vorrei i cazzi
Hello,
Thank you for expressing interest in Rolex Replica watches.
This opportunity to offer you our fine selection
of Italian/Swiss crafted Rolex Timepieces.
You can view our large selection of Rolexes
(including Breitling, Tag Heuer, Cartier etc)
You are guaranteed of lowest prices and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libpgp-sign-perl
Version : 0.19
Upstream Author : Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/software/pgp-sign/
* License : GPL or Artistic
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 04:02:58PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Adrian Bunk]
The entry packages: was a bug in my quickdirty scripting...
Thanks for making a nice summary of the relevant packages. :)
Feel free to include the script to generate the list when you generate
dynamic list
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libnews-article-perl
Version : 1.27
Upstream Author : Andrew Gierth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.erlenstar.demon.co.uk/perl/
* License : GPL or Artistic
Hi,
We got a bug on pdns-server #308409.
In the preinst we do an adduser to let pdns run with another user then root.
The bug submitter says that we need an dependency on adduser. But i'm
not really sure about it because adduser is a base package. And i
thought you don't have to depend on a
[Matthijs Mohlmann]
But i'm not really sure about it because adduser is a base
package. And i thought you don't have to depend on a base package.
Where did you get that idea? Any references to documentation stating
this?
I suspect you confuse this with build-dependencies, where you can drop
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: helpdeco
Version : 2.1.1
Upstream Author : Manfred Winterhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://sf.net/projects/helpdeco/
* License : GPL
Description : decompile Microsoft
Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 02:40 schrieb Anthony DeRobertis:
Seconded! The only RC-bug in openswan is for a newer version of the
kernel which will not ship with Sarge.
Yes, that's true. I have to admit that I messed up in not marking this bug
sid. My current best solution would be to put 2.2.0-4
#include hallo.h
* Matthijs Mohlmann [Tue, May 10 2005, 09:05:25AM]:
In the preinst we do an adduser to let pdns run with another user then root.
The bug submitter says that we need an dependency on adduser. But i'm
not really sure about it because adduser is a base package. And i
thought
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 09:12 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Matthijs Mohlmann]
But i'm not really sure about it because adduser is a base
package. And i thought you don't have to depend on a base package.
Where did you get that idea? Any references to documentation stating
this?
I
Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Matthijs Mohlmann]
But i'm not really sure about it because adduser is a base package. And
i thought you don't have to depend on a base package.
Where did you get that idea? Any references to documentation stating
this?
I suspect you confuse
#include hallo.h
* Eduard Bloch [Tue, May 10 2005, 09:20:38AM]:
base is not a priority level or so, it is just a term for packages
that are installed by the original installer. And nothing forbids the
local administrator to remove one of these, unless they have required
priority (eg. libc6)
Hi,
I mixed up stuff.
Thanks for helping out.
Regards,
Matthijs Mohlmann
Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Eduard Bloch [Tue, May 10 2005, 09:20:38AM]:
base is not a priority level or so, it is just a term for packages
that are installed by the original installer. And nothing forbids
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 09:47:11AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Eduard Bloch [Tue, May 10 2005, 09:20:38AM]:
base is not a priority level or so, it is just a term for packages
that are installed by the original installer. And nothing forbids the
local administrator to
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 09:32:49AM +0200, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 02:40 schrieb Anthony DeRobertis:
Seconded! The only RC-bug in openswan is for a newer version of the
kernel which will not ship with Sarge.
Yes, that's true. I have to admit that I messed up in not
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 05:42:31AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
- / can't be on lvm, raid0, raid5, reiserfs, xfs without causing
problems for /boot.
Why is that?
Missing bootloader support.
- a larger FS has more chance of failing so you risk having a fully
broken system more often
* Christoph Berg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
Re: Marc Haber in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am I missing something or is this part of policy widely ignored?
I had my own problems with that paragraph and would appreciate to have
it clarified.
There's a new mailing list for webapps since last week,
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 04:17:41AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 09:32:49AM +0200, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 02:40 schrieb Anthony DeRobertis:
Seconded! The only RC-bug in openswan is for a newer version of the
kernel which will not ship
Once upon a time GOMBAS Gabor said...
$ df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda5 99M 75M 19M 80% /
[...]
$ du -sh /etc/gconf
26M /etc/gconf
That's 1/3 of my root fs. It's damn too much.
I discovered this a while ago and learned that
Steve Langasek schrieb:
If that 2.3.x bug really only affects the newer ( 2.6.8) kernel, why
not just get 2.3.x pushed into sarge? Are there any other big issues
with it, that weren't in 2.2.x? Some people might certainly like the
agressive mode support, or 2.3.1's NAT-T fixes. Personally, 2.2.x
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
- / can't be on lvm, raid0, raid5, reiserfs, xfs without causing
problems for /boot.
Why is that?
Missing bootloader support.
the bootloader does not need to access the root filesystem. It only loads
the kernel and the initrd from /boot.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
libc6 is not and may not be marked Essential, as the NM process taught me.
So its a bad example.
Even if it is marked as essential, you have a versioned dependency, anyway.
Gruss
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:38:02AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Martin Waitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The BSDs use libexec but I don't really see a good reason why it exists.
It reduces search times in libraries, which is important.
We do not have that bug, so it's not important to
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:18:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
I cannot think of any other options. I'm short of clues for the best
way of doing this, and I'd be happy to give access to the svn repository
of people who could help and work on it together.
I imagine these libraries are
Rolex GMT
http://billions.mfek.com/replica/vron/Grosset.html
Vote: Rolex or Cartier or Breitling
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Raul Miller wrote:
On 5/9/05, Humberto Massa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can't re-state something saying a different thing. GPL#0 says
that a work based on the Program is a derivative work under
copyright law, and then says that is to say, a work
containing..., which is NOT a re-statement of a
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Martin Dickopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If there is a reason to separate /usr from / (which so many people
think there is, though I don't understand why, since it has no
semantic significance at all), why separate
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That doesn't make sense. If you get rid of the /usr vs /
distinction,
then there is no before /usr is mounted.
But then you have a minimum 1-5GB /. That sucks.
Why, exactly? I know people think
Le mardi 10 mai 2005 à 10:21 +0200, GOMBAS Gabor a écrit :
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 05:42:31AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
- / can't be on lvm, raid0, raid5, reiserfs, xfs without causing
problems for /boot.
Why is that?
Missing bootloader support.
Which bootloader doesn't
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 02:18, Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems to me that /usr/libexec is a better name for such things, and
having the same directory names used across distributions provides real
benefits (copying config files
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 10:36, Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- / can't be on lvm, raid0, raid5, reiserfs, xfs without causing
problems for /boot.
I believe that there are LILO patches for /boot on LVM. There's no reason why
GRUB and other boot loaders couldn't be updated in
Hi,
When i try to remove pdns-server while one of the backends is installed
i got the following behaviour:
monster:/usr/src# apt-get remove --purge pdns-server
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
pdns-backend-mysql*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Just uploaded a sunbird package to my experimental p.d.o. archive. It is still
not in a shape suitable for debian, but since upstream is quite a big step away
from a releasable state too, I have no problems with releasing this snapshot
today in
On 5/10/05, Humberto Massa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raul Miller wrote:
That's another re-statement of what a work based on the Program
means.
The GPL just equated the two, before the colon! It states, clearly, that
the a work based on the program is a derivative work under copyright
law,
Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
] It could be better described, yes. My understanding of /usr/share as
] architecture-independent (and read-only, as the description
] continues) is that /usr/share/can potentially be mounted read-only
] for multiple machines of different architectures.
Ok, I
Russ Allbery writes:
So far as I know, a base package (section base) has no particular special
meaning from a dependency perspective, although I believe that section
may be reserved for required packages (but am not sure).
There are optional packages in base.
--
John Hasler
--
To
Try your luck with our new brand cas1no. +30% for every diposit.
One hour payout, never fast before. Try play for free.
The real actor has a direct line to the collective heart.
http://zelica.com.wehiuhef.com/ Acquaintance. A person whom we know well enough
to borrow from, but not well enough to
On Sunday 08 May 2005 9:27am, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10283 March 1977, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Whats going on == someone needs to check it. Thats it.
That was the point made by Ed Cogburn. Its already been checked in the
other arch! If this is not the case please explain why. Without that
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:16:54AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
the bootloader does not need to access the root filesystem. It only loads
the kernel and the initrd from /boot.
(I assume that /boot is on /. If not, the following still applies to
/boot.)
Well, grub _does_ access the filesystem
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We do not have that bug, so it's not important to us.
Still, nobody has said. What filesystems available on Debian have a
better than linear search time for open, and are they used by a
default Debian install?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Ed Cogburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NO ONE IS GOING TO CARE ABOUT OUR NON-FREE!
You're entirely right. After having to read that lot, I'd be impressed
if anyone cared about making sure amd64 shipped with non-free.
--
Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Humberto Massa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What do you think are the original reasons / needed to be small?
I know what they are. PDP-11 boot loaders couldn't access long block
addresses. This was copied into 32V on the Vax, where it entered
4BSD.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 00:55, GOMBAS Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:16:54AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
the bootloader does not need to access the root filesystem. It only loads
the kernel and the initrd from /boot.
(I assume that /boot is on /. If not, the
GOMBAS Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:16:54AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
the bootloader does not need to access the root filesystem. It only loads
the kernel and the initrd from /boot.
(I assume that /boot is on /. If not, the following still applies to
Ed Cogburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday 08 May 2005 9:27am, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10283 March 1977, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Whats going on == someone needs to check it. Thats it.
That was the point made by Ed Cogburn. Its already been checked in the
other arch! If this is not the
Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
- / can't be on lvm, raid0, raid5, reiserfs, xfs without causing
problems for /boot.
Why is that?
Lvm has its backup data in /etc by default. If you ever need it you
are screwed with / on lvm. Also snapshots
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lvm has its backup data in /etc by default. If you ever need it you
are screwed with / on lvm. Also snapshots and pvmove don't work
(deadlock).
raid0/5 don't have support in the bootloaders.
reiserfs/xfs miss support in bootloaders or their
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le mardi 10 mai 2005 à 10:21 +0200, GOMBAS Gabor a écrit :
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 05:42:31AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
- / can't be on lvm, raid0, raid5, reiserfs, xfs without causing
problems for /boot.
Why is that?
Missing
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 02:18, Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems to me that /usr/libexec is a better name for such things, and
having the same directory names used across distributions
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 10:36, Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- / can't be on lvm, raid0, raid5, reiserfs, xfs without causing
problems for /boot.
I believe that there are LILO patches for /boot on LVM. There's no reason
why
GRUB
Try your luck with our new brand cas1no. +30% for every diposit.
One hour payout, never fast before. Try play for free.
In this country men seem to live for action as long as they can and sink into
apathy when they retire. http://wtp.ca.wehiuhef.com/ An actor is a guy who, if
you ain't talking
Le mardi 10 mai 2005 à 17:27 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Almost all the schemas were already moved out to /usr/share. We plan to
move the defaults directory structure to /var/lib/gconf after the
release - at least, the defaults brought by package; we have to keep a
defaults
Package: general
Severity: grave
When I close the lid on my iBook (clamshell, c.2000), pmud creates a
screen with text on it, e.g. black screen with white text, but does
not turn the screen off. It is definitely noticeable if the machine is
sitting in a dark room. The green power light does go
Hi,
The mrtg and related packages seems to be orphaned. Shiju p. Nair is
last done an upload at 2004 April the 6th. Since then, there are only
NMUs, like it was NMUed constantly since 2002. The package is a bit
bad shape, would be good if someone look into them; there are even
seven years old
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 01:39, Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 10:36, Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- / can't be on lvm, raid0, raid5, reiserfs, xfs without causing
problems for /boot.
I
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We do not have that bug, so it's not important to us.
Still, nobody has said. What filesystems available on Debian have a
better than linear search time for open, and are they used by a
default Debian install?
These
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 01:28, Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why would it be desirable to have arch-os directories under libexec?
On fedora-devel Bill Nottingham suggested having /usr/lib vs /usr/lib64 for
programs that care about such things and /usr/libexec for programs
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
You've missed the point. Split / and /boot, that makes sense if it's
necessary. Splitting / and /usr does not make sense.
Sure it does. Especially if you want / to be in a Flash disk and /usr to
be somewhere else in the network.
HTH
Massa
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Still, nobody has said. What filesystems available on Debian have a
better than linear search time for open,
reiserfs, ext2/3 (with dir_index), and probably others.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 02:03:01PM -0300, Humberto Massa wrote:
These are two questions: Q: What filesystems... ? A: Every one of them
with the possible exception of FAT and Minix.
ext2 doesn't.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 02:03:01PM -0300, Humberto Massa wrote:
These are two questions: Q: What filesystems... ? A: Every one of them
with the possible exception of FAT and Minix.
ext2 doesn't.
With dir_index, yes it does.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
cogito_0.10-2 is up, it now puts the internal scripts and the shell
library in /usr/share/cogito instead of /usr/lib/cogito. Thanks to Ben
Finney and Peter Samuelson for cluing me in.
You can get the package here:
http://highlab.com/~seb/debian
The only problem I know of with the package
Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
Hi,
The mrtg and related packages seems to be orphaned. Shiju p. Nair is
last done an upload at 2004 April the 6th. Since then, there are only
NMUs, like it was NMUed constantly since 2002. The package is a bit
bad shape, would be good if someone look into them; there
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 02:21:50PM -0300, Humberto Massa wrote:
ext2 doesn't.
With dir_index, yes it does.
If you want to forward port a three year old patch full of bugs and
incompatible to the dir_index used in ext3 - all luck to you.
All debian kernel-image packages don't have it for
Manual edit of /etc/apt/sources.list and apt-get update ; apt-get
dist-upgrade. [NOTE: I'm fairly sure the archive layout changed for
non-US/main between Woody - Sarge and I had problems here. Could be a
show stopper as not immediately obvious what to change]
As far as I've read the list
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 11:19am, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Ed Cogburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday 08 May 2005 9:27am, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
In fact, looking through the non-free docs section, most of that can go
in right now because they don't require anyone's permission to
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 01:07:30PM -0400, Ed Cogburn wrote:
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 11:19am, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Ed Cogburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday 08 May 2005 9:27am, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
In fact, looking through the non-free docs section, most of that can go
in
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 06:07:44PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
Hi,
The mrtg and related packages seems to be orphaned. Shiju p. Nair is
last done an upload at 2004 April the 6th. Since then, there are only
NMUs, like it was NMUed constantly since 2002. The package is a bit
bad shape,
[was Re: Debian AMD64 Archive Move]
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Just establish the non-free section and move everything over. If anyone
complains then just drop the package they're complaining about. Of course,
NO ONE is going to complain since they know we will
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Xfce Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: mousepad
Version : 0.2.2
Upstream Author : Erik Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.xfce.org/~benny/apps.html
* License : GPL
Description : simple
On Sat, 7 May 2005, Joey Hess wrote:
So here is a list (from update-excuses) of all 491 packages that is
being held out of sarge[1]. If you've already done all you can on the RC
bugs on packages in sarge, take a look over it and if you spot anything
important or generally worth fixing, point
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 01:07:30PM -0400, Ed Cogburn wrote:
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 11:19am, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Seriously, get some patience and don't inflame the situation
please. Things like most of that is of zero help in deciding what
can go in and what not. We know most of it
GOMBAS Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:16:54AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
the bootloader does not need to access the root filesystem. It only loads
the kernel and the initrd from /boot.
(I assume that /boot is on /. If not, the following still applies to
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le mardi 10 mai 2005 à 17:27 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Almost all the schemas were already moved out to /usr/share. We plan to
move the defaults directory structure to /var/lib/gconf after the
release - at least, the defaults brought
On 10285 March 1977, Ed Cogburn wrote:
Will you pay us for the work and cover legal fees if any should arise?
Sure. Because any rational person knows it won't happen.
Laywers arent rationale.
Give us one reasonable example of why some one would waste time and
money to sue the
Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 02:03:01PM -0300, Humberto Massa wrote:
These are two questions: Q: What filesystems... ? A: Every one of them
with the possible exception of FAT and Minix.
ext2 doesn't.
Convert it to utilize directory hashing. The
Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[was Re: Debian AMD64 Archive Move]
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Just establish the non-free section and move everything over. If anyone
complains then just drop the package they're complaining about. Of course,
NO ONE is
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 01:39, Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/ on lvm is a major pain in case of error and if you already need a
seperate / partition adding another for /boot is a bit stupid.
/ on LVM allows for snapshot backups
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 01:28, Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why would it be desirable to have arch-os directories under libexec?
On fedora-devel Bill Nottingham suggested having /usr/lib vs /usr/lib64 for
programs that care about
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 12:23 -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
Currently there are two packages that he maintains,
Yup.
I would like to maintain mrtg since I do use it. As to the other
package, it probably should be orphaned.
OK, please check the bugs, review patches etc. for mrtg.
I may even
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francesco P. Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: gstat
Version : 2.4.4
Upstream Author : Edzer J. Pebesma [EMAIL PROTECTED] et al.
* URL : http://www.gstat.org/
* License : GPL
Description : A program for
Le mardi 10 mai 2005 à 21:37 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le mardi 10 mai 2005 à 17:27 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Almost all the schemas were already moved out to /usr/share. We plan to
move the defaults directory structure
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 03:54:46AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Yes, it's called garbage in, garbage out. If people aren't going to file
bugs at the proper severity, and if package maintainers aren't going to
treat release-critical bugs with the appropriate urgency when they *are*
filed at
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 04:02:58PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Adrian Bunk]
The entry packages: was a bug in my quickdirty scripting...
Thanks for making a nice summary of the relevant packages. :)
Feel free to include the script to generate the list when you generate
dynamic list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Waitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hoi :)
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 03:45:32PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
Should we change some of these to /usr/libexec?
well, it would be against the FHS, I think.
The BSDs use libexec but I don't really
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Speaking as somebody who is quite unrelated to release issues (except
that I keep my packages bug free) I have some questions:
were at the correct severity and tagged correctly, your release
management is based on an assumption that isn't true.
Interesting
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 10:42:43PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Speaking as somebody who is quite unrelated to release issues (except
that I keep my packages bug free) I have some questions:
were at the correct severity and tagged correctly, your
Howdy,
Francesco Paolo Lovergine frankie at debian.org writes:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francesco P. Lovergine frankie at debian.org
* Package name: gstat
Version : 2.4.4
Upstream Author : Edzer J. Pebesma e.pebesma at geog.uu.nl et al.
* URL :
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:22:17AM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
I'm a wanna-be new maintainer starting out the New Maintainer process.
Please refer to http://nm.debian.org/.
I'm looking for a Debian Sponsor to upload this package to the archive.
I'll upload it. However, we'll have to wait
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 08:12:38AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We do not have that bug, so it's not important to us.
Still, nobody has said. What filesystems available on Debian have a
better than linear search time for open, and are they
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Still, nobody has said. What filesystems available on Debian have a
better than linear search time for open, and are they used by a
default Debian install?
/etc/ld.so.cache
Gruss
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
No lvm backup data available in case of superblock corruption. Bad
idea. No booting with init=/bin/sh to patch things back together as /
can't be mounted. Bad idea again.
You can store the backup wherever you like, and an emergency boot via usb
stick,
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Why would it be desirable to have arch-os directories under libexec?
For sharing the /usr tree among multiple machines with different
architectures (I guess).
Gruss
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 11:19 +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
libc6 is not and may not be marked Essential, as the NM process taught me.
So its a bad example.
Even if it is marked as essential, you have a versioned dependency, anyway.
But the point is,
* Sebastian Kuzminsky [Tue, 10 May 2005 11:22:17 -0600]:
I'm also looking to have my GPG key signed (I live in Colorado, USA),
http://nm.debian.org/gpg.php
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
Hi
I'd like to raise the question of apt-proxy. I discussed offlist with
JoeyH and he wasn't keen, but now I've done a few tests and have more
confidence that this is worth raising.
apt-proxy comes in two flavours - the old shell-based one and a new shiny
python one. The most recent
Thomas == Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thomas You've missed the point. Split / and /boot, that makes
Thomas sense if it's necessary. Splitting / and /usr does not
Thomas make sense.
Bad example.
A better example might be if you want to mount /usr via NFS or some
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 01:14:27PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Marc Haber said:
On Mon, 09 May 2005 15:34:06 +0300, Shaul Karl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
adduser(8) states that
With the --disabled-login option, the account will be created but
will be
sorry to followup my own post, but...
I did a few apt-proxy-import tests by removing a random set of .debs
out of the cache tree and importing again. This worked correctly.
Cheers
Vince
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 202 matches
Mail list logo
