Re: Seeking help with Java compile heap memory out-of-memory error on armel for zeroc-ice build

On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 09:13:09PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote: > Thank you this sounds promising. > > Would you consider this option in debian/rules to be safe to deploy to all > architectures? > > i.e. would adding this globally be an acceptable bug fix? Hi Chris, Yes, I think this is suitable

Re: Seeking help with Java compile heap memory out-of-memory error on armel for zeroc-ice build

On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 01:54:51PM +1200, Vladimir Petko wrote: > Unfortunately I do not have an armel box accessible, but maybe > tweaking Gradle heap size through 'export GRADLE_OPTS=-Xmx' > might help? > I have tried with export GRADLE_OPTS=-Xmx512M and the package was > built successfully. Hi

Re: Removing freeplane 1.7.x from Debian?

On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 04:53:17PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote: > Dear java team, > > the current freeplane package only works with an old JRE [1]. > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freeplane/+bug/2034752 > > I think that not many users figure out how to set JAVA_CMD or >

Re: Bug#1057171: libitext5-java: FTBFS with bouncycastle 1.77

On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 12:50:33PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > I tried the latest upstream version of libitext5-java and commited the > change to Git. Unfortunately the problem persists. Some Debian Med > packages are depending from this package so I'd be happy if someone > could have a look.

Re: [RFC] Removing support for GCJ and GCJFLAGS from dpkg?

Hi Guillem, On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 02:23:00AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > While going through the supported compilers and build flags recently, > I noticed that dpkg-buildflags and the various dpkg Makefile fragment > files still have support for gcj, but that compiler seems to have > stopped

Re: Re: jar missing in /usr/share/maven-repo/

On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 09:57:46PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jul 2023, Andreas B. Mundt wrote: > > >after that. However, when I try to start it, I get: > > > > $ java -jar /usr/share/java/filius.jar > > Error: Unable to initialize main class filius.Main > > Caused by:

Re: Bug#1034059: marked as pending in zstd-jni-java

On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 09:13:00PM +, Markus Koschany wrote: > Control: tag -1 pending > > Hello, > > Bug #1034059 in zstd-jni-java reported by you has been fixed in the > Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit > message below and you can check the diff of the fix

Re: RFS: zstd-jni-java/1.5.4-2+ds-1 [Team] -- JNI bindings for Zstd (Architecture-specific files)

Hi sun min, On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 03:01:00AM +, sun min wrote: > Hi, all > > Could someone have a look at the build status of zstd-jni-java[1] ? > > It seems that the official build was failed while my local build is okay. Yes, I will take a look. I also built the package successfully

Re: RFS: zstd-jni-java/1.5.4-2+ds-1 [Team] -- JNI bindings for Zstd (Architecture-specific files)

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 01:13:35AM +, sun min wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > > zstd-jni-java (1.5.4-2+ds-1) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* Team upload. >* New upstream release. >* Update debian/libzstd-jni1.symbols. Hello sun min, Should this upload target unstable

Re: reply: Bazel Removal from Debian

On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 03:15:18PM +, sun min wrote: > > If the test passes regularly, and just sometimes fails under the same > > conditions, I would consider disabling it in autopkgtest rather than have > > it not > > make it into bookworm. The perfect is the enemy of the good. > > The

Re: Bug#1031123: RFS: libcommons-collections4-java/4.4-1 [Team] -- Apache Commons Collections - Extended Collections API for Java

On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 03:43:05PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > Am 12.02.2023 um 07:54 teilte min sun mit: > > Hi, > > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > > following URL: > > > >https://mentors.debian.net/package/libcommons-collections4-java/ > > > If

Re: reply: RFS: libcommons-validator-java/1:1.7-1 [Team] -- ease and speed development and maintenance of validation rules

On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 07:55:08AM +, min sun wrote: > > Hi mentors! > > I packaged new version of libcommons-validator [1] and uploaded again to > debian mentors[2], please refer to Upload #2 . Hi! I will review and sponsor the upload soon. Thank you for your contribution to Debian!

Re: OpenJDK package - jtreg: asmtools

On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:21:34AM +1300, Vladimir Petko wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks a lot for the reply!!! I am more than happy to try to package it, > just wondering if I should put > "Owner: Debian Java team " and "The package > will be team-maintained in the Debian Java team" or something else

Re: OpenJDK package - jtreg: asmtools

Hello Vladimir, On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 08:22:45AM +1300, Vladimir Petko wrote: > Dear Maintainers, > > A number of jtreg tests fail during OpenJDK testing with the following > error: > > `` compiler/c1/KlassAccessCheckTest.java > Error. can't find jasm`` >

Re: RFS: stegosuite/0.9.0-1

On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 02:45:46PM -0400, stegosu...@gmx.net wrote: > Dear Java packagers, > > I am looking for a sponsor for package "stegosuite". > > * Package name: stegosuite > Version : 0.9.0 > Upstream Author : Stegosuite Developers > * URL :

Re: Bug#926714: Gradle packaging status update

Hi Phil, On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 05:10:10PM +0100, Phil Morrell wrote: > Feel free to chat with me in #debian-java on irc/matrix and if anyone > has permissions to the Salsa java-team, please could you add me there. Done. Cheers, tony signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#1014310: src:openjfx: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on arm64 and armhf

Hi Paul, On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 09:51:03PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 3 Jul 2022 21:25:49 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > > Your package failed to build from source on arm64 and armhf while it > > built there successfully in the past. > > I just checked to see if there would be a

Re: service-wrapper-java 20 releases / 6 years behind

On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 11:12:24PM +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote: > Hello, > > Le 05/06/2022 à 18:27, zzz a écrit : > > This is a dependency of the i2p project that I work on. > > If there's any maintainer available to bring it up-to-date, > > I'd really appreciate it. > > I gave it a try tonight,

Re: Bug#1007923: maven-*-helper JAR placement seems to contradict Java policy

On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 07:17:46PM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote: > Hi Alexandre, > > On 2022-03-23 16:33, Alexandre Rossi wrote: > > Seems to work: > > > > $ ls -la /usr/share/java/htmlcleaner* > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 18 mars 18:20 > > /usr/share/java/htmlcleaner-2.26.jar ->

Re: uscan: error: jh_repack --upstream-version 2.7 subprocess returned exit status 1

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 01:37:10PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > [cc me please] > > Hi there, > > I am trying to update xmlgraphics-commons but I fail to understand > what is going on with: > > % uscan --download --force-download --rename > uscan: Newest version of xmlgraphics-commons on

Re: libjpf-java

On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 10:22:04PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > libjpf-java is affected by an RC which in turn affects its rdepds like > osmosis. > > I've updated the package in git to modernize the packaging. > > tony, do you want to make any changes before upload? Hi Bas, I pulled

update of logback to 1.28

Hello Java Team, I have prepared an update of logback to 1.2.8, which addresses the same type of JNDI vulnerability recently announced for log4j2. Additional details in https://jira.qos.ch/browse/LOGBACK-1591 and https://github.com/qos-ch/logback/compare/v_1.2.7...v_1.2.8 A CVE has not yet been

Bug#1001463: java-policy: Please retitle to "Java Policy for Debian"

On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 10:37:54AM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 10/12/2021 à 15:20, Felix Lechner a écrit : > > > Lintian cites your manual as supporting documentation for several > > tags. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Such references help users when > > grasping the conditions that provoke

jblas update to 1.2.5?

Hello Debian Med, jblas (http://jblas.org/) is a Debian Java team package, but I think it is more appropriate to ask about users here. Upstream has released a new version, 1.2.5; Debian currently packages 1.2.4. From the upstream release notes: > Release 1.2.5 - Aug 20, 2020 > > It has been a

Re: packaging Go runtime for ANTLR4

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 01:06:11AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 08:41:46AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > >> Hi Peymaneh, > >> > >> Le 2021-07-27 10:09, Peymaneh Nejad a écrit : > >> > >> > Is it intended or wished for that additional runtimes other than Java > >> > are

Re: packaging Go runtime for ANTLR4

On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 08:41:46AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi Peymaneh, > > Le 2021-07-27 10:09, Peymaneh Nejad a écrit : > > > Is it intended or wished for that additional runtimes other than Java > > are packaged in seperate source packages > > Yes it is, for several reasons: > - The

Re: packaging Go runtime for ANTLR4

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:47:36AM -0400, Olek Wojnar wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2021, 04:09 Peymaneh Nejad wrote: > > Is it intended or wished for that additional runtimes other than Java are > > packaged in seperate source packages, or would it be better to add another > > binary package (that'd

Re: Request to join java-team on salsa

Hi Nilesh, On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 08:25:08PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jul 2021 at 20:22, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am Nilesh and I am a Debian Developer, and work mostly with Debian > > med. > > I wante to work on java packages with common > > intersection with the

Re: New source package httpcomponents-client5

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 04:34:18PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > Hi, > > I intend to package the 5.x series of httpcomponents-client [1][2][3]. We > already have the 4.x series in Debian packaged as src:httpcomponents-client. > Is > there anything against packaging the 5.x series as

Re: [RFS] eclipselink

Hi Pierre, I reviewed the diff, built the package, and build the r-deps (libspring-java) with ratt. Thank you for the bug fix. DM rights granted. Cheers, tony On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 05:15:55PM +0100, Pierre Gruet wrote: > Hello, > > I have updated the package eclipselink, which FTBFS due to

Re: gs-collections vs eclipse-collections

On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 07:10:25PM +0100, Vincent Prat wrote: > Hi Tony, > > >> Should we package Eclipse Collections as a separate project (in which > >> case I will submit an ITP bug), or update and rename the existing package? > >> For your information, the package gs-collections has no

Re: gs-collections vs eclipse-collections

Hi Vincent, On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 01:56:41AM +0100, Vincent Prat wrote: > Dear all, > > The latest version of NatTable (2.0.0) depends on Eclipse Collections > (https://www.eclipse.org/collections/). > Originally, it was called GS Collections, and was renamed when it > migrated to the Eclipse

Re: [RFS] libmiglayout-java

Hi Pierre, On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 06:47:56PM +0100, Pierre Gruet wrote: > Hi, > > I have worked on libmiglayout-java and fixed its serious bug. Would you mind > either reviewing [0] or giving me DM rights? I took a quick look at the commits in the Salsa repo. They look fine to me. > dcut dm

Re: Joining the Java Team

On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 08:20:52PM -0500, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > Hello folks! > > I've started to work on packaging backport9 [1], a dependency for jruby > 9.2.x and I would very much like to maintain in the Java Team. I think > teams are great :) > > Can I be added to the Salsa

Re: Please add me to the group on Salsa

On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 01:25:19PM +0100, Philipp Huebner wrote: > Hi, > > could somebody please add me to the java-team on Salsa? > > I would like to remove myself as uploader from the remaining freehep > packages. Hi Philipp, You should have access now. Please let me know if it didn't work.

Re: Bug#929530: libsis-base-java: unaligned access on armhf

On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 08:59:16PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Control: tags -1 help > > I wonder whether some Java expert might be able to clarify the > situation in bug #929530. Hi Andreas, There is good news and bad news... :) The good news is that the unaligned access error is no longer

Re: Bug#975874: buster-pu: package openjdk-11/11.0.9.1+1-1~deb10u1

On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 05:34:25PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 11:28 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > [adding d-java to Cc for greater visibility] > > > > On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 09:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On Wed, 2020-11-2

Re: 8u275?

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 09:58:09PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Hi *, > > should we merge that to sid and stretch-security? > > openjdk-8 (8u275-b01-0ubuntu1) hirsute; urgency=medium > > If it’s just an “ok, do it, and we don’t require any extra changes” > I can even do it to take the load

Re: okay to prepare 11.0.9.1+1 for Debian stable proposed updates?

On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 09:26:13AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 03:05:26PM -0800, tony mancill wrote: > > Hello Matthias, Tiago, and other members of the OpenJDK team, > > > > Thank you for the recent uploads of 11.0.9.1 [1]. Given that it >

okay to prepare 11.0.9.1+1 for Debian stable proposed updates?

Hello Matthias, Tiago, and other members of the OpenJDK team, Thank you for the recent uploads of 11.0.9.1 [1]. Given that it addresses JDK-8250861 [2] (which is serious, although I'm unsure as to whether it is DSA-worthy) and there are likely derivatives that would benefit from the update,

Re: [RFS] libdsiutils-java

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 11:31:26PM +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote: > Hello, > > libdsiutils-java has just exited NEW; I have prepared a source-only > upload, additionally fixing missing elements in the classpath. > > > Would you mind either reviewing [0] or giving me DM rights? > > > dcut dm --uid

Re: Solr version

On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 01:47:06PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 12:01 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > > > On 27/09/2020 00:23, Markus Koschany wrote: > > > > > > > > Why don't we just create more or less official (even though not really > > > perfect) Debian packages for

Re: Solr version

On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 03:40:39PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > In short: 3.6.2 will not be released again, 8.x could make it into > Debian 11 but there is a big question mark at the moment, more help is > appreciated. Hi Markus, Can you post a list of what others can help with? Cheers, tony

Re: incomplete manifest in jar files

On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 01:01:43AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 11:34 PM tony mancill wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 12:40:44PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > While working on #94355

Re: incomplete manifest in jar files

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 12:40:44PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > Hi All, > > While working on #943552 I faced few problems with manifest files and > as a result I am unable to list them in the bundles.info file. > > <--snip--> > > If no-one has any problem with my suggested changes then I can

Re: JDK Mission Control

On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 04:40:43PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > Is anyone working on packaging this tool? Upstream is here: > > > Not yet, but I do use it regularly (currently using the binaries

Re: Packaging of Zstd JNI bindings

Hello Olek, On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 10:44:35AM -0400, Olek Wojnar wrote: > Hello fellow Java developers, > > Has anyone been looking at packaging the JNI bindings for Zstd? [1][2] > Seems like a very useful piece of software and a fairly simple package. I > didn't see anything on WNPP but I

Re: Building r-cran-rcdk with cdk [Was: Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others)]

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:56:24AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote: > Hi Tony, > > On 2020-07-27 16:50, tony mancill wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 08:51:49AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote: > >> What is more, the subtree tool/smsd/ contains only pom.xml, what

Re: Building r-cran-rcdk with cdk [Was: Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others)]

Hi Andrius, On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 08:51:49AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote: > Hello, > > On 2020-07-27 08:38, tony mancill wrote: > >> It actually seems that org/openscience/cdk/smsd/Isomorphism is not > >> part of the currently packaged CDK. Any idea how t

Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others)

Hi Andreas, On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 10:34:07AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Andrius, > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 08:11:29AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote: > > On 2020-07-23 17:55, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > Would you mind to update cdk package (which was the original issue > > > I stumbled

Re: Providing GraalVM Community Edition Debian package

Hi Dongjin, On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 07:43:20PM +0900, Dongjin Lee wrote: > Hi Tony, > > > In this case, given that Graal is GPLv2 with the CPE, it feels like we > should be building it from source. > > Thanks for the comprehensive explanation. It was the very answer I needed. > > Then, if I

Re: Providing GraalVM Community Edition Debian package

Hello Dongjin, On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 06:45:43PM +0900, Dongjin Lee wrote: > Hello Debian Java community, > > It seems like there was a discussion about providing GraalVM community > edition (aka GraalVM CE) Debian package years ago, but it is still not > offered yet: > >

Re: ITP: eclipse-wtp -- Eclipse Web Tools Platform

On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 11:22:16AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > Hi All, > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 07:50:17PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > Owner: Sudip Mukherjee > > Control: block 943552 by -1 > > > > * Package name: eclipse-wtp > > So,

Re: Maven packages in Debian (was Re: Progress in preparing the Bazel Build System for Debian (COVID-19 Biohackathon follow-up))

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 07:29:33AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > Hi Olek, > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 5:09 AM Olek Wojnar wrote: > > > > On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 4:09 AM Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > >> > >> Le 23/05/2020 à 21:10, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : > >> > >> > Ouch, 33M… methinks this is

Re: Possible Bug in Maven Debian Helper

On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 11:03:37PM -0400, Olek Wojnar wrote: > Hi tony, > > On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 9:48 PM tony mancill wrote: > > > > > I attempted to reproduce this but the package depends on > > libchecker-framework-java and the sources checked into the Salsa r

Re: Possible Bug in Maven Debian Helper

Hi Olek, On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 03:09:43PM -0400, Olek Wojnar wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've been having some problems with a tweaked build and, before reporting a > bug, I wanted to see if anyone had any insights as to what is going wrong > here. > > So flogger [1] and bazel have a circular

Re: To build a java package with maven

On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 04:57:06PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Sat, 20 Jun 2020, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote: > > > In the d/rules I did the entry > > > > export CLASSPATH := /usr/share/java/jakarta.validation-api.jar > > There is no file named jakarta.validation-api.jar in Debian, >

Re: libwoodstox-java: new upstream version available (#958512)

Hi Alex, On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 05:30:38PM +0200, Alexandre Rossi wrote: > Hi list, > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:21 AM Alexandre Rossi wrote: > > > > Package: libwoodstox-java > > Version: 1:5.1.0-2 > > Severity: wishlist > > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > woodstox-core 6.1.1 is available. > >

Re: Request for merging and Sponsoring the Update

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 09:00:09PM +0530, Manas Kashyap wrote: > Hola , > I am Manas Kashyap an active Debian contributor and i am currently working > on updating of android and java team packages to new upstreams. I have made > the upstream update for scala-tools-sbinary >

Re: #952103 - svnkit with FTBFS

On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 06:45:05PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > Hi Mechtilde, > > I have now raised a merge request for svnkit. > https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/svnkit/-/merge_requests/1 > > <--snip--> > > Changes since the last upload: > >* Team upload. >* Fix FTBFS. (Closes:

Re: OpenJDK 14 (ea) entering testing

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 03:56:35PM +0100, Felix Natter wrote: > Lilian BENOIT writes: > > Hello, > > hello Lilian, Hans, Tony, > > > In july, a message "OpenJDK 13 (ea) entering testing" has been sended on > > this > > mailing-list. (https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2019/07/msg9.html) >

Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA?

On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 04:20:40PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Hi tony, > > > on January 28th as a reminder). I am in process of building the 8u242 > > source package uploaded to Debian unstable against stretch for a > > thanks for the update, but… Debian unstable has not yet been updated >

Re: OpenJDK 8u242 GA?

On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 03:57:11PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jan 2020, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > > What I don’t understand is why the new version isn’t uploaded > > It’s been over three weeks since the release, what (besides > GCC breaking everything) gives? Hi Thorsten, I

Re: sponsorship request for tycho

On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 01:31:58PM +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > Hi All, > > I have been trying to update tycho to 1.2.0 and have raised a > merge-request on salsa at [1]. Alternatvely it is also available at [2]. > > The latest upstream tycho is 1.5.1 but it needs 1.4.0 to build. >

Re: darcula and dependency libiconloader-java

Hi Felix, On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 08:13:34PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote: > hello Tony, > > as discussed, here are two more dependencies of freeplane-1.7.10 > (darcula and its dependency iconloader from the same author). > > 1. https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/libiconloader-java > > The

Re: RFS: libdata-url-java/1.0.1-1 [ITP] -- Support for data URLs according to RFC 2397

On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 05:18:33PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote: > > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libdata-url-java" Hi Felix, The initial review looks good. I will sponsor this upload (probably later this

Re: Build Zxing-Core

On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 04:22:53PM +0200, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote: > Hello Emmanuel > > Am 19.10.19 um 15:10 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > > Le 19/10/2019 à 13:16, Mechtilde Stehmann a écrit : > > > >> Can someone give me hint how I can solve it. > > > > Look at the substitution rules in

Re: Bug#940973: libarchive-zip-perl breaks strip-nondeterminism autopkgtest: error: becoming Archive::Zip::DirectoryMember

On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 06:29:08PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 06:30:52 -0700, tony mancill wrote: > > error: No member named $memberName > at /usr/share/perl5/Archive/Zip/Archive.pm line 411. > > Archive::Zip::Archive::contents(Archive:

Re: Bug#940973: libarchive-zip-perl breaks strip-nondeterminism autopkgtest: error: becoming Archive::Zip::DirectoryMember

On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 11:15:38PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > Control: tag -1 - fixed-upstream > COntrol: notforwarded -1 > > On Tue, 08 Oct 2019 14:10:19 -0700, Chris Lamb wrote: > > > This has apparently been fixed (again) upstream in version 1.67: > > > > > >

Re: Prepared update libyaml-snake-java

On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 09:01:43PM +0200, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote: > Hello > > Am 15.09.19 um 14:05 schrieb Markus Koschany: > > Simply put, a new upstream version should improve something and not > > break other packages. Rebuilding reverse-dependencies is a good way to > > check that or you

Re: Try to update jsoup

On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 02:08:54PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > > > Am 15.09.19 um 08:19 schrieb Mechtilde: > > Good morning Markus, > > > > a supplementary question > > > > Can I split the patch into single patches for each file? > > It is up to you and how you would like to maintain the

Re: jTDS driver horribly out of date

On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 08:24:17AM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 11:23:39PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hi Ryan, > > > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:55:59PM +, Ryan Morillo wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > The jTDS driver has been

Re: guava - updateable?

On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 02:18:02PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > Hi all, > > On 02.09.19 13:14, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > Le 30/08/2019 à 05:31, tony mancill a écrit : > > > > > I use Guava often at my job, and in my experience guava updates are > > > saf

Re: guava - updateable?

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 03:30:53PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > Hello, > > I need an update for the guava libraries from > > https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/guava-libraries/blob/master/debian/changelog > > and don't really use them, yet. Is there anybody volunteering to update > those

Re: Freeplane 1.7.9 update

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:25:33PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote: > there is a simple new upstream release of freeplane (1.7.9): > > (...) > > Could someone please consider uploading this? Absolutely - thank you for the update! Cheers, tony signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: New here, NatTable repository push to master

On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:16:51AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 02:31:45PM +0200, Vincent Prat wrote: > > Le 17/08/2019 à 13:52, Geert Stappers a écrit : > > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 01:34:43PM +0200, Vincent Prat wrote: > > ... > > > > Now I get the following error when

Re: Java 8 and 11 quarterly release tags

On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 01:51:17PM +0100, Martijn Verburg wrote: > Hi all, > > I've updated the info below - happy building! > > On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 23:44, Martijn Verburg > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > For this quarterly release the tags are: > > > > *Java 8 (all non-aarch64)* > > > > *

Re: jTDS driver horribly out of date

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 11:23:39PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:55:59PM +, Ryan Morillo wrote: > > Hi guys, > > The jTDS driver has been at version 1.3.1 for a few years and we still > > have 1.2.5 in the testing repo (libjtds-java) Can we get the

Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates

On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 09:47:13PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 24.05.19 20:29, Martijn Verburg wrote: > > On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 15:40, tony mancill wrote: > > > >> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:58:14PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > >>> Le 23/05/2

Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates

On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 12:45:15AM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Thu, 23 May 2019, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > > than 11.0.3+7, or patch the existing version. Since testing is currently > > frozen and difficult to update until the release of Buster, it leaves > > only the patch solution. > >

Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:58:14PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 23/05/2019 à 19:04, Martijn Verburg a écrit : > > > What was the difficulty in grabbing the 11.0.3+7 tag directly? > > The difficulty is the policy that applies to backported packages. A > package that is backported from the

Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:24:03PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 22/05/2019 à 06:17, tony mancill a écrit : > > > For stable backports and buster, I agree that we should upload an > > 11.0.3-ga package, particularly given the vulnerabilities still present > > in 11.0

Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 03:15:13PM +0200, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: > On 5/20/19 3:08 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > Le 20/05/2019 à 14:38, Aleksey Shipilev a écrit : > > > >> Yes. Security fixes and Japanese epoch changes are delivered in 11.0.3+7, > >> after security embargo was > >> lifted. The

Re: Javadoc -link makes broken links if module name matches package name

On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 05:48:30PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > Am 17.02.19 um 16:45 schrieb Ingo Bauersachs: > > Tony, Markus > > > >> [...] > >> Any thoughts on whether we should focus on fixing javadoc generation or > >> look at other ways to mitigate the FTBFS? > > > > I've

Re: Javadoc -link makes broken links if module name matches package name

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 08:22:14PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > Am 15.02.19 um 15:42 schrieb tony mancill: > [...] > > Any thoughts on whether we should focus on fixing javadoc generation or > > look at other ways to mitigate the FTBFS? > > Like burning all those -doc

Re: Javadoc -link makes broken links if module name matches package name

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:07:34PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > Hi, > > Am 26.01.19 um 20:07 schrieb tony mancill: > [...] > > I'm trying to peel the onion and believe that this is a problem in the > > maven-javadoc-plugin package. I found the same issue for a proje

Re: Buster soft freeze question

On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 04:24:02PM +0100, Felix Natter wrote: > Markus Koschany writes: > > > Hi, > > hello Markus, > hello Tony, > > > Am 30.01.19 um 20:55 schrieb Felix Natter: > >> hi Debian-java, > >> > >> I would like to get freeplane-1.7.5-1 into buster, because it contains > >>

Re: How to replace javax.xml.bind in milib

On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 12:25:35AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Tony, > > On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 10:52:46AM -0800, tony mancill wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 11:11:36AM +0100, Andreas Tille wro

Re: Javadoc -link makes broken links if module name matches package name

Hi Ole, On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 08:50:29PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > on a number of packages, javadoc now fails, which is reported by a > number of bugs. Since you mentioned that this is not a bug in the JDK, > could you give a hint what the problem is? The error message is

Re: How to replace javax.xml.bind in milib

On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 11:11:36AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Tony, > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 08:23:55PM -0800, tony mancill wrote: > > I recently patched the jhove package for a similar issue, > > ... > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/debian/patches/jh

Re: Bug#917655: biojava4-live: FTBFS (cannot find symbol JAXBContext)

l on the classpath while running tests. Attached are a set of commits that let the package build for me locally. Cheers, tony From f8f5c72b866718e05811b33f8445ee311228da12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: tony mancill Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 20:17:27 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add build-dep o

Re: Bug#917576: stegosuite: depends on libswt-gtk2 which is no longer built

owner -1 tmanc...@debian.org thanks On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 04:40:24PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Source: stegosuite > Version: 0.8.0-1 > Severity: serious > > stegosuite depends on libswt-gtk2-4-jni but that package is no longer > built by swt4-gtk. > > Please switch to using

Re: Please sponsor Freeplane fix

On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 09:28:04AM +0100, Felix Natter wrote: > hello debian-java, > > I have a trivial bug fix for a Freeplane FTBFS (thanks to Emmanuel for > the maven.rules hint!): > > freeplane (1.7.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium > > * Add maven rule for pulling

Re: Please sponsor freeplane-1.7.2

On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 07:10:15PM +0100, Felix Natter wrote: > hello Debian-java, > > there is a new major release of freeplane (1.7.2), which among many > other things has an API layer and full support for Java11. Hi Felix, Built, tagged, and uploaded - thank you for your contribution!

Re: OpenJDK 8u191 ready for upload but it needs jtreg fix

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 01:57:56AM -0200, Tiago Daitx wrote: > Hi, > > I have prepared an openjdk-8 update to 8u191, which will fix bugs > 911925 [1] and 911847 [2]. Hi Tiago, I haven't done many uploads of openjdk, so I don't know if the following lintian errors are expected or not: E:

Re: OpenJDK 8u191 ready for upload but it needs jtreg fix

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 01:57:56AM -0200, Tiago Daitx wrote: > Hi, > > I have prepared an openjdk-8 update to 8u191, which will fix bugs > 911925 [1] and 911847 [2]. > > Before this upload is done it would be very good to have the fix for > jtreg's bug 913853 [3] in place. Uploaded. Thank you

Re: Importing new pristine tar into git ?

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 03:58:32PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 02:20:49PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > > > gbp import-orig ../fop_2.3.orig.tar.gz > > Please add --pristine-tar to update pristine-tar branch. You can also add this to your ~/.gbp.conf file. I do

Re: jh_exec strangeness : doing chmod -x?

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 12:10:50AM +0200, Alexandre Rossi wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not familiar with perl but the rewrite[1] of jh_exec reads "chmod > -x" while the tool is expected to make some jars executable. My > debhelper log shows "chmod -x" while I would expect "chmod +x". > > [1] >

Re: Fwd: Bug#910327: RFS: javapoet/1.11.1-1 [ITP]

Hello Miroslav, Thank you for packaging javapoet. I was looking at doing this as a dependency for some of the OpenHFT libraries. One minor change I think we need to make to debian/copyright is to explicitly list the files that have Google and not Square as the copyright holder, but otherwise

Re: Please sponsor freeplane-1.6.15-1

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 07:47:25PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote: > hello debian-java, > > there is a minor update for freeplane (among others export fixes): > > freeplane (1.6.15-1) unstable; urgency=medium Hi Felix, Uploaded and tagged in the repo... Cheers, tony signature.asc Description:

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >