e; urgency=medium
.
* Initial release. (Closes: #1071392)
Regards,
--
Shriram Ravindranathan
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
, just to make sure? This
dependency has been there since the very first commit
<https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gpscorrelate/-/commit/90989886253b1c293435f532f775868d191a4048>.
I have removed the dependency in the latest upload.
Thanking you,
--
Shriram Ravindranathan
OpenPGP_s
ated build-dep pkg-config with pkgconf
- Bump Standards-Version to 4.7.0
- Update maintainer name
Regards,
--
Shriram Ravindranathan
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ou please create these two repositories for me?
Thanking you,
--
Shriram Ravindranathan
OpenPGP_0xFC7E951A7BEF0836.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
13, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 12:52:03PM +0530, Shriram Ravindranathan wrote:
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/keep
This doesn't exist.
Regards,
--
Shriram Ravindranathan
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Initial release. (Closes: #1067928)
Regards,
--
Shriram Ravindranathan
OpenPGP_0xFC7E951A7BEF0836.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--:--:-- 401k
```
It seems like a few other packages are also having similar troubles with uscan, for
example lomiri <https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/lomiri>
Is there a way to fix this?
Regards,
--
Shriram Ravindranathan
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
d
* d/p/0001-install-pkgconfig-file-into-arch-indep-usr-share-pkg.patch:
+ Add Forwarded info to patch header
Regards,
--
Shriram Ravindranathan
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
for amd64.
--
Shriram Ravindranathan
OpenPGP_0xFC7E951A7BEF0836.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Dear Mentors,
Unfortunately, my SD card got corrupted (SD Card moment) and I do not
have access to a sid environment right now. Is there a way to
debootstrap a sid environment for packaging (from trixie perhaps) while
the time_t transition is going on?
Thanks,
--
Shriram Ravindranathan
create a repository under my own namespace or if the
package should be placed under the debian namespace.
Thank you,
--
Shriram Ravindranathan
OpenPGP_0xFC7E951A7BEF0836.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
: #1062785)
.
[Marriott NZ]
* d/planner.mime: Remove quoted placeholder from mailcap entry. Fixes
lintian warning (Closes: #987406)
Regards,
--
Shriram Ravindranathan
OpenPGP_0xFC7E951A7BEF0836.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
n.org/s20n>
Thanks,
--
Shriram Ravindranathan
OpenPGP_0xFC7E951A7BEF0836.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tanzas for newly added missing-sources
- Add d/p/0004-escape-groff-backslash.patch (Fixes groff syntax error
and lintian warning)
--
Shriram Ravindranathan
OpenPGP_0xFC7E951A7BEF0836.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
bastien wrote:
You should rebuilt from source also... See for instance how I do with node-long
--
Shriram Ravindranathan
ters
OpenPGP_0xFC7E951A7BEF0836.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
which the source is not available).
Soren
--
Shriram Ravindranathan
ters
OpenPGP_0xFC7E951A7BEF0836.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
source code to the d/missing-sources directory
I don't think either of these are viable options in my case. I was
wondering whether it would be okay to suppress these errors. Is there
any other way to solve this?
--
Shriram Ravindranathan
--
Shriram Ravindranathan
OpenPGP_0xFC7E951A7BEF0836
he d/missing-sources directory
I don't think either of these are viable options in my case. I was
wondering whether it would be okay to suppress these errors. Is there
any other way to solve this?
--
Shriram Ravindranathan
OpenPGP_0xFC7E951A7BEF0836.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Ope
Add debian/upstream/metadata
Regards,
--
Shriram Ravindranathan
OpenPGP_0xFC7E951A7BEF0836.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
want to work on a bug I’ve searched
for this and can’t find anything I don’t know if I was searching for the right
thing thanks
73,
Darren Tomblin KC9JJJ
--
Shriram Ravindranathan
OpenPGP_0xFC7E951A7BEF0836.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
w upstream release.
* New maintainer (Closes: #1050242)
* debian/control:
- Add new maintainer's name to maintainer field.
* debian/copyright:
- Add new maintainer to copyright field.
Regards,
--
Shriram Ravindranathan
OpenPGP_0xFC7E951A7BEF0836.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Dear Mentors,
I am packaging a C++ TUI library called FTXUI in which there's an
examples/ folder which I am installing to /usr/share/doc/ftxui-dev/examples/
One of these examples is for using the library with webassembly is a
HTML file that loads the JS version of xterm from a CDN.
I was
ncy=medium
.
* Initial release. (Closes: #1062434)
Regards,
Shriram Ravindranathan
OpenPGP_0xFC7E951A7BEF0836.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Dear Mentors,
I am packaging magic_enum, a header-only C++ library which uses CMake
with GNUInstallDirs. AFAIK the package should be arch-independent as
there is no architecture dependent code in it.
Here are the generated files:
debian/libmagicenum-dev
├── DEBIAN
│ ├── control
│ └──
Thank you, that seems to have resolved it. I changed it to arch:any and
multiarch:same.
On 11/11/2023 20:10, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 07:36:07PM +0530, Shriram Ravindranathan wrote:
dpkg-deb: building package 'libmagicenum-dev' in
'../libmagicenum-dev_0.9.3
I just realized that I misread the error message. My apologies. It seems
to be expecting all instead of arm64. So how might I build it for all?
On 11/11/23 7:36 pm, Shriram Ravindranathan wrote:
Dear Mentors,
I am trying to build a multiarch package (ITP #1055706) for debian on
a raspberry
Dear Mentors,
I am trying to build a multiarch package (ITP #1055706) for debian on a
raspberry pi. The package builds fine, however, there is a lintian error
like so:
*Output from *debuild*:*
dpkg-deb: building package 'libmagicenum-dev' in
'../libmagicenum-dev_0.9.3-1_all.deb'.
27 matches
Mail list logo