Hi Bas,
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 11:40:40PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
I also wonder whether there are specific rules for backports or whether
a simple upload is sufficient.
The most relevant difference is that the package needs to be built in an
up to date wheezy environment.
Jonathan Perry-Houts jonat...@invertedearth.net writes:
Forgive me if this has already been mentioned, but have you looked in to
plplot? There is a program that claims to assist in converting pgplot
dependencies to plplot for exactly this
purpose. http://pg2plplot.sourceforge.net/
I'll have a
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org writes:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Ole Streicher wrote:
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Ole Streicher wrote:
I am just looking for a solution for this problem...
It might be easier to port the software to something
Hi,
Quoting Eriberto (2014-08-29 17:08:37)
2014-08-29 12:02 GMT-03:00 Paul Wise p...@debian.org:
Please ask vmci upstream to remove the embedded copy of fuzzylite and
depend on the system version.
https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies
I thought about it too. This is the best
Il Lunedì 1 Settembre 2014 15:42, Tobias Frost t...@frost.de ha scritto:
Hi Tobias
Hi Gianfranco,
Yes, collab-maint would be indeed the best option and can be done after
the initial upload. So just remove VCS-* for now and re-add once
you've
decided how to go on.
Hi Johannes,
vcmi (GPL-2+) with fuzzylite (Apache 2.0) can't be distributed from
upstream. It is the problem. IMHO, you can't make a -dfsg version
because the source code is 'improper', can't be distributed. But, if
the upstream distribute the source code without fuzzylite 4, then you
can package
tags 760257 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Carl,
2014-09-02 0:54 GMT-03:00 Carl Suster c...@contraflo.ws:
I'm not sure if it's best to wait until that is accepted before
attempting to upload this new release? If the package got bumped to the
end of the queue then it probably won't have a chance of
Hi,
Quoting Eriberto (2014-09-02 13:52:11)
vcmi (GPL-2+) with fuzzylite (Apache 2.0) can't be distributed from upstream.
It is the problem. IMHO, you can't make a -dfsg version because the source
code is 'improper', can't be distributed.
These two emails suggest otherwise:
Hi Joseph.
Please:
1. d/changelog:
- Change from 'Add Joseph Bisch as maintainer (Closes: #735288)'
to 'New maintainer (Closes: #735288)'.
2. Remove all garbage: d/changelog.{BACKUP.21866, BASE.21866,
LOCAL.21866, REMOTE.21866}. These files are trash or references to
Ubuntu d/changelog.
3.
On Tue, 02 Sep 2014, Ole Streicher wrote:
The policy manual says (2.2.2):
| The contrib archive area contains supplemental packages intended to
| work with the Debian distribution, but which require software outside
| of the distribution to either build or function.
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org writes:
Sure. The bug #690282 is two years old. All I ask here is how this can
be changed, or what the effective way is to support all platforms
here -- especially for a DM without abusing his mentor.
It is not trivial to address this request.
It
tags -1 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Innocent.
Please,
1. d/compat: change to 9.
2. d/control:
- Explain me why the package depends of writer and draw to work.
- Please, create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can
use github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to
tags 752487 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Guo. I would like to sponsor your package.
I found a issue only. I didn't see your name and the upstream updated
dates in d/copyright. Please, fix it.
I have two questions:
1. What is the exact link to download the tarball?
2. If you are a DM, why you don't
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org, 2014-09-02, 11:56:
2. Move it to non-free and get it vetoed as auto-buildable (requires
that its license and the license of its non-free build-dependencies
allow his). This isn't really supposed to work, but AFAIK we trust
people will not abuse
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 05:43:15PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
It requires manually vetoing which packages from non-free are safe to
be used as contrib build dependencies (much like we manually veto what
packages from non-free can be autobuilt).
Why would we need to manually select them?
On Seg, 01 Set 2014, Eriberto Mota wrote:
1. d/changelog: add ACK for NMU. See details here[1].
I included the NMU changelog entry in debian/changelog (after my
changes), is something else necessary?
2. d/rules: please, update to new (reduced) format. Ask me if you have
doubts. An example
2014-09-02 15:16 GMT-03:00 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI edua...@kalinowski.com.br:
On Seg, 01 Set 2014, Eriberto Mota wrote:
1. d/changelog: add ACK for NMU. See details here[1].
I included the NMU changelog entry in debian/changelog (after my changes),
is something else necessary?
See an example
[removing the RFS bug from the CC list and putting d-mentors@ldo]
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br wrote:
2014-09-02 15:16 GMT-03:00 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI edua...@kalinowski.com.br:
On Seg, 01 Set 2014, Eriberto Mota wrote:
1. d/changelog: add ACK for NMU. See
Hi Eriberto,
I've now uploaded a new package to mentors.debian.net with nearly all
the issues fixed.
1. Changelog now contains one entry only
2. Fixed line break before column 80.
Added VCS-control pointing to branch on github where debian/
folder is kept. Vcs-Browser points to the correct
On Tue, 02 Sep 2014, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org, 2014-09-02, 11:56:
2. Move it to non-free and get it vetoed as auto-buildable
(requires that its license and the license of its non-free
build-dependencies allow his). This isn't really supposed to
work,
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 02:20:59PM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
We want to provide a binary distribution to our end users, and we want
to have best possible experience, right?
We want to provide a libre / *free* distribution to our end users.
Anything else is just tolerated / hosted.
Reviewing the last version. I will reply you in some moments...
2014-09-02 16:38 GMT-03:00 Ruben Undheim ruben.undh...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I added -b branch-name to the Vcs-Git-field and reuploaded the
source package, so you can forget what I wrote in #2.
Regards
Ruben
2014-09-02 20:34
Hi Eriberto,
Thanks for reviewing my package. I reuploaded it to mentors.d.n. I
also uploaded to a private git repository, because I don't have
access to collab-maint. See my notes below on your points.
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:25:06AM -0300, Eriberto Mota wrote:
Hi Joseph.
Please:
1.
Hi,
I added -b branch-name to the Vcs-Git-field and reuploaded the
source package, so you can forget what I wrote in #2.
Regards
Ruben
2014-09-02 20:34 GMT+02:00 Ruben Undheim ruben.undh...@gmail.com:
Hi Eriberto,
I've now uploaded a new package to mentors.debian.net with nearly all
the
Your message dated Tue, 2 Sep 2014 20:34:39 +0100
with message-id 20140902193438.ga24...@achilles.my.domain
and subject line Dropping xombrero package
has caused the Debian Bug report #757176,
regarding RFS: xombrero/2:1.6.3-1 -- Minimalist's web browser
to be marked as done.
This means that you
2014-09-02 15:34 GMT-03:00 Ruben Undheim ruben.undh...@gmail.com:
Hi Eriberto,
Hi!
2. Fixed line break before column 80.
Added VCS-control pointing to branch on github where debian/
folder is kept. Vcs-Browser points to the correct branch (debian) on
github, but I didn't get Vcs-Git to
2014-09-02 16:45 GMT-03:00 Joseph Bisch joseph.bi...@gmail.com:
Hi Eriberto,
Thanks for reviewing my package. I reuploaded it to mentors.d.n. I
also uploaded to a private git repository, because I don't have
access to collab-maint. See my notes below on your points.
You're welcome.
On
Hi Eriberto,
The Vcs-Git must be:
Vcs-Git: git://github.com/rubund/gnuais.git -b debian
Thanks. Have fixed this.
3. I've gone through all Copyright-lines in all the files and I hope I
have included all. However, after I put the licenses separately below,
a few lintian information
Hi Eriberto,
I made your changes. Is there anything else I should do?
Thanks,
Joseph
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
I've uploaded a new version to mentors.debian.net.
I hope that the copyright file is converging towards a correct version.
Regards,
Ruben
2014-09-02 23:09 GMT+02:00 Ruben Undheim ruben.undh...@gmail.com:
Hi Eriberto,
The Vcs-Git must be:
Vcs-Git: git://github.com/rubund/gnuais.git
Hi! I uploaded to Debian now.
Thanks a lot for your work.
Cheers,
Eriberto
2014-09-02 18:46 GMT-03:00 Joseph Bisch joseph.bi...@gmail.com:
Hi Eriberto,
I made your changes. Is there anything else I should do?
Thanks,
Joseph
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Your message dated Tue, 2 Sep 2014 20:35:55 -0300
with message-id
cap+dxjcajksrjxvghbeecnirzvmkzq5xljoytv7p7ud6zrx...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: Bug#760241: RFS: winetricks/0.0+20140818+svn1202-1 (ITA)
has caused the Debian Bug report #760241,
regarding RFS:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package acpi-call
* Package name: acpi-call
Version : 1.1.0-1
Upstream Author : Michal Kottman
* URL : https://github.com/mkottman/acpi_call
* License :
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org wrote:
tags 752487 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Guo. I would like to sponsor your package.
Thank you for being interested in this package!
I found a issue only. I didn't see your name and the upstream updated
dates in
34 matches
Mail list logo
