Re: How to package a library only used with LD_PRELOAD?

Hi Linus, On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:24:44 +0200, Linus Vanas wrote: > I've been working on packaging libstrangle: > https://salsa.debian.org/Huitsi/libstrangle > > The library is only meant to be used with LD_PRELOAD and not linked with > at build-time, but an upstream script assumes the lib is

Bug#944323: RFS: piper/0.3-1 [ITP] -- graphical frontend for libratbag

On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 14:47:41 +, Stephan Lachnit wrote: > > you need python3-dev in the build-dependencies instead of python3 > > (as-is, the package doesn’t build in a clean build chroot) > This give me the following lintian warning: > build-depends-on-python-dev-with-no-arch-any > >

Bug#944323: RFS: piper/0.3-1 [ITP] -- graphical frontend for libratbag

Hi Stephan, On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 10:32:25PM +0100, Stephan Lachnit wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "piper" I noticed a few of problems which need to be fixed: * you need python3-dev in the build-dependencies instead of python3 (as-is, the package doesn’t build in a clean

Bug#943730: marked as done (RFS: cowsay/3.03+dfsg2-7 [ITA] -- configurable talking cow)

On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:03:33 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 5:03 AM Stephen Kitt wrote: > > I’ve pushed that to the games-team repository, and tagged the release. > > Please register a guest account on Salsa if you don’t already have one: > > https://si

Bug#943730: RFS: cowsay/3.03+dfsg2-7 [ITA] -- configurable talking cow

Hi James, On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 07:18:45PM +0100, James McDonald wrote: > Changes since the last upload: > * New maintainer (closes: #910035) > * Fix lintian warning about spelling of 'balloons' in patch > * Add fox cow (closes: #888229) > * Bump Standards-Version to 4.4.1 > * Bump

Bug#882392: RFS: dmg2img/1.6.7-1 [ITA]

Hi Denys, On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 04:08:05AM +, Denys Berkovskyy wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dmg2img" Excellent, thanks for taking care of this! > Changes since the last upload: > * New upstream version 1.6.6 (Closes: #778827) > * New upstream version 1.6.7 > *

Bug#864208: RFS: libunistring/0.9.7-1 ITA

Hi Jörg, On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 12:00:41 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this > command: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libu/libunistring/libunistring_0.9.7-1.dsc Thanks for taking

Bug#804947: RFS: inform/6.31.1+dfsg-2

Hi Ben, On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 07:13:04 +1100, Ben Finney <ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > On 14-Nov-2015, Stephen Kitt wrote: > > On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 13:48:19 +1100, Ben Finney > > <ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > > > Now the pa

Bug#804947: RFS: inform/6.31.1+dfsg-2

so completely. Certainly migrating to the ‘dh’ > command is a medium-term goal. OK, that seems sensible to me. > On 13-Nov-2015, Stephen Kitt wrote: > > and with dpkg-buildpackage -A (which would be nice to have since the > > source package produces an arch-independent

Bug#804947: RFS: inform/6.31.1+dfsg-2

Control: owner -1 ! Hi, On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 20:44:40 +, James Cowgill wrote: > On Fri, 2015-11-13 at 16:36 +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > > Package: sponsorship-requests > > Severity: wishlist > > Control: tags 698980 + pending > > Control: block 698980 by -1 > > > > I

Bug#799813: RFS: snes9x [ITP] -- Cross-platform SNES emulator

Hi Sérgio, On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 18:44:23 -0300, Sérgio Benjamim wrote: > Looking for a sponsor for this package: > > * Package name : snes9x [...] > * License : non-free/non-commercial [...] > > It's worth to mention that Snes9x is more accurate than ZSNES

Bug#798057: ITP RFS: node-sprintf-js/1.0.3-1

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Salut Bastien, On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 00:17:01 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-sprintf-js" > > * Package name: node-sprintf-js >Version : 1.0.3-1 >

Re: dpkg-source: info: local changes detected and gbp:error: Cannot parse archive name

On Sun, 31 May 2015 22:54:58 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin w...@debian.org wrote: On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 05:03:29PM +0200, Marcin Dulak wrote: $ debuild -us -uc ... dpkg-source: info: building gpaw using existing ./gpaw_0.10.0.11364.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: info: local changes detected,

Bug#783277: RFS: gnome-exe-thumbnailer/0.9.3 [ITP]

Hi James, On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:52:13 -0700, James Lu glol...@hotmail.com wrote: Thanks for the response! I've uploaded a new version (0.9.3-1) via dput mentors, which fixes most of the problems you've mentioned. The site, however, doesn't seem to have updated the package page, so I'm not

Bug#783277: RFS: gnome-exe-thumbnailer/0.9.3 [ITP]

Hi again, Before I forget, it would be nice to get in touch with Scott Ritchie to let him know you're packaging this for Debian! You could ask him if there's an official upstream repo (the version of gnome-exe-thumbnailer in winezeug is very old). Regards, Stephen pgpdmolQ1r43B.pgp

Bug#783277: RFS: gnome-exe-thumbnailer/0.9.3 [ITP]

Control: owner 783277 ! Hi James, On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 17:52:29 -0700, James Lu glol...@hotmail.com wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package gnome-exe-thumbnailer * Package name: gnome-exe-thumbnailer Version : 0.9.3 Upstream Author : 2010-2012 Jan Nekvasil

Bug#778729: Try 2: Bug#778729: RFS: git-tools/1.0.0-1 [ITP]

On Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:57:02 +0100, Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl wrote: On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 04:20:08PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: Could you fix up debian/patches/debian-changes? It's just got auto-generated template headers... Or is that because you're using single-debian-patch

Bug#778729: Try 2: Bug#778729: RFS: git-tools/1.0.0-1 [ITP]

On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:38:29 +0100, Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl wrote: Should be ready now. However, mentors.d.n seems to not allow uploading the same binary package with a different source more than once per day (there's some cronjob AFAIK), so I had to use my own repository:

Bug#778729: Try 2: Bug#778729: RFS: git-tools/1.0.0-1 [ITP]

Hi Adam, On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 23:52:15 +0100, Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 02:53:52AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: * Package name: git-tools * URL : https://github.com/MestreLion/git-tools It builds those binary packages:

Bug#771930: RFS: sane-frontends/1.0.14-10 [ITA]

Hi Jörg, On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:41:25 +0100, Jörg Frings-Fürst deb...@jff-webhosting.net wrote: first thanks for your review. You're welcome! [...] Packeage is uploaded to mentors[1] again. Thanks for all the fixes. I just noticed something else: version -9 installed

Bug#771930: RFS: sane-frontends/1.0.14-10 [ITA]

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Jörg, On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 17:20:22 +0100, Jörg Frings-Fürst deb...@jff-webhosting.net wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package sane-frontends Excellent, thanks for taking care of this. Your packaging updates look good, in particular the debian/copyright

Re: Fixing the warning of Depends field unknown substitution variable ${perl:Depends}

Hi, On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 19:24:59 + (UTC), T o n g mlist4sunt...@yahoo.com wrote: My packages gives this warning: dpkg-gencontrol: warning: Depends field of package dbab: unknown substitution variable ${perl:Depends} I am packaging Perl stuff, and I do use IO::Socket::INET in my

Bug#766833: RFS: fuzzylite/5.0+dfsg-1 [ITP]

Hi Johannes, On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 13:21:48 +0100, Johannes Schauer j.scha...@email.de wrote: Quoting Johannes Schauer (2014-10-26 09:01:55) Luckily, Juan Rada-Vilela, the author of fuzzylite volunteered to do this porting task because he is interested in getting fuzzylite into Debian and he

Bug#759796: RFS: gemrb/0.8.1-1

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Beren, On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 23:21:20 +0200, Beren Minor beren.minor+deb...@gmail.com wrote: I am still looking for a sponsor for my GemRB package. The details are in the OP of this bug report (#759796 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=%20759796). I've

Bug#761482: RFS: argyll/1.6.3-1 [ITA]

Hi Jörg, On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:15:34 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst deb...@jff-webhosting.net wrote: Am Dienstag, den 16.09.2014, 20:06 +0200 schrieb Stephen Kitt: Hi Jörg, On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:26:04 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst deb...@jff-webhosting.net wrote: [...] I've got

Bug#761482: RFS: argyll/1.6.3-1 [ITA]

Hi Jörg, On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:26:04 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst deb...@jff-webhosting.net wrote: Am Montag, den 15.09.2014, 22:59 +0200 schrieb Stephen Kitt: Ah right, thanks, the last time I checked dpkg-maintscript-helper didn't handle this case. Jörg, it's dpkg-maintscript-helper

Bug#761482: RFS: argyll/1.6.3-1 [ITA]

Hi Bastien, On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:28:54 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote: Le 14 sept. 2014 16:21, Stephen Kitt sk...@debian.org a écrit : Upgrading argyll does reveal a real problem though... Given that you're shipping all the documentation in argyll-doc

Bug#761482: RFS: argyll/1.6.3-1 [ITA]

Hi, Thanks for taking care of ArgyllCMS! Here's a quick review. On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:11:43 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst deb...@jff-webhosting.net wrote: * New Maintainer (Closes: #720178). * New upstream release (Closes: #742658). * debian/rules: - Add get-orig-source. - Remove

Bug#761482: RFS: argyll/1.6.3-1 [ITA]

Hi Jörg, On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:29:18 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst deb...@jff-webhosting.net wrote: Am Sonntag, den 14.09.2014, 12:35 +0200 schrieb Stephen Kitt: Line in d/changelog and comments in d/rules removed. I think that hardening=+all is not necessary for argyll. OK. [...] * debian

Re: Help needed about deprecated dependency

Hi, On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 18:20:13 +0200, bilibop project quid...@safe-mail.net wrote: a bug has been reported[1] against a package I maintain in Debian. It is said that one of the binary packages recommends Udisks, which is deprecated for a while now, and I should move to Udisks2. The problem is

Re: Access to mips64el system wanted to fix a bug in the capnproto package

On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 17:36:31 -0700, Tom Lee deb...@tomlee.co wrote: Thanks for the detailed response Stephen, all great stuff to know. Yunqiang Su has already been kind enough to offer up a porterbox since I sent my earlier email. :) Am I right in understanding a porterbox is basically just

Re: Access to mips64el system wanted to fix a bug in the capnproto package

Hi Tom, On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 13:29:48 -0700, Tom Lee deb...@tomlee.co wrote: Does the Debian project have hardware/VMs set aside to help packagers/upstream maintainers diagnose this sort of thing? I don't think it's appropriate for me to simply skip the test on the packaging side because the

Re: DEP8 tests using the built package source

Hi Andreas, On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 15:33:06 +0100, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:47:45AM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 08:35:33 +0100, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: In other words what we can see in the log above conflicts

Re: DEP8 tests using the built package source

On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 08:24:15 +0100, Martin Pitt mp...@debian.org wrote: Stephen Kitt [2014-03-19 23:54 +0100]: Well, it depends what you want to do. In CI we *always* want to test the packages from the actual archive of course. But as a package maintainer you may want to (and should) run your

Re: DEP8 tests using the built package source

Hi Andreas, On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 08:35:33 +0100, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:54:03PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: Moreover I observed another issue with autopkgtest which is quite astonishing to me: In bug #741274 it was reported that the autopkgtest

Re: DEP8 tests using the built package source

Hi, On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:10:23 +, Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk wrote: Stephen Kitt writes (Re: DEP8 tests using the built package source): (Hi Ian, I'm adding you to the discussion since I'm talking about changes to DEP8. I've snipped the exchanges but I hope you can get

Re: DEP8 tests using the built package source

On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:01:18 +0100, Martin Pitt mp...@debian.org wrote: Antonio Terceiro [2014-03-17 9:59 -0300]: On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 11:27:06PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: FTR, we explicitly make use of that for our toolchain packages: gcc, binutils, linux, and eglibc have a bin/true

Re: DEP8 tests using the built package source

Hi Andreas, On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 13:49:52 +0100, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:47:02AM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: Long answer: You can declare that a test needs to be run from a built source tree. Then the test runner will build the package. But that

Re: DEP8 tests using the built package source

On Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:41:15 -0300, Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org wrote: not subscribed to debian-mentors, please Cc: me explicitly if you still need my input. Noted, thanks for noticing :-). Stephen Kitt sk...@debian.org, 2014-03-15, 14:53: A local adt-run using an unstable chroot

Re: DEP8 tests using the built package source

16, 2014 at 08:39:38PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: On Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:41:15 -0300, Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org wrote: ... this is an important point. You have to make sure that the any tests will run against the code that is _installed_ and not against the code

DEP8 tests using the built package source

Hi, I maintain libevdev, which includes tests which need to be run as root in the built source tree: ./configure sudo make check Obviously this means I can't run the tests during the standard build, but Michael Terry from Canonical pointed out that DEP8 tests would be appropriate

Bug#739585: RFS: qjoypad/4.1.0-1 ITP

Hi Jordan, On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:12:40 -0600, Jordan Metzmeier jmetzmeie...@gmail.com wrote: The package has been updated. I uploaded the new version to mentors and pushed my changes to git under pkg-games. The following has been updated: * Add xpm file for desktop and menu icon *

Bug#739585: RFS: qjoypad/4.1.0-1 ITP

Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi Jordan, On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 01:33:48 -0600, Jordan Metzmeier jmetzmeie...@gmail.com wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package qjoypad [...] The package contains two lintian info warnings: desktop-entry-lacks-keywords-entry no-upstream-changelog For

Re: What to do when autobuilders might run out of memory when building a package

Hi, On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 14:03:00 +0100, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: One solution is to build with no optimisations (-O0 instead of -O2, perhaps using noopt); that allows seqan to build on my i386 buildd. I didn't try with -O1. Any volunteer to test $ svn diff Index: rules

Re: What to do when autobuilders might run out of memory when building a package

Hi Andreas, On Tue, 4 Feb 2014 21:15:41 +0100, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: recently I uploaded seqan and I admit I fail to build the package on two of three machines I control and use to build. Only one of these three amd64 machines has a big enough memory and does not die from

Bug#732613: RFS: xye/0.12.2+dfsg-1 [ITA]

Hi Andreas, On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:00:25PM +0100, Andreas Rönnquist wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package xye I like Xye, so I thought I'd give your package a look, with the intent of sponsoring it eventually. I've just got a couple of comments: * debian/repack is nice but seems

Bug#732613: RFS: xye/0.12.2+dfsg-1 [ITA]

On Sat, 21 Dec 2013 21:30:28 +0100, Andreas Rönnquist gus...@gusnan.se wrote: I've just got a couple of comments: * debian/repack is nice but seems like an awful lot of effort to remove two files; have you noticed the new Files-Excluded header in debian/copyright which uscan now

Bug#715172: RFS: solaar/0.8.99.10-3 ITP

Hi Daniel, On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 18:59:34 +0200, Daniel Augustin Pavel daniel.pa...@gmail.com wrote: On 13 July 2013 18:26, Stephen Kitt sk...@debian.org wrote: Here is my review of the package so far: * great job on the ConsoleKit / systemd support, with minimal debconf prompting, nice

Bug#715172: RFS: solaar/0.8.99.10-3 ITP

owner 715172 ! tag 715172 + pending tag 715172 + moreinfo thanks Hi Daniel, On Sat, 6 Jul 2013 18:21:08 +0200, Daniel Augustin Pavel daniel.pa...@gmail.com wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package solaar * Package name: solaar Version : 0.8.99.10-3 Upstream Author :

Re: Package version numbers

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 19:16:26 +0100, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote: Quoting Raphael Hertzog (hert...@debian.org): On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Jakub Wilk (jw...@debian.org): I would paint the bikeshed the following color: 0.8.51+dfsg1-0.1

Package version numbers

Hi, Neither my AM (Christian Perrier) nor myself are sure about the answer to this one, so he suggested I ask -devel for advice (and I'm throwing -mentors into the mix too). I've prepared an update for calibre, to fix a few issues in the package which is currently in Wheezy (see #686547 for

Re: Architecture-independent packages with missing build-dependencies on some architectures

On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 18:18:06 -0400, Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org wrote: I think it would be more appropriate to just close the bug with a message indicating that the package should be built on a system with multiarch enabled; where the wine-bin dependency would be satisfied via

Architecture-independent packages with missing build-dependencies on some architectures

Dear mentors, I maintain the wine-gecko package (wine-gecko-1.4), which is in an interesting situation because its build-dependencies can't be satisfied on all architectures, but it builds an Architecture: all package. Something similar was discussed in March, and as I understand it the consensus

Bug#678087: [UPLOADED] Re: Bug#678087: RFS: mail-notification/5.4.dfsg.1-6 (Evolution 3.4 transition)

On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:55:41 +0200, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote: On 19.06.2012 07:27, Stephen Kitt wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mail-notification

Bug#678087: RFS: mail-notification/5.4.dfsg.1-6 (Evolution 3.4 transition)

and Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre for the patch; closes: #677455). -- Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:03:39 +0200 Regards, Stephen Kitt signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#674959: RFS: jstest-gtk/0.1.1~git20090722-2 - joystick testing and configuration tool

flag management to allow hardened builds. * Standards-Version 3.9.3, no further change required. -- Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org Mon, 28 May 2012 23:49:12 +0200 Regards, Stephen Kitt signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#659083: RFS: xmoto -- 2D motocross platform game

Hi Mike, On Mon, 7 May 2012 01:01:37 +0200, Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org wrote: On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 06:04:17PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: I just reviewed this package. It looks good except for a couple issues: Thanks for taking a look at this. 1. bin/credits.rpl seems

Bug#659082: RFS: nestopia/1.40g+dfsg-1 [NEW] -- accurate emulator of the Nintendo Entertainment System

Hi Bart, On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 05:21:54AM +, Bart Martens wrote: I don't see the package at mentors. What happened ? It must have expired - I'm re-uploading it just now. Regards, Stephen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: Bug#659082: RFS: nestopia/1.40g+dfsg-1 [NEW] -- accurate emulator of the Nintendo Entertainment System

Hi Boris, On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:40:51AM +0300, Boris Pek wrote: I don't see the package at mentors. What happened ? It must have expired - I'm re-uploading it just now. Have you received the mail with note that your package was deleted from m.d.n.? If no it could be an

Bug#673277: RFS: evtest/1:1.30-1 -- utility to monitor Linux input device events

3.9.3, no change required. -- Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org Wed, 16 May 2012 22:17:49 +0200 Regards, Stephen Kitt signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#659083: RFS: xmoto -- 2D motocross platform game

Hi Mike, On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 06:04:17PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: I just reviewed this package. It looks good except for a couple issues: Thanks for taking a look at this. 1. bin/credits.rpl seems to be a binary file in the repacked upstream source (there may be others, but I

Bug#659083: RFS: xmoto -- 2D motocross platform game

tag 659083 - moreinfo thanks Hi Ansgar, It's been ages, but I've finally finished getting everything ready. On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:52:56 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org wrote: Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org writes: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xmoto

Bug#665926: RFS: mail-notification/5.4.dfsg.1-4 -- mail notification in system tray

to play sounds (thanks to Sergio Cipolla for pointing this out; closes: #658607). * Ignore default values which can no longer be found (patch provided by Gunnar Hjalmarsson; closes: #641937). * Standards-Version 3.9.3, no change required. -- Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:06

Bug#659083: RFS: xmoto -- 2D motocross platform game

Hi Ansgar, On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:52:56 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org wrote: You do not include the full license text for src/glext.h in the copyright information. Have the patches been forwarded upstream? You use debhelper compat level 9, so why don't you build-depend on

Bug#659082: RFS: nestopia/1.40g+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- accurate emulator of the Nintendo Entertainment System

://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nestopia/nestopia_1.40h+dfsg-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Stephen Kitt signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: oss-compat (RC bug fix)

On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:41:35 +0800, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Paul Wise wrote: I note that the package is installable on hurd-*. AFAICT Hurd doesn't support sound or Alsa so maybe it should not depend on 'hurd' or should switch to architecture

RFS: oss-compat (RC bug fix)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package oss-compat. The updated package adds a Multi-Arch declaration (#651335) and handles its configuration file according to policy (#649507, which is RC). The dsc is available at

Re: RFS: mail-notification (updated package; NMU for RC bugs among others)

On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 23:14:37 +0200, Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote: On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:31:56AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: I've reuploaded it to m.d.n, and placed it on http://www.sk2.org/mail-notification/ too (http://www.sk2.org/mail-notification/mail-notification_5.4.dfsg.1

Re: RFS: mail-notification (updated package; NMU for RC bugs among others)

Hi Sven, On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:26:59 +0200, Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote: On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 12:16:40AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: In the meantime though, would any one like to sponsor the NMU? I wanted to take a look at it over the weekend but parts of the package went

Re: RFS: mail-notification (updated package; NMU for RC bugs among others)

Hi Michael, On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 02:43:37 +0200, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote: Am 07.09.2011 00:57, schrieb Stephen Kitt: I am looking for a sponsor for the package mail-notification. This update would fix a couple of RC bugs (the usual Evolution updates, which also require a switch

Re: RFS: mail-notification (updated package; NMU for RC bugs among others)

On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:08:57 +0200, Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote: On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 10:34:11AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: OK - do you have any pointers to migration documentation? The main intent of the NMU was to fix the FTBFS, not really overhaul the whole package, but it

RFS: mail-notification (updated package; NMU for RC bugs among others)

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mail-notification/mail-notification_5.4.dfsg.1-2.5.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Stephen Kitt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble

RFS: nestopia -- accurate emulator of the Nintendo Entertainment System

/nestopia_1.40h+dfsg-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Stephen Kitt signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [done] RFS: libbs2b

On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:35:40 +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin jac...@debian.org wrote: One minor detail (for the next upload) I didn't notice before: there is no substitution variable '{misc:Pre-Depends}', so you can remove that Pre-Depends line of libbs2b0 altogether. Actually there is, in

Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)

Hi, On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:03:24PM +0200, Bruno Kleinert wrote: I uploaded the package. Thanks! Stephen signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)

Hi Sven, On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:10:48PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:06:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package oss-compat, which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this makes sense since

Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)

On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 04:22:13PM +0200, Bruno Kleinert wrote: What's the best practice to fix things up? Should I bump the debian revision of the package and re-upload it? I don't want to be blamed for hijacking packages by accident ;) No hard feelings ;-) It's a native package, so I

RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)

/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/oss-compat/oss-compat_0.0.5.dsc It also has a VCS at http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-games/oss-compat.git I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Stephen Kitt signature.asc

Re: How are directories managed.

On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 17:43:10 +0530, harish badrinath harishbadrin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Paul Elliott pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com wrote: This may be a FAQ but I could not find the answer in the documentation: How are directories managed? When does a directory

RFS: joystick (updated package), evtest (new package, split off from joystick)

main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/evtest/evtest_1.27-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded these packages for me. Kind regards Stephen Kitt signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: gdmap (adopting, updated package)

Dear mentors, On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 21:43:39 +0100, Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.1-2 of my package gdmap. It builds these binary packages: gdmap - Tool to visualize diskspace The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload

Re: RFS: the mingw-w64 toolchain

On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 19:18:26 +0200, Ove Kåven o...@arcticnet.no wrote: Den 29. mars 2011 01:08, skrev Stephen Kitt: In order to upload to Debian, it would theoretically be possible to upload mingw-w64 since it's Arch: all, then upload the full gcc-mingw-w64 without bootstrapping

RFS: gcc-mingw32 (NMU, RC bug fix)

regards Stephen Kitt signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: gcc-mingw32 (NMU, RC bug fix)

notfound 618242 4.4.4-0.1 thanks On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:01:51 +0200, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote: * Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org, 2011-03-30, 09:49: The upload would fix these bugs: 618242 (RC, FTBFS). Did you check if it still FTBFS? AFAICS the failure what caused by the fact

RFS: the mingw-w64 toolchain

Hi, It's been a while, but now that gcc-4.5 is in unstable and I've had the chance to fix various things, I believe the mingw-w64 toolchain is ready for an initial upload. As mentioned previously, the initial aim of these packages is to package wine-gecko and get wine development started up

Re: Git Package Versioning

Hi, On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 06:36:19 +0100, Julien Valroff jul...@debian.org wrote: or 1.2.1~gitMMDD.githash-1, which could be read as the 1.2.1 release currently being prepared, as of git hash ... on MMDD. Though it is perfectly correct, I try and avoid using this scheme: what

Re: Git Package Versioning

On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 22:25:38 +0100, Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote: Julien Valroff jul...@debian.org wrote on 2011-03-20 21:48: The best I have found is to use something like: latest_upstream_release+gitMMDD.githash Please be aware, that + is not the optimal connector.

Re: RFS: mail-notification (RC bug fix, NMU with maintainer's approval)

Hi Sven, On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:26:23 +0100, Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote: On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:36:30PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 5.4.dfsg.1-2.4 of my package mail-notification. This is an NMU approved by LUI Qi, the current

RFS: gdmap (adopting, updated package)

regards Stephen Kitt signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: mail-notification (RC bug fix, NMU with maintainer's approval)

for me. Kind regards Stephen Kitt signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: mail-notification (updated package)

On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 23:03:33 +0100, Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 01:15:17AM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: Note that I should soon be a DM, so if you do sponsor my package and deem it appropriate, I'd appreciate a DMUA field. (This is my third NMU of this package

RFS: mail-notification (updated package)

do sponsor my package and deem it appropriate, I'd appreciate a DMUA field. (This is my third NMU of this package; I'll gladly adopt it once it's orphaned.) Kind regards Stephen Kitt signature.asc Description: PGP signature

RFS: jstest-gtk

to Miriam Ruiz. I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Stephen Kitt signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: jstest-gtk

On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:22:06 +0100, Miriam Ruiz mir...@debian.org wrote: I will review and uload it :) Great, thanks! I forgot to mention my key should soon appear in the debian-maintainers keyring, so if you reckon it's appropriate there's also the possibility of adding a DMUA field. Regards,

Re: [Mingw-w64] RFC: MinGW-w64 toolchain (adoption and new packages)

On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:45:06 +0100, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote: On 11.12.2010 17:40, Stephen Kitt wrote: I imagine this could mean that the gcj and gnats builds don't use the patches in the gcc-4.x-source package, and only use the tarball which won't change from one Debian version

Re: [Mingw-w64] RFC: MinGW-w64 toolchain (adoption and new packages)

On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:28:10 +1030, Ron r...@debian.org wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:29:24PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: On 23.11.2010 12:49, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: debian-gcc is a bit specific to the native libc based toolchains and cross-toolchains using libc. I didn't manage to

Re: [Mingw-w64] RFC: MinGW-w64 toolchain (adoption and new packages)

Hi Jonathan, (I'll reply separately to the remaining points from your earlier email.) On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 04:17:32AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: mingw-w64 do all they work upstream. All patches that were created mingw-w64 project are applied directly to binutils and gcc head. That's

Re: [Mingw-w64] RFC: MinGW-w64 toolchain (adoption and new packages)

(For anyone else following, see the other subthread too.) On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 05:22:41PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Building the packages is slightly involved: 1. Build binutils-mingw-w64 and install it. So the first step could be to get this package alone in Debian. Indeed,

RFC: MinGW-w64 toolchain (adoption and new packages)

Dear mentors, I'm working on packaging a new version of the MinGW-w64 toolchain, which allows 32- and 64-bit Windows software to be compiled as a cross-compiler target using gcc. This all started with the requirement for a new version of gcc and MinGW-w64 to build wine-gecko, the browser engine

Re: RFS: stella (updated package, adoption)

whether it's DGT policy, but it seems fairly common practice. I also did it just to cast a wider net... I am a DGT member, that is why DGT is in the Maintainer field (I'd rather have the package team-maintained, even if in practice most DGT packages have a single actual maintainer). [Stephen Kitt

  1   2   >