Bug#818184: RFS: hal-flash/0.3.3-1 [ITP]

On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 02:09:35 +0900 d...@debian.org wrote: > Please restart ITP process and re-upload this with removal of overriding > for pedantic tags. I've removed pedantic tags and uploaded again. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hal-flash/hal-flash_0.3.3-1.dsc

Bug#818184: RFS: hal-flash/0.3.3-1 [ITP]

Please restart ITP process and re-upload this with removal of overriding for pedantic tags. -- Regards, dai GPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E 42E6 B765 B8D8 EA50 7839 619D D439 668E signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#818184: RFS: hal-flash/0.3.3-1 [ITP]

Hi, >Personally, I would remove Flash from my system entirely and use HTML5>video >or when that isn't available, run youtube-dl, get-flash-videos, >cclive or similar on the command-line. Some desktop video players can >also use these to play video from the web. I also hate flash, for many

Bug#818184: RFS: hal-flash/0.3.3-1 [ITP]

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:43 PM, HAYASHI Kentaro wrote: > If so, something like hal-compat software exists, (it also provides HAL > compatibility layer which is similar to hal-flash, but it does not > refer about flash DRM at all even though mainly used for it) - > does it acceptable for debian

Bug#818184: RFS: hal-flash/0.3.3-1 [ITP]

On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:02:43 +0900 d...@debian.org wrote: > lintian(1) says: > > | Adding overrides for pedantic tags is probably not worth the effort. Oh, I have overlooked it. Thank you for your feedback. I'd been just convinced that "I should fix it" at that time. > BTW, I hesitate to upload

Bug#818184: RFS: hal-flash/0.3.3-1 [ITP]

On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 05:47:23PM +0900, HAYASHI Kentaro wrote: > > I think there is no need to suppress pedantic reports. > > Maybe, but I think that it is a good manner to treat it explicitly. lintian(1) says: | Adding overrides for pedantic tags is probably not worth the effort. BTW, I

Bug#818184: RFS: hal-flash/0.3.3-1 [ITP]

Hi, On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 08:46:35 +0800 Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:20 AM, HAYASHI Kentaro wrote: > > > libhal1-flash - Compatibility library to allow playback of Flash DRM > > content > > Since flash is dying and most of the web video has dropped it at

Bug#818184: RFS: hal-flash/0.3.3-1 [ITP]

Hi, Thank you for your feedback. I've uploaded fixed version here. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hal-flash/hal-flash_0.3.3-1.dsc On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:28:03 +0900 d...@debian.org wrote: > > * debian/control > > - Maintainer: > > Does he agree to be the Debian official

Bug#818184: RFS: hal-flash/0.3.3-1 [ITP]

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:20 AM, HAYASHI Kentaro wrote: > libhal1-flash - Compatibility library to allow playback of Flash DRM content Since flash is dying and most of the web video has dropped it at this point I suggest not putting this in Debian, especially since it is solely for DRM, which

Bug#818184: RFS: hal-flash/0.3.3-1 [ITP]

> * debian/control - Maintainer: Does he agree to be the Debian official maintainer for this package? Aren't YOU the Debian official maintainer for it? - #Vcs-Git: - #Vcs-Browser: Please remove template. - Suggests: There is no package named flashplugin-installer in Debian. > *

Bug#818184: RFS: hal-flash/0.3.3-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [wishlist] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hal-flash" * Package name: hal-flash * Version : 0.3.3-1 * Upstream Author : Christopher Horler * URL :