Bug#846556: RFS: h5py/2.6.0-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "h5py" * Package name: h5py Version : 2.6.0-2 Upstream Author : Andrew Colette * URL : http://www.h5py.org/ * License : BSD Section : python

Bug#846190: RFS: openldap/2.4.44+dfsg-2 [RC]

On 2 December 2016 at 05:52, Ryan Tandy wrote: > I updated the package on mentors to add one more fix: > > + * Fix slapd-smbk5pwd failing to upgrade when there are no instances of > the > +overlay configured. > > affecting jessie-to-stretch upgrades when the slapd-smbk5pwd

Bug#846553: RFS: dvtm/0.15-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dvtm" * Package name: dvtm Version : 0.15-2 Upstream Author : Marc Andre Tanner * Url : http://www.brain-dump.org/projects/dvtm * Licenses

Bug#846190: RFS: openldap/2.4.44+dfsg-2 [RC]

I updated the package on mentors to add one more fix: + * Fix slapd-smbk5pwd failing to upgrade when there are no instances of the +overlay configured. affecting jessie-to-stretch upgrades when the slapd-smbk5pwd package is installed, but not used anywhere in the slapd configuration.

Bug#846546: RFS: ora2pg/17.6-1 [RC] [QA]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Hello I'm looking for an sponsor for my QA upload to ora2pg it closes an RC bug I've improved the general shape of the package and moved the packaging to collab-maint The changelog follows ora2pg (17.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium * QA

Bug#845614: marked as done (RFS: acorn/4.0.3-1)

Your message dated Thu, 1 Dec 2016 21:57:44 + (UTC) with message-id <1188989895.59107.1480629464...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#845614: RFS: acorn/4.0.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #845614, regarding RFS: acorn/4.0.3-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#846347: marked as done (RFS: golang-github-elithrar-simple-scrypt/1.1+git20161119.3.2325946-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Thu, 1 Dec 2016 20:58:12 +0100 with message-id <2016-12-01t20-57...@devnull.michael-prokop.at> and subject line Re: Bug#846347: RFS: golang-github-elithrar-simple-scrypt/1.1+git20161119.3.2325946-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #846347, regarding RFS:

Bug#846346: marked as done (RFS: golang-github-restic-chunker/0.0~git20160919.0.bb2ecf9-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Thu, 1 Dec 2016 20:54:28 +0100 with message-id <2016-12-01t20-53...@devnull.michael-prokop.at> and subject line Re: Bug#846346: RFS: golang-github-restic-chunker/0.0_git20160919.0.bb2ecf9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #846346, regarding RFS:

Bug#842157: marked as done (RFS: php-db-dataobject/1.11.5-1 [ITP] -- PHP PEAR module for object based SQL query building)

Your message dated Thu, 1 Dec 2016 19:08:32 + (UTC) with message-id <54702572.7839442.1480619312...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#842157: RFS: php-db-dataobject/1.11.5-1 [ITP] -- PHP PEAR module for object based SQL query building has caused the Debian Bug report #842157, regarding

Bug#846511: RFS: pentobi/12.1-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pentobi". Package name: pentobi Version : 12.1-1 Upstream Author : Markus Enzenberger URL :http://pentobi.sourceforge.net/ License : GPL-3.0+ Section

Bug#842157: RFS: php-db-dataobject/1.11.5-1 [ITP] -- PHP PEAR module for object based SQL query building

> E php-script-but-no-phpX-cli-dep > usr/share/php/DB/DataObject/createTables.php > > please remove moreinfo tag with an explanation :) > > G. > Hi Gianfranco Costamagna, The lintain error 'php-script-but-no-phpX-cli-dep' is due to a bug[1] in lintain. The package already has a dependency on

Bug#842157: RFS: php-db-dataobject/1.11.5-1 [ITP] -- PHP PEAR module for object based SQL query building

> E php-script-but-no-phpX-cli-dep > usr/share/php/DB/DataObject/createTables.php > > please remove moreinfo tag with an explanation :) > > G. Hi Gianfranco Costamagna, The lintain error 'php-script-but-no-phpX-cli-dep' is due to a bug[1] in lintain. The package already has a dependency on

Re: Problems to import origtar with gbp import-orig (Was: ncbi-blast+ new upstream version git import merge error)

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:36:09PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > I tried to apply your hint to ncbi-tools6[1] but this does not change > anything: > > ncbi-tools6(master) $ LC_ALL=C git merge upstream/6.1.20120620 > Already up-to-date. > > Did I missinterpreted your hint? No, but you could check

Re: Problems to import origtar with gbp import-orig (Was: ncbi-blast+ new upstream version git import merge error)

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:35:01PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > > As there is not enough data in the message, I'm assuming it's about the > > published repo. > > The upstream/2.4.0 tag is not merged into master so the debian/2.4.0-* > > tags are not its descendants. This will not work properly.

Re: Problems to import origtar with gbp import-orig (Was: ncbi-blast+ new upstream version git import merge error)

On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 19:21:32 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > forwarding issue to debian-mentors > As there is not enough data in the message, I'm assuming it's about the > published repo. > The upstream/2.4.0 tag is not merged into master so the debian/2.4.0-* > tags are not its descendants.

Re: Problems to import origtar with gbp import-orig (Was: ncbi-blast+ new upstream version git import merge error)

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 07:21:32PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > As there is not enough data in the message, I'm assuming it's about the > published repo. > The upstream/2.4.0 tag is not merged into master so the debian/2.4.0-* > tags are not its descendants. This will not work properly. >

Re: Problems to import origtar with gbp import-orig (Was: ncbi-blast+ new upstream version git import merge error)

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 03:15:00PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > forwarding issue to debian-mentors As there is not enough data in the message, I'm assuming it's about the published repo. The upstream/2.4.0 tag is not merged into master so the debian/2.4.0-* tags are not its descendants.

Re: ncbi-tools6: How to write a watch file with version encoded in _ftp_ directory

Eriberto writes: > There are three problems here. Thanks for taking a look! > 1. The current FTP address is > ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/toolbox/ncbi_tools/old/, not > ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/toolbox/ncbi_tools/old. Hm? Either name is valid, and I'd say the variant

Problems to import origtar with gbp import-orig (Was: ncbi-blast+ new upstream version git import merge error)

Hi, forwarding issue to debian-mentors On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 01:37:04PM +, olivier sallou wrote: > HI, > I have updated (locally) patches for the new release of ncbi-blast+. > However I face an error during import of new sources in git: > > gbp import-orig --pristine-tar

Re: Watch file for rnahybrid: Is redirection to jsf page messing confusing uscan?

Hi Eriberto, On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:48:12AM -0200, Eriberto wrote: > > https://bibiserv2.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de/rnahybrid?id=rnahybrid_view_download > redirects to https://bibiserv2.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de/sessionTimeout.jsf, > that shows the following message: > > > ERROR - Session

Re: ncbi-tools6: How to write a watch file with version encoded in _ftp_ directory

Hi Eriberto, On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:01:56AM -0200, Eriberto wrote: > > Please, try the folowing structure: > > version=4 > opts="passive,uversionmangle=s|^|6.1.|" \ > http://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/toolbox/ncbi_tools/old/ (\d{8}[a-z]*)/ > > I hope this help. Thanks, this was extremly helpful

Re: Watch file for rnahybrid: Is redirection to jsf page messing confusing uscan?

Hi, 2016-12-01 10:56 GMT-02:00 Andreas Tille : > Hi, > > I was trying to rewrite the watch file for rnahybrid[1] as > > version=4 > https://bibiserv2.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de/rnahybrid?id=rnahybrid_view_download > .*/downloads/RNAhybrid-(\d[.\d]+)\.tar\.gz

Bug#846364: RFS: discover/2.1.2-7.1 [NMU]

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 10:52:11AM -0200, Fernando Seiti Furusato wrote: > Indeed. Curiously it works on ppc64el. I guess it's not ppc64el but the machine HW configuration. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: ncbi-tools6: How to write a watch file with version encoded in _ftp_ directory

Hi Andreas, 2016-12-01 9:15 GMT-02:00 Andreas Tille : > > I just noticed that there is a new upstream version of ncbi-tools6[1]. > The current d/watch file in Git[2] locks as: > > > version=3 > # Too bad uscan doesn't actually honor downloadurlmangle for FTP urls. :-/ > # [would

Watch file for rnahybrid: Is redirection to jsf page messing confusing uscan?

Hi, I was trying to rewrite the watch file for rnahybrid[1] as version=4 https://bibiserv2.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de/rnahybrid?id=rnahybrid_view_download .*/downloads/RNAhybrid-(\d[.\d]+)\.tar\.gz but I get $ uscan --verbose uscan info: uscan (version 2.16.8) See uscan(1) for help uscan

Bug#846364: RFS: discover/2.1.2-7.1 [NMU]

On 12/01/2016 05:34 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > I've built this package and installed it and `sudo discover` crashes. It > doesn't crash when installed from sid. > > (gdb) bt > #0 strlen () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/strlen.S:106 > #1 0x7747b1ce in

Bug#846480: RFS: mailfilter/0.8.6-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mailfilter" * Package name : mailfilter Version : 0.8.6-2 Upstream Author : Andreas Bauer * URL : http://mailfilter.sourceforge.net¬ *

ncbi-tools6: How to write a watch file with version encoded in _ftp_ directory

Hi, I just noticed that there is a new upstream version of ncbi-tools6[1]. The current d/watch file in Git[2] locks as: version=3 # Too bad uscan doesn't actually honor downloadurlmangle for FTP urls. :-/ # [would use downloadurlmangle="s|$|/ncbi.tar.gz|] opts="uversionmangle=s|^|6.1.|" \