Hi,
I tried the latest upstream version of libitext5-java and commited the
change to Git. Unfortunately the problem persists. Some Debian Med
packages are depending from this package so I'd be happy if someone
could have a look. You can find the latest log in Salsa CI[1].
Kind regards
Hi,
Am Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 03:15:28PM +0100 schrieb Pierre Gruet:
> Control: tags -1 help
>
> Hello,
>
> I tried to investigate further, I feel a window should appear and the action
> of the user is expected, yet I don't see anything except the initial
> "Initializing BEAUti..." GUI.
> My
Hi Tony and Debian Science
Am Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 09:31:31AM -0800 schrieb tony mancill:
> Hello Debian Med,
>
> jblas (http://jblas.org/) is a Debian Java team package, but I think it
> is more appropriate to ask about users here.
... well, better Debian Science IMHO (which I'm keeping in the
Hi Thorsten,
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 05:55:20PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
> pbuilder@tglase:~/b/r-cran-epitweetr/java$ sbt -no-share package
A, that was helpful!
> … is the key to success, at least until…
>
> [warn] ::
> [warn] ::
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 02:57:41PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2021, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > I tried again without any clue - may be it is simply some missing
> > directory inside pbuilder - but I have no idea which one. :-(
>
> Shoot into the blue
Hi again,
I tried again without any clue - may be it is simply some missing
directory inside pbuilder - but I have no idea which one. :-(
Any hint would be welcome
Andreas.
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:29:52AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the source of r-cran-ep
Hi,
the source of r-cran-epitweetr[1] contains a JAR and the corresponding
scala code. I tried to sneak in a sbt call into debian/rules. I tried
several different things to at least get sbt running but I always get:
java.io.IOException: No such file or directory
at
Hi,
I'd like to forward this to Debian Java list for comments.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 01:50:01PM +0200, olivier sallou wrote:
> Issue seems to be related to xml-apis.jar not being symlinked itself
>
> /usr/share/java# ls *xml-api*
> xml-apis-1.4.01.jar
Hi Emmanuel,
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 09:41:11PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > Is there any good reason for this setting?
>
> When Salsa was set up we were instructed no to overuse the CI system, I
> don't know how this has evolved now.
As far as I know this has settled now.
> Personally I
Hi Sudip,
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 10:48:51AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > This entry can be found in the menu between Repository and Operations.
> > I intended to do this setting for packages (for instance cronometer and
> > cdk). However, the whole menu entry is missing. I have no idea
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 08:35:59PM -0500, Olek Wojnar wrote:
> > Good news, we came to an agreement to package OpenRefine and to support its
> > maintenance for the foreseeable future. I intend to introduce the core
>
> That looks really exciting, thanks for working on that! I imagine that the
>
Hi,
in Debian Med we are activating Salsa-CI by adding debian/salsa-ci.yml
to all packages and set this in
-> Settings -> CI/CD
This entry can be found in the menu between Repository and Operations.
I intended to do this setting for packages (for instance cronometer and
cdk). However, the
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 10:52:21PM +0100, Pierre Gruet wrote:
>
> Yes, the issue is the version number of the dependency javax.json-api was
> hardcoded in the patch 03-bundle-dependencies -- this thus broke when the
> last upstream version was adopted. I have pushed a correction to Salsa.
>
> To
Hi,
I'm not sure whether this is the right moment to update libjsonp-java but
I just stumbled upon it on the "stinks" page[1] and I'd love to make those
packages I'm responsible for non-stinky. ;-) Thus I refreshed the packaging
in Git[2] but the build time test issue I observed some time ago
Hi,
when I'm running the teammetrics gatherer of team commits I stumbled upon
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/gsoc-kotlin-blog/edit
which states that this repository is only visible for project members.
Usually repositories should be public. The gatherer will ignore this
project as long
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
I wonder whether some Java expert might be able to clarify the
situation in bug #929530.
Any help would be appreciated
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 10:30:23AM +0100, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> > There is a minor mistake with the email address of the Java team in
> > debian/control:
> >
> > pkg-java-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net
> >
> > should be replaced by:
> >
> >
Hi,
here is a suggested patch for commons-io that would prevent making the
test in libsis-base-java fail.
Kind regards
Andreas.
- Forwarded message from Bernd Rinn -
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 21:40:29 +0100
From: Bernd Rinn
To: Andreas Tille
CC: 973...@bugs.debian.org
Subject
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:55:43PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> This appears to be caused by the recent upgrade of Apache commons-io to
> version 2.8.0 (we had 2.6), see also #973135. In version 2.7 they
> removed a throws IOException in the method isSymlink()
>
>
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
I checked out the latest upstream commit and pushed it to Salsa.
Its the same with this. Any idea why this test has worked before
but is failing now?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 06:06:55PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source:
Hi Pierre,
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 12:32:49PM +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> >
> > in the source package. While its definitely primitive and just contains
> > "pack/empty.class" as binary content my bet is ftpmaster will stumble
> > upon this.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
>
> Thanks for
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
I wonder why this
...
autopkgtest [16:10:05]: test run-unit-test: [---
[warning] /usr/bin/cgview: No java runtime was found
autopkgtest [16:10:06]: test run-unit-test: ---]
autopkgtest [16:10:06]: test run-unit-test: - - - - - -
Hi Pierre,
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 01:22:41PM +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> I have worked on the initial packaging of libreflections-java, which
> lies in the Salsa repository
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/libreflections-java
>
> Could someone please review and sponsor it when time
Hi Pierre,
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 12:46:22PM +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have worked on the initial packaging of libdsiutils-java, which lies
> in the Salsa repository
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/libdsiutils-java
>
> Could someone please review and sponsor it when time
On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 12:07:17AM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > Gimme a bit, I’ll build it locally, now I found the Debian packaging.
>
> Heh, it was as easy as build targetting Java 8… patch and log attached.
Ahhh, that was simple. :-)
Thanks a lot. BTW, I'd consider it more
Hi Thorsten,
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 04:04:22PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2020, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > [ERROR]
> > /build/jimfs-1.1/jimfs/src/main/java/com/google/common/jimfs/PathService.java:[290,30]
> > error: is not abstract
> >
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
I was running routine-update on jimfs repository since it seems to lack
some love (not even Salsa URLs in VCS-fields) but the build error remains
(for sure since I did not changed the code). I've checked upstream[1]
which says:
1.1
@cgdecker released this on Feb
Uploaded. Thanks a lot, Andreas.
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 01:29:28PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 10:25 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
> >
> > Control: tags -1 help
> >
> > Hi Java team
> >
> > I admit I hav
Control: tags -1 help
Hi Java team
I admit I have no idea how to tackle this. Any help would be really
appreciated.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 10:01:35AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: figtree
> Version: 1.4.4-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on
Hi Tony & Andrius,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 09:18:52AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote:
> > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/cdk/-/merge_requests/4
>
> The MR looks good to me.
Thanks a lot for you both working on it.
> I posted a tiny suggestion to depend on
> jgrapht0.6 with a version to
Hi Andrius,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 08:11:29AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote:
> On 2020-07-23 17:55, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Would you mind to update cdk package (which was the original issue
> > I stumbled upon freehep)?
>
> I have updated cdk yesterday. The cdk-depic
Hi Emmanuel,
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 11:36:08PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> On 25/07/2020 08:39, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> >> Could someone please review and sponsor it when time permits?
> >
> > Hi Pierre, I'll take care of it.
>
> The package has been uploaded and is now in the NEW queue.
Hi Andrius,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 04:42:20PM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2020-07-22 22:00, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> > Thanks, I just pushed geogebra.
>
> Thanks!
Would you mind to update cdk package (which was the original issue
I stumbled upon freehep)?
Kind regards
Hi,
the Debian Med team wants to package sepp[1] as a COVID-19 relevant
package. It contains some Java code which fails to build with:
...
[javac] warning: [options] To suppress warnings about obsolete options, use
-Xlint:-options.
[javac]
Hi,
I had a look at oncofuse[1] again. The new version now has a different
reason to fail - hopefully it is easier to fix:
...
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO]
[INFO] --< es.unav:oncofuse >--
[INFO] Building oncofuse 1.1.1
[INFO]
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 04:06:03PM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote:
> On 2020-07-10 15:59, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> > Great, then I revoke the intention of RMing geogebra and close the
> > corresponding bug. As soon as freehep-vectographics is available, I will
> > bump patches and dependencies
Hi Andrius,
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 11:09:54AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote:
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964070
>
> Thanks a lot for the information. I have uploaded freehep-vectorgraphics
> to experimental, waiting for it to clear NEW.
Thanks for this. I've added
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 02:12:09PM -0400, Olek Wojnar wrote:
> > That was easy. I have pushed my changes to "sudip" which now builds
> > only those two.
>
> Great, thanks!
Yep.
> Good catch, thanks! The repo should be named google-api-client-java for
> consistency with the rest of the
Hi Sudip,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:42:52AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>
> I have taken the liberty to push to "tmancill" branch and the issue
As I tried to express: I wished you all would take the freedom to
simply push to the master branch which is perfectly fine for me. ;-)
Thanks a lot
Hi Tony,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 09:34:20PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
>
> I've pushed a "tmancill" branch to the Salsa repo that gets us further
> along.
Thanks a lot for your great help. I've merged your branch to master.
Feel free to push right to master in future since I feel unable to do
Hi Olek,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 05:01:37AM -0400, Olek Wojnar wrote:
>
> Good question! Due to some dependency issues, the bom artifacts are not
> packaged.
OK, that explains the issue ...
> But you should be able to just depend on the non-bom pom files.
... but I'm to uneducated to
Hi,
I have injected some preliminary packaging for google-api-client-java
into salsa[1]. When trying to build I get:
...
dh_auto_build
/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/java -noverify -cp
/usr/share/maven/boot/plexus-classworlds-2.x.jar -Dmaven.home=/usr/share/maven
[add debian-java to CC]
Hi Pierre,
thanks a lot for your continuous work to get snpeff packaged finally.
This is extremely welcome.
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 05:49:23PM +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am currently beginning packaging aparapi, which is a Java API to
> execute
Control: retitle -1 ITP: google-http-client-java -- Google HTTP Client Library
for Java
Control: owner -1 Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
in the COVID-19 sprint of Debian Med we spotted the bazel packaging
system as important target to finally get tensorflow packaged for
Debian
Hi Java team,
I'm working together with Olek to get all predependencies for bazel
which will finally enable us to build tensorflow for Debian. We both
have no clue to build a jar in the following project:
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:54:52PM -0400, Olek Wojnar wrote:
>
> I've been having
Hi,
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:07:48PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Thanks. This was pretty helpful. Now I need to package the
> remaining JAR which is not yet packaged from
>
>http://la4j.org/
I made some progress and also uploaded libla4j-java[1] to new. With
this I
HI Felix,
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 06:12:54PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
>
> Since the upstream jars were in ${lib}, you need to point ${lib} to
> /usr/share/java/:
>
> diff --git a/debian/patches/debian_packaged_libs.patch
> b/debian/patches/debian_packaged_libs.patch
> index 1d3790c..4fc1ed9
Hi,
I've started packaging of drop-seq[1] and replaced those JARs that are
replacable by Debian packaged versions. I also have set CLASS_PATH in
d/rules, but it seems to be ignored. I have dealt with similar cases by
patching it into build.xml but here I have not found the relevant place
to do
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 08:33:07PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > I remember times when such a web page (actually some autogenerated text
> > file) existed which was **extremely** helpful. I wished this would be
> > back!
> >
> > > … I just volunteerd, didn’t I?
>
> Here you are:
>
>
Control: retitle -1 ITP: opencensus-java -- Stats collection and distributed
tracing framework
Control: owner -1 Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 help
I've started packaging in
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/opencensus-java
to support bazel packaging. Unfortunately I have no idea how
Hi Pierre,
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 07:48:14AM +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote:
>
> I was planning to consider a full refresh of debian/rules, including
> dh_auto_clean.
Since I realised your changelog that all tests are passing I decided to
upload the current status in Git. That's really great work
Hi Thorsten,
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 05:15:04PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > Provides or something to make it clear? I saw changes to packages adding
>
> Or perhaps we need a webpage or wiki page generated by parsing the
> Contents file and listing the matching Debian package for each class
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 01:10:34PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> For the moment I did this. I delay the hint for the gradle dependencies
> given by Benedict in the other mail since for the moment I think I have
> spotted a real dependency that needs to be packaged:
>
> A p
Hi Andrius and Benedict,
thanks to you both for your answers!
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 06:01:45AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote:
>
> 8<
> plugins {
> id "io.codearte.nexus-staging" version "0.21.2"
> }
>
Hi Gilles,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 05:10:38PM +0200, Gilles Filippini wrote:
>
> I've cloned the git repo and attempted a build. But the dh_auto_test
> part doesn't execute any test actually:
>
>debian/rules override_dh_auto_test
> make[1]: Entering directory
> ...
>
Hi Pierre,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 10:40:31PM +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have been trying to package libsis-jhdf5-java, after Andreas imported the
> last upstream version.
> This package builds a java package with a .jar file and a jni package with
> native code used by the
Hi,
in our COVID-19 effort the Debian Med team intends to package some
workflows that are useful to detect viruses. A common workflow tool is
nextflow which I in injected into Salsa[1]. The build system uses
gradle where I do not have any experience in. The build log of my weak
attempt is
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 03:17:09PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 12:24:56AM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> > Hi Andreas,
> >
> > Am 05.03.20 um 09:34 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I was wondering, whet
Hi Andrius,
thanks a lot for your work on this - also thanks to Giovanni for your
comments.
I'd be really happy to get FreeHEP updated.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 08:03:20AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2020-04-21 10:40, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
Hi Andrius,
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 10:18:04AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote:
> Some time ago I had attempted packaging new freehep-vectorgraphics, with
> considerable success. However, I dropped the ball and did not upload it.
> I have pushed my packaging to salsa [1].
Thanks a lot for the
Hi,
I was digging through CDK to get the R interface running (see my other
mails here on this list). I just found another clue that cdk-depict is
missing. When inspecting cdk source I've found:
libcdk-java.poms:# depict requires freehep-graphicsio-* 2.4 (Debian has older)
This made me
Hi again,
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 10:50:28PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> 1 Test Suite :
> rcdk rcdk Unit Tests - 31 test functions, 31 errors, 0 failures
> ERROR in test.charges: Error in
> .jnew("org/openscience/cdk/smiles/SmilesParser", g
Hi Florian,
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 08:49:44PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> Meh. Does R have exceptions? It would be nice to translate the
> underlying exception from
>
> if (clnam)
> cls = findClass(env, clnam, oClassLoader);
> else
> cls = objectClass(env,o);
> if (!cls)
>
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 06:52:56PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Andreas Tille:
> > ERROR: loading failed
> > * removing
> > '/build/r-cran-rcdk-3.5.0/debian/r-cran-rcdk/usr/lib/R/site-library/rcdk'
> > dh_auto_install: error: R CMD INSTALL -l
> > /build/r-c
Hi,
in the COVID-19 packaging effort I need r-cran-rcdk as a predependency.
I have injected it into r-pkg-team Git[1]. It is using the rjava interface
and depends from r-cran-rcdklibs (which has a dependency from libcdk-java).
When I try to build I get:
** installing vignettes
** testing if
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 12:24:56AM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Am 05.03.20 um 09:34 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was wondering, whether there is a chance to get CVE-2020-1938 fixed in
> > Tomcat8 in Stretch? If the chances are
Hi,
I was wondering, whether there is a chance to get CVE-2020-1938 fixed in
Tomcat8 in Stretch? If the chances are low possibly backporting Tomcat9
to stretch-backports-sloppy would be a feasible way to go for me. What
would you recomment?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 11:30:11AM +0100, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Il 21/11/19 12:18, mer...@debian.org ha scritto:
> > New version of freehep-graphicsio is out (in 2014 [1]), and I would like
> > to see it packaged. However, packaging of freehep-graphicsio is split in
> > a dozen of
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:35:11PM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> > I have no idea what restrictions the lack of cmlxom might imply.
>
> I have packaged and uploaded cmlxom today. Will do so with the rest of
> dependencies.
>
> > Would you take over and upload your changes? If not please push
Hi Andrius,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:56:52AM +0200, mer...@debian.org wrote:
> I have managed to get around the most of the build problems. However, a
> lot of the artifacts depend (transitively) on org.xml-cml.cmlxom, which
> is not packaged yet. For the time being I can skip these artifacts,
Hi,
I've sat together with Egon Willighagen who is member of CDK upstream
team to update the cdk package[1]. So far the switch from ant to maven
seems to have basically succeeded. However, for some reason it does not
build modules in the correct sequence and thus we are running into:
[INFO]
Hi,
I'd be very happy if Debian Java team could comment on the analysis
of libs done by Olivier to enable us upgrading IGV.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 09:34:51AM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote:
>
> I had a quick look at latest version. It seems to be have been rewritten
> a lot, a lots of dependency
Control: tags -1 help
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:01:53PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> it would be nice if you could upgrade to current igv version 2.6.3. the
> current version in unstable is (apart from the other issues) so old,
> it's hardly usable.
I agree and its work in progress
Hi,
any comment from Debian Java team?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 09:57:58AM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote:
>
> On 9/13/19 3:43 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I upgraded the igv packaging Git[1] to the latest upstream version. I
> &
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:03:03PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2019, Mykola Nikishov wrote:
>
> > Seems the only option is to use Ant tasks directly [1] as GMaven is not
> > an option any more [2]:
>
> What about gmavenplus?
It seems you are refering to the package
Hi,
I'm trying to package oncofuse[1]. I used mh-make to create the
packaging skeleton. I asked mh-make to ignore the dependency
groovy-eclipse-compiler since I was hoping that its not urgently needed
(and I do not have the slightest idea what this is and how hard it is to
package it as
Hi Ryan,
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:55:59PM +, Ryan Morillo wrote:
> Hi guys,
> The jTDS driver has been at version 1.3.1 for a few years and we still
> have 1.2.5 in the testing repo (libjtds-java) Can we get the newer
> version packaged up and included?
> The biggest benefit is it makes it
.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:21:46AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to make some noise again about this issue. I'm concerned
> about the fact that
>
> jh_build --javadoc-opts='-link /usr/share/doc/default-jdk-doc/api'
>
> was creating a JAR file
.
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 01:36:18PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 03:35:58PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Daniel, if I do not hear from you I assume you agree that I inject
> > fannj into Debian Science Git and do a team upload.
>
> As
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 01:23:49PM +0200, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Hey Armando,
>
> Thanks for your interest and welcome!
+1
> There are many ways to jump into
> Java packaging. One way is to go through the bug reports and try
> confirming them and fixing them. Right now
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 03:35:58PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Daniel, if I do not hear from you I assume you agree that I inject
> fannj into Debian Science Git and do a team upload.
As I said I assumed agreement and have moved fannj to Salsa[1].
Unfortunately the build is no
Hi again,
Daniel, if I do not hear from you I assume you agree that I inject
fannj into Debian Science Git and do a team upload.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 03:08:17PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as far as I understood the Debian Java team agreed tha
Hi,
as far as I understood the Debian Java team agreed that droping the
documentation is an appropriate way to deal with errors like this:
Creating destination directory: "debian/_jh_build.javadoc/api/"
javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module,
but the
Hi Markus,
thanks a lot!
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 03:49:52PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
> Thinking about it, the patch could be much simpler. Actually all you
> need is the list of URLs. They are hardcoded but those jar files and
> your build directory probably will never change again.
is the
compile target that seems to be "hidden" in nbproject/build-impl.xml not
executed any more and how can I get back the status of 0.9.3-3 which was
building nicely?
I seriously need help on this matter.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 01:55:46PM +0100, Andreas T
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:58:33AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I realised that
>
> /usr/share/java/netlib-java-0.9.3.jar
>
> is nearly empty, specifically
>
> /org/netlib/arpack
> /org/netlib/blas
> /org/netlib/lapack
>
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:25:06PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> On 13/03/2019 21:30, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
> >> please look at the new upstream 1.7.2 and 1.8 releases.
May be that's sensible for Buster+1
> > In https://bugs.debian.org/855686 Emmanuel wrote that icedtea-web will
> > be
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:41:22AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Michael Crusoe has suggested a workaround[1]. What do you think about
> this?
In case there is no answer to this question I assume it is OK to
upload the workaround. Hope you agree with this.
Kind regards
A
Hi,
Michael Crusoe has suggested a workaround[1]. What do you think about
this?
Kind regards,
Andreas.
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=912549#10
--
http://fam-tille.de
ally want to package the new versions
* debhelper 12
* Point Vcs fields to salsa.debian.org
* Standards-Version: 4.3.0
* Secure URI in copyright format
-- Andreas Tille Sun, 13 Jan 2019 21:11:05 +0100
and the previous version on snapshots[1] contains a proper jar file with
all classes I su
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 02:02:05PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> ...
> Maybe we should change our javadoc policy too. Developers shall not
> build-depend on other -doc packages by default and override jh_build if
> they wish to link against external packages. This way they have more
> fine
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 09:41:53AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On the other hand: It seems this is not needed by any rdepends any more
> and popcon data are looking as if we should rather remove than fix this
> package ...
Sorry for the noise but this is really needed for
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 06:11:32AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Debian Java team,
>
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 12:19:40AM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > jh_build -J hac.jar src
> > find src -name *.java -and -type f -print0 | xargs -s 512000 -0
> > /usr/lib/jvm/de
Hi Debian Java team,
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 12:19:40AM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> jh_build -J hac.jar src
> find src -name *.java -and -type f -print0 | xargs -s 512000 -0
> /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/javac -g -cp :debian/_jh_build.hac -d
> debian/_jh_build.hac -source 1.7 -target 1.7
Hi,
I realised that libmilib-java is not installable[1] since ${maven:Depends}[2]
is resolved into libredberry-pipe-java (>= 1.0.0-alpha0) rather than the
existing
libredberry-pipe-java (>= 1.0.0~alpha0) (see difference between '-' and '~'
before 'alpha0'). How can I make sure that the correct
Hi,
the description of milib is bioinformatics related and a clear target of
Debian Med team. "Hiding" the package in Debian Java is escaping the QA
measures we have in our team and thus I realised bug #920839 very late
and only by chance. Thus I have moved the package to Debian Med[1] in
my
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:03:44AM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> >>> [INFO]
> >>>
> >>> [INFO] Reactor Summary for JSR 374 (JSON Processing) RI 1.1.2:
> >>> [INFO]
> >>> [INFO] JSR 374 (JSON Processing) RI
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:59:04AM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote:
>
> > which are less issues but the according JARs are definitely inside Debian:
> >
> > com.ibatis:ibatis:jar:debian -> libibatis-java
> > com.sshtools:j2ssh-core:jar:debian -> libj2ssh-java
> >
Hi Emmanuel,
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 09:15:49PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> No no no it has to work, otherwise you'll run into many other issues...
Ahhh, another very helpful hint. I was running mh_make now and was
merging its results in. That was very enlightening and saved me some
stupid
Hi Emmanuel,
as always thanks a lot for your quick help.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 02:26:27PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> You don't need jacoco, that's a test coverage tool that can be safely
> disabled when building Debian packages.
>
> Just add this to debian/maven.ignoreRules:
>
>
1 - 100 of 528 matches
Mail list logo
