I don't believe it's OK to close this bug due to the following reasons:
1. It does work with /usr/lib/debug version of gtk-1.2 libraries (when
application is linked against gtk-1.2 instead of gtk-2.0).
2. It does work with /usr/lib/debug version of libc6 libraries.
3. Package description of
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:49:30PM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote:
I don't believe it's OK to close this bug due to the following reasons:
1. It does work with /usr/lib/debug version of gtk-1.2 libraries (when
application is linked against gtk-1.2 instead of gtk-2.0).
2. It does work with
Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:49:30PM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote:
I don't believe it's OK to close this bug due to the following reasons:
1. It does work with /usr/lib/debug version of gtk-1.2 libraries (when
application is linked against gtk-1.2
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:25:23PM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote:
4. Probably ld-linux.so itself should not segfault no matter what.
Thank you very much for clarification. Yes, I did it wrong, and now the
program does start, but the (4) above holds, right? Therefore I still
think it's a bug in
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 11:57:23AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:25:23PM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote:
4. Probably ld-linux.so itself should not segfault no matter what.
Thank you very much for clarification. Yes, I did it wrong, and now the
program does
Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:25:23PM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote:
4. Probably ld-linux.so itself should not segfault no matter what.
Thank you very much for clarification. Yes, I did it wrong, and now the
program does start, but the (4) above holds,
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 11:57:23AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:25:23PM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote:
4. Probably ld-linux.so itself should not segfault no matter what.
Thank you very much for clarification. Yes, I
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 10:15:58PM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote:
Well, your answer suggests there are other programs that are allowed to
segfault. Is there a list of them so that I won't repeat mistake
reporting their segfaults as bugs in the future? ;)
The C library is simply a special case.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 10:20:29PM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote:
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 11:57:23AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:25:23PM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote:
4. Probably ld-linux.so itself should not segfault
9 matches
Mail list logo
