register.xhtml)
Quanti vanno??
Buona giornate e buon lavoro.
Marco
Il giorno 05
Ciao Francesco.
Il 05/06/2013 23:08, Francesco Namuri ha scritto:
Ciao Ragazzi,
c'è qualcuno che va? Visto che quest'anno e' cosi' vicino, mi piacerebbe
proprio andare... Ci sono dei preparativi in corso? Qualche
suggerimento?
Io vado. Mi sono iscritto (e spero che l'abbia fatto anche tu,
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 07:13:50PM +0200, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
Io vado.
Presente anche io! Andrò in moto, probabilmente da Bologna.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . z...@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o
Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o
Former
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 07:13:50PM +0200, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
Ciao Francesco.
Il 05/06/2013 23:08, Francesco Namuri ha scritto:
Ciao Ragazzi,
c'è qualcuno che va? Visto che quest'anno e' cosi' vicino, mi piacerebbe
proprio andare... Ci sono dei preparativi in corso? Qualche
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 07:39:12PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 07:13:50PM +0200, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
Io vado.
Presente anche io! Andrò in moto, probabilmente da Bologna.
Ma come sistemazioni? Andate tutti nella location dell'evento? A parte
Stefano che
On 05-06-13 18:30, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
I also like it, somewhat, but am also aware of this approach rendering
unstable more stable than testing. I would prefer another kind of punishment
for neglect / some difficulty than the mere removal.
In what way exactly would this effort even
On 06/06/2013 06:54, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2013-06-05 15:02:35 -0700 (-0700), Russ Allbery wrote:
[...]
Did I miss anything?
I don't understand at all how you could have missed such a prime
opportunity to rile up the vi vs. emacs debate while you were at
it... or am I showing my age?
hi,
2013/6/6 Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org:
On 06/06/2013 03:15 AM, Bjoern Meier wrote:
It is that hard, to build a dialog and ask for a desktop?
I don't think it would be that hard, though nobody did it. You know that
Debian is driven by volunteers only, right? So if you really want
0hi,
2013/6/6 Chow Loong Jin hyper...@debian.org:
On 06/06/2013 06:54, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2013-06-05 15:02:35 -0700 (-0700), Russ Allbery wrote:
[...]
Did I miss anything?
I don't understand at all how you could have missed such a prime
opportunity to rile up the vi vs. emacs debate
On Jo, 06 iun 13, 13:58:24, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Feel free to contribute it. I would welcome it. I too, feel like its a
shame that there's no dialog to choose which desktop you want (even if
we have specialized CDs, I prefer the netinst ones, and there, such a
dialog would be a very good
hi,
2013/6/6 Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com:
On Jo, 06 iun 13, 13:58:24, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Feel free to contribute it. I would welcome it. I too, feel like its a
shame that there's no dialog to choose which desktop you want (even if
we have specialized CDs, I prefer the netinst
Hi!
The latest sid upgrades produce dependencies on:
ii libc6-dev-x322.17-5
i386 Embedded GNU C Library: X32 ABI Development Libraries for
AMD64
ii libc6-x322.17-5
Le 6 juin 2013 07:20, Atsuhito Kohda ko...@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp a
écrit :
Hi,
I have updated texmacs package today and saw that many
type1 fonts contained in texmacs-common got error messages
font-adobe-copyrighted-fragment by lintian.
I remembered that there were discussions about
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 6. Juni 2013, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
I have updated texmacs package today and saw that many
type1 fonts contained in texmacs-common got error messages
font-adobe-copyrighted-fragment by lintian.
I remembered that there were discussions about proprietry
code of adobe in
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 10:23:14AM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
tglase@tglase:~ $ fgrep X32 /boot/config-3.9-1-amd64
# CONFIG_X86_X32 is not set
See http://wiki.debian.org/X32Port and
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg00355.html
Helmut
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:10:39PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
I think, most of developers are clever enough to define, whether the
built failed accidentally and needs to be restarted, or it requires
some fixing and uploading new version. It will save time for both DDs
and wb-team.
Generally
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 12:02:58AM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Re cdn:
IIRC the main blocker was that it plays with DNS records and would be a bit
painful to have to support such a configuration in part due to DNSSEC.
And it uses the location of the DNS resolver of the user, which we
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:49:41PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
[..snip..]
If they told us we could call it Firefox without compromising our ability
to maintain the packages to the quality standards that Debian users
expect, we would happily change the branding back, because we know it's
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 06.06.2013, 12:24 +0200 schrieb Philipp Kern:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:10:39PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
I think, most of developers are clever enough to define, whether the
built failed accidentally and needs to be restarted, or it requires
some fixing and
2013/6/6 Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org:
[..]
Can this be done using dcut files, just as with other DPA management commands?
That would be fine.
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Wednesday, June 05, 2013 15:35:14, Marc Haber wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 19:53:59 -0400, Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us wrote:
On Sunday, June 02, 2013 17:10:02, Marc Haber wrote:
Exim's default in the packages is not to send authentication data over
a non-encrypted connection.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:38:52PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, 30 May 2013 16:53:56 +0200, m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
I think that ease of configurability is a major plus for Postfix when
compared to Exim, since a common configurations is just a few lines long.
How many lines
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 02:07:38PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
You're right, in that the interface that a user has to exim-on-debian is
update-exim4.conf.conf, rather than exim4's configuration directly; however,
length aside, I don't see this as a strength, but a serious source of
Eric Dorland eric at debian.org writes:
Sorry about that. Generally how I transition to a new upstream version
is to update the automake package and then upload a new automake1.X
package after that. So I will be uploading an automake1.11 package
shortly to fix this.
OK, thank you!
(I think
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 04:19:04PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
That said, we provide GNOME Classic in wheezy for good reasons. Some of
Florian’s concerns are clearly among them.
I have tried that and the annoyances with the systray, multihead and
nautilus manages backdrop are the same.
I am
Helmut Grohne helmut at subdivi.de writes:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg00355.html
Ah okay. That one got lost in GMane’s threading because the original
mail wasn’t posted in this newsgroup.
I still think it schizo that x32 is only halfway in and the Linux
kernel Debian team
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Danjou a...@debian.org
* Package name: python-first
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : Hynek Schlawack
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/first
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : simple
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 04:31:43PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Danjou a...@debian.org
* Package name: python-first
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : Hynek Schlawack
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/first
*
On 06/06/2013 15:31, Florian Lohoff wrote:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 04:19:04PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
That said, we provide GNOME Classic in wheezy for good reasons. Some of
Florian’s concerns are clearly among them.
I have tried that and the annoyances with the systray, multihead and
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 11:27:15AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 10:23:14AM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
tglase@tglase:~ $ fgrep X32 /boot/config-3.9-1-amd64
# CONFIG_X86_X32 is not set
See http://wiki.debian.org/X32Port and
On 05/31/2013 12:27 AM, Philip Hands wrote:
Well, I'd say that at least part of the motivation was actually to write
a qmail replacement, that didn't have someone with DJB's atitute to
licensing as upstream -- it was for a long time called vmailer
(v==vapour) as coined by DJB, and adopted by
On 2013-06-06 15:35, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
I still think it schizo that x32 is only halfway in and the Linux
kernel Debian team mostly sends signals that it wants to block the
architecture altogether. And the multilibs thing… nobody seems to
have commented on it either.
Sometimes it helps if
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:34:35AM +0200, Bjoern Meier wrote:
0hi,
2013/6/6 Chow Loong Jin hyper...@debian.org:
On 06/06/2013 06:54, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2013-06-05 15:02:35 -0700 (-0700), Russ Allbery wrote:
[...]
Did I miss anything?
I don't understand at all how you could
On Donnerstag, 6. Juni 2013, Russ Allbery wrote:
udev sucks! Debian should hire a developer to replace all uses of CDBS
with dh! Perl should be replaced with Python in essential! All packages
need to switch to 3.0 (quilt)! Native packages should be banned! No one
should ever be allowed to
udev sucks! Debian should hire a developer to replace all uses of CDBS
with dh! Perl should be replaced with Python in essential! All packages
need to switch to 3.0 (quilt)! Native packages should be banned! No one
should ever be allowed to NMU anything ever if the maintainer says no!
Did
Thorsten Glaser t.gla...@tarent.de writes:
No complaints against x32 per sé, I want to crossgrade there once it’s
in, but for as long as it’s broken like this, it doesn’t make it look
good.
Be aware that x32 has sizeof(time_t) sizeof(long), so you should expect
SUBSTANTIAL porting of
* Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us [130606 14:53]:
I'm glad you asked this, because it prompted me to investigate further. This
was something I was told was commonly done, but it looks now like it might be
a misnomer. I'm not able to find a concrete example of a system that allows
2013/6/6 Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 04:19:04PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
That said, we provide GNOME Classic in wheezy for good reasons. Some of
Florian’s concerns are clearly among them.
I have tried that and the annoyances with the systray, multihead and
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 05:20:21PM +0200, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
But why on earth did very simple thing like multihead management break?
Very simple thing ‽ Clearly, you have no idea.
It was functional and working for me in Squeeze it doesnt now.
Wheezy is supposed to use
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicolas Delvaux cont...@nicolas-delvaux.org
* Package name: scandir
Version : 0.1+git
Upstream Author : Ben Hoyt benh...@gmail.com
* URL : https://github.com/benhoyt/scandir
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang:
On Thursday, June 06, 2013 13:18:39, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us [130606 14:53]:
I'm glad you asked this, because it prompted me to investigate further.
This was something I was told was commonly done, but it looks now like
it might be a misnomer. I'm
hi,
2013/6/6 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:34:35AM +0200, Bjoern Meier wrote:
0hi,
2013/6/6 Chow Loong Jin hyper...@debian.org:
On 06/06/2013 06:54, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2013-06-05 15:02:35 -0700 (-0700), Russ Allbery wrote:
[...]
Did I miss
Bjoern Meier bjoern.me...@gmail.com writes:
Freedom is not only that you have a choice, you have to know what your
decision and the consequences will be. Unmanageable? Really?
I done LFS a weeks ago, was that unmanageable? No. It's not. Yeah Debian
is not LFS, but I rember the
If you do discover how to do this reliably, I'd be interested in your solution.
If you/someone else feels it's too unrelated to this list, feel free to email
me directly, but I think this is generally interesting.
Ron Scott-Adams
r...@tohuw.net
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack
On 06/06/2013 02:25 PM, Bjoern Meier wrote:
the problem - IMHO - is
linux (as the kernel itself and tool-distributions) is getting fat and
kills his own advantages.
Time to try Hurd or kFreeBSD? :)
(note: I'd like to have more time to invest in them myself, and I
perfectly understand that not
On 06/06/2013 03:11 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
You are of course aware of the boot menu: Advanced Options -
Alternative Desktop Environment.
Yes. But it should be in d-i, when you choose to install a desktop. Not
in syslinux, when you are supposed to choose what kind of installer to
start. It's
In order for there to be any sensible decision about whether we should
switch the default init system in Debian, all of the different camps
need to summarize their arguments and counter-arguments, ideally with
data.
To this end, I have started outlining some of the open questions I see
in
hi,
2013/6/6 Russ Allbery r...@debian.org:
Bjoern Meier bjoern.me...@gmail.com writes:
Freedom is not only that you have a choice, you have to know what your
decision and the consequences will be. Unmanageable? Really?
I done LFS a weeks ago, was that unmanageable? No. It's not. Yeah
On 2013-06-06 12:40, Joachim Breitner wrote:
if the DPAs get wanna-build support (which I hope) you certainly don’t
want to handle nmu and gb requests for every developer’s pet
repositories, so there will be a need for a general interface. Can this
be done using dcut files, just as with other
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:31:12PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 2013-06-06 12:40, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Which begs the question if build management should be merged into
dak to provide insight about which package is new. Obviously this
could also be a defined interface but if we're going to
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:58:00AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Thorsten Glaser t.gla...@tarent.de writes:
No complaints against x32 per sé, I want to crossgrade there once it’s
in, but for as long as it’s broken like this, it doesn’t make it look
good.
Be aware that x32 has
Philipp Kern wrote:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 12:02:58AM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Re cdn:
IIRC the main blocker was that it plays with DNS records and would be a
bit painful to have to support such a configuration in part due to
DNSSEC.
And it uses the location of the DNS resolver of
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 12:02:58AM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Re cdn:
IIRC the main blocker was that it plays with DNS records and would be a bit
painful to have to support such a configuration in part due to DNSSEC.
If you're not afraid of such hacks, CNAME-to-CNAME can simplify DNSSEC
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:11:49PM +0200, Bjoern Meier wrote:
[...]
Ok, an example. my Girlfriend was really pissed of Win8. She hate it
(for good reasons). She came to me and asked:Can you show me Linux
and how it works?. I sweat blood, but I took my honor.
After a successful install she
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:13:50PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:11:49PM +0200, Bjoern Meier wrote:
[...]
Ok, an example. my Girlfriend was really pissed of Win8. She hate it
(for good reasons). She came to me and asked:Can you show me Linux
and how it works?. I
I've assisted a number of people with various distributions, and I will tell
you right now that there is only one new user-friendly way to do it: provide a
DE out of the box, and choose it for them. People will generally not research
and do not know which is better. They are willing to try
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 22:01:48 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
It was Linus' decree that no new ABI is allowed to suffer from the Y2k38
bug even if its word size is 32 bit, and I'd say he's right. This means
that this problem will bite us the next time another 32 bit arch comes,
so there's no
Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl writes:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:58:00AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
It's not quite as bad as the porting required for large file support,
but the consequences of not porting are worse.
How come? I don't think runtime bugs that are not some kind of a Y2k38
On 06/06/13 14:00, Chris Knadle wrote:
On Wednesday, June 05, 2013 15:35:14, Marc Haber wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 19:53:59 -0400, Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us wrote:
Attempting to use an FQDN is also troublesome, because Exim tries to use
DNS to look up the FQDN, and falls back to
On 05/06/13 12:10, Holger Levsen wrote:
I've switched 3 users from Squeeze to Wheezy in the last 2 weeks, and also to
Gnome 3 btw, and they all *love* it. And I also must say, I'm quite
impressed,
Debian on the desktop has come a long way. So, IOW YMMV.
We spend a lot of effort to package
On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 22:40 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 22:01:48 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
It was Linus' decree that no new ABI is allowed to suffer from the Y2k38
bug even if its word size is 32 bit, and I'd say he's right. This means
that this problem will
Subject: ITP: ruby-rinku -- autolinker for Ruby
Package: wnpp
Owner: Per Andersson avtob...@gmail.com
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ruby-rinku
Version : 1.7.3
Upstream Author : Vicent Marti v...@github.com
* URL : http://github.com/vmg/rinku
* License :
On Thursday, June 06, 2013 16:30:48, Roger Lynn wrote:
On 06/06/13 14:00, Chris Knadle wrote:
On Wednesday, June 05, 2013 15:35:14, Marc Haber wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 19:53:59 -0400, Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us wrote:
Attempting to use an FQDN is also troublesome, because
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 488 (new: 0)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 142 (new: 4)
Total number of packages
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 12:24:02PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
It seems that now, we can do this, but the cookbook also says this is
not here yet:
start on started network-services
I don't know how systemd behaves in this way (so this is not something
to hold against upstart), but
Hi everyone. First of all, I'm cross-posting this between legal and devel
because I really don't know to which of them belongs (or maybe it does in
both).
The issue is this: Qt 5 has grown so large (850+MB unpacked in the single-
source tarball, will continue growing) that upstream also
I would suggest the approach taken by the recent GSoC projects related
to bootstrapping new ports. Multi-stage builds. First stage without
docs and second stage with docs. Only the second stage gets uploaded
to Debian.
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianBootstrap
--
bye,
pabs
2013/6/7 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer perezme...@gmail.com
Hi everyone. First of all, I'm cross-posting this between legal and devel
because I really don't know to which of them belongs (or maybe it does in
both).
The issue is this: Qt 5 has grown so large (850+MB unpacked in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 08:02:49 +0200
Source: fuse
Binary: fuse fuse-dbg libfuse2 libfuse-dev fuse-udeb libfuse2-udeb
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.9.2-8
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 07:51:15 +0200
Source: libgnome-keyring
Binary: libgnome-keyring-dev libgnome-keyring0 libgnome-keyring-common
libgnome-keyring0-dbg gir1.2-gnomekeyring-1.0
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 3.8.0-2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 08:04:26 +0200
Source: libnetfilter-queue
Binary: libnetfilter-queue1 libnetfilter-queue1-dbg libnetfilter-queue-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 08:14:53 +0200
Source: dosfstools
Binary: dosfstools dosfstools-dbg dosfstools-udeb
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.0.17-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 20:39:15 +0200
Source: php-horde-icalendar
Binary: php-horde-icalendar
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 08:14:47 +0200
Source: php-horde-injector
Binary: php-horde-injector
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 08:20:37 +0200
Source: php-horde-log
Binary: php-horde-log
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers pkg-horde-hack...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 08:16:56 +0200
Source: php-horde-lock
Binary: php-horde-lock
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.1.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers pkg-horde-hack...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 08:22:05 +0200
Source: php-horde-logintasks
Binary: php-horde-logintasks
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 08:24:21 +0200
Source: php-horde-mail
Binary: php-horde-mail
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers pkg-horde-hack...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 08:25:13 +0200
Source: php-horde-mime
Binary: php-horde-mime
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers pkg-horde-hack...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 08:20:27 +0200
Source: tftp-hpa
Binary: tftp-hpa tftpd-hpa
Architecture: source i386
Version: 5.2-11
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann m...@daniel-baumann.ch
Changed-By: Daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 12:54:59 -0600
Source: wcalc
Binary: wcalc
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.4-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josue Ortega josueort...@debian.org.gt
Changed-By: Josue Ortega
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 16:36:18 +1000
Source: https-finder
Binary: xul-ext-https-finder
Architecture: source all
Version: 087-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Mozilla Extension Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 08:27:43 +0200
Source: php-horde-mime-viewer
Binary: php-horde-mime-viewer
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:05:16 +0200
Source: php-horde-nls
Binary: php-horde-nls
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers pkg-horde-hack...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:13:27 +0200
Source: php-horde-notification
Binary: php-horde-notification
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:14:14 +0200
Source: php-horde-perms
Binary: php-horde-perms
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.1.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers pkg-horde-hack...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:14:59 +0200
Source: php-horde-prefs
Binary: php-horde-prefs
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.4.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers pkg-horde-hack...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:16:56 +0200
Source: php-horde-editor
Binary: php-horde-editor
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.3+debian0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:17:08 +0200
Source: php-horde-elasticsearch
Binary: php-horde-elasticsearch
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:18:34 +0200
Source: php-horde-feed
Binary: php-horde-feed
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers pkg-horde-hack...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:18:23 +0200
Source: php-horde-form
Binary: php-horde-form
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers pkg-horde-hack...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:20:32 +0200
Source: php-horde-hashtable
Binary: php-horde-hashtable
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:20:06 +0200
Source: php-horde-http
Binary: php-horde-http
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers pkg-horde-hack...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:21:28 +0200
Source: php-horde-image
Binary: php-horde-image
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers pkg-horde-hack...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:22:56 +0200
Source: php-horde-imap-client
Binary: php-horde-imap-client
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.11.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:21:55 +0200
Source: php-horde-imsp
Binary: php-horde-imsp
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers pkg-horde-hack...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:24:30 +0200
Source: php-horde-itip
Binary: php-horde-itip
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers pkg-horde-hack...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:23:09 +0200
Source: php-horde-kolab-format
Binary: php-horde-kolab-format
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:24:27 +0200
Source: php-horde-kolab-server
Binary: php-horde-kolab-server
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:25:47 +0200
Source: php-horde-kolab-session
Binary: php-horde-kolab-session
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Horde Maintainers
1 - 100 of 229 matches
Mail list logo
