Re: Notes from the DebConf 17 Java BOF

Hi Tony, > I'm still making my way through the packaging, but it looks fine so far. > It does feel very odd to upload source packages with those large > bootstrap dependency tarballs when some of the dependencies are already > in the archive. That's right. Honestly I did all that some time ago

Re: Notes from the DebConf 17 Java BOF

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:10:01AM +0200, Frederic Bonnard wrote: > On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:41:44 -0700, tony mancill wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:01:26AM +0200, Frederic Bonnard wrote: > > > > > > and waiting for scala-tools-sbinary. > > > > I can have a look at

Re: Notes from the DebConf 17 Java BOF

I forgot a last missing bit for that sbt stack : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=853733 F. On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 10:01:26 +0200, Frederic Bonnard wrote: > Hi Emmanuel/all, > > On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 00:06:41 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg

Re: Notes from the DebConf 17 Java BOF

Hi Tony, On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:41:44 -0700, tony mancill wrote: > Hi Frederic, > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:01:26AM +0200, Frederic Bonnard wrote: > > Hi Emmanuel/all, > > > What are the issues blocking SBT currently? > > > > I've sent a list of sbt related packages

Re: Notes from the DebConf 17 Java BOF

> > I've sent a list of sbt related packages (for experimental) on mentors > > some time ago that Andreas kindly sponsored them. All but one were accepted > > by ftpmasters ; there's only scala-tools-sbinary remaining : I guess > > it's being examined :) > >

Re: Notes from the DebConf 17 Java BOF

Hi Frederic, On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:01:26AM +0200, Frederic Bonnard wrote: > Hi Emmanuel/all, > > What are the issues blocking SBT currently? > > I've sent a list of sbt related packages (for experimental) on mentors > some time ago that Andreas kindly sponsored them. All but one were

Re: Notes from the DebConf 17 Java BOF

On 08/16/2017 10:01 AM, Frederic Bonnard wrote: > I've sent a list of sbt related packages (for experimental) on mentors > some time ago that Andreas kindly sponsored them. All but one were accepted > by ftpmasters ; there's only scala-tools-sbinary remaining : I guess > it's being examined :) >

Re: Notes from the DebConf 17 Java BOF

Hi Emmanuel/all, On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 00:06:41 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Thank you for the summary Tom. How many people attended the BOF? > > On 08/09/2017 02:50 AM, Tom Marble wrote: > > > 1. Making openjdk-9 the default for buster > >- Yes we should try to do this.

Re: Notes from the DebConf 17 Java BOF

Am 12.08.2017 um 00:06 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Thank you for the summary Tom. How many people attended the BOF? > > On 08/09/2017 02:50 AM, Tom Marble wrote: > >> 1. Making openjdk-9 the default for buster >>- Yes we should try to do this. >>- We will gain some fixes for reproducible

Re: Notes from the DebConf 17 Java BOF

On 11.08.2017 20:49, Carnë Draug wrote: > On 11 August 2017 at 23:06, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> [...] >> On 08/09/2017 02:50 AM, Tom Marble wrote: >>> [...] >>> 6. Autopkgtest >>>- We should use this more >>>- Can include built-in tests >>>- We can (or autopkgtest

Re: Notes from the DebConf 17 Java BOF

Emmanuel Bourg writes: > Thank you for the summary Tom. How many people attended the BOF? I believe we were about 8. > On 08/09/2017 02:50 AM, Tom Marble wrote: >> 1. Making openjdk-9 the default for buster > Do we know what has improved on the reproducibility side with

Re: Notes from the DebConf 17 Java BOF

hello Debian-java, thanks for the work done in the BoF! Markus Koschany writes: > new ideas of packaging Java applications in general. Maybe flatpack or > other packaging formats may be a way for us to provide some Java apps at > all. That might be not perfect but better than

Re: Notes from the DebConf 17 Java BOF

On 11 August 2017 at 23:06, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > [...] > On 08/09/2017 02:50 AM, Tom Marble wrote: >> [...] >> 6. Autopkgtest >>- We should use this more >>- Can include built-in tests >>- We can (or autopkgtest already does) use 'ratt' to test reverse deps > >

Re: Notes from the DebConf 17 Java BOF

Thank you for the summary Tom. How many people attended the BOF? On 08/09/2017 02:50 AM, Tom Marble wrote: > 1. Making openjdk-9 the default for buster >- Yes we should try to do this. >- We will gain some fixes for reproducible builds Do we know what has improved on the reproducibility

Re: Notes from the DebConf 17 Java BOF

On 08/08/17 20:50, Tom Marble wrote: All: Here are my rough notes from today's BOF.. Please followup with corrections! Thanks Tom for taking all these notes yesterday. 5. javadoc - Our packages that are standards 4.0.1 compliant should support "nodoc" - Some users appreciate