the best place for it in
the long run.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-license
W: kdelibs-data: extra-license-file usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/common/gpl-license
W: kdelibs-data: extra-license-file
usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/common/lgpl-license
You could make them symlinks to common-licenses. That's probably what I'd
do.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED
Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thursday 3 January 2008 01:16, Russ Allbery wrote:
http://lintian.debian.org/reports-testing/
This looks good in general, it's a clear improvement over what we have.
Thanks!
* The HTML pages are now templatized (using Text::Template
tim hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russ Allbery wrote:
If you want to take a look at how good (or bad) the templates look, the
ones that generated those pages are in:
/org/lintian.debian.org/lintian-test/reporting/templates
on gluck.d.o.
Not being a DD, I probably can't access
their opinion. I'm happy to
modify lintian to match if needed.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
will get a more specific warning
a few lines down for being an old-style binary-NMU version number.
Thanks!
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. Is python-dev the problem or
python-setuptools? (pycha doesn't appear to be in the archive, so I can't
easily check myself.)
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
python-setuptools, I found another package in
the archive with this problem and it should now be fixed for the next
release.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
information?
I'm going to completely overhaul how script dependencies are handled to
try to lift more of the logic into data instead of code, and I'll fix this
at the same time.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On lördagen den 5 januari 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
There are no scripts that would be compatible with multiple versions of
Pike?
Hmmm ... well, there probably exist such scripts, but they'd
(theoretically) have to be able to work with all packages
in keeping this lintian
warning.
Agreed, and removed for the next release.
That tag was added in the very first set of debconf checks in 2001-02-14.
I'm guessing that the capabilities of debconf have passed it by.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle
something or missed some additional false positive, and I expect we'll
need several releases close together to clean up the fallout.
Uploaders support for lintian.d.o, watch file checking, the man page groff
warning discussion, and a few other things will have to wait for a later
release.
--
Russ Allbery
from the cron packages themselves.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russ Allbery wrote:
it would save me time if you could also add a new test case for any patch
that introduces a new tag.
Revised patch with testcases attached.
For this tag, I think we also want to exclude files named .placeholder
(maybe any files
Chris Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Attaching revised patch with testcases.
Looks great. Thank you!
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
of the test cases in lintian's test suite, so
I'm pretty sure it works in general. lintian's script checking logic
already does implement pretty much exactly what you describe. As Chris
says, we'll need to see the specific problem that triggered this.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http
to specify the syntax. We don't have any other
reference document that tries to document all of the Debian package
control fields.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for:
^include\s*/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/ant.mk
in debian/rules, and it looks like that's the problem and it should be
class/ant.mk instead. I'll fix this for the next release of lintian.
Thanks for the report!
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
in the lintian check that if it's not scriptable for some reason, they
should still provide a get-orig-source target that prints out an error and
then exits with status 2.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
the current behavior if -I
wasn't given, but if -I was given, add the number of info tags overridden
to the summary as well.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 11/01/2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
Chris Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not sure this is a bug, per se.
several-sonames-in-same-package is an info tag, whilst
package-name-doesnt-match-sonames is a warning tag. Thus, you
only override one
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
It's probably worth noting here that there's no specification for
either in Policy, so they really are unknown in that sense. That won't
stop me from adding them to Lintian's list, since we added
Dm-Upload
practice thing even if
it isn't used by software.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
I should also say that those should also be fixed IMO:
I: dpkg source: non-standard-arch-in-source-relation kfreebsd-i386
[build-depends: libselinux1-dev (= 1.28-4) [!hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386
!kfreebsd
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
It sounds like, from your analysis, that the verioned dependencies also
need to be permitted for Python (namely python2.4 | python2.4-dev |
python2.5 | python2.5-dev) and if that were added, that would resolve
shouldn't even
be running when the action isn't --check, which I'll fix.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
of their libraries into the
-dbg package instead of detached debugging symbols. I think this test
might give false positives for that case. (Or are such library builds not
seupposed to go into /usr/lib/debug?)
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle
probably change, were I maintaining the package.)
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
that Description is mandatory for all *.changes files,
which is why the lintian tag. However, I agree that Description doesn't
make much sense for source-only uploads, since there are no individual
package descriptions in that case to lift into it.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http
depend on tk.
Added.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sergei Golovan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 1/30/08, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sergei Golovan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These checks can't be sufficient anymore. There are two new packages
tcl8.5 (which includes /usr/bin/tclsh8.5) and tk8.5 (includes
/usr/bin/wish8.5) which can
if that would reach some other
conclusion.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
happy to change lintian accordingly.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
good internal procedures
for testing things and can fix this for our packages, but since the real
bug is in Perl, I think the average maintainer is best off just ignoring
it until the bug is fixed there.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle
the unicode
characters as two characters each.
Yup, it was indeed. Will be fixed in the next release.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(as odd as that might be)? We do run the
risk of missing cases where people put the statement on the same line as
an if statement or the like, but I think it makes sense to err on the side
of conservatism.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle
was proposing using:
'(?:^|\s+)echo\s+-e',# echo -e
'(?:^|\s+)exec\s+-[acl]',# exec -c/-l/-a name
'(?:^|\s+)let\s',# let ...
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
entirely correct. Sorry about that. I misread that
regex.
Hm, that's more aggressive than I expected, but since I've not gotten any
bug reports, I guess I'll leave it and see if anyone complains.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle
this particular correction from
the non-case-sensitive corrections (and fix the bug that caused it not to
recognize D-Bus).
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
or i18n
expert to tell me what to do.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, supposed to be optional. *sigh*. Fixed now.
It catches architecture restrictions to allow for perlapi-5.8.8 [i386].
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
-devpython2.4 is not a common package.
*heh*. Fixing now. I'll upload another version later today.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that all postinst scripts are shell scripts?
No, it was just expecting use and didn't know about require. I've taught
it about require and the fix will be in the bug-fix release of lintian
that will probably be uploaded this evening.
Thanks!
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-contains-* tags are a bit different). May not be
worth the effort, though.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in debhelper. Committing a fix in a
moment.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is sufficiently
useful to warrant the separation, I'm not sure. I considered merging them
when I restructured how the code worked and decided not to, but not for
any strong reasons.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
, as this line seems to satisfy all of the
requirements: copyright, date, holder. Is the check case-sensitive such
that it misses the all-caps COPYRIGHT?
Yes, sorry, my mistake. The check was supposed to be case-insensitive.
Will be fixed shortly.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED
metadata directory, so the
instructions for how to avoid them in diffs used for other files in the
source package wouldn't be accurate.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
in case
I'd not seen it. Will be there in the next release.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
couple of weeks since I won't have much time to work on lintian for that
time period.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
(C) 2007 Tom Patzig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Looks fine to me except that there is a CR involved.
It currently handles a date appearing in that situation but not (C)
followed by a date. That's a pretty simple fix; I'll add that for the
next version.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED
to me.
Going beyond that gets pretty hairy for possible false positives, but
README.Debian at least should be fine.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
for.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
negatives. I think it's better the
way that it is, once the case insensitivity is fixed and it's a bit more
accepting about (c) bits when there's an intervening newline.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
tomorrow.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
checking the watch file for version mangling as well, although there are
no watch files at all at present). I'd be happy to accept patches for
this.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
release). It moves backwards from Z to A and it's up to Fr,
so it shouldn't be too much longer.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
forms are
equivalent.
Added \s* after ; in the regex. Thanks!
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quoting Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access / on this server.
Apache/1.3.33 Server at lintian.debian.org Port 80
This works correctly now that the scan of the archive is finished.
OK, I
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quoting Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Rather than try to poke at it too much, I've just updated lintian to
the latest version on lintian.d.o and started a full archive run. It
should be fixed (with various other improvements in the reports
. That change has now also been made in lintian.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
things
like $((4 + 5)), and if the above is also okay, I'm not sure when this
would not be a false positive.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
is the best way of satisfying the first two requirements.
I'll clarify the long description to make it more obvious that this is a
Debian-specific requirement, not something required for a work to be
considered copyrighted.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org
?
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
). The benefit is really quite high, IMO.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with quoted
strings. I think the right thing to do here is to just bail if people use
quoted strings for the commands and assume they know what they're doing,
since more complex things may be going on than we can easily analyze.
I'll do this for the next release.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED
of
each line (to convert the format into what one would expect in a .changes
file presumably). The test needed to be adjusted for that.
Thanks!
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
into merging patches. I'd
welcome a patch implementing this feature (ideally with some test cases as
well).
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
now.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the future!
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
parameter in it.
Hm, I guess. Parsing desktop files and trying to verify things in them is
really hard due to the lack of standardization of desktop files, but this
looks reasonably self-contained.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
assertions. Thanks!
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 2008-03-02 at 21:18 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
[snipped tons of directories]
This looks rather unmaintainable from a lintian perspective unless
there's some (rarely-changing) standard that specifies those
directories. If I'm reading
to allow for that or not. I find the logic
dubious, but dpatch supports that mode of operation.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't know if we want to allow for that or not. I find the logic
dubious, but dpatch supports that mode of operation.
I have to admit that I consider using a patch system in this way to be a
bug. I
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.28
Severity: normal
Lintian produces a false possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl warning
for packages that are not GPL licensed, but contain the magic
/usr/share/common
Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But I agree a general warning is nice, though it should be easily
circumventable. (Though I guess it always is via renaming the patches
dir to something else).
Source lintian overrides also work.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED
for the host operating system?
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on what problem you're solving here and
what sort of package would contain files in those directories but be arch:
all?
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
. ldconfig
should have the chance to decide how to handle those libraries.
Oh. Hm. So replacing the /emul stuff.
Yeah, okay, I guess this makes sense. I'm not sure that this is the
direction Debian is going to go, but I also don't see the harm in making
these changes to lintian.
--
Russ Allbery
it, please
+++---+++
but you might want some better english for it :)
Wow, there's a fascinating selection of stuff in the archive that installs
files under there. I particularly like dart-server.
Will do. Thanks!
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle
the base-passwd package and verify that all users
match the corresponding UIDs, groups match their corresponding GIDs, and
verify that any UID or GID or owner or group is one of the reserved ones.
This would probably be a good idea, but I don't have time to implement it
at the moment.
--
Russ
);
#check for sect: games but nothing in /usr/games. Check for any binary to
(A superfluous 0 at end of file won't trigger the original test.)
Sorry for this inconvenience.
Oh, no problem, and good catch. I'll fix that now.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http
in mind.
Anyway, the mail looks fine, please go ahead and post it to dda.
I'm just waiting for the complete archive run to finish so that the
uploaders information is there, and then I'll do that.
Thanks for the review!
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle
be missing some neat way of handling it, though
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
something weird is going on.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/Spelling.pm line 401.
Exiting subroutine via next at /home/adam/lintian/lib/Spelling.pm line 401.
(Spotted via having forgotten to unset LINTIANROOT after looking at
#469222 a couple of weeks ago :-)
Good catch. Thanks.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle
Hideki Yamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current version of this package doesn't give this warning, so
something must have changed. I gather you either just uploaded this or
haven't yet? I don't see it in the archive yet.
Just you get source
is
another possible difference; if that's it, I can check by running lintian
in a current sid environment this evening from home.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm afraid I don't. After getting the source and building it, I get the
same lintian output as I get with the binary package currently in the
archive, namely:
windlord:~/tmp lintian -I *.changes
W: tomoyo-ccstools: maintainer-script-empty preinst
W
a basic
system without any graphic environment.
The current stable release of Debian does not include the GPLv3 in
common-licenses. It will be included in base-files in that directory in
the next stable release of Debian (lenny).
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http
at build time, but I realize this is an ongoing debate and
that's far from the consensus at the moment. I think we're still trying
to feel out what Lintian's role should be here. I'd welcome any feedback
from other people reading the mailing list.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http
:
Last updated: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:11:15 +
Archive timestamp: Fri Mar 14 09:00:01 UTC 2008
The ftp.debian.org mirror on gluck is not updating properly, and therefore
lintian is still working from old packages.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The URL:http://lintian.debian.org/reports/tags.html page currently
show this:
init.d-script-missing-lsb-section (172 packages, 200 tags, plus 0
overrides)
It has shown the same number since 2008-03-13
Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Russ Allbery]
Looks like it updated today, so this should now be better, although it
may have missed some new packages that came in over the last few days.
(The package lists were updating when the actual packages were not.)
Great. Yes
and it will be removed from the
next Policy release. Please change the section.
Thanks for catching the incorrect long description of the tag. I'll fix
that.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
-never-seen file. BTW, how do you generate that file?
testset/runtests -v with some munging after the fact.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
usage properly. As both my English language skills and my perl
skills could be better, I'm not setting the patch tag.
Thank you very much for this. I'll try to get this merged for the next
release.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
301 - 400 of 2537 matches
Mail list logo
