Re: dh-cmake writing to /usr instead of fakeroot?

On 2024-02-19, Elliana May wrote: > You can see a failure here: > https://launchpadlibrarian.net/714820377/buildlog_ubuntu-jammy-arm64.duckdb_0.10.0_BUILDING.txt.gz That build log is pointing to a missing debhelper build-dependency. /Sune

Re: Bug#1052597: RFS: libkysdk-base/2.2.0.1-1 -- common files for kylin sdk base library

On 2023-12-18, Tobias Frost wrote: > - Updating the SONAME of a library requires this procedure to be followed: > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions > Comparing the symbols file does not make it obvious why you are > bumping SONAME, but I did not check with

Re: Help with catch2 transition needed

On 2023-11-07, Andreas Tille wrote: > I noticed that catch2 does not contain the header file catch.hpp any > more. There is now some catch_all.hpp. So I replaced this header file > in a patch[1] but obviously this problem can't be solved by pure wild > guessing since this has lead to > >

Re: Bug#1053662: RFS: qt5-ukui-platformtheme/4.1.0.1-1 -- Qt5 QPA platform theme of UKUI

On 2023-10-08, xibowen wrote: > * URL : https://gitee.com/openkylin/qt5-ukui-platformtheme I think we should try to not add more c++ code that forces ancient c++ standards in their build systems. /Sune

Re: How to handle breakages when the size of a class in a shared lib increases?

On 2023-07-11, Pierre Gruet wrote: > Unfortunately, it turns out fields were added to some class (of which > size thus increased) in the shared library, so that binaries built > against a previous version of it now segfault as they are not allocating > enough space. Either you need to do a

Re: Bug#923209: RFS: heaptrack/1.1.0+20180922.gitf752536-3.1 [NMU]

On 2019-02-25, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Nicholas, > >> heaptrack (1.1.0+20180922.gitf752536-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium >> >> * Non-maintainer upload. >> * Update description to make heaptrack more discoverable to users. >> (Closes: #915241) >> >> -- Nicholas D Steeves Sun, 24 Feb

Re: Bug#920218: RFS: webcamoid/8.5.0+dfsg-1

On 2019-01-22, Herbert Fortes wrote: > akqml - full featured webcam capture application - qml module shouldn't this be called qml-module-something instead ? > libavkys-dev - full featured webcam capture application - dev Who are the consumers/users of this ? > webcamoid-plugins -

Re: cmake issue with minia: include could not find load file (GatbCore)

On 2019-01-21, Andreas Tille wrote: > Is there any way to make cmake more verbose where it is seeking for files > to include? cmake --trace at least give you more debugging info than you could ever wish for. /Sune

Re: Help for SIGSEGV in test suite needed when built with gcc 8.2 what works nicely with gcc 6.3

On 2019-01-09, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > As usual: reading the code, debugging, printfs. Address sanitizer and/or > valgrind may or may not help too. I just tried throwing some tools at it. Apparantly you need a three step thing to get to it. address-sanitizer. First issue. The command to

Re: Help to get Qt GUI of clonalorigin needed

On 2017-12-03, Andreas Tille wrote: > code from Qt4 to Qt5[2] which enabled to **build** the package. The patch looks right for a start. > $ clonalorigin-gui > QMetaObject::connectSlotsByName: No matching signal for > on_actionGelman_Rubin_test_activated()

Re: Bug#809768: RFS: kbibtex/0.6+git7fdc0cd97c093f-1

On 2016-01-03, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: Hi A brief look over it: > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kbibtex/kbibtex_0.6+git7fdc0cd97c093f-1.dsc There is a patch to the desktop file. Where is it forwarded to ? Has it been merged?

Re: sponsor/mentor packaging advise.

On 2014-07-17, Scarlett Clark scarl...@scarlettgatelyclark.com wrote: Hello! I have been doing alot of packaging over at Kubuntu and enjoy it thoroughly. I am seeking assistance in getting bits over into Debian as requested. With that said I have been requested to get packaging for I've

Re: Help with libquazip / Qt4-Qt5

On 2014-07-14, Eric Maeker eric.mae...@gmail.com wrote: Please, Mentors, help me with these unlying questions. - should libquazip be build inside debian using Qt5 and/or Qt4? Both. for now. Ok. How can I manage this? Is it possible inside one unique source package? Debhelper does only have a

Bug#753898: RFS: Looking for sponsor for apg-gui

On Saturday 05 July 2014 23:36:12 Tymon Radzik wrote: I have just uploaded to mentors my package - it is called apg-gui and is complex Graphical User Interface for Automated Password Generator. It supports all it functions. I have made it in C++ Qt. I think it should be put into Debian

Re: Help with libquazip / Qt4-Qt5

On 2014-06-13, Eric Maeker eric.mae...@gmail.com wrote: Please, Mentors, help me with these unlying questions. - should libquazip be build inside debian using Qt5 and/or Qt4? Both. for now. - for Qt4 projects (as some projects still not ported to Qt5), how can we provide a compatible Qt4

Re: grokking debian symbols files

On 2014-04-04, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote: It's a pkgkde-symbolshelper(1)'s (from the pkg-kde-tools package) thing. But AFIACS pkgkde-symbolshelper doesn't have any documentation, so the “is not explained” still holds. :/ http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/symbolfiles.html Hopefully

Re: Help with d-shlibs needed

On 2014-04-03, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: Hi, I tried to migrate bamtools (not yet released package!) at git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/bamtools.git to d-shlibs but it ended up by What's d-shlibs and why do you use it? Isn't it just much easier to use a install file

Re: Solving shlibs-declares-dependency-on-other-package lintian warning

On 2014-03-18, Joseph Herlant herla...@gmail.com wrote: The complete version of the packages are currently available on mentors (for those who would like to have a look a little deeper about what's wrong): https://mentors.debian.net/package/libnxml and

Re: missing symbols for non-public functions in library?

On 2014-03-04, Sascha Steinbiss sas...@steinbiss.name wrote: developers -- of which I am one). This now leads to a discrepancy involving missing symbols, apparently detected by comparison to the 1.5.1 symbols file created by Andreas quite some time ago for me (thanks btw!). According to the

Re: Is this really the debian way ?

On 2014-02-08, Roelof Wobben rwob...@hotmail.com wrote: DEB_DH_MAKESHLIBS_ARGS_libcjs0c = -Xusr/lib/cjs-1.0/ -V'libcjs0c (= $(DEB_UPSTREAM_VERSION)), libcjs0-$(LIBMOZJS)' -- -c4 I don't see anything wrong here. It is not in the 'beginners end' of library packaging, and library packaging is not

Re: Bug#736355: RFS: checkbox-ng/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Simple replacement for CheckBox

On 2014-01-22, Sylvain Pineau sylvain.pin...@canonical.com wrote: It builds those binary packages: checkbox-ng - Simple replacement for CheckBox What's CheckBox? /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#718893: RFS: coinutils/2.9.4-1 [ITA] -- CoinOR base library

On Wednesday 07 August 2013 15:45:37 Etienne Millon wrote: There are tarballs containing the full distribution at: http://www.coin-or.org/download/source/CoinAll/ It seems to be a a little older (the last release is from january 2012), but it would be massively easier to maintain than having

Re: I'm so frustrated trying to adopt a package, I could scream.

On 2013-02-12, Paul Johnson pauljoh...@gmail.com wrote: Can I guess what's next? 664092 is a bug against the metapackage wnpp. So my message is supposed to be: package wnpp retitle 664092 ITA: blt -- the BLT extension library for Tcl/Tk - run-time package owner 664092

Re: Maintainer address for collab-maint team maintained packages

On 2012-11-19, Arno Töll a...@debian.org wrote: That said, I'd be very glad to have some mailing list Debian service different to lists.d.o for such lightweight list management purposes. wasn't there a teams.dn ? /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Re: Bug#669565: RFS: gammaray/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- Tool for examining the internals of Qt application

On 2012-08-10, Felix Geyer fge...@debian.org wrote: On 10.08.2012 16:47, Jakub Adam wrote: debian/patches/gammaray-probe-versioned-soname.patch: Why do you set a SONAME for gammaray_probe? When gammaray changes the ABI custom plugins will break anyway since you can't install different

Re: Bug#674717: RFS: qpdfview/0.2.2-1 [ITP]

On 2012-05-26, Benjamin Eltzner b.eltz...@gmx.de wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package qpdfview * Package name: qpdfview Version : 0.2.2-1 Upstream Author : Adam Reichold adamreich...@myopera.com

Re: Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection

On 2012-05-09, Boris Pek tehnic...@yandex.ru wrote: My regular sponsor is very busy now and I am looking for a sponsor for my new package kde-gtk-config. Description : KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection first, kde configuration modules are packaged as

Re: Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection

On 2012-05-11, Boris Pek tehnic...@yandex.ru wrote: kde-config-gtk-style does not allow to: * select themes for Gtk 3.x applications * preview available themes for Gtk 2.x and Gtk 3.x applications * custmize toolbars and menus for Gtk applications * select icon themes for Gtk applications *

Re: Help needed to fix gcc 4.7 bug in jellyfish package

On 2012-05-02, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: Hi, I tried to fix the problem in the jellyfish package but the general hints given did not helped me really. Any more precise help to fix this problem: parse_dna.cc:97:3: error: narrowing conversion of '-3' from 'int' to 'const uint_t

Re: RFS: owncloud 2.0.1

On 2012-01-01, Thomas Müller thomas.muel...@tmit.eu wrote: [about a non-free file] Or wget'ing it within postinst? erm ?!? /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Re: RFS: qastools

On 2011-12-13, Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org wrote: So? It's difficult for me to get your point when you're asking questions without making any statement. I'd be grateful if you could clarify. Hi Depending on the answers, my statements would be different. In general, I see to 'primary'

Re: RFS: qastools

On 2011-12-14, Sebastian H. va...@gmx.de wrote: I've made a quick build. qastools-common_0.16.1-1_all.deb 23988 bytes qastools-qasconfig_0.16.1-1_amd64.deb 61768 bytes qastools-qashctl_0.16.1-1_amd64.deb 274986 bytes qastools-qasmixer_0.16.1-1_amd64.deb 309520 bytes versus

Re: RFS: qastools

On 2011-12-13, Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org wrote: Sebastian H. wrote: Why regroup qasmixer and qasconfig into one package? Wouldn't it be better having them Recommend each other? It doesn't seem like an improvement forcing users to install both tools instead of giving them the

Re: Overriding .desktop file with localized version (QasMixer)

On 2011-11-01, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org wrote: Hi! Am 01.11.2011 14:14, schrieb Sebastian H.: In the progress of separating localizations for QasMixer into a separate package qasmixer-l10n I've stumbled over the following linitan warning: W: qasmixer-l10n:

Re: flashcache - call for resolution / seeking for a mentor

On 2011-09-21, onlyjob only...@member.fsf.org wrote: * Is it true that whoever happen to create an ITP first gets the monopoly for packaging? * If ITP always have priority, aren't we sending a wrong message for ambitious maintainers who might be tempted to create ITP early in order

Re: RFS: gentoo (New upstream version: package already in Debian).

On 2011-09-13, Marc Haber mh+debian-ment...@zugschlus.de wrote: On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 04:17:12PM +0200, Innocent De Marchi wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package gentoo. * Package name: gentoo Version : 0.19.11-1 Upstream Author : Emil Brink e...@obsession.se

Re: Depends on -dev package

On 2011-08-22, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org writes: * Russ Allbery r...@debian.org [110822 19:59]: That's a fascinating point. I have never done that with any -dev package, since essentially every -dev package would require that, which seems rather

Re: Compiling Qt translation files

On 2011-06-29, Dmitry Shachnev mity...@gmail.com wrote: Will it be better if I provide .ts text-format source for translations and compile them during build? This will add a big build-dependency on Qt. the Qt linguist tools have recently been split out from the qt dev tools to make it easier

Re: RFS: kst (updated package)

On 2011-06-28, David Kalnischkies kalnischk...@gmail.com wrote: btw: Without looking at the source: Architecture dependent symbols are e.g. all methods with size_t (or its sibling ssize_t) or va_list as parameter. and qreal if kst is what I think it is. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: RFS: undo-closed-tabs-button

On 2011-05-26, Ludwin Alduvi Hernández Vásquez alduv...@gmail.com wrote: It builds these binary packages: undo-closed-tabs-button - This add-on allows you to undo closed tabs via a toolbar button addon to ? /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: RFS: haskell-qt

On 2011-05-26, Filip Brcic br...@gna.org wrote: On Wednesday, 25. May 2011. 0.29.07 Sune Vuorela wrote: On 2011-05-24, Filip Brcic br...@gna.org wrote: libghc6-qt-dev - Haskell bindings for Qt GUI library for GHC Is it only bindings for QtGui, or for other parts as well ? It binds to all

Re: RFS: undo-closed-tabs-button

On 2011-05-26, Arno Töll deb...@toell.net wrote: a) Without haing further looked on your package you may want to reconsider package name and description to something more useful. There might actaully be a naming policy for such addons that one should adhere to. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: RFS: haskell-qt

On 2011-05-24, Filip Brcic br...@gna.org wrote: It builds these binary packages: libghc6-qt-dev - Haskell bindings for Qt GUI library for GHC Is it only bindings for QtGui, or for other parts as well ? libqws - Haskell bindings for Qt GUI library for GHC Is this thing actually called

Re: RFS: libiwtan and iwtan-gui (3rd try)

On 2011-05-18, Marco Cornolti corno...@cli.di.unipi.it wrote: It builds these binary packages: libiwtan - meta-package for the IWTAN Wireless Topology Analyzer library I think I asked it before: whath's the prupose of this binary package? /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: what if upstream provides debian build directory

On 2011-03-18, Harald Dunkel ha...@afaics.de wrote: Is upstream always right? The general answer here is 'no, upstream is never right, but often they can be educated' (when coming to packaging ideas and such) /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: Build-Dep: libqtwebkit-dev

On 2011-03-16, Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote: http://packages.debian.org/sid/libqtwebkit-dev It is only available in: - unstable - on amd64/i386 well... that's just a matter of time. I need to specify something like: B-D on libqtwebkit-dev only if libQt4-dev does

Re: RFS: libiwtan

On 2011-02-23, Marco Cornolti corno...@cli.di.unipi.it wrote: Dunno actually. Mainly because dh_make made it for me, so I thought it was the way things are done. Isn't it needed to keep libiwtan up to date even when libiwtan0 moves to libiwtan1? well.. who needs a library? the apps

Re: RFS: libiwtan

On 2011-02-23, Marco Cornolti corno...@cli.di.unipi.it wrote: * URL : http://iwtan.sourceforge.net * License : GPL v3 hmm.. gplv3 for a library. kind of aggressive. but well. It builds these binary packages: libiwtan - meta-package for the IWTAN Wireless Topology

Re: packaging a new qt application with 2 components

On 2011-02-21, Steven redalert.comman...@gmail.com wrote: What would be the best approach to deal with this? Note that I'm fairly new at creating Debian packages and developing qt applications (I do have experience in Java, but not with Debian in mind). two tarballs is a v3 source format?

Re: RFS: faenza-icon-theme

On 2011-01-24, Adnan Hodzic ad...@foolcontrol.org wrote: btw is this theme specific to GNOME or can it be used with other desktop environments? Specific for GNOME. Last I looked, it was following the FDO icon spec, so theoretically it would work anywhere that supports that spec. Practically,

Re: RFS: muon

On 2010-12-08, Paul Rufos paulruf...@gmail.com wrote: muon - package manager for KDE muon-dbg - Muon debugging symbols muon-installer - Utility for browsing, installing, and removing applications muon-notifier - update notifier for KDE muon-updater - update manager for KDE qapt-batch

Re: RF[CS]: ubiquity (mozilla extension) in Debian

On 2010-10-26, Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/26/2010 04:53 PM, Michael Shuler wrote: An existing source name conflict example I found: libsage2 - Source: sage xul-ext-sage - Source: sage-extension -extension sounds a little cleaner to me. ;) I'd like to keep

Re: shlibs and lintian

On 2010-10-11, Zvi Dubitzky d...@il.ibm.com wrote: I am having a package for libraries (several) Speaking as a maintainer who has been having library packages that contained several libraries (Qt, kdelibs, kde4libs, kdepimlibs, kdebase-workspace and ) - we have ended up splitting everything

Re: RFS: wacom-source

On 2010-07-13, Taylor LeMasurier-Wren ripps...@gmail.com wrote: --0016364ecb64f571dd048b48701a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package wacom-source. Package name: wacom-source Version : 0.8.8-1 Upstream Author

Re: Asking for DMUA: Yes while seeking first sponsor

On 2010-06-15, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: This isn't the only misuse of DMUA that exists, some people set it in their package instead of asking the sponsor to set it. Others go I guess it is unimportant who exactly writes the lines to debian/control. But the sponsor should definately

Re: RFS: snap2 rsync-based backup program with GUI (with Debian source)

On 2010-06-15, Lloyd Standish ll...@crnatural.net wrote: It did not occur to me to check for gtkdialog in Sid (it is available in Lenny http://packages.debian.org/lenny/gtkdialog). So, until there is a gtkdialog package in Sid, snap2 cannot run. This is a great disappointment - I put a lot

Re: desktopnova (rename packages or change dependencies?)

On 2010-06-09, Daniel Leidert daniel.leidert.s...@gmx.net wrote: b) Let both modules packages provide desktopnova-module and conflict with each other. Then let desktopnova depend on desktopnova-module. So the user will have to choose the module package to install. IMO this is a common

Re: A lot of pending packages

On 2010-06-09, Lorenzo De Liso blackz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I'm a simple debian contributor: I'm trying to get my work in debian through a sponsor [1] [2]. The problem is that I'm waiting for a sponsor since 7 days+ (and not only me, in mentors.debian.net there are 20+ pending

Re: RFS: lmfit

On 2010-03-12, j.wuttke j.wut...@fz-juelich.de wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package lmfit. * Package name: lmfit Version : 3.1-1 Upstream Author : myself (Joachim Wuttke j.wut...@fz-juelich.de * URL :

Re: RFS: libqt4pas

On 2010-01-12, Matthias Klumpp matth...@nlinux.org wrote: This package is necessary to build FPC/LCL Pascal applications against Qt4. It would make lots of FPC apps able to be compiled for the KDE/Qt platform and fix some bugs depending on this. The package was previously known as libqtintf4

Re: RFS: libqtintf4 (ping)

On 2009-12-18, Matthias Klumpp matth...@nlinux.org wrote: The package is lintian-clean. There were some concerns about the build-script, but because it's a really small lib there should be no problem in building this. The way it is built, it takes around 1G of memory to build. This *needs* to

Re: New developer.

On 2009-11-26, George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote: * start with learning how Debian Bug Tracking System is manipulated (which is one of the most valuable Debian assets) * look for neglected bug reports, eventually in packages you are using * try to submit patches and/or helpful comments

Re: RFS: libqtintf4

On 2009-11-10, Matthias Klumpp matth...@nlinux.org wrote: Makefiles just serve to finally create calls to gcc, And I think the way the gcc calls are made requires a amazing amount of RAM for no apparant reason. these calls I wrote by hand (there was no qmake in qt2) to more easily configure

Re: RFS: libqtintf4

On 2009-11-07, Matthias Klumpp matth...@nlinux.org wrote: http://users.telenet.be/Jan.Van.hijfte/qtforfpc/fpcqt4.html * License : GPL Looks like lgpl It builds these binary packages: libqt4intf-dev - Qt4 interface bindings libqt4intf5 - Qt4 interface bindings For which language?

Re: new-maintai...@debian.org dead?

On 2009-11-07, Harry Rickards ha...@linux.com wrote: Hi, I sent an email to new-maintai...@debian.org about a week ago, and haven't received a response yet. It's only been a week, so I'm still hoping to get a reply soon. However, I just found

Re: new-maintai...@debian.org dead?

On 2009-11-07, Harry Rickards ha...@linux.com wrote: 2009/11/7 Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk: On 2009-11-07, Harry Rickards ha...@linux.com wrote: Hi, I sent an email to new-maintai...@debian.org about a week ago, and haven't received a response yet. It's only been a week, so I'm still

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

On 2009-11-03, Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote: It's fairly rare for someone to laboriously create multiple versions of icons at different resolutions in PNG. [I know I certainly haven't done it since about 1992.] Yes and no. Some icon artists create it in svg and then export to png and

Re: RFS: kwin-style-aurorae

On 2009-10-31, Lukasz Janyst jan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, I have been using Debian for a couple of years now. I really appreciate the great work you're doing and I would like to help. I have read some docs and faqs on contributing to the project and decided to start with this simple

Re: RFS: qemu-kvm (kvm)

On 2009-10-16, Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 21:36 +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: Michael Tokarev ha scritto: You are trying to hijack kvm, this is not the way to do it appropriately. I'm trying to make it to work. And to my shame, I don't know how to

Re: script-with-language-extension

On 2009-10-05, Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org wrote: I have repened the Policy bug where the renaming policy was decided, and hope to get it reverted. Don't expect it to happen, but you are free to hope. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: RFS: libv8

On 2009-09-06, Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br wrote: - I doubt that many sponsors will be happy DM-Upload-Allowed: yes on a NEW package. While I understand that you mentioned this regarding a NEW package, I'm a slightly bit confused about the best current practices of the DMUA

Re: Requests to sponsor new library packages (was: why?)

On 2009-08-19, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote: Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk writes: For example, I would be very reluctant to sponsor a first package of a person that was a new library without any application using it, whereas a interesting kde application might easier catch my

Re: Requests to sponsor new library packages

On 2009-08-19, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote: Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk writes: On 2009-08-19, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote: That's interesting, thank you for that perspective. What do you propose, then, for a maintainer who wants to get a new package

Re: why?

On 2009-08-18, Leinier Cruz Salfran salfra...@ipigto.rimed.cu wrote: --=-+HFkoxaqb4DFPsQ5uB2y Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable why is so hard to find a sponsor? I have a package online since 2 weeks ago, I sent 3 RFS and I have found no sponsor yet.

Re: rules file and missing dh_shlibdeps

On 2009-07-10, Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk wrote: --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:26:04AM +0200, Adrian Stel wrote: And my question is: can i

Re: Packaging:library packaging stuff

On 2009-06-08, Adrian von Bidder avbid...@fortytwo.ch wrote: * how can I build the dependencies of the -dev package in a sane way? I'm= =20 sure creating them by hand is not optimal. (And I'm sure I've read at some= You need to create it by hand by looking at what includes is in *your*

Re: RFS: concordance

On 2009-06-04, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote: Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre mathieu...@gmail.com writes: I've applied the suggested changes to the files, and pushed it back on mentors.debian.net. It's using the same version number as before, just overwrote the files. Not sure if this

Re: RFS: agedu

On 2009-05-29, Alexander Prinsier aphe...@mailhaven.com wrote: PS2: for DD's, is it customary to upload a new version to unstable even if it only fixes a small issue? Or should small issues be batched into one update? Couldn't find an answer on this in the Debian policy. It depends.

Re: how to check for binary compability?

On 2009-05-25, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote: The new version of the library is no longer exporting its internal portability functions. This is good -- libraries should not export Only lurker is using this library. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Confused by foo.dirs, foo.install etc

On 2009-05-24, Jack Kelly endgame@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: I have a problem building a library, starting with a dh_make template. The basic problem seems to boil down to files don't get moved from DESTDIR (debian/tmp)

Re: Confused by foo.dirs, foo.install etc

On 2009-05-24, Jack Kelly endgame@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk wrote: On 2009-05-24, Jack Kelly endgame@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: I have a problem building

Re: Updated packge on m.d.n (was: RFS: kde-plasmoid-yawp)

On 2009-05-22, John Stamp jst...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: On Friday 22 May 2009 11:12:36 am Kai Wasserbäch wrote: Dear mentors, an updated package of kde-plasmoid-yawp has been uploaded to mentors.debian.net, the new dgetable URL is:

Re: RFS: krecipes (updated package)

On 2009-05-19, Matthias Julius m...@julius-net.net wrote: I would really appreciate if someone could either help me to get my krecipes package into Debian. I am just not quite sure whether it is OK to hijack a package like that from an unresponsive packaging team. Should I ask QA to orphan

Re: RFS: krecipes (updated package)

On 2009-05-19, Matthias Julius m...@julius-net.net wrote: I just noticed that he actually cross-posted his messages to pkg-kde-talk. There seems to be a little more human presence. Next time I'll post there. That's *NOT* a sponsering list, but sending sponsoring requests there is the

Re: RFS: krecipes (updated package)

On 2009-05-19, Matthias Julius m...@julius-net.net wrote: Barry deFreese bdefre...@verizon.net writes: Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: I'm not a DD, but I think the correct way is to ping MIA team about it and then after 2 weeks time you ping them again and they do a little chat and come up with a

Re: RFS: valkyrie

On 2009-05-08, LI Daobing lidaob...@debian.org wrote: there is a proposed copyright format in [2], you also can use that format. [2] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ Note that this is just a proposal and many people don't like it, so please don't take it too serious. And some people won't

Re: questions regarding libmimelib1 as seperate source package

On 2009-04-25, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Jonas Meurer jo...@freesources.org wrote: I intend to maintain libmimelib1 as a seperate source package now that kdepim 3.5.9 has been removed from debian/unstable. What does lurker link against on other distros

Re: RFS: katimon

On 2009-04-17, Stefanos Harhalakis v...@v13.gr wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package katimon. * Package name: katimon Version : 1.0.2-2 Upstream Author : me * URL : http://www.v13.gr/proj/katimon/ : also available from

Re: RFS: kita2

On 2009-03-21, Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp wrote: On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:42:43 +0900 Junichi Uekawa dan...@netfort.gr.jp wrote: So instead of adding a package to be removed soon after it is clear of NEW, I suggest not adding it at all. So, it's been two weeks, is there a working

Sponsorship requirements and copyright files

Hi! After a discussion on #debian-mentors and other places, I will not sponsor packages using the copyright file format described on http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat It is a too complex, overengineered solution to a very minor issue. It is not easy readables for humans It is

Re: debian/control

On 2009-03-15, Laurent Guignard lguignard.deb...@gmail.com wrote: On dim, 15 mar 2009 13:57:40 +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Hello, Hello, I am not sure what to fill to Section in control file for my new package I am building. Program is small easy CLI utility generating sound (pink and

Re: libv8: library without SONAME

On 2009-02-09, Antonio Radici anto...@dyne.org wrote: Hi, as part of ITP #497701 I'm packaging libv8, a high-performance java script library written by Google and used in Chrominum, the open source version of the Chrome browser. The source code is taken directly from the SVN tags here:

Re: Closing bugs, incrementing release number, and uploads to mentors.debian.net

On 2009-01-19, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote: * When fixing bugs that prevented a previous release (e.g. one made to mentors.debian.net) from making it into Debian (e.g. because the sponsor requires further changes), recommended practice is to increment the release number

Re: RFS: kita2

On 2008-12-29, Junichi Uekawa dan...@netfort.gr.jp wrote: It needs more work than just change the dependencies to make it work with korundum4 Are we talking about a package which only exists in experimental replacing the version in sid? Yes. and the replacement is planned ASAP. Let the

Re: RFS: kita2

On 2008-12-28, Hiroyuki Yamamoto yama1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Sune Vuorela wrote: On 2008-12-27, Hiroyuki Yamamoto yama1...@gmail.com wrote: Upstream Author: Hideki Ikemoto ikemo _at_ users.sourceforge.jp * URL: http://kita.sourceforge.jp/ Looking at this page, without much japanese

Re: RFS: kita2

On 2008-12-28, Hiroyuki Yamamoto yama1...@gmail.com wrote: How about kde4? KDE4 has nice ruby bindings, currently available in experimental. Oh, thanks. When kde4 has entered in sid, kita2 should depend on korundum4 package. http://packages.debian.org/experimental/korundum4 It needs more

Re: RFS: kita2

On 2008-12-27, Hiroyuki Yamamoto yama1...@gmail.com wrote: Upstream Author: Hideki Ikemoto ikemo _at_ users.sourceforge.jp * URL: http://kita.sourceforge.jp/ Looking at this page, without much japanese knowledge, it looks like a kde3 application * License: The MIT License Section: net

Re: Listing dependencies with specific versions

On 2008-12-09, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I doubt that - merely adding a new symbol is NOT a bug, let alone release-critical. Right, but not bumping shlibs at the same time is an RC bug AFAIK. I agree. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: Preferred version format for svn revisions?

On 2008-11-09, Guido Loupias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Could someone tell me if there is a preferred version format for svn revisions? Right now I have something like latestupstreamversion+svnrevisionnumber. If it is a snapshot after a release, I also do that. If it is a snapshot

Re: RFS: kio-ftps

On 2008-11-01, Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Laurent, On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 16:04, Laurent L?onard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package kio-ftps. ... kio-ftps - an ftps KIO slave for KDE 4 Did you consider joining KDE packaging

  1   2   >