With TrueCrypt 5.x comes the new License version 2.4:
TrueCrypt License Version 2.4
I. Definitions
1. This Product means the work (including, but not limited to, source
code,
graphics, texts, and accompanying files) made available under and
governed by
this version of this license (License),
On Jan 28, 2008 12:05 AM, MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we have named Firefux the modified version of Firefox, I doubt the
Mozilla foundation would have let that pass.
There's various other reasons for that and it wouldn't have been covered
by a prohibition on calling it Firefox or
John Halton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 28, 2008 12:05 AM, MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we have named Firefux the modified version of Firefox, I doubt the
Mozilla foundation would have let that pass.
There's various other reasons for that and it wouldn't have been covered
by
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le mercredi 16 janvier 2008 =C3=A0 14:55 +, MJ Ray a =C3=A9crit :
Where? The naming rights asserted above seem much broader than what a
trademark allows. Trademarks have many limitations.
If we have named Firefux the modified version of
Hi all people, I new on this list and I am
also interesting in this problem with the
license of TrueCrypt.
Maybe it can help to know that in Mandriva
distribution, somebody has packed TrueCrypt
with another name: RealCrypt and it has made
it available in their contrib/backports
repositories.
Le mercredi 16 janvier 2008 à 14:55 +, MJ Ray a écrit :
We have allowed exactly the same conditions by using software with
trademarked names.
Where? The naming rights asserted above seem much broader than what a
trademark allows. Trademarks have many limitations.
If we have named
Le lundi 14 janvier 2008 à 22:50 +0100, Francesco Poli a écrit :
a. The name of Your Product (or of Your modified version of This
Product)
must not contain the name TrueCrypt (for example, the following names
are
not allowed: TrueCrypt, TrueCrypt+, TrueCrypt Professional,
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le lundi 14 janvier 2008 =E0 22:50 +0100, Francesco Poli a =E9crit :
a. The name of Your Product (or of Your modified version of This Pr=
oduct)
must not contain the name TrueCrypt (for example, the following nam=
es are
not
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:15:49 +0100 Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 14 janvier 2008 à 22:50 +0100, Francesco Poli a écrit :
a. The name of Your Product (or of Your modified version of This
Product)
must not contain the name TrueCrypt (for example, the following names
are
Ken Arromdee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, the clause doesn't keep you from performing fair use. It can't.
Aside: note that there is no global standard for what level of 'fair use' is
permitted and so it cannot be relied on.
[...]
This should, however, make the program non-free. A
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
IV. Disclaimer of Warranties and Liabilities; Indemnification
[...]
4. You shall indemnify, defend and hold all (co)authors of This Product,
their
agents and associates, and applicable copyright/trademark owners,
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:27:57 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
The plain text version of the licence may be found at
http://www.truecrypt.org/docs/License.txt
and is pasted below in its entirety.
My comments follow.
As usual I would like to draw your attention on my disclaimers, that is
to
Måns Rullgård schrieb:
Patrick Matthäi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I wanted to package maybe truecrypt for Debian.
There was an older discussion on l.d.legal for an older version of the
TrueCrypt license, where the most developers said, that it is not
distributeable.
But as I know
Hi,
Wow, that's a lot of license text. There are multiple bits in these
licenses that I don't like.
TrueCrypt License Version 2.3
[...]
II. Terms and Conditions for Use, Reproduction, and Distribution
1. You [must] ensure that all the legal notices and
documents (containing, e.g., the
Patrick Matthäi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Måns Rullgård schrieb:
Patrick Matthäi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I wanted to package maybe truecrypt for Debian.
There was an older discussion on l.d.legal for an older version of the
TrueCrypt license, where the most developers said, that
Iain Nicol [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
VI. General Terms
1. You may not use, modify, reproduce, derive from, (re)distribute, or
sublicense This Product, or portion(s) thereof, except as expressly
provided under this License. Any attempt (even if permitted by
applicable law) otherwise to use,
On sam, 2008-01-12 at 20:27 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
The plain text version of the licence may be found at
http://www.truecrypt.org/docs/License.txt
and is pasted below in its entirety.
Thanks.
Summary:
* I think this software is fine for main if we package it the
iceweasel
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Måns Rullgård wrote:
1. You may not use, modify, reproduce, derive from, (re)distribute, or
sublicense This Product, or portion(s) thereof, except as expressly
provided under this License. Any attempt (even if permitted by
applicable law) otherwise to use, modify,
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:33:22 +0100 Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Hello,
Hi!
I wanted to package maybe truecrypt for Debian.
There was an older discussion on l.d.legal for an older version of the
TrueCrypt license, where the most developers said, that it is not
distributeable.
You're probably
Patrick Matthäi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I wanted to package maybe truecrypt for Debian.
There was an older discussion on l.d.legal for an older version of the
TrueCrypt license, where the most developers said, that it is not
distributeable.
But as I know TrueCrypt has modified
20 matches
Mail list logo
