Re: RFS: alure (updated package)

2011-04-26 Thread Tobias Hansen
I added the linker version script and a symbols file in git. Would you please upload the changes Mr. Mejia? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Re: RFS: alure (updated package)

2011-04-25 Thread Tobias Hansen
Am 23.04.2011 09:50, schrieb George Danchev: On Saturday 23 April 2011 10:03:32 Tobias Hansen wrote: Am 23.04.2011 05:07, schrieb Paul Wise: I would suggest adding a symbols file so that stuff using the new symbols gets the new version and anything else gets the old version.

Re: RFS: alure (updated package)

2011-04-23 Thread George Danchev
On Saturday 23 April 2011 10:03:32 Tobias Hansen wrote: Am 23.04.2011 05:07, schrieb Paul Wise: I would suggest adding a symbols file so that stuff using the new symbols gets the new version and anything else gets the old version. http://wiki.debian.org/UsingSymbolsFiles On that wiki

Re: RFS: alure (updated package)

2011-04-22 Thread Tobias Hansen
Hi, first of all, thanks for uploading the package. :) I saw that you removed the shlibs file. alure 1.1 introduced new symbols and so there must be a way for other packages to depend on alure 1.1, right? SLUDGE for example uses symbols introduced in alure 1.1. Regards, Tobias Hansen --

Re: RFS: alure (updated package)

2011-04-22 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Tobias Hansen tobias@gmx.de wrote: first of all, thanks for uploading the package. :) I saw that you removed the shlibs file. alure 1.1 introduced new symbols and so there must be a way for other packages to depend on alure 1.1, right? SLUDGE for example

Re: RFS: alure (updated package)

2011-04-19 Thread Tobias Hansen
I changed the name of the dev package back to libalure-dev. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dadc96b.2010...@gmx.de

Re: RFS: alure (updated package)

2011-04-15 Thread Tobias Hansen
Am 15.04.2011 02:10, schrieb Paul Wise: On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Tobias Hansen tobias.han...@physik.uni-hamburg.de wrote: Paul Wise suggested it, referencing the Debian Library Packaging guide. He also said it's no problem because no program in Debian is using alure yet. I

Re: RFS: alure (updated package)

2011-04-15 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Tobias Hansen tobias.han...@physik.uni-hamburg.de wrote: Here's what you said: (08:04:51) pabs: BigMc: since alure is a library, I suggest that you read libpkg-guide to get familiar with packaging libraries (08:05:23) pabs: libpkg-guide does recommend

Re: RFS: alure (updated package)

2011-04-15 Thread Tobias Hansen
Am 15.04.2011 10:15, schrieb Paul Wise: On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Tobias Hansen tobias.han...@physik.uni-hamburg.de wrote: Here's what you said: (08:04:51) pabs: BigMc: since alure is a library, I suggest that you read libpkg-guide to get familiar with packaging libraries

Re: RFS: alure (updated package)

2011-04-14 Thread Andres Mejia
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Tobias Hansen tobias@gmx.de wrote: Am 13.04.2011 00:23, schrieb Andres Mejia: Yes, same terms as upstream source. Ok, done. Ok. Took a quick look at changes to the packaging. Why did you rename the development package? Did you intend to maintain more

Re: RFS: alure (updated package)

2011-04-14 Thread Tobias Hansen
Am 14.04.2011 22:14, schrieb Andres Mejia: On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Tobias Hansentobias@gmx.de wrote: Am 13.04.2011 00:23, schrieb Andres Mejia: Yes, same terms as upstream source. Ok, done. Ok. Took a quick look at changes to the packaging. Why did you

Re: RFS: alure (updated package)

2011-04-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Tobias Hansen tobias.han...@physik.uni-hamburg.de wrote: Paul Wise suggested it, referencing the Debian Library Packaging guide. He also said it's no problem because no program in Debian is using alure yet. I thought I said that libpkg-guide was wrong about

Re: RFS: alure (updated package)

2011-04-12 Thread Tobias Hansen
Am 12.04.2011 04:45, schrieb Andres Mejia: I'll take a look at this soon. One thing I could add is copyright information for the Debian packaging. Are you ok with GPL-3+ or do you suggest something else? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: RFS: alure (updated package)

2011-04-12 Thread Andres Mejia
On Apr 12, 2011 2:21 PM, Tobias Hansen tobias@gmx.de wrote: Am 12.04.2011 04:45, schrieb Andres Mejia: I'll take a look at this soon. One thing I could add is copyright information for the Debian packaging. Are you ok with GPL-3+ or do you suggest something else? Yes, same terms as

Re: RFS: alure (updated package)

2011-04-12 Thread Tobias Hansen
Am 13.04.2011 00:23, schrieb Andres Mejia: Yes, same terms as upstream source. Ok, done. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4da53587.2090...@gmx.de

RFS: alure (updated package)

2011-04-11 Thread Tobias Hansen
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-1 of my package alure. It builds these binary packages: alure-doc - AL Utilities REtooled (documentation) libalure1 - AL Utilities REtooled (shared library) libalure1-dbg - AL Utilities REtooled (debugging symbols) libalure1-dev

Re: RFS: alure (updated package)

2011-04-11 Thread Andres Mejia
On Apr 11, 2011 5:54 PM, Tobias Hansen tobias@gmx.de wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-1 of my package alure. It builds these binary packages: alure-doc - AL Utilities REtooled (documentation) libalure1 - AL Utilities REtooled (shared library)