Bug#427357: linux-source-2.6.21-4: module psmouse.ko gives segmentation fault

2007-06-04 Thread richard
Package: linux-source-2.6.21-4 for amd64 Severity: normal mouse driver selected as a module for kernel build via xconfig|make-kpkg When logged into gdm the cursor is not activated by the mouse. lsmod shows that the module psmouse is not loaded running # insmod ./psmouse.ko gives segmentation

Bug#427438: yair-0.0.12-10: Fails to build linux-image-2.6.18-4-k7

2007-06-04 Thread Jay Kumar
Package: yair-0.0.12-10 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-rc3-k7

Processed: Re: Bug#427381: Random pixels - not chars - in Console display

2007-06-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 427357 linux-2.6 Bug#427357: linux-source-2.6.21-4: module psmouse.ko gives segmentation fault Warning: Unknown package 'linux-source-2.6.21-4' Warning: Unknown package 'for' Warning: Unknown package 'amd64' Bug reassigned from package

linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-13lenny1_alpha.changes ACCEPTED

2007-06-04 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: linux-headers-2.6.18-5-all-alpha_2.6.18.dfsg.1-13lenny1_alpha.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.18-5-all-alpha_2.6.18.dfsg.1-13lenny1_alpha.deb linux-headers-2.6.18-5-all_2.6.18.dfsg.1-13lenny1_alpha.deb to

Processing of linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.18-7+etch3_sparc.changes

2007-06-04 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.18-7+etch3_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.18-7+etch3.dsc linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.18-7+etch3.tar.gz redhat-cluster-modules-2.6.18-5-sparc32_2.6.18+1.03.00-7+etch3_sparc.deb

Processing of linux-modules-contrib-2.6_2.6.18-4+etch2_sparc.changes

2007-06-04 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-modules-contrib-2.6_2.6.18-4+etch2_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-modules-contrib-2.6_2.6.18-4+etch2.dsc linux-modules-contrib-2.6_2.6.18-4+etch2.tar.gz ivtv-modules-2.6.18-5-sparc32_2.6.18+0.8.2-4+etch2_sparc.deb

linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.18-7+etch3_sparc.changes is NEW

2007-06-04 Thread Debian Installer
linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.18-7+etch3.dsc to pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.18-7+etch3.dsc linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.18-7+etch3.tar.gz to pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.18-7+etch3.tar.gz

linux-modules-contrib-2.6_2.6.18-4+etch2_sparc.changes is NEW

2007-06-04 Thread Debian Installer
ivtv-modules-2.6-sparc32_2.6.18-4+etch2_sparc.deb to pool/contrib/l/linux-modules-contrib-2.6/ivtv-modules-2.6-sparc32_2.6.18-4+etch2_sparc.deb ivtv-modules-2.6-sparc64-smp_2.6.18-4+etch2_sparc.deb to

Bug#427514: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64: System does not boot with 2.6.21-4

2007-06-04 Thread Jack Malmostoso
Subject: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64: System does not boot with 2.6.21-4 Package: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64 Version: 2.6.21-5~snapshot.8808 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system *** Please type your report below this line *** Hi there, since I have installed 2.6.21-4 from

Bug#427514: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64: System does not boot with 2.6.21-4

2007-06-04 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 06:55:14PM +0200, Jack Malmostoso wrote: Hi there, since I have installed 2.6.21-4 from unstable I cannot boot my system anymore. First my configuration: an Asus A8N-E (nforce4) motherboard with two SATA disks. The disks are configured in a software RAID1 using

Processed: severity of 427514 is normal

2007-06-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 severity 427514 normal Bug#427514: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64: System does not boot with 2.6.21-4 Severity set to `normal' from `critical' End of message, stopping processing here.

Processed: Re: Bug#427518: fuse-utils: kernel oops when reinstalling

2007-06-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 427518 kernel Bug#427518: fuse-utils: kernel oops when reinstalling Bug reassigned from package `fuse-utils' to `kernel'. tags 427518 patch Bug#427518: fuse-utils: kernel oops when reinstalling There were no tags set. Tags added: patch

Bug#427514: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64: System does not boot with 2.6.21-4

2007-06-04 Thread maximilian attems
hello jack, please keep the bug report on cc for future mails, thanks. On Mon, 04 Jun 2007, Jack Malmostoso wrote: On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 19:12 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: please post the output for check: cat /etc/fstab cat /proc/mdstat cat /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf Hi Maximilian,

Bug#427514: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64: System does not boot with 2.6.21-4

2007-06-04 Thread Jack Malmostoso
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 19:12 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: please post the output for check: cat /etc/fstab cat /proc/mdstat cat /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf Hi Maximilian, thanks for the quick answer! Here's the output you asked for: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/fstab # /etc/fstab: static file

turning on CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL for 2.6.22

2007-06-04 Thread maximilian attems
i'm about to shortly enable CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL on topconfig: * default for smp kernels * not much left that relies on lock_kernel(), unlock_kernel() * good debug infrastructure if that path triggers a bug * no overhead * set in fedora -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

changing maintainer field

2007-06-04 Thread maximilian attems
heya, can the Maintainer field be changed to the newly added -maint list address so that ususal discussion end in debian-kernel. i just read fedora-kernel and it was nice to follow and easy to read - as not flooded by all bug reports. what where the args against it appart from pure inertia? i'd

Bug#426738: linux-image-2.6.21-1-686: soft lockup

2007-06-04 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 31 May 2007 16:59:42 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: Since the upgrade to 2.6.21 my laptop (Thinkpad R60e) freezes every other minute please checkout trunk builds for 2.6.22-rc3 it has more timer fixes. Nope, I still have freezes of the keyboard/mouse with 2.6.22-rc3-686; and

Bug#426738: linux-image-2.6.21-1-686: soft lockup

2007-06-04 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:36:11PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: Trial and error lead me to booting with clocksource=acpi_pm - that seems to work around the problem in both 2.6.22-rc3 and 2.6.21-4 (the idea was from http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8582) ok cool! what's the dmesg

Re: changing maintainer field

2007-06-04 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:23:16PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: heya, can the Maintainer field be changed to the newly added -maint list address so that ususal discussion end in debian-kernel. i just read fedora-kernel and it was nice to follow and easy to read - as not flooded by all

reenabling sparc32 for 2.6.22

2007-06-04 Thread maximilian attems
thanks to kylem for fixing the failure upstream. afaik the sparc porter and the release team haven't made any decision concerning sparc32 for lenny. so i think it is only logical to reenable it. regards -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

Re: changing maintainer field

2007-06-04 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 04 June 2007 23:42, maximilian attems wrote: what where the args against it appart from pure inertia? Note that you'll probably lose me as someone who occasionally helps reply to bugs as I doubt I'll want to be subscribed to two separate kernel lists. I suspect this will be true for

Bug#426738: linux-image-2.6.21-1-686: soft lockup

2007-06-04 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 23:41:26 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: Trial and error lead me to booting with clocksource=acpi_pm - that seems to work around the problem in both 2.6.22-rc3 and 2.6.21-4 (the idea was from http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8582) ok cool! Yup :) what's

Re: changing maintainer field

2007-06-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:13:19AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: On Monday 04 June 2007 23:42, maximilian attems wrote: what where the args against it appart from pure inertia? Note that you'll probably lose me as someone who occasionally helps reply to bugs as I doubt I'll want to be subscribed

linux-modules-contrib-2.6_2.6.18-4+etch2_sparc.changes ACCEPTED

2007-06-04 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: ivtv-modules-2.6-sparc32_2.6.18-4+etch2_sparc.deb to pool/contrib/l/linux-modules-contrib-2.6/ivtv-modules-2.6-sparc32_2.6.18-4+etch2_sparc.deb ivtv-modules-2.6-sparc64-smp_2.6.18-4+etch2_sparc.deb to

FIREWIRE on 2.6.22

2007-06-04 Thread maximilian attems
the new stack is waiting to get enabled on topconfig: CONFIG_FIREWIRE=m # CONFIG_IEEE1394 is not set downside no ETH1394 support yet. but i guess more user are confused by it than anyone actually using it. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#427574: linux-image-2.6.21-1-686: quickcam_messenger driver does not work

2007-06-04 Thread René-Louis EYMARD
Package: linux-image-2.6.21-1-686 Version: 2.6.21-4 Severity: normal when I plug my webcam quickcam messenger and try to use it (with xawtv for example), all I get is a blank screen. The cam works perfectly with the previous version of the kernel (2.6.18-4) -- Package-specific info: -- System

Re: changing maintainer field

2007-06-04 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:13:19AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: On Monday 04 June 2007 23:42, maximilian attems wrote: what where the args against it appart from pure inertia? Note that you'll probably lose me as someone who occasionally helps reply to bugs as I doubt I'll want to be

Re: changing maintainer field

2007-06-04 Thread dann frazier
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:13:19AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: On Monday 04 June 2007 23:42, maximilian attems wrote: what where the args against it appart from pure inertia? Note that you'll probably lose me as someone who occasionally helps reply to bugs as I doubt I'll want to be