Hi Andreas,
I finally found some time to push an autopkgtest for unicycler :) A bit of
rearrangement was also done in unicycler-data [1].
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 at 16:28 Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 01:37:37PM +0200, Liubov Chuprikova wrote:
> >
> > Instead of this, it is
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 03:23:15PM +0200, Liubov Chuprikova wrote:
>
> It is appered that pilon was missing jre in its dependencies and also it
> requires java-wrappers package. After the following changes I tested pilon
> by running unicycler's "Quick Usage" commands. It seems that everything
>
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 at 16:28 Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 01:37:37PM +0200, Liubov Chuprikova wrote:
> > I got
> > the following error:
> >
> > Error: Pilon was found (/usr/bin/pilon) but does not work - either fix
> it,
> > specify a different location using
чт, 27 сент. 2018 г., 16:28 Andreas Tille
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 01:37:37PM +0200, Liubov Chuprikova wrote:
> >
> > I decided not to use the same tests that we run during the package build
> in
> > autopkgtest suite since these tests do not check executables and their
> > implementation
Hi Liubov,
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 01:37:37PM +0200, Liubov Chuprikova wrote:
>
> I decided not to use the same tests that we run during the package build in
> autopkgtest suite since these tests do not check executables and their
> implementation requires additional useless code to be installed
Hi Andreas,
On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 at 13:21 Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 06:01:43PM +0200, Liubov Chuprikova wrote:
>
> > Should I try to implement the same tests as autopkgtest suite? If so, I
> > will have to put all required scripts and test data into the same or a
> > separate
On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 06:01:43PM +0200, Liubov Chuprikova wrote:
> > Tput is from package ncurses-bin. If it needs $TERM set may be it helps
> > to export xterm or vt100 in d/rules. I've checked codesearch
> >
> > https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=file%3Adebian%2Frules+TERM
> >
>
>
Dear Andreas,
I am sorry for too aggressive quoting in the previous message: after the
first quotation block there go other questions. Could you please answer
them too?
On Sat, 15 Sep 2018 at 23:42 Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Liubov,
>
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 06:01:43PM +0200, Liubov
Hi Liubov,
On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 06:01:43PM +0200, Liubov Chuprikova wrote:
>
> The one is regarding cpp_functions.so file that is renamed for some reason
> to cpp_functions.cpython-{version}-x86_64-linux-gnu.so during the build. I
> have just found that it is possible to override dh_python3
Hi Andreas,
Sorry for the delay in answering! I had some questions, but could not find
time to first explore them a bit.
The one is regarding cpp_functions.so file that is renamed for some reason
to cpp_functions.cpython-{version}-x86_64-linux-gnu.so during the build. I
have just found that it
Hi Liubov,
On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 01:36:10PM +0200, Liubov Chuprikova wrote:
> > In general I have no problem to skip tests in a
> > package. There can be different reasons for failing tests - sometimes
> > the test itself is wrong.
>
> The tests itself are definitely correct.
OK.
> > So if
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 at 21:37 Andreas Tille wrote:
> In general I have no problem to skip tests in a
> package. There can be different reasons for failing tests - sometimes
> the test itself is wrong.
The tests itself are definitely correct.
> So if we know why a test fails
Hi Liubov,
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 08:25:18PM +0200, Liubov Chuprikova wrote:
> I finally made some progress with unicycler (As you said it is mañana :D).
> A couple of tests still fails, but the reason does not seem to be in
> missing files as these tests just check running with --help option. I
13 matches
Mail list logo
