On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Sebastien Badia wrote:
* URL : http://www.ripe.net/tools/
According to the upstream FTP site, asused has been 'decommissioned'.
I wonder if the package should be replaced in Debian by whatever
replaces it upstream?
ftp://ftp.ripe.net/tools/OLD/
--
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
This is my first package. Should I follow some special procedure? or
just rename the files and re-upload?
Since probably no-one has the old package name installed, just rename
everything, retitle the bug and re-upload.
I have
On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 02:37 +0100, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
I would have to fork the project, declare the SVGs the source, and then
convert them back to OpenType? That sounds like a lot of work. :-/
I definitely would not suggest forking the project but taking over
maintenance of the
On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 19:17 +0100, Felix Natter wrote:
I guess it is ok to simply do the repacking/reimporting with gbp
import-orig --filter ...?
What would the version number be: 1.2.23+dfsg1-1 or 1.2.23+dfsg1-3
(current version number is 1.2.23-2)?
I guess 1.2.23+dfsg1-1 is ok since:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Felix Natter wrote:
Freeplane (a package in pkg-java) uses a swf file for browsing exported
mindmaps. Now I need to distribute the source (see #736106), so I plan
to put it in a separate package freeplane-flash-browser.
Personally I would just delete the SWF
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:59 AM, L.C. Karssen wrote:
What I can't see is their exact error messages. This is because automake
by default runs tests in parallel and sends the output of the individual
tests to a file called test-suite.log. Is there a way to get access to
that file on the build
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Roman Valov wrote:
The problem is that on unix systems cmake generates shared
library with name libglfw.so.3 (libglfw.so intented to be put
into -dev package) and static library is built with api version
in its name: libglfw3.a
Sounds like a bug that should
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
* Add lintian override for debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature,
upstream doesn't provide signatures for verification.
The only time it is appropriate to override this tag is when you have
asked upstream to sign their tarballs and they
Ask upstream to remove the non-source files from their source tarball
and distribute binary packages for users who don't have the right
build tools.
If they don't want to do that the way I workaround this is:
Delete the files in debian/rules clean (usually just add them to debian/clean).
Delete
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
So I have got a problem, upstream has localization files in po/ directory.
When make is called, it traverses to po/ and also calls make, then .po files
change (they are updated with the current date) like in the example below.
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 12:08 PM, T o n g wrote:
Ok, so I read the manpage of dh_installdirs(1), which I included below.
But still how can I use it to create patch that I can send upstream to
support creating $DESTDIR/usr/bin and so on, as suggested by Paul?
The two topics are completely
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
Seems that different architectures have different symbols.
To me it doesn't look that simple, since the missing symbols are the
same on many arches. It seems like upstream is basing the
presence/absence of some public functions on what is
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Olе Streicher wrote:
This would be an option, as long as there is not complaint that an
arch-independent package should be generated identically regardless of
the architecture it is built on :-)
At some point we want the entire archive to be reproducibly
On Sat, 2013-12-28 at 20:58 +, Thomas Thurman wrote:
So sorry to have vanished.
No worries.
I've updated the plover packaging to (attempt to) address your concerns
raised in http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2013/06/msg00026.html .
Please could you take a further look when you have
On Mon, 2013-12-30 at 13:09 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Other issues:
In addition Jakub Wilk provided you some more stuff to look at here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710989#15
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Markus Hitter wrote:
1) Reducing the number of patches coming with the packaging to zero. If
something doesn't align, upstream should be fixed instead.
As do Debian:
http://www.debian.org/social_contract
2) Provide a one-stop script to GNUstep developers
Please don't take my mails as definitive answers, I'm just one of many
Debian contributors.
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Markus Hitter wrote:
Packaging is out of the scope of Debian? That's an unexpected response. :-)
You asked about automated packaging, which isn't something we do in
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Markus Hitter wrote:
Which trouble? I see only needs maintainer multiple times.
Lets see:
Woops, I sent the mail without finishing the list:
Many of the packages don't have complete debtags:
http
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 1:08 AM, T o n g wrote:
- Can I specify multiple Perl modules to cpan2dsc/dh-make-perl?
I tried that and it looks like no is the answer:
$ cpan2dsc Toadfarm ACL::Lite
== dh-make-perl 0.80 ==
cpan2dsc requires exactly one non-option argument at
Don't symlink the manual page, that isn't useful at all. Just ignore
the warning until you or upstream have written a useful manual page.
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 8:46 AM, T o n g wrote:
$(INSTALL) -m 644 file/dbab.addr $(etcdir)
This command installs the file /etc instead of putting
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 10:10 AM, T o n g wrote:
But how come the following get my files in the correct place?
$(INSTALL) -m 755 bin/dbab-get-list $(bindir)
$(INSTALL) -m 644 file/dbab-get-list.8 $(mandir)
This command creates bindir before putting files in it.
$(INSTALL) -m
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 11:00 AM, T o n g wrote:
- dpkg-source: error: cannot write /tmp/temp-lintian-lab-...
Something is wrong with your /tmp directory. It is probably either
full or has incorrect permissions.
- unknown substitution variable ${shlibs:Depends}
If you aren't packaging ELF
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Salvo Tomaselli
Do you think I should consider the patch or no?
Depends on the patch and the package, please include details when
asking questions.
I would suggest neither option; instead, fix the patch and then accept it.
--
bye,
pabs
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Robert Ames wrote:
1) Is the use of tempfile here correct? (is this properly secure / policy
compliant? should it be in /var/run? but /var/run requires permissions
issues)
The manual page for tempfile says that it is deprecated in favour of
mktemp. Otherwise
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:30 AM, Juhani Numminen wrote:
I can add this file, but are you aware of its uses other than to
“display bibliographic information about which academic article to
cite”? Also as pointed out earlier, DEP12 isn’t available.
The PTS points at it where the file is
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 7:47 AM, David Griffith wrote:
What am I missing?
Some documentation that may help:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/advanced.en.html#library
http://manpages.debian.org/man/0/dpkg-shlibdeps
http://manpages.debian.org/man/0/deb-shlibs
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Felix Natter wrote:
Unfortunately libjgoodies-forms-java 1.6 renames some classes so you
can't have a source code/patch that works with both 1.4 and 1.6...
Is there really no way to do #ifdef in Java?
I wonder if you could have two implementations and have ant
I would suggest contacting the Java list:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Juhani Numminen wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package pentobi.
Uploaded, thanks for taking care of the package.
Here are some things you might want to look at:
Please send upstream these links.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Andrew Shadura wrote:
Use lrelease tool. Please have a look at openrpt package, I used it there.
Please also ask upstream to drop the pre-built files from their
tarball and build them from source during the build process.
--
bye,
pabs
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Felix Natter wrote:
This is not possible for all patches. For instance, Freeplane also has a
Mageia linux package and so due to the lack of a recent Mageia
libjgoodies-forms-java package, we cannot update upstream to the new
libjgoodies-forms-java...
It is
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Felix Natter wrote:
The patches don't apply with line ending changes.
The best course of action appears to be to get your patches included
upstream and also ask them to stop exporting tarballs with Windows
line endings.
--
bye,
pabs
On Sat, 2013-11-16 at 13:40 +0100, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
Sorry, the package on mentors was still the old one. ( it wasn't
uploaded because of .upload file, and I somehow forgot to upload it
again after I deleted the .upload file)
Now I really uploaded the new one with the mentioned
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Jose G. López wrote:
I was looking for a solution and I saw that ubuntu uses build1 as version's
end name [0].
That is how they version rebuilds, in Debian we use something
different for that:
https://wiki.debian.org/binNMU
Is this aproach ok in debian?
A
Just a note on your style of reply. Not including blank lines around
your responses while also interleaving them with my mail makes your mail
really hard to read. You can also strip the parts of my mail that are
unnecessary for your mail.
On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 17:40 +0100, Alex Mestiashvili
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package authprogs
Since I may want to use this in the future, I've taken a look at it.
A review:
debian/copyright is incorrect, authprogs is GPL-2.0 not GPL-2.0+. If
you want it to be GPL-2.0+ you
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
This is already in progress -- no need to send more patches.
This was mainly a trick to get more people involved in lintian development :)
Good to hear it is in progress though.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
I tried to add gio here but configure fails when I'm doing so. Any idea
how to do this correctly?
Change the first instance to this:
PKG_CHECK_MODULES([GTK], [gtk+-2.0 = 2.12 glib-2.0 = 2.14 gio-2.0], , [
--
bye,
pabs
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
libtool: link: gcc ... -lX11 -ldbus-1 -ldbus-glib-1 -lgtk-x11-2.0
-lgdk-x11-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -pthread
,,,
Any ideas?
g_file_delete comes from -lgio-2.0, which is missing.
--
bye,
pabs
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
That seems obvious to me but I wonder whether this is not part of the
result of pkg-config ...
Neither of the uses of PKG_CHECK_MODULES include gio:
http://sources.debian.net/src/artha/1.0.2-1/configure.ac#L58
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
Do you know a license somehow similar in spirit than mine which I could
use?
It would be nice to have something that oblidges 'closed distributions' to
publish
at least their sources as required by some software in RHEL which is
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
Having modified my .dsc file by letting the files section be
autogenerated the upload still did not succeed. There must be some
other error in my package though it compiles without warnings at me.
Could anyone please have a look? I
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
This line in debian/control is completely invalid:
Section: System/X11/Utilities
I'm told that the mentors.debian.net software is now more forgiving
and will accept packages with invalid sections instead of crashing.
--
bye,
pabs
http
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Joseph Herlant wrote:
I've packaged an extension for gnome-shell, and I realized that the
version I packaged is only compatible with gnome-shell 3.4, so it will
only work with Debian testing and stable, but not unstable.
You will need to package a version that
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Joseph Herlant wrote:
So that means that I won't be able to have my package in testing
before gnome 3.8 gets in testing?
Correct.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
Having filed an ITP bug for xchroot as required (721447) and
uploaded xchroot-2.3.2-1 with the correct key to mentors.debian.net by
dput more than a day ago the package still has not appeared in my
personal folder at
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Florian Rothmaier wrote:
I'm an astro-physicist working for the Virtual Observatory project at
the University of Heidelberg.
Awesome!
What is the reason behind this issue?
It sounds like your prerm is missing the code needed to delete the
.pyc files. For
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Godfrey Chung wrote:
Please follow the steps from http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers.
In addition, since you are developing the software, please read our
upstream guide:
http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide
--
bye,
pabs
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Andrew Bakin wrote:
1) Should I be trying to use the build.sh script at all? If not, I need a
mechanism for copying some files in the deb package (a udev rule). I know I
can do this in debian/rules - more reading required.
If build.sh is the upstream supported
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Tong Sun wrote:
Is it OK to have compile warnings when building a package? If not,
It is fairly normal to have compile warnings since GCC gets stricter over time.
how can I fix the following:
dial.c: In function 'main':
dial.c:273:8: warning: ignoring
When asking questions about watch files, at minimum you should point
at the download page or website of the project you are asking about.
Otherwise we have no idea how to answer your question.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Pierre Blanc wrote:
It's a general question non specific to my package :)
Hmm, none of these work any longer:
http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=gitorious.org+path%3Adebian%2Fwatch
Unfortunately it appears that gitorious changed their code and now it
is
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
I think we're going to have to (as the Debian Python community? as the
broader Debian maintainer community?) come up with a unified approach to
dealing with the rapidly increasing tendency for upstream releases
bundling doing this.
Upstream
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
Since there is no list debian-l10n-japanese, I could
use some advice on how to find an authoritative statement
of an identifiable project member.
Apparently Japanese translation stuff happens on the debian-japanese list:
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Beco wrote:
After implementing the score (using SGID), I have a race condition in my game.
Please delete that code and revert to using per-user scores. Making it
setgid games just creates a source of vulnerabilities and is strongly
discouraged. Please follow the
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Tim Edwards wrote:
No, not yet. It should be a pretty straightforward set of packages to
include as it's really just a packaging of dictionaries generated by my
scripts available at https://github.com/tkedwards/wiktionarytodict
How are the dictionaries
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
On Debian, those high scores are usually stored in /var/games/X. The
file permissions allow a user from the group games to write the
file. See for example `monsterz`.
That usually requires the game to be setgid, which isn't worth the
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
per-user high-scores or
I forgot to mention that most computers these days (at least in rich
countries) are not multi-user so this isn't as big of an issue as it
would seem.
network service to share high scores
You need to ensure that both
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Vincent Prat wrote:
Thanks to both of you for the review.
As regards the repackaging of the orig.tar tarball, if I have correctly
understood, there are two solutions: do it by hand (and document it in
README.source) or do it automatically with a get-orig-source
I am not sure which version numbers you are referring to but the API
version number should be part of the .pc file name (for example GTK+
has gtk+-2.0.pc and gtk+-3.0.pc) but the ABI version number should not
be. The version number of the library is usually not the same as
either of the API/ABI
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Markus Koschany wrote:
- It is not 100% clear how you obtained the sources. The original
tarball is bz2 compressed. Yours is gz compressed. I suggest you switch
to xz compression in source/options and for the upstream tarball and
document modifications either
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Dominik George wrote:
Sorry to disapoint you, but you should read *all of* DPM before passing
a package for upload to a sponsor or to mentors.
I don't think we have never expected that new maintainers read policy
before creating a package. The Debian member who
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Martin Eberhard Schauer wrote:
today I found a package at (1) with
sug: xine [hppa]
Package not available message translated from German
xine does not seem to be available at all.
It appears to be renamed to xine-ui:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Dave Steele wrote:
I was curious about the current efficacy of the BTS-based RFS process,
and so created some charts[1] to provide visibility.
Interesting stuff, some thoughts...
If you plan to continue running these charts, please add some links to
them on
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Wookey wrote:
I expect most other devs are in a similar boat.
Indeed, your experience sounds fairly typical.
So, no real answers there, but I would appreciate some feedback on
just how much responsibility sponsors are expected to take. I assume
it's the same
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Tomasz Rybak wrote:
I am DM, I maintain PyCUDA and PyOpenCL which are in contrib
as they require non-free drivers to run software on GPU.
I got bug report #722014 about non-free example distributed
in examples/, in python-pyopencl-doc package.
Basically
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Zeno Rogue wrote:
Neon Corridor has agreed to compose music for HyperRogue, under the Creative
Commons BY-NC-ND 3.0 licence. Is this OK for Debian?
As mentioned by others it is not acceptable for Debian.
In addition it would be great if the music were as
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Jan-Pascal van Best wrote:
My problem is that upstream does not provide a single-step database
upgrade from the version in Wheezy to the current version. Normally
database upgrades are performed by running a PHP script (upgrade-db.php)
which uses a number of
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Albert Huang wrote:
However, TIGCC/GCC4TI is another problem, in that the tool is a heavily
patched outdated version of binutils/gcc, and that it has a very strange
developer environment in order to function. (Specifically, it relies on
shell scripts to
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
OK, something went wrong with the upload on my end, then. The tree I
was working from has them removed.
Thanks, uploaded. It will be in NEW waiting for ftpmaster checks soon.
Non-blocker and minor issues that would be good to fix at some
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fonts-klaudia-berenika/fonts-klaudia-berenika_2011-09-03-1.dsc
Unfortunately this still contains the sourceless PDFs so I guess the
package will be rejected by the FTPmasters.
--
bye,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Scott Leggett wrote:
This didn't work for me,
Hmm, it still works for me, are you sure?
the wiki[0]. Actually, the example has a bug where it looks for two
adjacent periods in the file name. I note that you were the last editor
of the page - maybe you could
Please read the devref section about reintroducing packages:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#reintroducing-pkgs
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
A new blocker:
The upstream website contains this text:
New! Jul 11 Transcriber has been superseded by TranscriberAG: see
http://transag.sourceforge.net/!
I wonder if it would be best to replace Transcriber with TranscriberAG
in Debian. TranscriberAG uses GTK+ and C++ instead of Tcl/Tk.
On
On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 10:27 +0200, Giulio Paci wrote:
In my opinion it is not:
Thanks for the explanation, seems reasonable to leave it for now.
BTW: if upstream doesn't respond to your patch requests, sourceforge now
has an abandoned project takeover process that you could use to get
access
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 03:04 +0200, chrysn wrote:
zeno (the hyperrogue author) has shown interest in pango sdl, but won't
convert on short term. (currently, there's no i18n either).
Cool, fair enough.
as i assume that fontconfig will do just that kind of fallbacks, i've
changed the depends
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:23 AM, chrysn wrote:
i've written a package for the hyperrogue game, and would like to ask
for sponsorship for this new package.
Here is a first-pass review:
About the fonts stuff; The best would be if the program used SDL Pango
instead or as an alternative to SDL
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:17 PM, chrysn wrote:
given that the game only displays its own static strings and usually
ships the font file, i'd assume upstream will stay with sdl ttf, but i
asked anyway.
The main advantage of fontconfig is not having to hard-code font
pathnames at build time nor
This is what I would do: add a script (or use the existing one for
your framework) to the package that the sysadmin can run that sets up
an instance of the app under a sysadmin-chosen URL with
sysadmin-chosen filesystem/database storage.
Some more links about this topic:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Sebastian Tramp wrote:
Unfortunately, webapps-common looks very unmaintained.
Sadly that is true, you might want to help out with it.
Unfortunately there is no discussion on how to reload the apache
configuration?
I guess the right thing here is to use
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Lucio Messina wrote:
Another question: If I want to put my package in the official repository
of Debian, what should I do?
http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers
An empty lintian output is enough?
That is a good idea but isn't officially required. Some
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Tong Sun wrote:
but googling on source: ancient-standards-version didn't give me much
helpful answer.
The first result is the lintian info for this warning:
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/ancient-standards-version.html
--
bye,
pabs
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
Please check the replacement of autoconf-gl-macros package
Pabs could you check if your pacakge built with this version ?
chromium-bsu builds just fine with the new macros from
autoconf-archive on Debian. I haven't tested this on other
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
CC: Paul Wise p...@debian.org
Firstly, please use X-Debbugs-CC instead of CC when reporting bugs:
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting#xcc
Please check the replacement of autoconf-gl-macros package
Pabs could you check if your
My guess is that the intersection between people who have upload
access, experience, time, interest in running an XMPP server, aren't
already running other XMPP server software and are reading this list
is close to zero.
Daniel Pocock has been blogging about XMPP, federated services and
other
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Please see:
http://clang.debian.net/
Also:
http://buildd-clang.debian.net/package.php
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Thomas Moulard wrote:
[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/visp.git;a=commitdiff;h=6994be42b1aa3e5d700187fd432a09abb4e542e4;hp=0361f28d746259e3131928c12786e90b7aace299
The first part of the patch is very wrong. You should override
Since upstream distributes the data in a separate source package, I
would suggest packaging it separately and then build-depending on the
data package. We have larger packages in the archive so the size isn't
a problem.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Thomas Moulard wrote:
Actually I think so too but I am a bit reluctant to process the
Doxygen documentation locally
then copy it into the package (mainly because it will easy to forget
updating the documentation).
If you are aware of a package that could
On Wed, 2013-06-12 at 03:10 +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
Which package contains such oui file? Is there any package shipping
generic oui files to be shared or is every package shipping just his own
oui file?
None yet, all packages that need it ship a copy of it, possibly in a
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
I'm not sure if beta versions are welcome on Debian or should be avoided
if possible. My understanding is that it should be avoided if possible.
The main thing is that packages uploaded to unstable are destined for
the next
On Sat, 2013-06-08 at 13:09 +0200, Julian Wollrath wrote:
Since for this powertop release it is too late to ask upstream to update
autotools, I added autotools-dev to the build-deps. But I will ask
them, to consider updating autotools for their next release, so that
the build-dep can be
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Dominik George wrote:
There are two issues I see with the package that I would like to get feedback
on:
- I had to remove test cases from upstream's build system
...
- Geierlein uses some JavaScript libraries that Debian does not (yet)
include.
...
I
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 1:50 AM, Julian Wollrath wrote:
W: powertop source: outdated-autotools-helper-file config.guess
2012-02-10
W: powertop source: outdated-autotools-helper-file config.sub 2012-02-10
But I do not know, what the best way, with cdbs as build system, would
be to get rid of
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Olе Streicher wrote:
In my package, I need two directories that have the permission
drwxrwxrwt: Users shall be able to create a subdirectory on their own
there: one is a cache area, and the other is a storage place.
I would suggest that you use the appropriate
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Thomas Thurman wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package plover.
As promised, here is a review...
There are some that I require to be fixed before I would upload this to Debian:
There is a security issue (DoS attack); on multi-user systems, any
user can
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:35 AM, linux at iocellnetworks wrote:
I guess I had my hopes a little bit high when I wrote to the list. I was
hoping for something more along the lines of a mentor as described on
Wikipedia: ... the personal name Mentor has been adopted in English as a
term meaning
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 10:49 AM, T o n g wrote:
Does it happen to you as well?
I'm using a desktop (GNOME) that starts a gpg agent before everything
else. I suggest you modify your login setup to do this and or check if
they already do that.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
Please include some details about the app.
Where does it normally place code?
Where does it normally place files modified by the web app?
How does it generate an apache config?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Anton Balashov wrote:
Like most of webapps, it expects all its dirs in /var/www :) But I should
put some dirs in /usr/share/pkg and some in /var/lib/pkg
It doesn't have its apache config.
So you will need to change the webapp to be more flexible about where
901 - 1000 of 2536 matches
Mail list logo
